nasa is using a 3D world graphic for the solar eclipse thingy today where germany is still devided in east and west adjfglkafdhgadfg. buddies, it's been almost 40 years.
The Bowery Presents
đȘŒ
Fieri Frames
Color Me Curious
taylor price
Aqua Utopiaïœæ”·ăźćșă§èšæ¶ă玥ă

blake kathryn
Cosmic Funnies

izzy's playlists!

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
The Stonewall Inn
Claire Keane
đ©” avery cochrane đ©”

#extradirty
Game of Thrones Daily

Kiana Khansmith
Noah Kahan

PR's Tumblrdome
macklin celebrini has autism

shark vs the universe
seen from Germany
seen from Philippines

seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Vietnam
seen from Colombia

seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Philippines
seen from Australia

seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from T1

seen from Mexico
seen from Singapore

seen from United States

seen from Netherlands
@themailedfist-blog
nasa is using a 3D world graphic for the solar eclipse thingy today where germany is still devided in east and west adjfglkafdhgadfg. buddies, it's been almost 40 years.
This is about as unrelated as it gets, but I was once on a cooking competition show as background. I had a prep list, and while the contestants were front-stage, I was in the back of the shot, doing the prep list, looking chef-y, alongside some other BG. The prep list was double-duty, it was also making stuff for the contestants to use later, but our main job was just to make the kitchen look busier. I imagine that in most shots I was in, I was at best an out-of-focus blur behind the main shot. So at the beginning, the contestants are showing off their knife skills and making little fruit sculptures or whatever, IDGAF, and they were being interviewed at the same time. "What does cooking mean to you?" and that kind of stuff. I . . . was not supposed to be interviewed. I was BG. The interviewer apparently, did not know who was a contestant and who was BG, so they came over to me. And after all of these eloquent long-winded philosophy-and-dream guided answers, they come to me, and go "What is cooking?" And me, deep in focus on looking professional and getting the prep list done and not listening to the interviews, aware that I'm not supposed to talk or be talked to (I'm not paid for speaking lines!), but also aware I am the focus right now, but also aware that they will cut this out of the televised part and I can relax and shrug him off, but also suddenly aware there's still a live audience and I can't just shrug him off, but also confused because I didn't realize he was fishing for a deep philosophical answer: "Cooking is making food". Well. I got a laugh out of the live audience, and they must have decided to keep the line because my pay was upgraded from "SSE" (Special Skills Extra) rates to "Speaking" rates.
best answer
i think the key difference between george lucasâs star wars and disneyâs star wars is that lucas is a man with an ideology. someone with a point of view, and all that entails. which comes with ideas of revolution, anti-imperialism, challenging the status quo, cultural appropriation and racist stereotypes. complex and contradictory ideas because thatâs how artists are: complex and complicated people. disney is not. disney is a corporation. a corporation canât have ideology, because ideology defeats the purpose of profit. and when the only thing you do is to turn on the movie manufacturing machine before you sit down and plan what ideas are you trying to convey to the audience, then your results are going to be washed out corporate garbage. and because when youâre a giant corporation who only cares about selling to the widest audience possible, you canât take sides. you canât decide on an idea. because you want to sell your product to people who are on the entire political spectrum. which results in movies without ideology, without purpose, without soul.
I have been looking for this post for years after I came across it and itâs finally here and I need to reblog this because it is absolutely and entirely accurate.
#as I always say: lucas was making a samurai film and a ww2 flying ace film and a western film and adding laser swords#because he fundamentally LIKED samurai films and dambusters films and westerns and 40âs adventure serials#but disney are making a âstar wars filmâ and adding nothing because it already had laser swords and they have nothing else to say#xerox of a xerox baybeeeee (via harrietvane)
The Titanic Savage Sword
I am about halfway through the Titan Comics Savage Sword of Conan run and, upon reflection on the road so far I must conclude... It's pretty good. I really like the short unconnected story format for the character and it's fun to see new artists depicting the character. It feels like a collection of tales told in taverns across Hyboria with the details changing with every telling, and that's very appropriate for a legend like Conan. The other characters have been fun too, Zircher's Solomon Kane makes regular appearances in evocative vignettes and I like these black & white Kane stories more than I do the full-colour Serpent Ring stuff. There's only been two black spots so far. One issue was just advertising for the Battle of the Black Stone crossover event (which also got an attached novel, I think?). I hate a lot of crossover stuff, though there's a hair of precedent for it with REH's work and if it was deftly done I could see it being fun, but what periphery I've seen of the Black Stone is as deft as a sledgehammer, and I don't appreciate an entire issue of an unrelated series being devoted to 'hey, go read this other thing!'
The second was a longer-running story with King Conan visiting Brythunia and getting tied up with a local witch hunt. Now, this one was pretty clearly aiming for the 1970s comic aesthetic which is... not an aesthetic I particularly appreciate. But I won't condemn a story for fairly successfully replicating something that I don't really like. I *will* condemn a Conan story for attempting to rehabilitate sorcery. Again. Nothing will remind me why I don't truck with pastiche work as much as this boneheaded attempt to introduce 'good wizards'* or (a far greater sin) insinuate that Conan himself is possessed of magical powers as an explanation for his prowess against the Outer Dark. It's cheap and boring and utterly counter to REH's cosmology. Overall, though, it was a good time and I look forward to getting through the back half of the collection. *We have a handful in the REH canon, I won't deny it, but they are vanishingly few and in the pastiche world it seems you can't throw a rock without hitting some asshole in robes who's 'different because they're using it for good' or 'actually this a completely different tradition and it is natural and fine and good' or 'actually the whole "bad sorcerer thing" was a mistake and we're going to put words in a barbarian's mouth about it being misguided'. Makes a warrior want to puke
whenever stuff I like gets popular a dark entity inhabits my body and makes me want to carve harm into the world
if you touch my stuff wrong I'll chop off your fangers leave me alone
Reblog and put in the tags the book that is physically nearest to you at this moment.
Josephine Tey, THE DAUGHTER OF TIME
Oliver Sacks - Musicophilia
(I already got the original US version in 2009, but I wanted to share it with French speakers)
Working with different business cultures all over the globe, my biggest surprise is that while the USA is bad, it's not actually the very absolute worst I've ever worked with.
I can imagine all the guesses, but if you haven't talked with a crap ton of people from dozens of countries, it's not obvious.
The key is business culture is like its own weird separate culture with rules and structures, but most places have a fairly comprehensible set of expectations. So most of the time, it's just remembering perceived differences in expectations. Some places it's polite to be what feels really overly friendly to me. Some places it's polite to be what feels obsequious and formal to me. It's like, whatever. A secondary form of language kinda. It's not even social cues, it's just mechanics of language really. Places with that stuff, those are all fine and wonderful to deal with because there's a framework to communicate and all that.
Part of why the USA shits the bed trying to talk with is because every business person here has like zero framework, it's all lies and bullshit, and everyone wants to be the smartest bestest boy. It's not business culture as much as daycare for toddlers who have millions of dollars and hate human rights. Not the worst though, not by far.
What's key to understand is this is all separate from things like the real people in different places. Business brain people don't have any relevance to real human behavior, it's this whole other structure of make believe which controls everyone's well being. It's important to know because I know how to email a business guy in South Korea using language that will feel appropriate enough after translation, but that's completely irrelevant to the real people living there. It's easy to talk to business guys in China or India or whatever. Germany, Nigeria, Mexico.
UK business guys are pretty bad too. Still not the worst but you have to put a lot of extra work in because business culture in the UK still thinks the Brittish empire exists. The majority of business dudes in the UK see no difference between selling something that has their company name on it, and making it themselves. It's like how all the stuff that says "made in the USA" is 99% made somewhere else, and then one staple is put into it and it's made in the USA, but if you talk to business guys here, they never confuse where things are made, just like... more basic realities like linear time and physics. UK guys go the opposite way, and always say they own everything. But that's all relatively navigable. It's like, okay, you all live in an imaginary world, but I can still get everyone to understand time and logistics and stuff enough to get everyone understanding the same information. I can translate imagination land to reality and back, they get it.
Apparently tumble ate my explanation, but the worst business guys are Australians.
I cannot stress how much effort I put into explaining things in ways that work for people who aren't native English speakers, because I understand how weird translation can get, and I am not good at other languages. I have so many special little quirks and tricks to make what I say become something moderately clear and apropriate in translation. I can rotate through a dozen approaches to a topic to make it click for someone unfamiliar with what I'm explaining. I know it works because it's been time tested.
Australian executives simply take any information they receive, and do not. Did you say something is going to take a month - after signing a contract and collect a fee? The Australian business executive simply accepts that you have said you have begun work and it will be finished in 48 hours. If I told an Australian executive that the earth revolves around the sun, I would expect him to let me know that I had told him a hamster named Ben carries a really bright lamp around space to make the seasons. I have to painstakingly document every single detail of any interaction with Australian business persons, because they simply imagine things that have happened and information they have been told, and ignore whatever has transpired in actuality.
I have actually warned all my friends off buying anything from Australia - not because I think there's anything specifically wrong with the general quality of Australian goods, but because after every conversation with Australian executives going exactly the same (I say one thing, they declare I have said something completely different), I am hard pressed to believe anyone at a corporate level in Australian businesses actually understands laws, regulations, logistics, safety, or just... words. Every interaction I have with an Australian business guy inevitably stuns me into a loss for words through some completely unanticipated recap of an interaction we had or email I sent which is fully disconnected from the text or actual event. I cannot understand how the people of Australia, not particularly better or worse than people anywhere else, become the worst humans I have had the misfortune to encounter the second they enter the world of business. I wouldn't trust a single Australian executive to pour water out of a boot with instructions printed on the heel.
this is utterly fascinating and iâm so sorry you have to deal with it but also
you work in business????
I work with businesses, but I'm not working in business. Which is nice because at least a few times a year I get to tell an extremely confident corporate executive, "Sorry, but you simply cannot." Everything else is pretty horrible though.
so in the 2003 Aquaman series they introduce a new backstory for archvillain Black Manta in which the entire reason for his (hyper)fixation on destroying Aquaman's life was severely maltreated autism, which Aquaman then cures him of with his magic water hand to completely redeem him. and this is obviously insanely stupid and ill-conceived and genuinely hateful, but given all of that, this is still one of the funniest speech balloons i've ever read in a comic. me @ myself when i remember how i acted in high school or whatever
i'm so sorry but also delighted to report that after black manta betrays aquaman it gets even funnier
guy on a work call just accidentally said âhave a nice freak-endâ instead of weekend and now i desperately want that to be the new meme. have a nice freakend everybody
Robert E Howard with Solomon Kane and Conan The Barbarian by Faust
Jeffrey Catherine Jones âWithdrawnâ Solomon Kane Painting Original Art (1975) Source
Now that the problem of my zombified library card that let me borrow for eight years past the expiry date has been resolved, I've been able to catch up on some newer stories of old favourite characters.
The Serpent Ring was great swashbuckling fun and cleaves reasonably close to an REH feel without muzzling the author entirely. I wasn't enamoured with the art style: it's perfectly serviceable and there's nothing I can point to that I firmly dislike but there's something missing from the imagery of the grim Puritan in particular that I can't quite put my finger on. Perhaps it's a feeling that the world of Solomon Kane might benefit from a gloomier, more stylised approach but that's pure personal preference. Regardless, the tale was a good one and I'll be watching the Titan Comics Kane stories with great interest.
Having someone ask ChatGPT in a meeting is like being a grown-ass professional adult in a room full of other grown-ass professional adults trying to solve a problem, while a colleague with one of those baby toys that makes animal sounds repeatedly presses the cow button. And we all have to stop what we're doing and listen to cow go moo and say "wow hm yeah that's not really what we're asking but the cow does definitely go moo, good thoughts"
Except increasingly the cow is being treated as a respected contributor to meetings as we pivot to a moo-centric business model that principally produces bullshit
If THE modern translator of the OG Odyssey text wrote this about my film adaptation Iâd kill myself
Emily Wilson youâre goated
Odyssey 2026: Xenia? I hardly know ya!
Not the sadist femme fatale of Goldeneye fame, but the ancient Greek concept of hospitality. Xenia, broadly put, is the customs around how to receive and entertain guests, invited or otherwise. It's reciprocal, sacred and quite important to understanding a lot of what goes on in Odyssey and Iliad both. A bad host is just as damned as a bad guest. Zeus is solidly associated with the concept as 'protector of strangers' but a lot of Olympians have been involved in the custom and many stories have them exercising Xenia with each other. There is the associated idea that any stranger might be a god in disguise so best to treat them all well, but it's not the *point* of the principle, as xenia applies to familiar guests just as much as strangers. Nolan's Odyssey renders this complex and revealing aspect of ancient Greek society into 'Zeus' law' (they're really hung up on the 'gods in disguise as strangers' bit) which then becomes the thin broth of 'treat others as you'd like to be treated'. Not really a sentiment of ancient Greece, particularly not while you're at war. And, while I have said it before it bears repeating: *Xenia* has absolutely fuck all to do with the Trojan Horse ploy. Xenia has a place in a siege: if a delegation comes openly and honestly from the other side for diplomacy you welcome them as a guest. If you want to show respect to a fellow Greek commander when he comes to visit your tent, you treat him well and offer him your own provisions. If the King of Troy sneaks out to beg you for his son's body that you've been dragging around for days behind your chariot and you're feeling a bit bad about that you receive him with honour. If, on the other hand, you've arranged a ploy where you left a horse on the beach as an offering to Athena and the Trojans drag it in as a trophy of victory, not knowing that you and 29 of your stabbiest friends are inside? There's no guest arrangement to consider. You haven't broken any law of hospitality because you aren't guests, you've been besieging the city for ten fucking years and made your hostile intentions pretty damn clear.
This is a literal sexual harassment training video we had to complete
i assumed this was porn
Heresy's rules are so fucked it needs an entire paragraph to explain a door never fights back in melee combat and can't be panicked
If they didnt specify that, you'd run up against someone who would insist they can panic a door and have it run off the field instead of opening it or blowing it up. in that scenario, there's no rules governing where and how hard you should hit your opponent, so their hands were tied really.