Im working on an essay/article about Christopher Nolan's take on the Odyssey. It talks a LOT about "Zeus's Law" and I wanted people's opinion on how he interprets it. Id say, overall he doesnt do a BAD job. I mean, personally, he clearly misunderstands what "Xenia" is. Here are three points I have-
If I remember correctly, they refer to using the wooden horse to sneak into the city of Troy as "breaking Xenia" and... thats not what it means. Xenia is, put very simply, the relationship between guest and host. Calling that move "breaking Xenia" implies the Trojans knew and invited the Greeks into their city. Which, would collectively act as a Household in this light. Yet, they didnt. They didnt invite ANYONE. But maybe one could argue the GREEKS knowing was all that mattered because they knew and they broke the rule. Id also say NO. Again, its not like they were invited as guests and were secretly spies. They were hidden, and the inanimate object was brought in to be set at a temple.
Anyway, another point I think of is if you want Odysseus breaking Xenia, I think itd be easy to argue that in the epic poem Polyphemus gives Xenia to Nobody the Stranger, and gets burned for it -literally. They could have done that, and even included themes of Man vs Monster easily. Instead, they dehumanize Polyphemus even beyond the already inhuman state he's at in the poem. (It all comes back to that damn Nobody scene, or lacktherof.)
Another idea I plan on tackling is the very American-Christian-yet-Atheistic take on Greek religion and I cant help but connect to how the origins of the "golden rule" is the Bible (its found in some form in almost every religion, but the phrase "do unto others..." is from the Bible) and thats how Nolan inteprets Xenia. (Penelope says "treat others..." in the movie. literally quoting it.)
anyway, if anyone else has something to add concerning Xenia, I would like to hear it.