we're not kids anymore.
Misplaced Lens Cap

★
Noah Kahan
ojovivo
todays bird
No title available
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Jules of Nature
untitled

izzy's playlists!
No title available

@theartofmadeline
Not today Justin
$LAYYYTER
One Nice Bug Per Day
The Bowery Presents

pixel skylines
will byers stan first human second
art blog(derogatory)
seen from Chile
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from Netherlands

seen from France
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Vietnam

seen from Italy
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia
seen from Bangladesh

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from Russia

seen from Türkiye

seen from Vietnam
seen from Indonesia

seen from Malaysia
@tseecka
me when therse apple slices at the function
I miss when ads were a single click and then they’re gone. Now every ad has a minimum of three phases where you watch a video, exit the still frame of fake gameplay, and then exit the app download. That doesn’t even touch on the ones that forcibly take you to another app after opening a tab in safari without you ever touching the screen.
I hate advertising. I hate that you can’t do anything without companies jumping down your throat with mostly bullshit ads. I hate that billboards exist. I hate that every company unanimously decided to make their ads longer and longer. I hate that ad blockers try to charge you money and there are in app purchases to remove ads. I hate that my attention has become commodified. I hate that there’s nothing I can do about it.
One time a friend told me that if she wanted to have a chill night she would come to me and ask for tea and a book to read. I didn’t like tea at the time, but I always made sure my cupboards had them in case she needed a quiet night. One time I told my boss that I loved oranges, but couldn’t peel them because of my nails. For a year he made sure to peel me one at least once a week. Once my friends gave me a made up superlative of “most likely to have a pen they could borrow” and ever since I’ve made sure I always carry a pen with me. A long time ago, my high school librarian told me that no one would care what my grade in my sophomore chemistry class was if I’m bringing them doughnuts and asking them about their day.
Sometimes friendship is about carrying pens and peeling oranges. But the point is, surrounding yourself with people who you want to do the little things for. The point of it all is bringing in the doughnuts because you’ve found the people who deserve the doughnuts.
How sweet it is to be with people you enjoy taking care of
calling my lover "mine" but not in the way that my toothbrush or notebook are mine, mine in the way my neighborhood is mine, and also everybody else's, "mine" like mine to tend to, mine to care for, mine to love. "mine" not like possession but devotion.
God I have been struggling so much to explain my irritation with a certain trend I keep running across in LGBTQ+ "cozy fantasy books"
Because everytime I try to verbalize it, it just comes out as sounding like I'm trying to say there's like. An upper limit on how daydreamy an author can be about worlds in which their every fantasy is fulfilled (entire farming village based on mutual aid; where also everyone is queer and/or gender-conforming! And there is little to no conflict! And everyone knows therapy speak and is unfailingly kind and generous and good!)
Because like--there's not, really, an upper limit on these things.
But there is an invisible line of tolerance for me where it turns from "cozy fantasy" to "oh my god grow the fuck up; this is so saccharine it's become one-note and boring and dull that I can't actually ENJOY the low-stakes cozy vibes"
But it sounds like I'm complaining about "there's too many gender queers and not enough homophobia in this book" and it's Not That
Ugh idk take your 2 stars and let me delete this book off my Kobo, I finished it and that's honestly more than I think it deserved.
(a 4.07 average star rating are you FUCKING kidding me)
The problem you're trying to pinpoint is TENSION ISSUES, and cozy fantasy is fuckin RIFE with them. Major chronic problem with the genre, and editors just keep letting authors get away with it instead of developing the story.
Low stakes are fine, utopian settings are fine, even low-conflict is fine -- but you gotta have a source of tension SOMEWHERE, or it pisses people off. If everyone's cooperating together and an amazing team and there's no interpersonal drama, ok great, but hit them with a tornado or a famine or heavy rains that wash out the fields right after planting.
The following have been called the "7 types of conflict" but people always think conflict means fighting or angry feelings, so i do think that "7 types of tension" might be a better wording:
Person vs Person (this is the one that cozy fantasy is most allergic to, and that's ok!)
Person vs Society (cozy fantasy also allergic to this one, we're still fine!)
Person vs Self (inexplicably underutilized, it rules, highly recommend)
Person vs Supernatural
Person vs Fate
Person vs Technology
Person vs Nature
And here is a list of free cozy fantasy tension points for each one of those. Feel free to steal these, adapt them, tweak them, etc -- as long as you promise to commit to the bit and actually make your protagonist face their problems head-on and have feelings about them and actually DO SOME HARD WORK to resolve them instead of conveniently handwaving it all away. (Your protagonist's name is Blue.)
Person vs Person: Blue's neighbor has a longstanding grudge and is trying to get Blue's bakery shut down by any means necessary, including reporting Blue to the health inspectors, who threaten to shut the whole operation down. (If you are writing for adults, then the grudge is bad enough that it CANNOT be solved with the power of friendship or by offering said neighbor free daily croissants. C'mon, don't wimp out. Imagine the Worst coworker you've ever had. Imagine the pettiest HOA lady ever.)
Person vs Society: There is a war in the neighboring kingdom which has impacted the chocolate chip import market. Blue's bakery is struggling financially, and the bank is making ominous noises about Blue's fantasy student loans.
Person vs Self: Blue is having a crisis of faith. They inherited the bakery and they hate running it, but they feel an obligation to their beloved dead relative. They don't know how to balance this against their own dreams, and they feel a ton of guilt about it.
Person vs Supernatural. Blue boasted that they're a better baker than the local hearth goddess. Blue now has a curse that fucks up every loaf, danish, cookie, and sticky-bun they touch. They can't even go into other people's bakeries without jinxing them.
Person vs Fate: Several generations ago, a fortune-teller spoke a prophecy that says the bakery will fail if someone matching Blue's description takes over. Blue doesn't give a shit about that, Blue is determined to make it work, Blue spits in the face of Fate.
Person vs Technology. A new bakery opens just a block away from Blue's, with newfangled magical ovens and staffed entirely by magic robots. Can Blue compete against this? We explore the upsides and downsides between artisanship and mass manufacturing.
Person vs Nature. A really bad winter strangles the town, trapping people in their homes. Blue doggedly wades through waist-deep snow on their daily bread deliveries to the old folks of the town, but they slip on ice and twist their ankle really bad.
(Anyway read my book Yield Under Great Persuasion, which is an M/M cozy romantasy with lots of different tension points -- we've got a lil bit of #1 and #2, a WHOLE LOT of #3, and a smidge of #4 and #5)
The thing about this book is that I literally spent the entire time thinking, "This book wants to be Yield. But Yield already exists. So what are we doing here?" It's very similar--pastoral setting and themes, magic that has to do with planting and harvest and gardening and the land.
And don't get me wrong there ARE stakes! There is tension! The main character has basically gone into hiding and adopted a new identity following their release from servitude to an evil cultist that ravaged the land! There is a chapter of the Templars or paladins of whomstever fought against the evil cultist in the new town that they run away too! They're trying to figure out how to work this enchanted land they've acquired and are feeling immense pressure because everyone in the community contributes to the co-op and they feel they will be unable to meet their new community's expectations, and if anyone learns who they really are they'll lose their peace and their home! Like--even for cozy low-stakes fantasy, there should be tension here. (That's about as descriptive as I can go without putting the book on actual blast, which I don't want to do.)
I think the problem is (forgive my copy-paste from my own post elsewhere) that the world completely defangs that tension. Everyone is happy and friendly and participates in co-operative operations and there is a foundational system of mutual aid in the world, and everyone has apparently been through loads of real-world therapy so they are all, to a one, able to recognize the signs of someone's trauma turning them into a kicked shelter dog and therefore meeting them where they are at with gentleness and kindness and nary a miscommunication to be found. Which is VERY LOVELY, in terms of daydreaming wish fulfillment! I wish the world looked more like that!
But THAT is what annoys me. You have tension and stakes on paper, but true to the fashion of the day, they cannot permit their wish fulfillment characters in their wish fulfillment worlds to experience actual discomfort (though of course there is plenty to be had in the author-insert's internal dialogue, but that's an issue of perception that the audience is immediately keyed into--you know, so WE don't have to feel discomfort, heaven forbid).
It's almost more egregious than a true lack of tension. You've gathered all the ingredients of a truly marvellous cake to bring to the function, but you've balked at the last second, because ChatGPT can't give you a straight answer on whether the baking soda could be crosscontaminated with gluten, and while you know all your friends' sensitivities, what if someone at the party has an allergy to salt and can't eat your cake? Better to just not bake it, I guess, and let the ingredients go to waste.
But yes. Don't read this book, which I will continue to not name.
Read Yield Under Great Persuasion by Alexandra Rowland instead!!!
Blackwell's (UK; international shipping incl., currently on slight discount)
Indigo (Canada; Pre-order)
Barnes & Noble (USA; Pre-order)
God I have been struggling so much to explain my irritation with a certain trend I keep running across in LGBTQ+ "cozy fantasy books"
Because everytime I try to verbalize it, it just comes out as sounding like I'm trying to say there's like. An upper limit on how daydreamy an author can be about worlds in which their every fantasy is fulfilled (entire farming village based on mutual aid; where also everyone is queer and/or gender-conforming! And there is little to no conflict! And everyone knows therapy speak and is unfailingly kind and generous and good!)
Because like--there's not, really, an upper limit on these things.
But there is an invisible line of tolerance for me where it turns from "cozy fantasy" to "oh my god grow the fuck up; this is so saccharine it's become one-note and boring and dull that I can't actually ENJOY the low-stakes cozy vibes"
But it sounds like I'm complaining about "there's too many gender queers and not enough homophobia in this book" and it's Not That
Ugh idk take your 2 stars and let me delete this book off my Kobo, I finished it and that's honestly more than I think it deserved.
(a 4.07 average star rating are you FUCKING kidding me)
It sounds like a book lacking in conflict and character growth, the things that pull readers in the most. It's just...not much of a journey. Does that fit your experience?
Mmm--not quite. There is both conflict and character growth, and even relatively moderate stakes. At least taken in isolation.
I think the problem is that the world completely defangs the stakes. Everyone is happy and friendly and participates in co-operative operations and there is a foundational system of mutual aid in the world, and everyone has been through loads of therapy so they are all, to a one, able to recognize the signs of someone's trauma turning them into a kicked shelter dog and therefore meeting them where they are at with gentleness and kindness and nary a miscommunication to be found. Which is VERY LOVELY, in terms of daydreaming wish fulfillment! I wish the world looked more like that!
But the problem is that it's not really very interesting to read about...
One thing I appreciate about the show, thinking about it, is the use the framing devices of the narrative.
In seasons 1-2 Louis was basically giving the interview as a form of almost DIY therapy. He was doing it for himself, because on some level he was unsatisfied with the status quo of his existence and needed something to change. He very much did NOT really want the story to have an audience afterwards even if he initially claimed otherwise. So we watch the story unfold and we are made slowly aware of the ways in which there are inaccuracies; and that these were due to the natural fallacy of memory, to Louis wanting to remember things a certain way or Armand wanting him to remember things a certain way or to the yet to be determined accuracy of the diaries (which, to be fair, were read by other people on at least two occasions that Claudia was aware of, which may have had an impact of what/when she wrote there...) which were censored to some degree in any case.
The show reminds viewers throughout both seasons of the untrustworthy narrator aspect of things, which certainly had layers which we slowly discover along with Louis in Dubai. But it was never really a matter of artistic choice, as that was not the point of the story being told. It was a gothic suspense narrative of self-doscovery, revisiting the past through a different perspective to slowly uncover and learn to accept the truth.
Whereas in S3 Lestat is at the center, and he is innately an artist and performer. He is doing this as a reaction to the book and he is very much NOT doing it with the intent of DIY therapy or exploring his past for personal growth and emotional closure, but as performance. There is the documentary layer, which shows how he wished to present himself in that format, at one period in time. There are the Failure recordings, which is a different way he wished to present his story, at a later period in time. One explicitly to Daniel and one no one there but Lestat himself. They overlap but both very explicitly were created as a performance for an intended audience of many or one. And just as S1 and S2 kept circling back to the theme of 'odyssey of memory' the repeated emphasis on Baudelaire in S3 seems significant in presenting that as the underlying thesis for this season: Symbolism as an artistic movement.
Things don't have to be perfectly factually accurate to be TRUE. Exaggerations or omissions used as a deliberate choice in service of better representing the emotional truth of a moment seems very Lestat. Who in universe seems quite enamoured of the artistic merits of Baudelaire and presumably Symbolism as an artistic concept. Keeping that in mind changes the viewing experience and can make it easier to forgive things like the bad wigs. Is that the costume dept being lazy/cheap or is it deliberate decision to emphasize how Lestat felt and viewed the whole family, the cabbages and even his mother, the vibe of how it felt to be there? You will never be able to see it the way that he saw it, so this is the choice he makes in performance of it to evoke the feeling and senses as he experienced them being there, in a way the strict truth couldn't. Could go either way!
Unreliable narrator but not lying except in the sense of 'based on real events' movies are lying. The way that the author of 'The Things They Carried' as an exploration of what it felt like to be a soldier in the Vietnam war was lying.
The book as far as I recall did not have anything like this Symbolism as thesis interpretation which I think can help parse and accept the differences made either due to the writer's artistic vision or to budget and logistics constraints of making a TV show adaptation. TV show vs book: Lestat's story through a Symbolism vs Realism interpretation. This is the nitty gritty of exactly what happened vs this is what you need to understand what I want you to understand about what it felt like, to get the enough of the truth of what happened, and nothing more.
Louis realizing he's part of an Italian family now
imagine a goat with a hat
STOP-
what hat did you give the goat what is the instinctual hat you gave to this goat
I honestly think Gen-Z and younger simply does not understand how recent widespread smartphone adoption is.
I am not that old, and I didn't have a smartphone until probably late high school. For most of my life, many if not most people were not walking around with a magic internet machine in their pocket that they pulled out and used constantly for everything.
reblog if you remember having to ration your text messages and accidentally opening the internet on your phone was the end of the world
How old were you when you got your first smartphone?
Younger than 10
10-13
13-16
17-20
21-25
26-30
31-40
41-50
51-60
Older than 60
Never had a smartphone
this was on one of the Anne Rice writing method reblogs and its so good but i know people will take it the wrong way and i want to post it here to preserve and honor it. because theyre right, her writing IS mid. i really really enjoy her work but she is not particularly good at it. and i think that is the most important aspect of conceptualizing of yourself as a creative producer that is performing non-alienated work: how "good" it turns out to be has nothing to do with 1. how much of it you will sell 2. how much people will enjoy it 3. how MANY people will enjoy it and finally 4. the effort you put into making it. developing skill and taste are DIFFERENT tasks from the actual production. let this inspire you
Do you think tumblr will ever learn the difference between “I’m defending this person because I agree with them wholeheartedly and I am also like this person” and “I’m defending this person because your behavior is dangerous and you need to stop”
IMO, blurring the lines between “I’m defending them because they’re right” and “I’m defending them because you’re taking this too far” is step numero uno to cutting down the very existence of fair trial and democracy–even in places where saying that might seem a little dramatic.
Mob mentality is extremely strong in humans and it’s also extremely dangerous. Mobs don’t think things through. Mobs kill and they destroy and they can’t be reasoned with. Someone trying to calm a mob down isn’t someone defending the ~problematic party~ It’s time we re-learn that.
Just say you don't want actual representation and be done with it instead of jumping through all these hoops omfg
If you don't want Louis' dismembered head on the body horror show then you get to pick one:
- no agency or reparations or apology or healing for the Brown character who Louis used as a tool for 77 years to punish himself and Lestat
- keeping Louis white
Widow's Bay
season 1 (2026) Created by Katie Dippold
A double-sided Pride Dragons themed token I made to give out to people I played Magic against during Pride Month! Going to add them to my shop later.