2016 is over and gone, 2017 has begun. I decided to start this year with a recipe post - my own stew recipe that I make once a year. Stew ...
official daine visual archive
d e v o n
Show & Tell
Misplaced Lens Cap
h
art blog(derogatory)

⁂
occasionally subtle
Mike Driver
hello vonnie

Kiana Khansmith
No title available

if i look back, i am lost

JVL
tumblr dot com

No title available

Kaledo Art
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

Discoholic 🪩

No title available

seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Germany

seen from Australia
seen from El Salvador

seen from El Salvador

seen from Canada

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Argentina
seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia
@undertheredfedora-blog
2016 is over and gone, 2017 has begun. I decided to start this year with a recipe post - my own stew recipe that I make once a year. Stew ...
Dear internet,
Please give me all the advice you have on writing cover letters. Like, the closer you can get to literally just writing a cover letter for me, the better. Ok bye.
This is how I did the one for my librarian position. I hope it helps.
Dear Person Hiring for this Job,
I am writing to ask you to consider me for X position. This is a paragraph about why I want to do X position in general. It includes at least one personal detail and at least one job skill I consider a particular strength. It argues that I am passionate about this career. It is not long.
I have had the opportunity to gain experience in this job by - paragraph about my work or study experience. It should go from most recent experience back. Include some details about your responsibilities/achievements in your most recent or most important positions. If you have mostly study experience, give more detail about what exactly you studied. If you shadowed people, mention that. If your work experience is largely unrelated, try to shoehorn some of it in (e.g. I gained experience working with people by). You can supplement with relevant hobbies. (But if you do have recent, relevant work experience, you should largely be detailing that. Only embroider the other stuff if you need to flesh it out.) This should be the longest paragraph.
I hope you will consider allowing me to do X thing at your company. This is a few sentences about why I want to work at your company in particular and what I think I could bring. Try to mention at least one detail from the company website, so they know you visited it. This is a short paragraph that parallels the first one.
Thank you very much for your time and attention.
Sincerely,
Person You Would Be a Fool Not to At Least Interview
oh my god thank you this is relevant to current interests
Two other points, to challenge what’s being said above a little:
1) Remember that the person reading this cover letter wants to know how you can contribute to the company. Not how excited you are about the position: it’s all about what they gain. Try framing the whole thing in that sense — “You would gain my X awesome skill that would help you Y with your mission.” “Here’s why I’m awesome and a great fit for making your company go better.”
2) At the end, ask for the interview. “I am available at PHONE NUMBER at your convenience. I look forward to speaking with you about this great opportunity soon.” Maybe even say you’ll be following up at a specific time and date. Ask for the job. People respond to that, and it’s a good way to fake confidence until you make it. Ask for the job.
Okay, three points. People reading cover letters get SO BORED going through them. Think about starting off with a story that relates to why you’re interested in the job, or that demonstrates a skill or a strong interest that would make you a good candidate. Be memorable — people remember stories, even (maybe especially) very little ones.
*hoards advice*
Reblogging valuable info. I would even add that the example length in the original post is a tad too long - especially if you are applying to a company/agency/organization that does not have dedicated HR staff. The busy mid-level manager flipping past your letter at breakneck speed amongst the 8,000 other emails in their inbox will glaze over at the eyes at a paragraph longer than 4-5 lines. Brevity is power!
"I can't believe I'm etching cups with birds at a time like this." "My art is so useless." "I feel sucker punched. What's the point of tr...
An angel
Wtf bats swim
Omfg
Here’s another little-known bat fact:
Orphaned baby bats are often swaddled tightly like teeny burritos to mimic being cuddled by mom and help ease separation anxiety.
They also seem to find pacifiers soothing.
I’m pretty sure I’ve posted on this before, but there’s always someone who hasn’t heard about this before. Plus, I’ll happily take any excuse I can to post cute baby animal pics (especially when they’re wrapped like tiny furry burritos) :)
The AP’s standards blog just posted a piece about how to use the term ‘alt-right’ when writing articles. Considering the Associated Press provides the style guidelines for newspapers and magazines nationwide, this clarification is a big deal. Here’s...
The AP’s standards blog just posted a piece about how to use the term ‘alt-right’ when writing articles. Considering the Associated Press provides the style guidelines for newspapers and magazines nationwide, this clarification is a big deal. Here’s the sweet and succinct “usage” section.
“Alt-right” (quotation marks, hyphen and lower case) may be used in quotes or modified as in the “self-described” or “so-called alt-right” in stories discussing what the movement says about itself.
Avoid using the term generically and without definition, however, because it is not well known and the term may exist primarily as a public-relations device to make its supporters’ actual beliefs less clear and more acceptable to a broader audience. In the past we have called such beliefs racist, neo-Nazi or white supremacist.
The Associated Press is ready to call a duck a duck and so should you.
And remember, this is 2016. The government itself starves Native Americans who just protect their own land.
The media is silent, as usual.
God bless these warriors.
#NoDAPL #NoJusticeNoPeace
A fiery, hearty chili inspired by American Gods.
If anybody’s down for making Laura Moon’s chili (note to self: would not be a bad American Gods premiere party idea…)
October is almost gone, which means that my favorite holiday is almost upon us: Halloween! If you follow my Instagram , you already know tha...
Halloween is coming, and I finally - finally - had a chance to do a bit of house work in preparation. And by housework I mean pulling out...
Are you ready for #NaNoWriMo? Stock up on my personal Autumn tea blend 'NaNoWriMo Room' to keep those fingers warm for writing. If you're new to Adagio (great tea store!), save $5 with GC # 3764361376.
Bollywood Recap: Dhoom 2
Meet A: Notorious thief, cunning, hot, and so awesome that even the Indian police drools over him
Keep reading
my favorite scene in the whole tv history
the only sad thing about this scene being in picture form is that you can’t hear the way Garcia says “Quantico”. Kwan-tee-co.
the best 90 seconds of television ever filmed
This is seriously amazing.
erinserrand:
fuckyeahjupiterascending:
unicornempire:
refinery29:
Meryl Streep Perfectly Summarizes Why Sexism Is Still A Reality For Women
After discussing sexism in the refugee crisis, the Church, and financial systems, she went on to criticize her own industry for its deplorable lack of female film critics.
READ MORE
GIFS VIA.
This is why a perfectly reasonable action/adventure/fantasy film like Jupiter Ascending gets panned as ‘garbage’ and we have to all pretend to like it because it’s glittery trash and say it’s bad- the film wasn’t bad, for an action film (of which I have seen many worse ones with male leads who are considered fair-to-good by most people!) it was rather well put together- not surprising in a lot of ways but beautiful and well put together without any massive plotholes to my recollection- But no, I have to laugh and pretend to like it ironically because it’s made with a female power fantasy rather than a male one, which automatically makes it bad somehow for no real reason whatsoever. Yeah.
Thank you for this commentary. The more I contemplate it, the more angry I get about how Jupiter Ascending has been treated. Most of the defences of Jupiter Ascending contemporary with its release took the “trash” angle, basically arguing that it was total garbage but entertaining garbage (the Mary Sue review is the quintessential example of this). Most of these kinds of defences came from women who were at pains to distance themselves from any suggestion that the movie had actual merit or substance.
Very recently, I came across a comment from someone saying that they loved the movie and had seen it twenty times. This show of enthusiasm and support was quickly followed up by a series of statements stressing how “horrible” and objectively awful Jupiter Ascending is. Almost no reasons for why it was awful were given, with its terribleness being treated as a pre-ordained fact. While I absolutely understand people viewing movies critically and acknowledging their flaws (that’s how people should approach cinema, imo), I do not understand how someone can both claim to genuinely love and enjoy a movie and, at the same time, deem it terrible.
Upon reflection, I can’t help but feel that people have become afraid of diverging from the mighty consensus, embodied as it is by aggregators such as Rotten Tomatoes (where Jupiter Ascending is languishing with a 26% average). We have a loud commentator culture, which you’d think would introduce a broad spectrum of opinions and tastes, but it’s surprising and disheartening to realise how often commentators merely repeat each other and simply magnify pre-existing opinions. Virtually every ‘bad movie’ podcast/web series you could care to name (Nostalgia Critic, Blockbuster Buster, HDTGM, YMS, Cinema Sims, Honest Trailers, etc. - all exclusively male voices, incidentally) has done a Jupiter Ascending episode, with the same tired and generally unfair criticisms being trotted out time after time (the claims that Jupiter Ascending ‘stole’ conceits and visuals from other movies are particularly lazy and commonplace, and are particularly easy to tear down).
Because influential figures - be they trade reviewers or highly subscribed web personalities - are constantly transmitting the message that Jupiter Ascending is a cinematic atrocity, people who like or even love it feel that they have to qualify their enjoyment by endlessly re-iterating how bad the film is. This kind of culture is wrong, frustrating and disheartening, and I’m glad that Meryl Streep was brave enough to take a stand and stress how worrying it is that our collective judgements of movies are heavily dominated by male perspectives.
I’m so glad I know this because I recently watch The Boy with my two bffs and we were terrified, because it is a terrifying concept, especially if you are female. It made complete sense to me when I learned afterwards that it was directed by a man and written by a women–a lot of the shots pandered to the male gaze but the story definitely explored specifically female anxieties. There’s an amazing moment in this film where the female protagonists has an extra panic to the terrifying situation when she realizes that a creepy man has been watching her for a long period of time without her consent–showering, sleeping, changing, eating. It’s a horrifying thought, and my friends and I as female viewers GOT how disturbing of a discovery that would be. The male character doesn’t get why it freaks her out so much. It’s a small moment, but it was very poignant to me.
This movie has like a 26% on rotten tomatoes. The criticism? Implausible, ridiculous, and the concept is not even a little bit scary. Literally the men rating this movie were just like the dude in this movie, they couldn’t relate to or understand the female anxieties presented by the film. It makes me sad because the writing of this movie was incredibly tight and aside from the male gaze-y shots, I enjoyed this film. I enjoyed it enough that I wanted to write an analysis-type paper on it like I did for the films I viewed in my horror film class.
All of this. And for the record, I thought The Boy was a great movie, especially how the main character tries to use the situation to her advantage. I was THRILLED with that. I was expecting it to be horrible and like every other garbage scary movie, but it was great! As for Jupiter Ascending, let me tell you, you know what garbage movie is? The Bale Batman movies. Those are awful. But no one thinks they are?!?!?!
And another great movie? Star Trek: Beyond. Men who watched this movie were all lukewarm about it at best. I saw it and found it amazing! It has the appeal that I think a lot of viewers, like female viewers, find so attractive in some anime stories that doesn’t get told in many Western stories. Team stories about a group of friends coming together to handle a situation. check out a little more about this here in this TedTalk about how media teachers manhood
I also notice that male reviewers have a hard time mentioning if a movie is funny or enjoyable. They won’t mention TONE?? I’ve gone into a lot of movies and then was surprised when they were enjoyable and fun because none of the reviews or men that had seen the movie that told me about it mentioned that.
I also notice male reviewers don’t notice when characters are out of character, when behavior doesn’t make any sense. Especially female characters. Case in point, I have real problems with Stranger Things, especially Winona Ryder’s “character” which flips between “capable” and “emotional mess”, and when does that happen? When a male character appears near her, especially the police chief. She suddenly becomes less capable so that his character can shine.
Male reviewers don’t notice the messages that a film communicates. Take that horrible Elysium movie. It’s a shitty, racist, sexist, white savior movie. A coworker (who considers himself a film buff) asked why I didn’t like it and I stated “because it’s racist” and in the middle of explaining why he interrupted me to loudly ask if there was any other reason. I pointed out that a movie being racist garbage was usually enough for me to not like a movie.
Another Example of the difference in male reviewers: Sometimes I’ll listen to this podcast called “Flophouse” where 3 (white/straight/cis) men review movies considered bad, and when I listen to them talk about a movie I’ve also seen, and their summaries will almost always leave out aspects I find important. I might agree something is a bad movie, but just considering how they summarize, it’s like literally they had a completely different experience.
Women and minority perspectives on film are important. You’re not getting the whole story if all you hear is a white male perspective.
(sorry this deleted everything above my comment?! I don’t know why!! it keeps doing this to me, when I reblog it again, it’s there in the editing phase but disappears when i hit ‘reblog’ here’s a link to all the really good things other people said on this post)
This is the spoopy content you need on your dash
This is so precious I can’t even…
Hawkeye and language
No, not an Age of Ultron joke. There are millions of different definitions of language. For the purposes of this discussion, I’ll just use a simple but incredibly broad one, partly because I’m lazy but also because it’s necessary here: A language is any structured system to convey information using symbols. Those symbols can be spoken sounds, letters, but also a lot of different things.
Hawkeye’s use of language is very interesting. Obviously the basic level here is the standard English language, but right away we see it playing with its conventions, for example in the obvious cases of internal editing.
There is always a disconnect between “actual events” and their comic version, something many comic artists and writers try to hide with realistic dialogue and graphics. This, on the other hand, explicitly draws attention to its artificial nature. It works because this is an explicit representation of Clint Barton’s point of view and mindset: This is literally what he understands. It is an expansion of the language, conveying information that normal dialogue couldn’t.
Playing with language in comics, even expanding a bit beyond realistic depiction of dialogue, is nothing new or unique, though I do always like it when it happens, e.g. this adorable bit in a preview one-shot for Gotham Academy:
A very distinctive example in Hawkguy is the use of “Bro” and “seriously”, which can be all a good dialogue needs at times.
The comic makes it obvious that the actual dialogue, and what we understand of it, are two separate things. This is a comic that likes to have fun on the written language level. But it goes beyond that.
The structure of comics is a form of language in itself, at least using the very expansive definition, and you can likewise see Hawkeye play with it to convey its information, for example by subverting our expectations…
There are many more examples. The comic loves its time jumps. One of the best parts ever is when five successive issues show the same evening, and part of its introduction and its follow-up, each from a different perspective, to understand what each character thinks, but also how they all have incomplete information.
So far, so good. Hawkeye is a very ambitious and complex comic that pushes what comic language can do, and generally succeeds. I do think it got the whole non-linear stuff better over time; in the first issue it was harder to follow the structure than later, even though it didn’t get easier.
And then it goes ahead and invents a completely new language, for one single issue.
Here is where the expansive definition of language really becomes necessary. Issue 11, generally known as “The Dog Issue”, shows a new symbolic system that isn’t spoken, nor written, but it is a structured and effective way of telling a story. It is an interesting language, too, with the way it portrays structure mostly in form of clusters instead of linearly.
And it also talks about human language. Lucky is not a magical wonder-dog. He can’t read or speak, and he cannot really understand human language. But he does understand that it is a language, and he can understand parts of it. Which is portrayed in the comic by again, playing with language; here by only showing the words that Lucky can, in some form, distinguish. The amount differs heavily depending on the conversation, but it’s clear that he mostly gets stuff that people use to talk to him or around him. He can understand his name, various commands, but he also understands the names of the various humans in his world and various of their usual expressions. This provides a commentary on these people as well. Apparently someone taught him to understand the word “ass”, for example.
This is one of the most inventive uses of comics and their possibilities I’ve ever seen. And it works, which is by no means a given for something as complex as this. To get there, it is based on graphical symbols we can understand, but arranged in new ways to convey new information. And as the story progresses, it gradually cranks up the complexity to really spread out the dog world.
And then they went ahead and did it again.
I’ve heard some people say that this issue is written in American Sign Language. That isn’t exactly wrong, but it doesn’t tell the whole story, because the way of representing it is new. Instead of having people use it in panel, ASL here is used outside, once more using graphical symbols.
Compare this to Batgirl (2011-) #37, where the titular hero is analyzing pictures of an impostor of hers for clues:
It’s also ASL (I’m assuming; I didn’t actually check), but in a very different role. Here it is used to hide that communication is taking place, both from the reader and from other characters. Barbara Gordon is awesome because she can figure it out anyway. (Also these aren’t holograms, it’s a representation of her photographic memory; that comics’ own visual language.)
In Hawkguy, the communication is explicit and in your face. When you think about it, these are some of the biggest words ever used in comics.
Unlike the dog issue, these are symbols that most readers will not readily understand, and that is a huge part of the point. Language is exclusionary if you don’t know it. It was that case in issue 11, but it is much more important (and a big part of the story) here.
A minor example is shown in the same issue at the airport:
None of the people in this gang speak English well, but they speak it better than any of each other’s languages. It is something that connects them, but also highlights their differences. Two of them can’t figure out the “arrivals” sign, assuming it means “alligators”. It is meant to be universal, and that works to some degree, but it is also another form of sign language with its own barriers.
The comic also features lip reading, and again, shows a different use of language.
It is English, but filtered, distorted and unclear, and the comic takes great pains to show this. The structure of language here is unreliable, impeding communication, but in some contexts, it’s also the only way communication can take place at all.
(Also, I love how the font used for Clint shows his uncertainty with spoken language now that he can’t hear himself. It’s very subtle but effective.)
All these things are based on standard comics language, partly on standard english or standard recognized signs, but then they use it as a starting point to create something new. A side-effect of that is that it really has to be a comic. For many of my favorite other titles, I could easily imagine a movie or animated TV show or book or video game adaptation. Not here.
Hawkeye has found many fans and imitators amongst Marvel comics makers
(Secret Avengers #1, Hawkeye vs. Deadpool #0, All-New Hawkeye #3)
And probably beyond; if you know any examples, I’d be glad to hear about them! But all of them just copy the style without copying the creativity that made it awesome. Hawkeye is true art, in a way many other comics are not.
I’m organizing my nail polish collection when I realize that I don’t own any yellow polish. When I’m at the store, browsing through the vari...