SLUT CEMETERY

Rawr *glomps you* xD

[enki2]

[xanaxfarts]

A tiny insect clinging to the head of a horned viper

[nattousan]

#ratatouille

[bogwatr]

Saw the most beautiful thing at Pride the other day

[desolatus]

Victor Nizovtsev

[ahsoka-in-a-hood]

Apparently some people still need to hear this so: using an 'ai checker' is still using ai. If you are feeding someone's fic to one of these checkers, you will still not be sure their fic is ai because they are not 100% accurate, but you can be 100% sure that you are using ai. For fic. Furthermore you are doing the work of an ai scraper for them. You are, personally, feeding the machine. There is no actual excuse for using an ai checker on fanfic as a hobby. YOU are the problem.

If you think a fic is ai, mute it and move on. That's it. That's all you do.

[ahsoka-in-a-hood]

Um. Yikes

[marquisedeserault]

DUO BOON: LOVE HANDLES Your blast effects from Hephaestus also creates a Heartthrob

[unicorngraphics]

I am sorry. I have done you evil and I cannot undo it. No. Unicorns are in the world again. No sorrow will live in me with that joy–save one. And I thank you for that part, too. Farewell good magician. I will try to go home.

[teaboot]

"Oh yeah, we have an outdoor Corgi, he just gets so bored cooped up inside all day. He knows to stay off the road. Don't worry, he's way too smart for coyotes and the neighbor's know to look out when they drive past."

"Us? Oh, of *course* our Dachshund sleeps inside- we just let him out in the morning and make sure he comes back for dinner. He just does his own thing, no worries."

"Um, you know it's not humane to keep a chihuahua confined to an apartment? They're dogs, they're natural predators. They need to experience hunting behaviors or they get depressed. No we don't leash ours, he absolutely hates it, we just let him come and go whenever."

Yall get how fucking stupid that sounds, right? So stop letting your goddamn cats get eaten and attacked and infected and hit by cars

A toddler would probably love full unattended access to the neighborhood too, but we don't do that either, do we

It's 2026, "keep your damn pet in a house or in your view" should not be controversial

[angel-stars]

I had to go on a hunt for this but it was worth it. 100% agree

[julytrees]

Ella Fitzgerald in the midst of a soulful performance at Mr. Kelly's nightclub in Chicago, Illinois, ca. 1958.

[shoreleave]

You don't have to pretend with me.

[shakespearesdaughters]

Ursula K. Le Guin, The Left Hand of Darkness

[unsubconscious]

Glen Martin Taylor

[catmask]

in finnish, the '@' symbol is sometimes referred to as 'kissanhnta' [cat's tail] or 'miau', 'miau merkki' [meow marks]. in the pokemon universe, i thought it might be cute if the '@' symbol were called 'the mew' or 'mew symbol'

considering both bill and professor oak would know about mew, i imagined a conversation in which this term was coined in which professor oak tries (and finally succeeds) at sending his first email.

[catmask]

regional dialects make it difficult to share 'mewsernames'!

in swedish, the @ symbol is called 'trunk a' [elephants trunk]

in polish, it's called 'malpa' [monkey]!

[catmask]

[henstomper]

hard cider was invented when someone decided to make beer that tastes good instead of bad

[impossiblepackage]

stupid fuckin post. People have been making beer since before they even knew how to write and you think that they don’t like the way it tastes?

[henstomper]

damn all that time and it still tastes really bad. huge L tbh

[escuerzoresucitado]

[jewfrogs]

falling asleep during the day: slipping away on a clouds so easy

falling asleep at night: I heard an ant gasp downstairs

[annabelle--cane]

once i was browsing a tag for a thing i like that i won't mention here but it had an addiction subplot and i saw a post that absolutely gobsmacked me which said that having compassion for addicts was misogynistic and pro-abuse so I empathize with your pitt plight

truly in the minds of some people addiction is a thing only experienced by men, white people, parents, and abusers. they view it as a "first-world problem" that actual oppressed people can't get away with having and thus of course oppressed people never have it. as we all know, the reason you are less likely to encounter multiply marginalized people with criminalized / stigmatized psychiatric conditions in every day life is because multiply marginalized people just elect not to have them and no other reason. why is someone linking me to a picture of a plane covered in polka dots.

[annabelle--cane]

official disclaimer of no beef to this OP or anyone who shared this post, but one of these things is not like the other. why is that?

[annabelle--cane]

I'm having difficultly articulating this in a way that sounds coherent, but I think there's a tendency on particularly this website to think of addiction as a problem that you couldn't ever have. one of the most common takes about personal substance use I hear on here is "my parents / other family members had addiction issues so I've decided to be sober to avoid that potential problem," which, yknow, valid and real, but I think when that's the attitude expressed in a given environment over and over again it gives rise to the idea that you can just Decide not to become an addict and so anyone who does become one simply never made that wise decision to #justsayno. another common take I see around on here is "why is it so normalized for people to pollute their bodies with poisons? I just don't see the appeal, why would someone do that to themself?" which, again, betrays a view of addiction as being the result of irresponsible choices that you would never make. you understand that substances are bad, you are responsible, you would never choose to make yourself a burden to others, and if someone isn't savvy and socially conscious enough to make those wise decisions that that person must be a them, an Other outside your social circles who just doesn't care and probably presents a threat to you.

to continue to use the above post as a little case study, it's written from a place of empathy for children being deprived of access to knowledge of things that are relevant to their lives, and the voice of the post can empathize with the idea of being a child soldier, murdered, trafficked, assaulted, those are all things that could happen to you, but it breezes right past the opportunity to empathize with the idea of being an addict in a really obvious way that breaks the form the post. that line also contradicts the post's own point, it's presuming that children are too "innocent" to be addicts and that the information about addiction available to children should center around "how to handle someone in your life being an addict" instead of "how to handle it if you are an addict." also kind of ironic, cause, like, what kind of children do you think the troubled teen industry is trafficking?