Local SefiZakKura Enjoyer 🌸

Ursa | He/Him | 23

[thermed]

check out my Renarin cosplay from Momocon 2026! specifically future/husband Renarin from the end of Wind and Truth. i’m so attached to this outfit now that if he ends up wearing pants i’ll be disappointed lol

[xenosagaepisodeone]

are we not feeling very pious today, brother lionel

[pro-sipper]

Can antis explain why posting art of an adult x minor ship is csem but them saving said art to their computer and reposting it on their own blogs is totally fine?

If it's illegal to post, aren't you also breaking the law by saving it and distributing it? Or is there some loophole I'm not aware of where it doesn't count if you just post it for the purpose of going "eww look how gross this is!" Because if someone tried that with actual csem, where do you think they'd end up?

[theassholeantiarchive2-0]

Unfortunately that had happened but because csem gets treated as same as fictional ship

So because antis, some being minors think anything involving minors ( fictional) means it’s csem. So when one of them found ACTUAL csem they of course got charged for having that. And they also spread it because you had comments going “ let me see, link?? Source?!”

The fact it gotten to that points is fucked in itself

[myfandomrealitea]

I really feel like people forget that fandom is a fun hobby and not some sort of like, activist group.

Like, one of my hobbies is wildlife photography. If I follow a bunch of wildlife photography accounts and it's the only thing I see on my dash, am I in an echo chamber? No, I'm just engaging with my hobby.

It's really not that deep lmao is that person okay

Honestly the growing trend of forcing accountability, activism, virtue signalling and moral hunting in every single space is exhausting and crippling and it will eventually succeed in a massive cull of fandom spaces and creators. It already has, even, we've seen 'purges' of creators and content in certain fandoms and from a majority of websites and in revised policies.

That said, per your example, your internet space is allowed to be curated any way that you want it to. This blog, for example, is vastly different to my other account, where you will not find even a speck of political content. Not even a whiff of discourse. Its all cat pictures and the occasional shameless thirst over a man's thighs and probably an unhealthy amount of astronomy. They are both my spaces, they have just simply been curated very, very differently, and with two different intents.

"Isolated" (by content) spaces are not bad. Even in regards to some "negative" aspects. Some people are very, very set in their ways, and cannot or will not change. In such cases, its simply best to allow them to box themselves into their hate and not have a wider outreach.

[synf3ll]

"if you're going to write dark fiction you should explicitly state that it's not okay to do in real life so that a child doesn't see it and think it's okay"

actually i don't cater my art to children, my art is not intended for children, and it's not my responsibility to parent them. hope this helps

[allsortsoflicorice]

"if you're going to write dark fiction you should explicitly state that it's not okay to do in real life so that a child doesn't see it and think it's okay"

I am forced to wonder sometimes if these posts are written by people who fancy themselves a great deal smarter than the average bear, and so assume that even though they knew this stuff as a kid, ordinary average kids can't be expected to know it. Either that, or they have forgotten what being a child is like.

Even the smallest child knows that it's not okay for the witch to cook Hansel in her pot, it's not okay for the Wolf to eat Red Riding Hood and her grandma, it's not okay for Cinderella's step-family to bully her, and it's not okay for Beauty's dad to make a major promise on her behalf without even asking for her consent first. The fact that it all works out well for Beauty in the end doesn't offset the wrong her father did her. Every small child knows this.

[tyramir]

I remember as a kid really liking the show Hercules: The Legendary Journeys. Kind of cringe in hindsight, but at the time, I thought it was amazing. I was a dumb kid, apparently.

And there is this one episode where it goes absolutely Looney Tunes, with Hercules and Ares smashing each other in the face with maces. It's absolutely ridiculous. And my parental figure took me aside after watching the episode, and had The Talk with me. No, not the sex talk. The, "This is fiction, so don't do this at home" talk.

And even being a kid so dumb that I enjoyed Hercules: The Legendary Journeys, I gave my parental figure a look that very clearly communicated, "I might be dumb, but I'm not that dumb." I was young, "impressionable", but not *stupid.* And the second my parental unit realized that, they backed off and gave me the respect I deserved, even if I was a little idiot who enjoyed Kevin Sorbo.

Because that was how the talk worked back in the day. Parents were worried you'd see violence on the teevee, and immediately rush to repeat it in real life. And this was even before the regular occurrence of school shootings. Just a quick little check-in, make sure you're not gonna do something dumb, and then let the kid figure it out.

Note, at no point did Sam Raimi, the Executive Producer and showrunner of Hercules, take part in this conversation. Because it's a given that *he's not my parental unit.*

[bunniope]

okay. which of you motherfuckers taught my vile little homunculus how to put on eyeliner

[bunniope]

it is fucking serving.

[sugarloom]

antis: I hate seeing proshitters all over my homepage!!! how do I get rid of them?!

the humble block button:

[pro-sipper]

If you're more prone to believing something written in a carrd with no sources to back it up (or worse, treating said carrd as an actual source), over the word of licensed professionals who went to school to earn degrees in this type of thinking, trust that no one is going to take anything you say seriously

[damnfandomproblems]

Fandom Problem #6041:

If a man feels uncomfortable showing affection towards his male friends for fear of homophobic harassment, the answer isn't to tell people to stop shipping male friends together. It's to make it so that being gay isn't seen is a bad thing.

[pygmi-says-hi]

Commonly misused phrases!

idioms or sayings that people say more often than they write, so when they write it it's usually wrong.

Once in a while, not 'once and a while.'

Per se, not 'per say.'

For all intents and purposes, not 'for all intensive purposes'

Irregardless is not a word, actually, it's either 'regardless' or 'in regards'. ir- as a prefix means 'without' but so does the suffix 'less'. So if you write 'irregardless' you are writing 'without a lack of regard' which means 'in regards to.' double negative, yeah?

By and large, not 'by in large'.

I could care less vs I couldn't care less. First one means 'yeah I don't mind it, it's whatever.' second one (correct) means "I fucking hate that thing my opinions are in the basement of hell."

"much to be desired" correctly is "lacking in appearance/utility", not "beautiful." What it means is, "that thing is so bad, it does not satisfy my aesthetic/utilitarian needs for it and I desire something better." not, "I desire that thing so much because it's gorgeous."

"Leaving little to the imagination" means you can see/understand all of it. it does not mean 'modest', idk which one of you fucks started that but no. wrong. A sweater leaves a lot to the imagination because you can't see any of the person. Lingerie leaves 'little to the imagination' because you can see everything, you don't have to imagine it. in terms of understanding, 'little to the imagination' would be a very thorough explanation rather than a vague outline.

if you have any others you want me to include, lmk!

xox byeeee

[comedownstairsandsayhello]

something has gone deeply wrong when "focusing pragmatically on issues you can influence and working to make life better for yourself and your community" is considered an unserious distraction while "endlessly exposing yourself to media about distressing situations you can't control" is considered political engagement

[ntrider]

noncon friendship

[sonyvegas9-deactivated20241118]

Coworkers

[moldyycheese]

Y'all need to be taking tips from Sephiroth

I just realized I posted this on the wrong account

[milo-hypno]

I'm certain this is on Tumblr somewhere, but I haven't seen it around, so I'm sharing it myself

[cat-cosplay]

[cat-cosplay]

Well? Have you?

[ms-demeanor]

Hey, also, all the anarchist shit aside, tomorrow I want you to make something.

I forced myself to draw something after the 2016 election. I forced myself to draw something when my mother died in 2018. I forced myself to draw something when my spouse was hospitalized for multiple organ failure in 2021.

When you are miserable, make something. Add a row to your project, bake a box cake, draw on a sheet of lined paper, write a poem on a napkin, fold an origami shirt out of a dollar bill, make your favorite recipe for dinner, but make something with your hands, something that you can hold and look at engage your senses in.

It won't fix the world, but it will change the world. You will have made something that didn't exist before. You will have impacted your reality, even in a very small way. And it is going to be something you made *after.* Something bad happened, something shook you, and you made something after, in spite of it.

[boy-gender]

To all the trans people who see this tonight, no matter what happens, we will survive. Trans people will still be here 4 years from now and 10 years from now and 100 years from now and tomorrow. We have always existed and we always will. The world cannot unlearn about us; we are too public, too loud, too beloved, too present. Ill be here tomorrow. Please stay here with me.