Boldly Going

~Just here to yap about my latest hyperfixations~ Sherlock Holmes | Les Miserables | Good Omens Mincemeat | Star Wars/Trek | Pirates | Hazbin Hotel Find me on AO3 at a_genius_man

[veryfastnighuncatchable]

I am haunting the narrative in a way that is a little uncomfortable for the other characters in the narrative

[yourfavpunchesnazis]

you punch nazis!

(requested by anonymous)

[yourfavpunchesnazis]

[tnystrk-exe]

[veryfastnighuncatchable]

Me, to my new favs in my new piece of media: go in the jar...go in the jar. you will like it I promise. no there's not spikes in it don't worry. no I'm not gonna shake it. go in the jar.

[writing-prompt-s]

"What did you do to them?" "Nothing. They were the ones that went into my head uninvited, psychics really need to learn boundaries. I tried to keep the away from dangerous memories, but you know how they are with privacy." "What did they find?" "I don't know, I forgot it for a reason."

[veryfastnighuncatchable]

I absolutely adored Enola Holmes 3. Enola and Tewkesbury were soooooo cute, Sherlock was Sherlock, Watson was brilliant, Moriarty was terrifying, and the side characters were all so well done!

[veryfastnighuncatchable]

Obi-Wan Kenobi: I just feel like something's not right here

Everyone in the galaxy, apparently: oh my god, kill that guy right now

[fruitviking]

Presenting: The Six-Point System For Rating Your Watson

(Developed in collaboration with the Letters From Watson server, thanks folks)

On a scale of 1-10, rate your Dr Watson for the following qualities:

Buff - strength and build

Fluff - handsomeness and kindness

Gruff - sternness and anger potential

Stuff - can he do things besides just watching Holmes

Bluff - how unreliable a narrator is he/can he lie

Chuffed - is he happy to be there? Does he like hanging out with Holmes?

Go forth!

[doingbad]

Adding from the LFW discord:

On a scale of 1-10, rate your Sherlock Holmes for the following qualities:

Deductive - can he detect?

Seductive - does he have sex appeal? (he should ideally have zero points in this category)

Destructive - does he blow things up and cause chaos?

Productive - can he do things that actually help people

Obstructive - is he lying to the police? is he meddling? does he identify as a problem?

Instructive - is he teaching his methods and trying to get others to observe?

[veryfastnighuncatchable]

Alright let's go.

My Watson:

Buff - I mean he's strong, but he's a doctor (not a soldier!) so I'll give him a solid 4/10

Fluff - 10/10 this man is the human embodiment of a golden retriever

Gruff - does have a kill count, but usually it takes being mean to Sherlock to get him to that point. He did try to physically fight Mycroft once tho. 7/10

Stuff - he can do so much stuff. A multi-talented king. 9/10

Bluff - he lies to lestrade. But everyone does that so he's not particularly special. 3/10

Chuffed - Holmes might as well have invented sunlight. He is exactly where he wants to be don't worry about him. 1000/10

And my Holmes:

Deductive - 10/10 no explanation necessary.

Seductive - a hard 1/10. She gives off the vibes of a confused baby deer that just learned how to walk.

Destructive - yes. So many explosions. 8/10

Productive - she solves desperate people's cases for free. 8/10

Obstructive - yes she is lying to police, yes she is actively committing crimes to solve other crimes. 7/10

Instructive - she lectures at a university in between cases 10/10

[helmet-noob]

i was doomscrolling ship dynamics on Pinterest and suddenly thought of one i've loved for ages but I don't know if it has a name

PLEASE tell me you guys see the vision

[melanch0lic-mist]

This is Lestrade with Holmes and Watson

In every adaptation

[veryfastnighuncatchable]

Poor Lestrade is not paid enough for this

[veryfastnighuncatchable]

Is anyone else's relationship with gender less like a relationship and more like a low-commitment situationship?

[veryfastnighuncatchable]

The only three men I've ever been attracted to are a gay man, a woman dressed as a man, and David Tennant

[veryfastnighuncatchable]

I think we as a fandom are really sleeping on the fact that one of the first canon descriptions of Crowley specifies that he "could do really weird things with his tongue". Just saying.

[veryfastnighuncatchable]

The prequels really made the originals so much funnier. Like in 1977, obi-wan was this mysterious mentor figure and everything he said seems wise and mystical. And then you watch it after seeing the prequels and you realize that he's just being a little bitch.

[blatherby]

Spin the Lesgles Spelling Wheel!

To celebrate *spins wheel* Lêguele meeting Marius today in the readalong, I finally made a *spins wheel* L’Aîgles spelling randomizer using @fremedon’s list!

[veryfastnighuncatchable]

Happy pride to the screenwriters at the bbc whether they like it or not

[veryfastnighuncatchable]

"the fifth stage of grief is acceptance" wrong! ao3.

[communismrainclouds]

fucked up thinking about the concept of les mis being a loop

a tale of real life tragedy to be retold again and again

where each show ends with the failure to create change and the call to try once more

people dying for what they love over and over again

a story doomed to repeat itself until there is no more suffering in the world

[veryfastnighuncatchable]

To the world we dream about, and the one we live in now

[thegoldengirl2006]

Whatever happens in Enola Holmes 3 I just hope there is the eldest bro of Enola and with only one job that is to be confused. Like enola is getting married?? To whom?? Why?? Sherlock is kidnapped???????? How????! Oh you will find him from the clue all Holmes leave while disappearing! We do?? Why did not I know that? Also mom is all well and alive great! She is leading a feminist movement? She is a criminal now??Also what a great FRIEND Watson is to Sherlock right.huh? Enola why are you laughing? Why??

WHY DOES NOT ANYBODY TELLS ME ANYTHING???????