Stargate SG-1 | S01E21 Politics
Michael Shanks beautiful but pupils BLOWN baby what were you on

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
occasionally subtle
Noah Kahan
sheepfilms

Love Begins
Claire Keane
Phantogram Three
One Nice Bug Per Day
Mike Driver
The Stonewall Inn
Today's Document
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

Jimmy Eat World
Show & Tell
EXPECTATIONS
No title available

titsay
RMH
Fieri Frames

seen from Lithuania

seen from Taiwan

seen from Kosovo
seen from United States

seen from Ireland

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Albania

seen from Spain
seen from United States

seen from Russia
seen from Philippines
seen from Colombia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Pakistan
@wherethestoriesare
Stargate SG-1 | S01E21 Politics
Michael Shanks beautiful but pupils BLOWN baby what were you on
everything reminds me of him…
"Hey, pal."
『Avengers : Doomsday』
Anyone else think that's Loki?
I wasn't thinking that, no... but now I am!
Actually, no. I wish, but I don't think so. Why would Loki appear as a version of Steve with that beard and hair? Wouldn't Loki appear as he remembers Steve, more clean cut? Also, as much as I think Loki is worthy of wielding Mjolnir, the Russos would never do that. Steve Rogers is Their Boy, their self-insert character, and the only one they believe is worthy. So... no. I wish that was Loki, but I doubt that it is. Even though, "hey, pal," in that tone sounds more Loki than Steve to me.
I do agree with your points here and I think that when we've seen Loki impersonate people before, he's gone for a version he knows. And the Russos are very weird about Steve Rogers (the whole America's ass thing? I never got it).
Let me explain my thinking: when I first saw the trailer I had a big uncanny valley vibe and my first reaction was "Not Steve Rogers" - so then I thought oh, ok, this is like an evil manipulation vision to fuck with Thor maybe
But then I thought why? Why use Steve to manipulate Thor like that when there are plenty of others that would work better, including his mother and brother? Plus we were already teased with Steve's return with the clip of him holding the baby so this isnt restricted to this one moment. Why use evilmirror!Steve as a recurring character in a movie like this?
But that little smirk, calling the hammer to him with magic, using a visage of one of Thor's best friends, and using Steve specifically (which we've seen Loki do a couple of times now), plus add in the Loki post S2 of the TV show, who has had all this character progression, and is now a protector of the multiverse,and would understand what being worthy of Mjolnir now means, and would qualify i think, and who can see across all timelines and interact in a limited way, who views this Thor as "Thor" but potentially not his Thor, and so doesnt want to show up as Loki to break this Thor's heart and cause them both emotional suffering, and is potentially an aiding force in the story rather than an antagonistic one...
And now I can see this version of Steve popping up 2 or 3 times through the film to give specifically Thor help and with a little reveal of you were always my brother at the end
And all of this wild speculation is because I looked at that clip for 2 seconds and thought oh no theres something off there so I am fully aware that I have fabricated all of this from practically nothing
But i love the speculation
"Hey, pal."
『Avengers : Doomsday』
Anyone else think that's Loki?
If anyone would like to know, the Women’s World Cup is gonna be in Brazil 2027
Come on Lionesses!
Okay, certain people need to understand that 99.8% of Falklanders want to remain an overseas British territory and view Argentina as aggressors to them, so this really isn't a "fuck the English" moment. I get hating us, I really do, but this makes it sound like you hate us more than you care about Falkland Islanders.
If Falklanders wanted to be rid of the UK and join Argentina and we were being difficult and not letting them, it'd be another matter entirely. But surely the actual people who are from there should get the final say?
This^^
Seeing a lot of uninformed takes on the Falklands since the Arg team brought out that ridiculous banner but so long as the people of the Falklands consider themselves British then they shall be British
and the Argentina government can keep pulling out that political football every time they want a distraction from whatever it is they've done this time but everyone sees right through it
and in that moment i could swear we were all spanish
hi i just got here. what's going on re: the final
My dash gave me the summary answer you requested:
Delighted to see that the USA correctly recognise that The Muppets are the internationally celebrated ambassadors required on this sort of stage
That time when Spain didn't exist
This is a milestone of the Internet
Thinking of this anon during the Spain-France World Cup Semi Final 2026
mark, my words. *mark brings me my dictionary* thank you mark
JULY 20th! ITS HAPPENING! The Guild Reunion Movie Kickstarter goes LIVE! Please repost to help us reach all the Guildies who want to support! And sign up on the website! https://watchtheguild.com! We're making a movie!!!!
As I get older, the entire moral arc of Return of the Jedi irks me more and more, even without getting to see Anakin's actual atrocities in the prequels or the fact that his act of defiance barely even mattered in the sequels.
I remember an Expanded Universe comic set immediately after RotJ where Leia tells Luke words to the effect of "Vader literally had me tortured and blew up my homeworld. What, am I supposed to feel kinship with him just because I discovered he's my dad yesterday?"
The important thing that happens in Return of the Jedi is that the Emperor dies and the planet-killing superweapon gets blown up. Vader spent the last two hours of his life doing something good after 25 years of genocide, mass murder and torture, and even then, it was partly out of vengeful hatred. Vader fucking hated Palpatine for a quarter century and never had the spine to do anything about it. It was only after his own son was being tortured to death in front of him that he chose to act - and he'd cut off the kid's hand like two years before that! That's not a fucking redemption arc.
Darth Vader the fucking child-killing planet-murderer gets to stand there with Yoda and Obi-Wan as a Force Ghost, give me a fucking break.
"My father's name was Bail Organa, actually."
I have a whole other post I did about the original Star Wars trilogy that is relevant to this, but I'll try condense it:
So one, yes, absolutely it is entirely correct to take issue with Darth Vader's apparent forgiveness by the Force, there is no need for Leia to accept him as her father or to feel anything for him besides hate and contempt, redemption takes more than turning back for a couple of hours and then getting out of culpability by dying, all fair.
That said: the original trilogy is Luke Skywalker's story and the story of Luke Skywalker, on a meta level, is about being a young adult in the 60s and 70s who did not experience WWII or the depths of fascism personally, but who grew up with gaping familial wounds - family members who you never knew but who older people refer to or talk around, people they compare you to, figures who other children had in their lives but you didn't. Someone who as a child was given fantasies of heroes fighting daring battles, who was told it was all about nationhood and fighting for your people and the course of civilization, someone who internalized those principles as guiding lights for their own morality and who they want to be... and THEN finding out when you become an adult, and are permitted to know about the horrors, that it is not just honor and glory in your heritage, that you, 70s white boy, may have evil and darkness and the corruption of all your values as a potential to fall into just as your father did, the temptation to hate and cruelty and domination and atrocity. And the absences in your family are maybe not just because of death, of noble sacrifice, but perhaps instead because those people who shared your blood became monsters, severed from their family because of their terrible actions, and still live as awful hateful versions of themselves, enslaved to evil, and that could be you.
And what do you do with that? Will you strike your father down with all of your hatred, when the thing that corrupted him by his hate for its own ends is sitting there grinning and laughing, waiting to do the same to you? Is violence the answer against that creature, infinitely better at taking advantage from violence than you are? Or will you just die - and even just walking away here means death, sooner or later - and let the evil persist?
Or will you, privileged young person with ideals and hopes, with a family member who has done terrible unforgivable things but who still holds affection for you, make use of that affection to tempt them to just turn their back on that evil for a moment, the thing it will never expect from the person it made its slave for longer than you've been alive? Neither you nor he can pay back the crimes of those years, but perhaps you can stop the evil, here and now, from going on.
So you do that. And what is your reward? Is it appropriate for Luke, whose whole story has been about becoming the ideal he grew up admiring and defeating the evil that ideal had the potential to become, both halves of it embodied in the being of his father, to come back to his friends and then have the universe say to him 'your father was unredeemable, and had nothing good enough in him to deserve peace in death'? Or to say there was a darkness lifted from him, and a light restored?
The whole purpose of Darth Vader in the story of the original trilogy is to represent who Luke could be, and through Luke, the audience. He wasn't really supposed to have a character arc of his own, his redemption isn't for his own sake, the story isn't about him - or wasn't meant to be originally, in any case. How you depict the fate of Darth Vader is something that sends a very strong message, and there's a reason why it was chosen as the final message of the original movies, in the context of the world in which those movies were made and who they were intended to be speaking to. If you change that, you change the message. Which you can do! And you can take issue with the original message! But like, there was a message, that was chosen purposefully, and you have to lose the original message to add a new one.
This rebuttal is really good, but I actually think it also works as the culmination of Anakin/Vader’s arc… when you understand the message ISN’T “one good deed absolves years of atrocities”: It’s that it’s never too late to do the right thing, and be a better person.
It doesn’t mean people will forgive you - hell no. The things Vader did were unforgivable, and he knew that. But because of that, he believed the only path left was to keep committing atrocities, to wallow in self-hatred and anger for decades and take it out on the galaxy. He says it himself: “It’s too late for me, son”.
But what Luke shows Vader is that we ALWAYS have a choice: To be a better person, and to choose compassion. Anakin doesn’t kill the Emperor out of hatred, or even because he thinks it’ll make up for anything he did: He knows nothing ever will. He chooses to save Luke, and break the cycle of violence because it’s the right, kind thing to do.
Vader/Anakin isn’t fully redeemed by the end of Return of the Jedi: He simply takes his first step back into the light. Obi-Wan and Yoda chose to give him that second chance, but that was their decision to make. The people you hurt are by NO means obligated to forgive you - but you should still strive to be better regardless.
And I think that’s the message of Anakin’s sacrifice: No matter what we’ve done, we always have a choice to break the cycle and be better, with no expectation of forgiveness.
Gore of my comfort character. How will Ally feel. Thats their partner.
Jasmine just going through it with the vajazzled box of doom filled with shareable snacks
Original tweet: (x)
"Would you look at that, mercury's in Gatorade."
"I don't believe in astrology."
"No, I mean there is a recall."