Sweet Seals For You, Always
hello vonnie
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
icyghini twinkie
No title available
Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
Stranger Things
The Bowery Presents
Claire Keane
Discoholic šŖ©
untitled
The Stonewall Inn
noise dept.
ā£ Chile in a Photography ā£
Monterey Bay Aquarium
No title available
Show & Tell
shark vs the universe
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
art blog(derogatory)
seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia
seen from Singapore
seen from Singapore
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from South Africa
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from France
seen from Belize
seen from Malaysia
seen from T1
seen from Finland
seen from United States
@winged-starlight
YALL im so excited I received my first hate message but Iām just very confused why since Iām not a filthy terf lmao
Trans women are women š³ļøāā§ļøš³ļøāā§ļøš³ļøāā§ļøš
oh also come off anon babe, itās not fair if ur hating outside the club š
oh my gooooddddd fucking kill yourseeeeelllvvvveeesssss
entire article makes me homicidal
The women's category of Olympic sports will be limited to biological females from 2028, says the International Olympic Committee.
"this will keep out pretty much all intersex people and a lot of black women but oh well! btw men don't have any such test to go through"
Adding my tags as a reply bc fuck it:
Has anyone mentioned how this opens up every woman competing to even more sexual abuse than she would have most likely already experienced during the process of elite athletic training? Like, any woman who wants to compete is being told that the price of going to the olympics is being molested. This is a structural, required component that is now part of the rules.
We need to talk about these "exams" as a form of sexual violence. Because they are.
Hi it's good that we're pointing out how this is bad for cis women (because it is) but also I think it is worth pointing out that
THE ENTIRE POINT OF THIS LEGISLATION IS TO CATEGORICALLY BAN TRANS WOMEN FROM THE OLYMPICS. THAT IS THE MAIN PROBLEM AND WHAT ANY SERIOUS CRITIQUE OF THE LEGISLATION MUST FOCUS ON.
I hear you, but before trying to cringey yell over everyone in text format, maybe consider the fact that if ciswomen cannot be safe and have their bodily autonomy respected when going through their training what kind of abuse do you think that would open transwomen up to? Like itās great youāre privileged enough to be able to focus solely on the exclusion of transwomen but transwomen DEFINITELY wonāt have rights in womenās spaces if ciswomen donāt have rights themselves too like be so for real right now.
This is a bigger fucking issue where ALL women are fighting for their rights to having their bodily autonomy respected INCLUDING transwomen (who are women too!), and saying this is singularly a trans issue is just as divisive and harmful as the people banning transwomen from competing.
the biggest loss of animated movies trending towards sympathetic villains/no villains is that we dont get enough crazy death scenes anymore. stuff like tarzan's villain accidentally hanging himself or help i'm a fish's villain drowning and floating away silently on screen. sometimes your movies just need stuff to scare 8 year olds shitless. its good for the enviroment i think. probably.
I think we should keep sympathetic villains but still also have crazy death scenes. Like you have this evil monsterous guy realize the errors of his ways only to get hit by a train going like a million miles per hour. Or sacrifice for the greater good but the death is absolutely horrific.
I think it builds character for the 8 year olds. Which is good for the environment, probably maybe.
imo this actually teaches the wrong lesson though for a child specifically.
we as adults know that even if someone who is demonstrably villainous finds error in their ways and wants to repent isn't always allowed the mercy of forgiveness. However, this is a really nuanced concept an 8 year old kid isn't going to grasp.
What they will grasp however, is that if they do something "wrong" or "evil" that even if they say they're sorry, they'll still be hurt and punished anyway and that's a terrible lesson to teach anyone because then why would you ever bother to apologize for your mistakes or wrongdoing? Why would you show remorse or guilt for your actions at all if you're still going to be punished for them?
So while it's a great concept, it's far too nuanced and would rely on adults being media literate as well.
The thing that really boils my potatoes about AI in general is that I have been a creative professional for over a decade now and the devil has ALWAYS been in the details. Big and small, I've had single-person businesses rip me to shreds over how their colors turned out on newsprint, and have worked with huge companies with THICK brand guidelines with every detail of their brand identity laid out and enforced with an iron fist.
But I guess all of that stuff doesn't matter anymore? Who gives a fuck if this AI generated baby has six fingers, that mom-and-pop shop is still going to use it. That rug from Temu says Happy Thanksgivirg? Oh well haha it's just a silly funny thing now (nevermind that you never would have given a B-grade item from a craft show the same consideration). I don't actually care that the AI Coca-cola ad has a truck that changes size every scene, but I can't help but think about how, if it had been some poor underpaid artist, they would have been laughed out of the building.
I don't really know how to put it in a succint way but it just feels all the more obvious how much more grace and flexibility has always been possible but never offered.
statements like "It's wrong to masturbate about a person without their consent" and "It's wrong to do something that quietly arouses you while you are in public even if no one can see it" show that a person's understanding of morality basically involves magical thinking. like I wrote this post on the toilet. That's not the same thing as me literally shitting on you
Like, you do understand that peeping toms falls under "something that quietly arouses you even if nobody can see it" perfectly? This is what happens when your ethical system is processed through your penis.
Wrong. "Peeping toms" are mentally ill individuals with a paraphilic disorder (voyeuristic disorder in fact).
Fantasizing about catching your hot neighbor changing doesn't make you a peeping tom, which is what this post is about. I do find it interesting though that you seem preoccupied about peeping toms though, since that is the first example you reach for (and is a bit maladaptive). It's okay, you can admit you have some shame around voyeurism as much as it turns you on. You don't have to admit it to me, but we both know. Just remember: OP's post is about the private thoughts inside of your head and your own bodily autonomy. Catching a glimpse of a hot person in public and masturbating about it later is different from spying on your hot neighbor and masturbating to them in the moment. Like OP said, it's the difference between writing a post on the toilet and coming into someone's house to take a shit on their chest. So while you might find peeping arousing, please only fantasize about it.
Do you just fucking say shit? Is this post AI generated?
no im just autistic and just like to weaponize my phd in psychology for fun sometimes lol but ill dumb it down to internet speak with some lower case to feel more human for you ok?
anyway idk why ur so defensive that i clocked u tho when a quick google search will confirm the āword saladā i used are real medical terms with actual definitions.
thereās a big difference between a paraphilia (fetish) and a paraphilic disorder (when ur fetish becomes compulsive and u harm others).
fantasizing about catching ur neighbor undressing through the window? thatās a paraphilia (fetish). itās safe sane and consensual bc ur neighbor is a concept in ur brain (like a celebrity crush or a porn star).
actively trying to catch, spy, or watch ur neighbor undress so u can masturbate to it (aka āpeeping tomā behavior)? thatās a paraphilic disorder and a crime. ur now engaging in real world harm to another person bc itās no longer isolated to the inside of ur complex little meat nugget.
anyway hope that helps u stay safe in exploring ur own voyeurism. take care!
oh p.s: u donāt have to be ashamed either itās a p normal paraphilia to have š¤
statements like "It's wrong to masturbate about a person without their consent" and "It's wrong to do something that quietly arouses you while you are in public even if no one can see it" show that a person's understanding of morality basically involves magical thinking. like I wrote this post on the toilet. That's not the same thing as me literally shitting on you
Like, you do understand that peeping toms falls under "something that quietly arouses you even if nobody can see it" perfectly? This is what happens when your ethical system is processed through your penis.
Wrong. "Peeping toms" are mentally ill individuals with a paraphilic disorder (voyeuristic disorder in fact).
Fantasizing about catching your hot neighbor changing doesn't make you a peeping tom, which is what this post is about. I do find it interesting though that you seem preoccupied about peeping toms though, since that is the first example you reach for (and is a bit maladaptive). It's okay, you can admit you have some shame around voyeurism as much as it turns you on. You don't have to admit it to me, but we both know. Just remember: OP's post is about the private thoughts inside of your head and your own bodily autonomy. Catching a glimpse of a hot person in public and masturbating about it later is different from spying on your hot neighbor and masturbating to them in the moment. Like OP said, it's the difference between writing a post on the toilet and coming into someone's house to take a shit on their chest. So while you might find peeping arousing, please only fantasize about it.
I've never seen trad wives explained so perfectly. "Non-nude fetish content for sexist men"
I miss when feminism wasnāt performative and women werenāt torn down for choosing how to express their gender. š«©
Youāre not a feminist if you judge and tear down women for performing femininity in a way that upsets you. Thatās just misogyny rebranded babes
op isnt feminist for criticizing female nazis cause women can do anything and are above moral reproach!
Since when is homesteading, cottagecore, and SAHM/trad wife synonymous with nazis? Do YOU hear yourself? Imagine calling a stay at home parent a nazi, what the actual fuck is wrong with you. You need to set aside your moral outrage and equip your fucking reading comprehension.
trad wives are telling women they belong in the kitchen without voting privileges and they operate as broodmares for white babies. that is quite literally a nazi offshoot. sorry to be the one to break the news but the entire tradwife movement is based in racism and eugenics.
x
don't hear what OP didn't say holy shit
you're insane, blocked
we've got a life to love living.
Trans Woman: Lesbian spaces that permit Trans Men and Exclude Trans women are bad actually.
Dipshit: Trans Men Belong in Lesbian Spaces and have belonged there longer than You!!!
Trans Woman: I need you to think critically about what kind of Lesbian Space sees Trans Men as legitimate members in that space but explicitly view Trans women as invaders.
A thousand people with no reading comprehension: Trans Women want to ban Trans Men from lesbian spaces! SMH, this is proof of transandrophobia and why transfeminism is actually a TERF ideology.
I've never seen trad wives explained so perfectly. "Non-nude fetish content for sexist men"
I miss when feminism wasnāt performative and women werenāt torn down for choosing how to express their gender. š«©
Youāre not a feminist if you judge and tear down women for performing femininity in a way that upsets you. Thatās just misogyny rebranded babes
op isnt feminist for criticizing female nazis cause women can do anything and are above moral reproach!
Since when is homesteading, cottagecore, and SAHM/trad wife synonymous with nazis? Do YOU hear yourself? Imagine calling a stay at home parent a nazi, what the actual fuck is wrong with you. You need to set aside your moral outrage and equip your fucking reading comprehension.
I've never seen trad wives explained so perfectly. "Non-nude fetish content for sexist men"
I miss when feminism wasnāt performative and women werenāt torn down for choosing how to express their gender. š«©
Youāre not a feminist if you judge and tear down women for performing femininity in a way that upsets you. Thatās just misogyny rebranded babes
sry fiestylittlebeetle I blocked u for ur own mental wellness. Be safe š¤
hi, this is your gentle reminder and PSA: there are ELECTIONS happening in November 4th. PLEASE GO VOTE. Trump is the most unpopular he has ever been, but does that mean your average independent, or republican will vote for a dem this time around-likely no- they probably will just skip the process entirely if they donāt have a candidate they feel strongly about. this is why iām asking YOU SPECIFICALLY to make sure to go vote. and i donāt wanna hear any doomerism shit about how voting is a waste of time bc of whatever, guys voting is the last of anything we have it is clear most of these people who represent us do not actually care, HOWEVER trump currently has the house, senate and courts and making it even slightly harder to do anything or having a large enough group to speak out against what heās doing will help hundreds of thousands of people in the US. now more than ever is it important to make sure that they know that we do not stand for this
Hey!
THERE ARE FUCKING BALLOT PETITION PROPOSALS ON THE BALLOT THIS YEAR.
THINGS LIKE WEED, CENSORSHIP, VOTING RIGHTS ETC. GIVE A SHIT AND LOOK IT UP ON YOUR STATE'S ELECTIONS/ SECRETARY OF STATE PAGE.
Bros really out here reblogging in favor of hamas
yeah
When Palestine is free there'll be time to talk about the politics to come. For now I'm following the lead of the PFLP and supporting the Palestinian resistance in all its forms.
Woah mama just reminding my followers that TERF ideology is fundamentally evil and not welcome anywhere near my blog hummina hummina hummina
Protecting genuine women is āfundamentally evilā?
Protecting women is one of the most noble things you can do. Unfortunately you don't do that
official anti terf post
Woah mama I'm getting certification now
This is made insanely ironic by the fact Elvis was a predator and a pedophile that groomed a young girl lmao. Or should we talk about the numerous song lyrics about rape and violating consent?
Not who Iād want to be representing the trans community or anti-terf tbh even as a ājokeā account š¤¢š¤®
You do realize that I'm not *actually* Elvis, right? Would you go up to a random Elvis impersonator on the street and say this? Would you???
I do! I just think youāre weird for choosing a historical figure that was groomer and a pedophile who sang songs about romanticizing rape to champion anti-terf rhetoric.
It feels less like youāre for trans rights and more like using trans folks to hide your disgusting misogyny. You couldāve chosen any figure in history and Iām sure you have other accounts other than this parody. Itās just gross idk
and for the record? yes bc im from the area and those impersonators often think he was some great icon instead of the garbage human he actually was. most donāt even know Priscilla was 14 and he was 24. š¤¢
The mod of the Elvis blog is trans femme. Donāt assign gender to people based on nothing more than āI donāt like what youāre sayingā.
š
hey reminder unfollow me if you use gen ai
One unfollowed keep em coming
I was going to follow you just to unfollow to be funny, but I actually want to respectfully say that both kids and adults who use bot platforms like CAI and other generative tools while minding their business arenāt the āenemyā to be shamed. People choosing to write silly little love stories with a predictive bot that brings them comfort is such a weird hill to fight people on tbh and brings a lack of compassion to the table I donāt really like
Shaming gen ai users is so reminiscent of the whole āhow dare McDonaldās employees want a living wage!ā when the actual damage of gen AI use lies with the unethical practices of the companies (via scraping, environmental, etc). Yes people using them doesnāt help, but if people stopped using gen AI it would be integrated in other, more insidious ways that society couldnāt avoid which is something theyāre already doing btw. You probably use gen AI and donāt even know it, esp if you have any android or google products at all.
so idk at least be consistent in your moralism if ur gonna get on ur soapbox
