Putting anti-capitalist stickers on ads in NYC
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Peter Solarz

blake kathryn
trying on a metaphor
tumblr dot com
d e v o n

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
h
we're not kids anymore.

No title available
No title available
taylor price
almost home
will byers stan first human second

Origami Around
No title available

if i look back, i am lost
Sade Olutola
wallacepolsom

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

seen from Malaysia

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Estonia
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Azerbaijan

seen from Sri Lanka
seen from Singapore
seen from France

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Singapore
seen from Germany

seen from Germany
seen from United States
@wretchedmeat
Putting anti-capitalist stickers on ads in NYC
Personally I hate AI because it uses slave labor, is killing the planet and is making people stupid, but that's just me. The soulless art aspect is just one little piece of my grander disdain.
wait how does AI use slave labor? Do you mean the human works that are stolen and not credited or compensated? Because technically under capitalism everything is exploited but there are varying degrees
Aside from the scraping, AI tech companies, including openAI/chatGPT, have outsourced training their models to countries in the global south, specifically Kenya in openAI's case. These workers are working in sweatshop conditions for less than 2 bucks USD per hour. I'm on mobile, but if you search 'openAI Kenya slave labor' and related keywords, you can find multiple articles about it.
Training AI takes a heavy toll on Kenyan workers, who say they earned $2 an hour to label and sift through gruesome content for American com
I think about this so goddamn often. Even the good uses are trained on slave labor.
Wambalo and other digital workers spent eight hours a day in front of a screen studying photos and videos, drawing boxes around objects and labeling them, teaching AI algorithms to recognize them. Human labelers tag cars and pedestrians to teach autonomous vehicles not to hit them. Humans circle abnormalities in CTs, MRIs and X-rays to teach AI to recognize diseases. Even as AI gets smarter, humans in the loop will always be needed because there will always be new devices and inventions that'll need labeling.
Humans in the loop are found not only in Kenya, but also in India, the Philippines and Venezuela. They're often countries with low wages but large populations — well educated, but unemployed.
The pay for humans in the loop is $1.50-2 an hour. "And that is gross, before tax," Wambalo said. Wambalo, Nathan Nkunzimana and Fasica Berhane Gebrekidan were employed by SAMA, an American outsourcing company that hired for Meta and OpenAI. SAMA, based in the California Bay Area, employed over 3,000 workers in Kenya. Documents reviewed by 60 Minutes show OpenAI agreed to pay SAMA $12.50 an hour per worker, much more than the $2 the workers actually got, though SAMA says what it paid is a fair wage for the region.
It's destroying the environment. It's taking advantage of people who're desperate. It's traumatizing them for dollars an hour--if they're lucky and they aren't denied their pay for no reason. I think about this a lot, that these people were made to look at awful and disgusting and illegal things for the sake of training these stupid AI.
"I looked at people being slaughtered," Wambalo said. "People engaging in sexual activity with animals. People abusing children physically, sexually. People committing suicide." Berhane Gebrekidan thought she'd been hired for a translation job, but she said what she ended up doing was reviewing content featuring dismembered bodies and drone attack victims.
[...]
SAMA says mental health counseling was provided by "fully-licensed professionals." Workers say it was woefully inadequate.
It's just absurd and disgusting and infuriating. Yes the good applications are worth humans working on. It's not a bad thing--if the people employed to do the work are compensated appropriately and cared for. But so many of the uses are just unnecessary.
It just. Sucks. And all they'd have to do to make it suck just a litte bit less would be to pay people appropriately, give them access to the counseling needs they have, treat them like human beings worthy of respect and care on a basic fucking level. It wouldn't resolve the environmental issues or the fact that people are thinking less and less for themselves in the name of getting all of their answers from gen AI but at least they could do one thing to make it a little less The Worst Thing Ever.
I feel like every day I learn a new reason why AI is terrible
anti-fatness is not just body shaming.
anti-fatness is discrimination. anti-fatness is having next to no legal protections for being discriminated against. anti-fatness is being denied housing, jobs, receiving less pay and promotions (legally) because of your size. anti-fatness is being denied access to clothing, seating, transportation, and other human rights because infrastructure has been designed to exclude you. anti-fatness is less likelihood of receiving a fair trial. anti-fatness is dehumanization. anti-fatness is being denied necessary surgeries, but not surgery that amputates the digestive tract with the intent to starve and shrink you (it doesn’t work either). anti-fatness is mutilation. anti-fatness is being subject to torture devices that bolt your mouth shut. anti-fatness is being told by close friends, family, and professionals that you are better off living with an eating disorder or other life-threatening illness. anti-fatness sells you starvation as a guaranteed opt-out of oppression, but doesn’t tell you that bodies will always regain weight to survive. anti-fatness blames and punishes you for failing at an achievement that is quite literally impossible. anti-fatness is a $90 billion dollar industry. anti-fatness is being denied gender-affirming care. anti-fatness is being barred from in vitro fertilization and reproductive healthcare. anti-fatness is being barred from adopting children. anti-fatness is being removed from your loving parents because they couldn’t make you thin. anti-fatness is intentionally starving your own baby so they won’t get fat. anti-fatness is disproportionately high suicide rates. anti-fatness is being killed at the hands of medical neglect and mistreatment. anti-fatness is the world preferring a dead body over a fat one.
reblogging this again because so many people still do not realize that fat liberation is deeply political. fat liberation is not body positivity. it is not about loving yourself or being non-judgemental. it is about THIS. 👆
the way ozempic has finally made the fact that eating healthy and exercising doesn't necessarily make you thin well known and society's reaction to this is not "oh i guess being thin or fat doesn't actually show if you're healthy" but "oh i guess everyone should be on this drug"
I hate that this is infact how ozempic is viewed now because I watched, in real time, how my mothers diabetes got significantly better on ozempic, she didn't start it for weight loss, infact she started it before it even got big for weight loss, but all people can talk about is the weight loss on ozempic and not how good it is as a diabetes medication. Watching my mom find energy and happiness because for once a drug wasn't making her lethargic and miserable was wonderful, she was able to feel better, but then it was spouted as this miracle weight loss drug, and suddenly she just couldn't access it anymore at a good price. Not only has the ozempidemic made fatphobia normal in an already fatphobic society but it's making it harder to access for people who genuinely need it because it's seen as a luxury cosmetic drug.
knowing when not to open the comments is a skill
internet soft skills
not opening the comments
letting people be wrong
letting people be wrong about YOU
letting people have a bad impression of you (see above)
knowing when your input isn't needed
spotting bot comments
block button
blocking tip: you don't have to wait to have a negative interaction with someone to block them. you can block them without ever interacting with them. I can't tell you how many times I've seen someone being rude to someone else and preemptively blocked them
"why'd they block me? we've never talked" bro if i see you being nasty to the bartender i'm not gonna chat you up
"Masking has been politicized" doesn't capture the full truth of what's going on.
Masks have been identified as the visual trigger for a problem, not the solution to multiple pressing public health issues.
To please right wing elements in the desperate hope of stealing *checks notes* fascist support for an openly fascist party, the center-right Democrats in the US with Joe Biden as their figurehead worked to downplay the continued necessity of masking even as studies on viral genetics find that vax-only methods for controlling covid cause more rapid and effective viral immune escape to become dominant, does little to actually prevent spread of the illness (especially in enclosed spaces), and has showed that doctors are willing to toe a political line instead of following scientific and medical best practices for halting the spread of a communicable disease which is still killing more Americans than breast and prostate cancer combined.
People who refuse to mask in public spaces, stay home when sick, use tests, or otherwise refuse to take covid seriously as a public health threat have shifted politically to the right.
People who mock and belittle those still taking precautions have adopted political positions identical to the "cough in my mouth" pandemic deniers of 2020 and are pushing full blown eugenics about who should be allowed to safely navigate public life.
"Has been" implies a past tense, an end to the pattern. Masking *contines* to be politicized. A public health tool has been narratively relegated to the bin of "public health tools that don't work" as it continues to be roped in with ideas like enforced distancing and face shields to prevent the spread of airborne illness.
Public health agencies refuse to take the scientifically confirmed threat of aerosols spread just by breathing seriously, pushing handwashing as the number one prevention for illnesses that can linger on poorly ventilated indoor air for dozens of minutes to dozens if hours given the right conditions.
This is a global effort to deny responsibility for a continuing crisis as covid continues to spread and long covid rates have skyrocketed, especially in children where the condition has surpassed asthma as the leading chronic illness in children. This is a failure by medicine to keep up with science and remain apolitical. This is a failure of public health to act in the defense of all. This is the normalization of fascist eugenics in daily life.
"Masks have been politicized" is trying to say ^ all of that ^
Mask up. Keep us safe. Keep you safe.
Same exact playbook, down to the "but it was based on a lie."
It's kind of amazing how much this is the identical strategy. Focusing on the distress and harm of parents over the trans or autistic person themselves. Pathologizing the condition treating it as an epidemic, including calling it a social contagion causing a worrying "explosion" of diagnosis because it is "trendy."
Ignoring the experts on the subject while also appealing to "common sense" and dismissing all research that contradicts them while also appealing to "basic science."
Plus it's all the same quacks and actors behind previous medical and social moral panics saying them same things in the same ways and no one seems to acknowledge that.
she says in the article that she was inspired to think this way about autism after she started reporting on detransitioners. Her Twitter mentions are filled with prominent voices in the detrans terf movement. This isn't just similar, It is quite self-consciously an extension of the same movement.
isupportforcefem and the white trans problem, or: bringing up black people to look less like a rape culture advocate
note: before you say anything know that this post was written by a black woman who is not going to take your hit dog hollering seriously
one thing myself and others have noticed from isupportforcefem is a bizarre inclination to shoving "and black people" where it isn't at all required. issues that directly affect transfems have an "and black people" tacked on to make the reader consider that not only is what being discussed transmisogynistic, but potentially racist, and wouldn't that just be terrible? The constant juxtaposition comes across as though isff believes accusations of transmisogyny to not be serious enough, whereas beefing such discrimination up with potential racism makes others more liable to consider it "real".
take these two posts:
these posts are based on a false premise: the idea that, in tandem with trans people being constantly falsely accused of rape, black people are also constantly falsely accused of rape.
I do not know any people, black or nonblack, cis or trans, who have been falsely accused of rape. the idea that false rape accusations are 1. a source of discrimination that these specific groups face and 2. a commonality between them requires you to believe that
false rape accusations are commonly made, and
for some reason trans people and black people are constantly accused of this
this requires you to align yourself with the misogynistic belief that false accusations of rape are constantly weaponised against the accused. the premise requires you to believe that there are squawking harpies constantly accusing innocents of rape, and that they must not be believed. pokeballvictimized's entire blog for the last few days has been trying to get you to believe that "actually who gets to determine what rape is?" is a line of logic a true transfeminist would follow and not logic imported straight from seething incels on 4chan.
the related "and black people" thing here is white transfems knowing a basic concept - that, in countries where we are minorities, black people are incarcerated at disproportionate rates; that we are more likely to be falsely accused of crimes; and that racially-based accusations of sexual assault and rape have, in cases, been weaponised against black men - and mixing these into a finely blended soup to run away with it. black people as a whole are similar to transfems because we are constantly accused of rape. black transfems are constantly accused of rape. where did they get that? don't worry about it, just know it's happening. the woman who confessed to choking a woman unconscious in a parking lot and complained about how mean people are being for bringing up that she choked a woman unconscious in a parking lot (highly recommend searching "anonsee" on bluesky to see what people have said about storyweavingspider, serial boundary violator during sex who tries to frame these assaults as just being part of kink!) is in support of it, and she's our token black woman, so it's all good. 👍
if you see yourself as someone who cares about women, who cares about victims of sexual violence, and who does not ally themselves with those who perpetrate sexual violence, you must see these posts for what they are: people who assume that everyone else is constantly being "falsely" accused of sexual harassment dragging black people into it because they need to look better. the idea of ubiquitous false allegations of rape and sexual assault is something coined by misogynistic men. no useful transfeminist analysis can operate under the assumption that waves of innocents are being falsely accused of rape while not addressing what this says: that malintentioned vile creatures are doing the accusing, that they are lying, that whatever assault or rape they report is an attempt to have someone unpersoned and socially murdered. you must also see it as an inherently racist act to bring up black people solely to go "a-and it's not just me, black transfems i mean uh people get this too!"
if you are surrounded by people constantly accused of rape it would do you good to assess exactly what sort of company you are keeping. "My friends are constantly accused of rape" is a line only people like Bret from the frat house, iignoremissingstairs86 from IRC and John Politics the senator should be capable of saying, because these are the types of people who would keep accused rapists in their company. false accusations of sexual violence form a very small fraction of total accusations, and these false accusations are usually vague accusations with no named perpetrator. the idea that a specific group of people are constantly targeted by false accusations of sexual violence flies in the face of what we know to be fact about sexual violence reporting and statistics.
again, consider: what benefit do these people derive from going "and black people" when talking about issues very specific to them and their online circles of people who seemingly constantly engage in behaviour worthy of being accused of sexual violence? they want you to connect the struggle that black people have in proving our innocence when accused of crimes with their struggle: being ostracised from communities for behaviour ranging from sexual harassment to outright sexual assault. they want you to equivocate these struggles because they earnestly believe that systemic discrimination against black people is equivalent to their former friendcord's self-policing.
this is something that only someone racist is capable of. make no mistake about it. there is nothing innocent about bringing up black people in an exaggerated defense against "false" accusations of sexual violence. they want you to feel guilty because you, the reader, know that systems are stacked against black people, and they want you to feel that their "struggle" - being constantly accused of sexual assault, something they attempt to paint as normal for trans people - is equivalent. do not believe them. it is transphobic and racist rhetoric and these people should be shamed.
I will conclude this with another post from isupportforcefem shoving black people into unnecessary hyperonline transfem discourse:
note that again black people are brought up where we are irrelevant. the gun that kills transfems And Black People. because us black people are constantly hurting others, you see, just as transfems are constantly hurting others - but don't worry, we aren't worth ostracising, even if we do constantly hurt people. you have to include us for our mistakes. said mistakes may range from being racist to being a rapist. but please forgive us. social ostracisation is on par with murder after all.
note the final post that would make Brock Turner proud: "accountability is a lie made to hurt underprivileged members." the concept of recognising the missing stair is, to people like isff, a form of oppression in itself: to warn people about someone's past behaviour is as good as pulling the trigger on them yourself. accountability of any form, including accountability as minor as no longer being allowed to participate in a community with someone you have harmed, is a falsehood - because by doing this to protect others you are hurting the feelings of someone who has done wrong, and transfems And Black People Btw who are more likely to do wrong somehow will be really hurt :(
Damn this post was eye-opening. And so true. I don't know a single person in my life who has been falsely accused of rape, but I sure do know a lot of rape survivors falsely accused of being "hysterical" or "oversensitive" or "manipulative" or "trying to ruin a good person's life over a misunderstanding."
False accusations are not a problem on the scale people on this site want us to think it is. I remember when "false accusations" were rightly seen as a misogynistic whataboutism meant to derail talks about rape culture. Now we're doing "but false accusations!!!" Wokely, so it's okay... what the fuck ever. And the racism of trying to use black people as a human shield against this "problem" is just... vile. (Obviously this is different from people trying to, say, classify drag shows near children or teaching them about Pride as pedophilia; that actually IS pedojacketing. But even then, note that the accusation isn't coming from any of the children who would be seeing a drag performer, but instead from the government twisting the language to begin with... so still it's not an example of a lying, false victim making accusations.)
Plus it doesn't escape my notice that usually, the people getting accused of "predatorjacketing" the trans people in these instances are themselves queer; it's blatantly putting trans victims below trans predators on the hierarchy. If it really was about protecting trans people, there would be a desire to remove predators from the community before they could hurt more people. Not to protect the predators from the consequences of THEIR OWN ACTIONS. It was always about protecting predators over the victims, even when those victims are trans, all along.
Oh I am so mad. I can't believe I let people on this site convince me to start using such an inherently anti-survivor sentiment in the name of "protecting" marginalized people. It's been feminism 101 for DECADES that "false accusations" are a wildly exaggerated phenomenon and the language around it exists solely to delegitimize rape victims. But they put a leftist coat of paint on it, intertwined it with racial issues and with the government passing laws with language intended to target queer people, and had me buying it, hook line and sinker when it was just repackaged rape apologism all along. They fucking exploited my desire not to harm people through systemic violence. Oh I am so fucking maddddd
Sorry to reblog-spam, and especially with a novella of a reply, but I keep thinking about this.
One thing I noticed too is that the fear is always "what if you're falsely accusing a trans woman of being a predator? What then? What if you singlehandedly get trans women killed? Is that what you want?"
But there's never fear the other way. "What if we're ignoring a victim of sexual harassment, abuse, rape, or other sexual violence? What if we're perpetrating rape culture by silencing victims? What if we create an environment where missing stairs operate with impunity? What if our collective indifference to sexual assault causes a victim to commit suicide?"
There is already a society-wide presumption that false accusations do more harm than actual sexual violence, and that predators are more worthy of protection than people they victimize. There's already an implicit, built-in framework that the victims are the ones at fault. They should have fought harder, not dressed that way, not been into kink, not refused to do kink, not been impressionable young people... The victims have to act carefully so as not to cause "undue" harm to the one who hurt them. The victims are the ones expected to act responsibly. Their pain is secondary to the hypothetical pain making an accusation could cause. Even though false accusations just do not actually lead to the kind of life-ruining people say it does. People accused of rape, DV, harassment, and other crimes rarely have any problem becoming politicians, musicians, athletes, priests, teachers, and other respected figures after this comes to light.
Notice that all the "false" allegations made against high-profile trans women on this site have never harmed them beyond their blog getting deleted for de facto violations of the site's terms of service (IE death threats), which is inevitably followed by them returning within a week as banned-account-2 and subsequently being left alone. That's what the racist queer people on this site call "lynching." For all they insist, MRA-style, that a false accusation will LITERALLY RUIN LIVES, it has never happened within the Tumblr queer community. In fact, most of the ones who have "had their lives ruined" have gained more support, more followers, and more influence in the community after...... kinda like in real life.
On the other hand, I've seen victims of their behavior harassed into attempting and possibly committing suicide, including MINORS. I've seen victims doxxed, threatened with rape, stalked, isolated from their own communities while their abuser is welcomed with open arms... you name it.
Once again: it's victims of sexual violence who are at risk of having their lives ruined, not "victims of false accusations," and yet everyone acts as though the latter are the ones in need of protection. Because vengeful, lying little shrews are everywhere, just waiting to ruin lives with malicious false accusations. And if you happen to get wrongly lumped in as a false accuser, oh well, suck it up buttercup, no one cares about something so insignificant as sexual harassment. You should be lucky you were only sexually harassed instead of being falsely accused of sexual harassment. Imagine how much worse it would have been for you!
It's parasitizing your empathy, that's what it is. It's taking your natural desire to good and help marginalized people, and shifting it from the people who do deserve it (people who have been harmed by bad actors in the community [and note that by far, most victims of bad actors in the queer community are themselves queer, so this behavior of denying victims recourse is queerphobic and dangerous to the queer community!]) towards predators who can speak well, have large followings, and convinced people that accusing any trans woman of sexual misconduct in any circumstances makes you a JK Rowling-level TERF.
And again, the race issue here, the inherent antiblackness of framing this as something that constantly happens to black people as a way of shielding themselves- that's another form of parasitizing. It's not "black people are disproportionately accused and convicted of crimes, and most wrongfully convicted death row convicts are black too- we need to help those folks," it's "black people and trans people are constantly falsely accused of rape, just, all the time, we need to help trans people, and a few of the black trans people who happen to agree with us on all these issues." It's basic feminism that false accusations are an anti-feminist, anti-victim dogwhistle; by trying to associate black folks with it, on a site where A HUGE NUMBER of black people have already been run off due to antiblackness... it muddies the waters ON PURPOSE. It makes it seem like to be a proper ally to the trans community and the black community, you HAVE to buy into the misogynistic canard that false accusations happen OFTEN. It repackages misogyny in a Woke, rainbow-colored box. The fucking nerve to use black folks that way!!
If the Anonsee debacle had happened today, her victims would absolutely have been labeled transmisogynists and run off the site. Her victims would have been labeled dangerous, lying, transmisogynistic predatorjacketers not to be trusted in the community.
It's becoming increasingly clear that too much of the queer community on this site learned NOTHING from the MeToo movement. Actually, worse than learning nothing at all, what they "learned" is that "believe victims" is some kind of dangerous sentiment made solely to oppress queer people. They view sexual harassment or assault as a minor inconvenience that pales in comparison to the trauma of being accused of sexual harassment or assault.
That's really, really sad. Basic feminist principles, like "false accusations are not nearly as big a problem as rape culture itself" have been entirely discarded.
False accusations are not a real issue. Never have been and never will be. But silencing victims under the guise of preventing false accusations is VERY real.
Ending by echoing the OP, here: How many people do you guys know who have been wrongfully accused of rape, DV, sexual harassment, or other sexual violence? And how many people do you guys know who have been victims of rape, DV, sexual harassment, or other sexual violence, but were dismissed as "wrongful accusers?"
My tally: 0 falsely accused, dozens of victims not believed or written off as liars.
> looking at a new popular collectible
> ask the people if it's objects or gambling
> they don't understand
> pull out illustrated diagram explaining what is objects and what is gambling
> they laugh and say "it's a good collectible sir"
> look up how to buy a collectible
> its gambling
> #wait are labubu's blind bags?!
Labubus are blind bags but they're also blind bags with some of the most insane dark patterns stacked on top. The online store for them has a thing where they tell you what you got the second you order it online so that you can immediately try again if you didn't get the thing you wanted.
There's also a shake feature that is designed to encourage you to buy more than one by narrowing down the possibility space on a crate of options so that if you're hunting a specific model you can verify that it's guaranteed to be in one of these three IF you buy all three right now!!!!!
You can read more about what dark patterns are and how to spot them here.
The original website about deceptive patterns (also known as “dark patterns”) - tricks used in websites and apps that make you do things tha
That is a fucking awesome site everyone should visit. Don't skip the Hall of Shame.
I just thought of this post, which was actually how I learned what Dark Patterns are, because I tried to cancel my Adobe Acrobat subscription, and it took much longer than I anticipated because several times throughout the process it felt like it was intentionally trying to trick me into thinking I'd cancelled my subscription when I actually hadn't yet.
Please read up on Dark Patterns and learn how to recognize them.
Anyone who cleans public restrooms should automatically make $100/hr
Stuff like this makes me question if I’m actually passionate about anything
Although he lost the use of both legs, Xie Junwu from Jiangxi Province never lost his sense of freedom. Watch him take on a skateboard from
Urban Resets Prints | Ko-fi | Patreon | Bluesky ⭐
tuesday morning fat hource