I'm writing historical fiction and I'm reading a lot of contradicting information on the time period and different interpretations of events. Is it best to write with the version of history most people are familiar with or use the more modern, revisionist interpretation?
Eep, okay, well Iâm sorry to hear the research isnât going well. Do make sure youâre researching in the right places and the stuff youâre reading is by actual historians/professionals and not Joe Bob or Rainbow Mountainâs Blog of Skewed Opinions (unfortunately either can also be âprofessionalsâ). Donât use the ârevisionist interpretationâ unless itâs genuinely concrete and accurate, as opposed to an inaccurate and biased âversionâ of history weâre familiar with. Sometimes history surprises you. Sometimes your teachers are wrong. Sometimes people really want history to look their way when it didnât. Learn to be discerning.
If itâs simply an area of history that was not well documented or was from a time that could not be recorded, itâs possible we still donât have the accurate history. Therefore, theories will fly and âinformationâ will be contradictory. I say this only because Iâve had asks expecting non-existent historical info from me, lol.
Go to a library or an actual online database if the era/location/events youâre researching are not showing up on the first page of Google or all youâre getting is conflicting info.
May I ask what era youâre researching? Itâs possible youâre just having a research issue and I might be able to help (I can reply in private if youâd like).





















