Billionaires lie. All the time.
cherry valley forever
No title available
art blog(derogatory)

izzy's playlists!
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

PR's Tumblrdome
Monterey Bay Aquarium

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
No title available
dirt enthusiast
$LAYYYTER

Love Begins

@theartofmadeline
RMH

titsay
taylor price
Keni
Not today Justin
No title available
seen from Netherlands

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia

seen from Greece
seen from Germany

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Australia

seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from Netherlands
seen from T1
seen from United States
seen from United States
@ymalcal
Billionaires lie. All the time.
Analyzing the politics of a work that's meant to be apolitical is actually a really interesting exercise because it asks you to critically examine what the creator considers to be "political" in the first place. Which ideas are just How Things Are, and which ones are Political, and how is that influenced by the creator's beliefs?
Usually this just ends up with you looking like a moron btw
Angrily lashing out at the suggestion that it's possible to do basic media analysis was foundational to the ragebait ecosystem of the 2010s, from which we got basically the entire culture of modern far right politics, btw.
I genuinely believe myself and others are being so sincere and literal when we say TOUCH GRASS
I went outside and got an education, that's where I learned that you can obtain knowledge and insight through analytical methods, then noticed that some people who sit on the internet yelling at strangers get really mad about that constantly.
So actually if you really wanted to use your analysis skills you'd realize that what people are annoyed about is the implication that there's never a story or creative work they can create that can escape people like you attempting to assign political meaning to it when they just don't want that. That in fact people's presumptions about life are not, in fact, political (at best they are cultural, which is not an inherently facet of politics). And that by you people arrogantly pushing this idea you are intruding on the fact that a lot of people use fiction as escapism from politics and insisting that "urm no actually your favourite cartoon actually has politics cause no human being is 100% unbiased" is in fact, supremely fucking annoying
"Stop having fun wrong, it ruins my fun when you have fun wrong, it's not enough for me to just scroll past the analysis I don't like, if anyone anywhere is saying that the cartoon exists in a political context that's undermining my enjoyment of it!"
That's you. That's what you sound like.
If your "fun" involves deliberately and knowingly doing something that annoys and irritates people then yes you are having fun wrong, its also not just about you doing analysis; if it was just that you can do that in your head, but you don't, you insist upon other people and upon their work when its clearly not welcome or appreciated. Keep your thoughts to yourself
I am talking about posting on my own blog and engaging with posts by others who are doing the same thing, and you are responding to my post. Do you understand the irony of what you just said?
I mean, I may be a bad political scientist (apologies to my university for the very expensive degree I underutilize and may misrepresent haha), but almost everything in life /is/ political because that is simply the nature of the world we live in. Culture and society and art and infrastructure and literature and even science are all political because the way we engage with things is political.
The difference is how you interpret what it means to be political as a whole. That's the whole basis of political theory and why it so closely intersects with philosophy and psychology. We, as people, exist under social constructs and contracts that we engage with every day and these things are basis for our political world. Which is why it's so silly when people insist that they are apolitical or that things should remain apolitical, because nothing ever really is and the choice to abstain from discourse or dialogue around topics is, in itself, a political act.
Do you think it's weird and/or predatory for a 13 year-old and a 30 year-old to be best friends if they're not family members or related by blood? Assuming everything is innocent and platonic. Nothing romantic or sexual.
Yes, it's weird and predatory
It's weird. But not predatory
It's predatory. But not weird
No, it's not weird or predatory
*This poll was submitted to us and we simply posted it so people could vote and discuss their opinions on the matter. If you’d like for us to ask the internet a question for you, feel free to drop the poll of your choice in our inbox and we’ll post them anonymously (for more info, please check our pinned post).
unpopular opinion but I don't think there's anything weird or predatory about an innocent friendship
The question is why the fuck is a thirty year old hanging out with a 13 year old if not in their family?? The only other relation that could have them interact is through teacher/student and bring friends like that would be weird as fuck
found family? the kid not feeling safe in their house? the adult wanting to help? family / teacher / school isn't always a guaranteed safe place. should the kid and adult each have friends that are their own age too? sure. but if their friendship is genuinely innocent then I think the problem isn't them but people who project their weird and predatory thoughts onto them
Don't forget shared hobbies?
A 13 year old and a 30 year old could reasonably meet at a tabletop gaming store, a fiber arts group, a book club....
They could literally just be neighbors. This whole isolationist thing of never even talking to the people you live closest to is new and weird.
It is important to human social development to have extra-parental adults as advisors and role models!
Look the 13yo which has safe and healthy relationships with other adults that are not part of their family, they're probably safer than kids that don't because they have someone outside of their closed circle to ask for help.
Also stop pretending that kids are fucking aliens ffs, or that they're babies until they hit the magical age of 18! A 13yo is just as funny, creative, and thoughtful as anyone else, they don't unlock new ways of thinking or feeling, all the software is on board! Teenagers and kids are fully human and I am so sick of people acting as though a kid has nothing to offer in a friendship and that their presence must be a burden to everyone!!!
Youth lib is treating kids as human beings, and by isolating kids and young people from everyone who isn't their own age or an authority, you put them at more risk! Adult friends model appropriate behaviour, allowing the young person (who is at risk of manipulation and abuse due to limited life experience, not because they're a little baby who's brain isn't formed yet) to know when behaviour from adults is inappropriate.
A young person with adult friends can also approach them and go "hey Alex is making me feel really uncomfortable, is that weird or am I overreacting" and have their friend go "Alex is doing what?? No you're absolutely not overreacting, you don't have to put up with that." And help them get out of a situation before it develops.
I dont take issue with the friendship itself necessarily. I'm 10 yrs older Than my niece and my best best friend formed a friendship with her independent of me because I brought them into proximity so often.
I take issue with the "best friend" part of the relationship implied in OP's poll. The other scenarios on the post indicate that there are other healthy friendships to consider in those relationships, both with other adults and other people their own age. In that case, sure a friendship seems okay and above board, friendships built on mutual interests or hobbies or etc. But we cannot deny that there is 100% a power imbalance when a friendship involves such an age gap, and there's something slippery slope like about the implications of a "best friend" type relationship. Idk, maybe it's all the childhood trauma clouding my perspective on this one, but that distinction gives weird vibes to me.
A mentorship or guardian type relationship or friendship built solely around mutual hobbies/interests, and so forth, all give different connotations to the level of involvement or time spent or how that time is spent together, and those don't give the same weird connotations as a "best friend" relationship between those ages.
Always bear in mind that there is absolutely no legitimate evidence that Luigi was actually the one who killed the insurance company guy.
Of course he wasn't. He was at a party with me that day.
No but like literally, actually. All bits aside.
He didn't do it.
The cops very clearly planted evidence on him because they had to make an arrest because all eyes were on them and whoever actually did the deed was making them look stupid.
Why would the real killer hero have kept the weapon on his person and traveled two states over while carrying it and a manifesto in his bag, conveniently turning the crime into a federal matter? The same guy whose bag they found in a park, filled with monopoly money? Why did the police turn off their bodycams, take Luigi's stuff, drive a block away, turn their bodycams back on, go back into the restaurant, and then arrest him?
From the moment of his arrest, even left-of-center media has been presuming his guilt without examining anything (e.g. calling him "the killer" instead of "alleged" or "accused") and then when I say he didn't do it, the nearest person chimes in with some quip that tells me they think he did do it but should go free anyway. Don't get me wrong, I would have the same attitude if he had done it. But he didn't. It makes me feel like the only sane person in the world, even among my staunchly leftist friends.
I know like nothing about hockey, but I feel from the little I do know that the most unrealistic part of Off Campus for me has been that Graham somehow could be in deep shit or risking his future for taking off his gloves and starting a fight on the ice?
Like I doubt this is an original thought, but wouldn't that be like a perk? Like a "oh look he can fight too!" Kinda thing?
did perfectionism ever truly protect you from harm or neglect as a child though. ultimately. Lol
[REALLY NORMAL AND WELL-ADJUSTED VOICE] well you never know maybe it COULD have saved me. if i ever actually achieved perfection. it could have happened then. if i was actually ever enough. Which i was not
please god let chatgpt die out like nfts did. With a fast and graceless fall into irrelevancy
Like to charge, reblog to cast.
This spell has a very low hit ratio, so we need a lot of us to do it.
"There's millions of Tumblr users" to you. To me there's only about 12 and we all reblog the same five posts from each other
swag won’t pay the bills but apparently neither will your degree
I can't be the first to make this connection
y'all slept on the first chart but I will make the world see my vision
...Can I add this