just when thru my likes....promise im not going through anybody’s blogs!

祝日 / Permanent Vacation

Andulka
🪼
RMH
YOU ARE THE REASON
Stranger Things
Today's Document
DEAR READER

Origami Around
hello vonnie
$LAYYYTER

No title available
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Monterey Bay Aquarium

@theartofmadeline
art blog(derogatory)
One Nice Bug Per Day
styofa doing anything
No title available

#extradirty
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from United States
seen from Italy

seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from Iraq

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from France
seen from United States
@yocheveds
just when thru my likes....promise im not going through anybody’s blogs!
mood for 2018
This one’s an older poem titled “Gaze.”
“Warrior Virgins and Boston Marriages: Spinsterhood in History and Culture,” Micaela di Leonardo (1985), p. 48. DOI: 10.1007/BF02685577
“Some periods of our growth are so confusing that we don’t even recognize that growth is happening. We may feel hostile or angry or weepy and hysterical, or we may feel depressed. It would never occur to us, unless we stumbled on a book or a person who explained to us, that we were in fact in the process of change, of actually becoming larger, spiritually, than we were before. Whenever we grow, we tend to feel it, as a young seed must feel the weight and inertia of the earth as it seeks to break out of its shell on its way to becoming a plant. Often the feeling is anything but pleasant. But what is most unpleasant is the not knowing what is happening. Those long periods when something inside ourselves seems to be waiting, holding its breath, unsure about what the next step should be, eventually become the periods we wait for, for it is in those periods that we realize that we are being prepared for the next phase of our life and that, in all probability, a new level of the personality is about to be revealed.”
— Alice Walker, Living by the Word (via themindmovement)
Ladies and Gentlemen, the Fabulous Stains dir. Lou Adler
“I believe that there are people who truly dislike romantic gestures, in the same way that there are people who truly dislike sweets. And it’s certainly true that a lot of what passes for “romance” in our broad cultural definition—the Jumbotron proposal, the bed covered in rose petals—has been neatly split from genuine emotion, like a painted eggshell blown clear of its guts. It’s a charade of romance, a mask we give straight men to wear when they’re frightened or confused by showing their naked face. I truly did not want that, and I still don’t, and I never will. Being dragooned into acting as a partner in these romantic pageants is like having one of those dreams where you’re hauled up unprepared on stage. But attentiveness, consideration, compliments, small and large kindnesses, feeling truly loved, having someone put you first while you put them first because you’re in cahoots to make each other’s lives easier and better: most people do like that, when it’s thoughtful and sincere. It’s here, more than in the big gestures, that romance lives: in being actively caring and thoughtful, in a way that is reciprocal but not transactional. And yet, for most of my life, I never would have asked for or expected such a thing. Many women wouldn’t, even the ones who secretly or not-so-secretly pine to be treated like a princess. It’s one thing to fantasize about a perfect proposal or an expensive gift; that’s high-maintenance, sure, but it’s also par for the course. It’s asking something from a man, but primarily it’s asking him to step into an already-choreographed mating dance. But asking to be thought of, understood, prioritized: this is a request so deep it is almost unfathomable. It’s a voracious request, the demand of the attention whore. Women talk ourselves into needing less, because we’re not supposed to want more—or because we know we won’t get more, and we don’t want to feel unsatisfied. We reduce our needs for food, for space, for respect, for help, for love and affection, for being noticed, according to what we think we’re allowed to have. Sometimes we tell ourselves that we can live without it, even that we don’t want it. But it’s not that we don’t want more. It’s that we don’t want to be seen asking for it. And when it comes to romance, women always, always need to ask.”
— Jess Zimmermann, Hunger Makes Me
“intimacy means that we can be who we are in a relationship, and allow the other person to do the same. ‘Being who we are’ requires that we can talk openly about things that are important to us, that we take a clear position on where we stand on important emotional issues, and that we clarify the limits of what is acceptable and tolerable to us in a relationship. ‘Allowing the other person to do the same’ means that we can stay emotionally connected to that other party who thinks, feels, and believes differently, without needing to change, convince, or fix the other. An intimate relationship is one in which neither party silences, sacrifices, or betrays the self and each party expresses strength and vulnerability, weakness and competence in a balanced way.”
— Harriet Lerner in The Dance of Intimacy, p. 3 (via fatemareads)
Interview with Carmen Maria Machado
そうして私たちはプールに金魚を、(And So We Put Goldfish In the Pool) 2017
“Self-sabotage is often a way of avoiding that moment of showing up, of facing potential loss, of being strong enough and courageous enough to surrender to the unknown — but also, to surrender to the goodness of ordinary human beings.” “When we’re immature and addicted to fantasies and we resist surrender, when we live in the world of “I have to be on top, charming, impressive, better than anyone else, and only then will I deserve love/success/happiness/high-caliber friends and lovers,” we view surrender and being present as the realm of sad drippy nothing people who speak in sentimental cliches but fail to set themselves apart, who connect but aren’t original, who commune with others, but only because they’re a little simple or a little stupid. Or they’re suckers who will get hurt eventually. Or all of the above. The beauty of surrender, though, is that, contrary to your prejudices against it, it isn’t stagnant and sad. It doesn’t keep you small or hurt. It propels you forward, into a world of connection and feeling that not only generates more love and inspiration and hope, but also gives you inspired, clear, focused, generous energy that you can share with anyone. It’s so sad that the active resistance to high-capitalist fantasies is painted as the stuff of hippies and commies and losers in our commerce-dominated world, because it’s the difference between alienated suffering and feeling alive and good and real and in love, not just with one person but with the whole world.”
Ask Polly: ‘How Do I Stop Sabotaging My Amazing New Relationship?’
I’d like to add a piece of wisdom from Gertrude Stein: ‘Act so there is no use in a center.’ That’s what I try to teach my students.
Anne Carson, in Unwriting The Books of the Dead, Anne Carson and Robert Currie on Translation, Collaboration, and History (via antigonick)
“Don’t / Accommodate: write in blood or don’t bother.”
— Sina Queyras, from “I Know a Queen That Swallowed a Sword, I Don’t Know Why She Swallowed That Sword, I Guess She’ll Cry,” My Ariel (via rcmeomontague)
‘Male Fantasies’ examined the inner lives of German fascists and reached a horrifying conclusion
Misogyny is integral to fascism.
When Erich Muhsam wrote about the counter revolution that crushed the Bavarian Council Republic in 1918, he said that a common belief among the right wing soldiers was that communists planned to “nationalize the women”, and this was a major source of their anger.
Male Fantasies PDF
It is imperative to ask why and how this obscure Canadian academic, who insists that gender and class hierarchies are ordained by nature and validated by science, has suddenly come to be hailed as the West’s most influential public intellectual. Peterson rails against “softness,” arguing that men have been “pushed too hard to feminize,” like other hyper-masculinist thinkers before him who saw compassion as a vice and urged insecure men to harden their hearts against the weak (women and minorities) on the grounds that the latter were biologically and culturally inferior. Peterson’s ageless insights are, in fact, a typical, if not archetypal, product of our own times: right-wing pieties seductively mythologized for our current lost generations.
Closer examination, however, reveals Peterson’s ageless insights as a typical, if not archetypal, product of our own times: right-wing pieties seductively mythologized for our current lost generations.
@beyonslayed do you remember the name of that Adorno piece everyone was discussing a while ago about irrational culture and fascism?
The Stars Down To Earth and other essays on the irrational in the culture