Companies that rushed to replace human labor with AI are now shelling out to have IRL workers to fix the technology's screwups.
Delicious. We love to see it.
@ralfmaximus
Ultimately, she spent 20 hours redoing the copy from scratch — and with her $100-per-hour rate, that meant her client was shelling out $2,000 for copy that likely would have ended up being far cheaper had a human just written it in the first place.
I love stories like this.
Get peer reviewed!
This is the problem though:
“Maybe I’m being naive,” the American marketer said, “but I think if you are very good, you won’t have trouble.”
It's great that the "very good" people aren't worried. But in my opinion, people who aren't "very good" still deserve to have a job. People who are mediocre at their job still deserve to have a job. People at entry level who are frankly very bad at their job because they are still learning also deserve a job. These are the real issues with AI replacing jobs, not the fact that the "very good" people are and will always be better than AI.
