Cloak, 1570-80
From the Museu del Disseny
tumblr dot com
official daine visual archive
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr

#extradirty
The Stonewall Inn

bliss lane

blake kathryn
Color Me Curious
NASA
No title available
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
No title available
Show & Tell
$LAYYYTER
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

titsay

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
Xuebing Du
The Bowery Presents
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Malaysia
seen from Türkiye
seen from Kenya
seen from Spain

seen from Iceland
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Côte d’Ivoire
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
@yourunderworldusa
Cloak, 1570-80
From the Museu del Disseny
Girl with a Pearl Earrings cosplay in a Han-dynasty costume (recreation of a dress uncovered in the mawangdui tombs)
Well this one aged like fucking milk
(Emphasis mine)
“When Philip Roth died in 2018 an era of unpalatable writing by men about men seemed to close. Roth, who often wrote about antagonistic relationships, was dogged by accusations of misogyny for his portrayals of women. Carmen Callil, the founder of Virago resigned from the judging panel of the Man Booker International Prize in 2011 when it was given to Roth: “he goes on and on and on about the same subject. It’s as though he’s sitting on your face and you can’t breathe”.”
Luke Brown, TLS
First things first, George Floyd didn’t have the chance to put down the damn book. The existence of a writer whose style you don’t like isn’t an imposition on you, Carmen.
Second, read the linked article. It’s about how male writers have become a bit scared of their own shadows w/r/t sexuality, having internalized the shame of dirty sock sexuality (my OP actually mentions Roth) and are trying to get out from under the shadow cast by criticisms of frank discussions of male libido written by men. If you’re down for a long read, it’s worth it.
Guys i am OBSESSED with this illustration by Leyendecker omg
Where do i even start
I am usually loathe to demystify Art but in this case context only makes it better: https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/kihm2.wordpress.com/2016/10/18/now-i-understand-3/amp/
So, three years ago, thanks to Jay Cornell, I saw this illustration by J.C. Leyendecker which appeared on the cover of the Saturday Evening
everyone reblog this version instead and go read the article i’m begging you all
Fuck dude you really can’t
This is the first ad I’ve seen on here that actually fits tumblr’s demographic
God when is art nouveau going to make a comeback.
tory government is such a fuckin joke the NHS has to rely on fetish sites for supplies
Imagine trying to explain this shit to Nye Bevan.
Seen a lot of takes lately like "the thing is most people don't have careers, they have jobs, deriving identity and purpose from your work is a PMC-specific thing"
And it makes me think of Mike Judge's High Neoliberal Exurban "Republican voters are diverse and nuanced" series King of the Hill, and how central it was to Hank Hill's identity that he had a workaday job he took as a calling
Like, try to imagine Al Bundy with a quarter of the passion for women's shoes that Hank has for propane and propane accessories
death grips is like if wesley willis shoved cotton balls in his mouth to do a marlon brando impression
I know just enough about these subjects to laugh but not enough to evaluate the claim
greek mythology and those nuns who claimed to have sex with jesus or whatever and probably a whole bunch of other religions make a whole lot of sense when you consider the “what kind of idiot would make a robot you can’t fuck” angle
just realized that this is kind of ambiguous between “what kind of god would make a human you can’t fuck” and “what kind of human would make a god you can’t fuck” which makes it a much better post than it was intended to be
“Well… At least we don’t have to worry about anarchy anymore.” USA, 1968
Ghetto Wars v2
I wasn’t happy with the colors on this one so here is another take. Greens and yellows are a lot of fun to play with. Also this will be a part of free drop that I will be uploading in a couple weeks including the “Magnum Opus” (that big ass weird inktober thing) and some other recent content. More info when it’s up. Another thing to start thinking about: The Kickstarter campaign for Downfall (Future is Now new book - follow up to Neon Rising) will go live on April 9
2019 is the Future https://www.instagram.com/p/BtT0zuXBq_9/?utm_source=ig_tumblr_share&igshid=1g79tbs71pvun
big necromunda vibes
Martin and his legs during WV tour
Did you know there are no rabbis? Or else that maybe there are only 70-ish rabbis in the world, all of whom are in Israel? Or maybe some other number? Sounds fake, but this is how I interpret https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semikhah .
Consider the difference between Protestant ministers and Catholic priests. Ministers are just people who passed all their classes at seminary and probably have good opinions about the Bible. Nobody claims otherwise. Priests are different. If you ask the Catholics, priests are special, holy, invested with mystical powers by God. You or I could perform the rite of confession, and it wouldn’t work - wouldn’t remove sins - because we don’t have mystical powers. It would be like a Muggle trying to cast avada kedavra. But priests are magic. They were ordained as priests by other priests, who were ordained by other priests, and so on back to Jesus himself, and this makes them a special class of humans.
Rabbis are like Protestant ministers. Trained in seminary, well-educated about Judaism, but no magic.
But that wasn’t always true. Up until 400 AD, there was a rabbinical ordination, similar to the Catholic priestly ordination, that supposedly formed a direct line back to Moses.
What happened? The Romans, in one of their periodic attempts to destroy the Jews, cracked down on rabbinical ordination. And Romans don’t do things halfway. They declared that if anyone gave rabbinical ordination, both the ordainer and the ordained would be killed, the town in which the ordination happened would be destroyed, and all crops within half a mile of the ordination would be burned.
But Jews also don’t do things halfway, so they kept doing rabbinical ordinations in secret for a few centuries, losing the occasional town along the way. It worked for a while, but eventually someone missed a step, and the line of rabbinical ordination probably died out around 400 AD.
After that, Jewish leaders stopped calling themselves rabbis, since even the most learned and important of them couldn’t get officially ordained. This state of affairs lasted a few centuries, until “rabbi” came back as kind of a colloquial usage, a sort of “we know he’s not a real rabbi, but he’s serving the rabbinical function, so we might as well use the title”, and then eventually everyone just forgot there could be another kind of rabbi and stopped caring.
The great Jewish scholar Maimonides wrote in the 1100s that if all the sages in Israel agreed someone was a rabbi, that would effectively confer upon them the true rabbinical ordination, and then they could ordain other people, and the line of rabbinical ordination would be back. In the 1500s, a scholar named Jacob Berab tried this. He moved to Israel, became universally recognized as the wisest and holiest person in the land, and then asked all the sages of Israel to declare him a real rabbi. The sages of Israel said yes, so he declared himself a real rabbi and started ordaining other people. But he had apparently forgotten to ask the Chief Rabbi of Jerusalem, and the Chief Rabbi of Jerusalem was so angry at being left out that he said no, calling the whole thing into question. There was a lot of debate over Maimonides’ use of the word “all”, and whether it literally meant “everyone” or was a figurative word that could mean “most”. Anyway, after few generations for some reason Berab’s lineal descendants stopped ordaining other people, so that line of ordination died out too, and there stopped being real rabbis again sometime in the 1600s.
Which brings us to 2004! A group of rabbis met in Israel and decided to re-re-create rabbinical ordination. They selected one among them, Rabbi Moshe Halberstam, as their guinea pig. Then they launched an advertising blitz around Israel asking everybody to agree Rabbi Halberstam was a real rabbi. They sent letters to hundreds of “Israel’s leading rabbis”, and claim that “none of them objected” - which was interesting since the plan was very divisive and the Wikipedia page about it has a Controversy section with eight sub-headings and 1,500 words. Probably this was one of those miracles that happens to the Jewish people from time to time. Having satisfied themselves as to the unanimity of the sages of Israel, they declared Rabbi Halberstam a real rabbi. Rabbi Halberstam then ordained other people, who ordained other people, and so on.
This is important because only real rabbis can serve on the Sanhedrin, the traditional governing body of the Jewish people. You haven’t heard much about this lately because there were no real rabbis, hence no Sanhedrin, hence no unified Jewish government. But after Rabbi Halberstam ordained seventy other rabbis, the number of real rabbis reached 71, the requirement for a Sanhedrin, and they called a Sanhedrin in the Israeli city of Tiberias. This provoked so much criticism that the Sanhedrinites walked back their claim, asking journalists to refer to them as “the attempted Sanhedrin”, and specifying that they’re just going to do some Sanhedrin-like things and not make any stronger claims until the rest of the world catches up with them. You can read about what they’ve been doing here . One of their first decrees was a statement of opposition to gay pride parades in Israel, which if nothing else makes me nod my head and say “Yeah, that seems like a real religious organization”. Good work sounding convincing, attempted Sanhedrin!
Since then, they’ve come up with other exciting new Jewish laws, like “you must vote for a religious party in Israeli elections”, and “Israeli soldiers may never withdraw from their occupation of Palestine” and “right-wing politics good, left-wing politics bad”. Maybe participation in a sketchy attempt to revive a 1700-year dead regressive religious organization selects for a certain type of person, who knows?
More traditional Jews believe that the Messiah will re-establish the Sanhedrin when he comes to redeem the Jewish people. But it’s going to be awkward if the Messiah comes and there’s a Sanhedrin already. What happens if there are two Sanhedrins? Three? Ten? Will we have to regularly take a vote of all the Sanhedrins to see who wins?
If yes, can we call that form of government a regular polyhedrin?
Role: Klytämnestra Singer: Jill Grove Opera: Elektra (R. Strauss)
Jill Grove portraying an extraordinarily vicious Queen Klytämnestra, mother of Elektra. I’m taken aback by the amazing stage design, I urge you to take a closer look at the last picture to catch all the details! I love the idea of having a bald Queen and bald handmaidens, such a striking contrast to Elektra’s (portrayed by Christine Goerke) long unkept hair.
Lyric Opera of Chicago, 2012.
THIS LOOKS AMAZING OH MY GOD