Tiles, Gustav Klimt
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

⁂
Claire Keane
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
ojovivo

roma★
Not today Justin

Janaina Medeiros
taylor price

izzy's playlists!
i don't do bad sauce passes
Show & Tell
Game of Thrones Daily
$LAYYYTER
No title available

shark vs the universe
Misplaced Lens Cap
Today's Document

Origami Around
hello vonnie
seen from China
seen from Egypt

seen from Russia
seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from Netherlands

seen from Switzerland

seen from China
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia

seen from South Korea

seen from Germany
seen from China
seen from New Zealand
seen from United States
seen from United States
@zone804
Tiles, Gustav Klimt
Gizem Akdag
Millions upon millions of posts, and tumblr has not produced a single critique of plant-based diets that isn't indistinguishable from violently insecure cope.
The amount of violent insecurity required to say shit like this.
OK, let's talk about how even if everyone went plant-based tomorrow, we would still have soil erosion, habitat loss and slave labour in agriculture. Not to mention the issues caused by pesticide run-off. And plant-based doesn't always mean less animal cruelty, as many animals are killed during plowing and harvesting, and that's not even getting into how many animals are killed in cruel and inhumane ways just for eating crops. For eating what replaced their usual food source. These animals are viewed as competition by many farmers.
What about the emissions released when the food has to be shipped across the planet to reach your table? It's hard to grow certain food products in environments they aren't native to. You can set up an animal farm pretty much anywhere and feed a community. We've been doing this exact thing since the birth of civilization.
All of these problems would increase exponentially and become even worse than our current system in a totally plant based society. And I don't know about you, but I would prefer to fix the problems with both industries before deciding to get rid of one of them.
So much of this is simply untrue so I'm going to comb through point by point.
The first thing you need to understand which entirely debunks your entire post is:
Animal agriculture uses more land for farming plants for animals to eat than will ever be needed to feed all of humanity on plants.
Around 80% of farmed soya is used for animal feed. Less than 10% is for human consumption (the majority consumers being non-vegans)
"we would still have soil erosion, habitat loss and slave labour in agriculture"
To some extent yes. However there would be less because less farmland would be needed.
There would also be less steps in the process of farm to plate so people can make more educated choices. It's easier to find out where your rice came from or where the soya in your tofu came from than it is to find out where the soya fed to the pigs you are eating came from. Educated choices means more regulation to avoid consumer boycotting.
"Not to mention the issues caused by pesticide run-off."
See above but also add animal farm run-off and slurry etc. In the UK our rivers are full of shit, the two biggest polluters are the water/sewege companies and run-off from animal farmland or farmers intentionally disposing of animals excrement in local rivers.
"And plant-based doesn't always mean less animal cruelty, as many animals are killed during plowing and harvesting"
This gets talked about a lot. Almost every study conducted does show a massive drop in small animals in the field after crop harvesting, carnists use this as a gotcha to vegans but forget two important factors
1) more crops are grown for animal feed than for humans
2) those same studies that show a drop in field animals? Show a massive increase in animals in the hedgerows during/after harvest. The vast majority of small animals aren't being killed! They're moving out of the way!!!
"and that's not even getting into how many animals are killed in cruel and inhumane ways just for eating crops."
Like wolves, badgers, eagles, foxes, coyotes and so many more animals hunted, poisoned and driven to extinction for killing farmed animals? "These animals are viewed as competition by many farmers."
Animals that eat crops would have less need to do so if there were still forests and pastures not being used for farmland.
A massive benefit of veganism would be less land use therefore more rewilding, thus protecting both predator and prey animals.
"What about the emissions released when the food has to be shipped across the planet to reach your table?"
The same stands for animals shipped around the world, and animal feed shipped from South America.
However, the animal agriculture industry is responsible for more global greenhouse gas emissions than the entire transport industry, including aviation and cars.
"It's hard to grow certain food products in environments they aren't native to. You can set up an animal farm pretty much anywhere and feed a community."
Yes, you can't grow all plants everywhere. But the animals need to eat too and they are much more resource intensive than humans. You would need to massively decrease the amount of meat eaten in the community.
Additionally, this doesn't work for cities and suburban communities, these groups usually can go vegan and it's better for the planet if they do.
"We've been doing this exact thing since the birth of civilization."
Sort of, but not really. We consume much more meat per person than we have ever consumed in all of human history. The rate of production is completely unsustainable and it will end civilisation if it continues.
We have absolutely not been intensively farming since the birth of civilization.
And again, we live in cities now, things have changed and our habits also need to change.
"All of these problems would increase exponentially and become even worse than our current system in a totally plant based society."
No, they wouldn't. For all the reasons above.
"And I don't know about you, but I would prefer to fix the problems with both industries before deciding to get rid of one of them."
As above, "fixing" animal agriculture requires fixing plant agriculture in the process.
However,
every single day animal agriculture continues, 202 million chickens will be slaughtered, 12 million ducks, 1.6 million turkeys, 3.8 million pigs, 1.7 million sheep, 1.4 million goats, and 900,000 cows are killed.
Every single day.
Each individual animal is a sentient being that feels fear, pain and joy.
Their continued life cycle of breeding and slaughter is actively destroying our planet.
There's no fucking comparison. One of these industries cannot be fixed.
"only a poor artisan blames his tools" is such bullshit, in almost every imaginable line of work the quality of the tools you have access to plays a massive role in the quality of the end product, sometimes in excess of the role played by individual skill! For example, some people have to code in javascript
my current project is figuring out how to trap the daemon of words inside my laptop so that it can only perform tasks within the scope of its remit
there's a lot of interesting work that goes into "how do you run a semi-untrusted piece of software on your machine and limit what it can have access to", given that the traditional unix model is "everything running as a user has access to everything else running as that user"
bodies should have crash logs. why the fuck did that just happen.
cut flowers / mia forrest
My latest cartoon for New Scientist
To be clear, this isn't a bit. This is what they actually did. "Its too late" is the new "Climate change isn't real"... And its still a lie!
Every serious climate scientist agrees that there is no such as thing as too late, just as there is no such thing as too early. We should have done a lot more than we have to fight climate change, and the world will suffer for our inaction, but there is no point of no return. We can always work to reduce the amount of suffering that occurs, and eventually turn things around to the point where our planet is healing once again. Do not believe anyone who says it's "too late".
AI company: i have made Assistant
me: you fucked up a perfectly good matrix multiplication is what you did. look at it. it's got anxiety
Nextpad++ feels like a fever dream. Like what Mac apps would be if the Nazis had won WWII.
Nextpad++ feels like a fever dream. Like what Mac apps would be if the Nazis had won WWII. Look, there are all sorts of foreign apps on the Mac. Electron apps. Apps ported with Wine. Web apps running in browser tabs or saved to the Dock. The curious new generation of lean-and-mean apps that are, in a technical sense, “native”, but are decidedly not Mac-assed apps, like Zed and Tolaria. All those types of apps feel alien on MacOS. Like different species. They are apps for the Mac but aren’t Mac apps. The Mac, however, is welcoming to them all, like the Mos Eisley cantina. We do serve their kind here. Nextpad++ isn’t like that. It doesn’t feel like an alien. It feels like Vincent D’Onofrio’s alien-bug-in-human-skin character from Men in Black.
Letov’s website describes Nextpad++ as “A real Mac app, not a Wine wrapper: Objective-C++ on top of Scintilla and Cocoa, shipped as a Universal Binary for Apple Silicon (M1–M5) and Intel Macs.” Ostensibly that’s a good thing. The download is only 14 MB. But Nextpad++ looks and feels like something that should not exist. The promotional screenshots on the app’s own website show it with 50 inscrutable toolbar buttons. It closes document tabs on mousedown, not mouseup. Its default font is 10-point Courier New. This is a real dialog box. It offers four settings for font antialiasing — “Default”, “None”, “Antialiased”, and “LCD Optimized” — but the default is not “Default”. No human being would port a complex Windows app like Notepad++ to the Mac like this.
I don't care about this app but that's some amusing prose.
I feel confident enough to post these now. A collection of all the existing posters after some edits from the other post that got 13k notes! These are full size/quality. Go nuts.
You may use them for wallpapers, tabletop campaigns, whatever. Consider tipping me or buying a print or sticker on ko-fi here! If you do use them, let me know what for, or send pictures!
i do think it’s kinda hilarious how the self proclaimed leftists on this website have infinitely more tolerance and sympathy for religious people than they do for vegans
yes many vegans are annoying but at least they have a moral stance that comes from what they have observed to happen in The Real World and that is based on their personal ethical and political values irt harm and violence
It's honestly amazing how much AI discourse has radicalized me about eating meat, of all things.
There is not a single argument against AI and data centers that does not apply ten times as hard to factory farming, except you replace "could kind of be considered to be stealing people's IP" with "torturing animals". They use way more water, way more land, cause way more pollution, way more emissions, and exploit way more people.
And listen, we all have to pick and choose our battles and I'm sure you personally have a really good reason for not going vegetarian. My point isn't "everyone should be vegetarian", my point is "if you aren't a vegetarian I do not want to hear one more goddamn word about AI water usage out of you"
(But also we should all consider cutting back our meat consumption at the very least)
Untitled, Richard Caldicott, 2012