
No title available
AnasAbdin

★
todays bird
d e v o n
Claire Keane

⁂
RMH
Misplaced Lens Cap
🪼
DEAR READER
h
Sweet Seals For You, Always
No title available
Sade Olutola

#extradirty
$LAYYYTER
YOU ARE THE REASON

No title available

pixel skylines
seen from Brazil
seen from Latvia

seen from Germany
seen from Vietnam

seen from Colombia

seen from France

seen from Spain

seen from Malaysia

seen from Panama
seen from T1

seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
@zoqaeski
don’t you love that america used to have the most electric trains by track mileage in like the 1920s/30s then we just took it all out back and killed it.
This is probably why I don't get invited to parties.
I am shocked at how many people don't have an actively hostile relationship with advertising
I am skipping your ads as fast as I can. I'm skipping past your sponsor read. I'm muting the tv. I'm muting the tab. If they get too annoying I will simply stop trying to watch.
If advertisers can use every manipulative trick in the book to get me to buy their product, I am fully within my rights to do everything I can on my end to make their job impossible
I can't identify the locomotive in this image. It's not a P5a because the cab has the wrong proportions (square corners and angled front windows).
Maybe an ex-GN FF2?
Terribly sorry to not answer, I hate this website.
The locomotive in this picture is JNR ED53 5. When I edited the image I added noise to make it harder to search and to cover some messiness in the front.
Ah, now I see that the PRR logo was added to the original image. On a second look there are so many details that reveal its not an American locomotive at all.
As an aside, I went down a rabbit hole reading about the GN locomotives and the electrical engineering behind how they worked. Motor-generators seem like a lot more trouble than they're worth compared to tap changers and series-wound AC motors, but you do get very smooth acceleration out of them which would be very useful on mountain grades. To the best of my knowledge, the Swiss and Austrians never used motor-generator locomotives outside of a few prototypes, preferring to improve the tap changing mechanism so that there were a lot of running notches; the BLS Ae 4/4 of 1944 had over 40.
I can't identify the locomotive in this image. It's not a P5a because the cab has the wrong proportions (square corners and angled front windows).
Maybe an ex-GN FF2?
Swedish State railways ASEA Type Rc 1 - 7
The Rc series are so cool. As was the orange livery (though it must be said I'm also quite partial to the current all black).
idk if this is a hot take but hear me out: trams are a type of train and the line between what we call trams vs trains is greyer than one might think
e.g. this vehicle
this is a pic of the tōkyū-setagaya-line. i personally wouldn't call this a tram, but apparently everyone else does which vexes me. i feel like if there was a the spectrum of train vs tram, this vehicle would be 60% train 40% tram, bc it's not shaped like more classic trains and is quite slow, but it also doesn't drive on the same asphaltic streets alongside cars. but if i had to assign it a binary term, i'd call it a train
this post is 100% serious btw. i've asked friends for their opinion and have had heated arguments about this
This line is legally classed as a tram because it's an isolated remnant of a tram line. It's also built to the uncommon gauge of 1372 mm (4’ 6”), which is the same gauge as Tokyo's former tram network, and only the Tōden Arakawa Line, the Keiō Line, and the Toei Shinjuku Line use this gauge in and around Tokyo today.
Given that it runs on its on dedicated track and has platforms at every stop, I'd describe it as light rail.
there's a lot of memeing about "walkable mixed-used neighborhoods" especially by people from the US to whom these concepts seem as impossible as "fully automated luxury communism" or whatever. but i live in a walkable mixed-use neighborhood and it fucking rules. no amount of money would make me move. there is this new strawman of the "obnoxious internet urbanist" who won't shut up about how bad cars are or whatever but the problem is that they (we) are 100% right about everything
in the future, you will see the term "transit bro" or "urbanism bro" used disparagingly by lib bluesky posters who don't believe in anything. it is your moral imperative to attack anyone who thinks urbanism is some kind of elite, out-of-touch flight of fancy
I remember staying with my aunt in a well populated suburb of a large town in Canada and being gobsmacked that I couldn't get to anything that wasn't another house without driving for minimum 10 minutes. In my boring ass Australian suburb (which is a very normal, low-mid tier one ≈30 mins from the CBD) I can walk to a range of supermarkets, restaurants, cafes and fast food, a few stores that sell products, the library, a train station/bus depot, op shops (thrift stores) and various services like hairdresser/doctor/massage/accountant/etc. Like not to brag or anything (I actually kind of hate where I live ngl) but this is just...normal. I can't think of another metropolitan suburb here where that isn't pretty standard. Why would you design a place to be Less Convenient on purpose?
The outer suburbs in most large Australian towns and cities are very much like the American dystopia of needing a car to do anything. Go beyond the tram network in Melbourne and it very quickly becomes extremely car-centric. Sure, there are nominally bus routes but the buses are infrequent and have limited service, especially during the evenings and on weekends. And PTV Transport for Victoria refuse to do any meaningful reform to the bus network.
Tarneit and Wyndham Vale are the epitome of bad urban Australian "planning" because that area is one of the most densely populated parts of Melbourne but consists almost entirely of single family homes packed so tightly together that there are no gaps between the houses. The only stores are concentrated in shopping centres built around a Colesworths in the middle of a carpark, and there aren't really cafes or restaurants. There's no main street or mixed use precincts. There's also not much in the way of schools or medical facilities or things to do. The roads are extremely congested and Tarneit station is the second busiest V/line station after Southern Cross. Tarneit station carpark has named aisles because it is so huge—all that wasted land that should have been mixed use development but was buried under asphalt paving.
The growing urban area north of Craigieburn is even worse.
I noticed yesterday that I apparently don't have a master thread of all the Lemuria pieces from Phase 1, so here they are again as a refreshes to see how far we've come since the Cretaceous.
Coral reefs
Rudist reefs
Carbonate Platform
Coasts
Rivers
Central Lake (shallows)
Central Lake (deep)
Wetlands
Hot steppe
Desert
Open Woodland
Rainforest
Temperate forest
Leaf litter
Subterranean
Cold Steppe
Mountains
It is really important to me that all of you learn about Al Bean, astronaut on Apollo 12 and the fourth man to walk on the moon, who after 20 years in the US Navy and 18 years with NASA during which he spent 69 days in space and more than 10 hours doing EVAs on the moon , retired to become a painter.
He is my favorite astronaut for any number of reasons, but he’s also one of my favorite visual artists.
Like, look at this stuff????
It’s all so expressive and textured and colorful! He literally painted his own experience on the moon! And that's just really fucking cool to me!
Just look at this! This is one of my absolute favorite emotions of all time. Is Anyone Out There? is like the ultimate reaction image. Any time I have an existential crisis, this is how I picture myself.
And then there's this one:
The Fantasy
For all of the six Apollo missions to land on the moon, there was no spare time. Every second of their time on the surface was budgeted to perfection: sleeping, eating, putting on the suits, entering and exiting the LEM, rock collection, setting up longterm experiments to transmit data back to Earth, everything. These timetables usually got screwed over by something, but for the most part the astronauts stuck to them.
The crew of Apollo 12 (Pete Conrad, Al Bean, and Dick Gordon) had other plans. Conrad and Bean had snuck a small camera with a timer into the LEM to take a couple pictures together on the moon throughout the mission. They had hidden the key for the timer in one of the rock collection bags, with the idea being to grab the key soon after landing, take some fun photos here and there, and then sneak the camera back to Earth to develop them. They had practiced where they would hide the key and how to get it out from under the collected rocks back on Earth dozens of times.
But when they got to the moon, the key was nowhere to be found. Al Bean spent precious time digging through the collection bags before he called it off. The camera had been pushing their luck anyways, he couldn't afford to spend anymore time not on the mission objectives. Conrad and Bean continued the mission as per the NASA plan while Dick Gordon orbited overhead.
Fast forward to the very end of the mission. Bean and Conrad are doing last checks of the LEM before they enter for the last time and depart from the moon. As Bean is stowing one of the collection bags, the camera key falls out. The unofficially planned photo time has come and gone, and he tosses the key over his shoulder to rest forever on the surface of the moon.
This painting, The Fantasy, is that moment. There have never been three people on the moon at the same time, there was never an unofficial photo shoot on the moon, this picture could never have happened.
"The most experienced astronaut was designated commander, in charge of all aspects of the mission, including flying the lunar module. Prudent thinking suggested that the next-most-experienced crew member be assigned to take care of the command module, since it was our only way back home. Pete had flown two Gemini flights, the second with Dick as his crewmate. This left the least experienced - me - to accompany the commander on the lunar surface.
"I was the rookie. I had not flown at all; yet I got the prize assignment. But not once during the three years of training which preceded our mission did Dick say that it wasn't fair and that he wished he could walk on the moon, too. I do not have his unwavering discipline or strength of character.
"We often fantasized about Dick's joining us on the moon but we never found a way. In my paintings, though, I can have it my way. Now, at last, our best friend has come the last sixty miles." - Al Bean, about The Fantasy.
There’s also Alexei Leonov, writer and artist and first person to conduct a spacewalk!
This is his art.
You can't forget this, the first art made in space.
March 1965, Alexei Leonov made this drawing only moments after narrowly surviving the very first space walk.
I do gotta point out that Michael Collins wrote the fucking brilliant account of his experiences in NASA, CARRYING THE FIRE: AN ASTRONAUT'S JOURNEYS and the equally fucking brilliant LIFTOFF, which goes into a lot more detail about the history of spaceflight and the minutiae of how to do shit like dock with other craft in different orbits. Collins was a fantastic writer and deeply appreciated other people's turns of phrase; he mentions John Gillespie Magee's High Flight in CARRYING THE FIRE while describing the view from orbit:
"All that from the cockpit of a Spitfire. What could he have said after one orbit? I cry that he was killed."
Lots of people are huge fans of monorails. And why wouldn't they be? They get rid of all the boring redundancy that you usually see on trains, in favour of a devil-may-care approach to the one-rail life. Many of us will never live in a town that has been blessed by the monorail gods, but there is still hope.
Near where I live, you have to drive over some water to get to another town. This is inconvenient, because cars conventionally cannot drive over or through water. To solve this, the ancient forebears of civilization have invented what they call "a ferry."
Usually, a ferry is just some dude's boat, and you want to try very hard not to talk to or even make eye contact with the skipper. Decades of going back and forth between two shores all day long have turned them into warped simulacra of a human being. Even if you have some common interest (like shore birds,) the next thing you know, you will be in their position and their soul freed from that drudgery.
For the purposes of this story, I'll point out that the ferry near me travels on an underwater cable between the two shores. Goes back and forth, pulled by an engine on the opposing shore. Like a... monorail. That's right, Big Boat has been in the pocket of public transit this whole time! Not only did they make a train, they made a special water train just to rub it in about how much cars actually suck.
There is more, too. I've heard stories that every major skyscraper has many small monorails inside them, in the form of "elevators," capable of towing dozens of people per day. I've yet to confirm this personally, due to the restraining order the entire downtown business zone has taken out on me, but rest assured, I'm going to get to the bottom of it. And then the top. Then the bottom again. Top some more, if I have time.
Fun fact!
Both Melbourne and Sydney have "red rattlers"
By Trainsandtech - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=65367379
By Matthew DAVALLE - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=116280829
As you can see they are not the same train! In fact, Melbourne's electrification scheme was earlier than Sydney's by a good couple years, with the beginnings happening before the First World War.
The first electric train service in Melbourne was on May 28 1919, and the first in Sydney was on 9 December 1926. (This may be wrong)
I find it interesting that they have ending up with the same name over the many years that these trains were in service.
Officially, the "Red Rattlers" of Sydney were several types of single deck EMUs that were a mix of wooden and steel body.
Sidenote: I don't really know much about Sydney trains so any extra info would be awesome!
The "Red Rattlers" of Melbourne were specifically the Swing Door and Sliding Door classifications, with the Sliding Doors becoming Tait trains, and the Swingdoors getting merged into one word.
The first generation of both Melbourne and Sydney's electric rollingstock were converted steam-hauled carriages. The modifications done in Sydney were quite extensive, involving rebuilding the carriages from the underframe up, increasing the width to match the 10'6" width of the new all-steel carriages that were introduced at the same time.
The first all-steel cars were manufactured in the UK and imported as a kit to be assembled locally. Subsequent orders were built by a number of manufacturers, all of them to the same general design until the 1950s. A major difference between Sydney and Melbourne was in the electrical equipment. Although both systems used 1500 V DC as the overhead supply, Melbourne's powered rollingstock had four traction motors driving all axles of the car. NSWGR considered using four motors, but ultimately decided that they could get adequate performance using just two motors on one bogie under the powered car. The motors used in Sydney were wound for 1500 V and operated in series and parallel. I believe that there were eight resistance stages inserted when starting and after transitioning from series to parallel.
Despite only using two motors per powered car, Sydney's rollingstock had considerably more power available for traction. The gradients on the Sydney network are more severe than those in Melbourne, and the climb up from Wynyard to the Sydney Harbour Bridge involves a long 1:30 grade that eases to 1:40 over the bridge itself. Ignoring the different gauges used by each state, Melbourne's rollingstock would not have been able to accelerate out of the Sydney Underground and over the bridge without overheating the resistances, as they wouldn't have had enough power to get up to full series running.
Later single-deck rollingstock introduced in Sydney after WWII adopted four motors on the powered cars, but these were electrically incompatible with the older stock and were marshalled into separate trains. These units were nicknamed 'Sputnik' trains after the Soviet satellite launched the same year.
An aside about the name "Red Rattler": Melbourne had an entirely wooden-bodied fleet until the all-steel "Harris" trains were introduced in 1952. These trains were painted in the VR blue-and-gold scheme instead of the all-over red used previously. The older trains became known as "Red Rattlers" because the doors and windows literally rattled in their frames. When Sydney introduced double-decker rollingstock from the mid-1970s, the shiny stainless steel looked a lot more modern than the dark red painted single-decker stock, to the extent that the new Eastern Suburbs line was operated with double-decker trains from its opening to emphasise its modernity. The "Red Rattler" moniker was adopted from Melbourne by the Sydney media, and only really took off in the 1980s.
These two books go into a huge amount of detail about Sydney and Melbourne's electric railways. The former book compares the technology and development of the two systems from the early 20th century to the present day, and the latter book describes every single class of electric multiple unit used by the NSWGR.
I'm an electrical engineer and for the longest time I was saying that electricity and electronics isn't magic, but think about it.
You literally have to collect rare stones from remote locations, put them into specific formations to work. All of this gets written down in symbols which don't make sense to the uninformed. It gets powered by energy which can not be seen in most cases.
Like what else do you want. What's your standard for calling something magic.
"It doesn't stop being magic just because you know how it works."
Terry Pratchett, The Wee Free Men (Discworld #30)
Fun fact!
Both Melbourne and Sydney have "red rattlers"
By Trainsandtech - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=65367379
By Matthew DAVALLE - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=116280829
As you can see they are not the same train! In fact, Melbourne's electrification scheme was earlier than Sydney's by a good couple years, with the beginnings happening before the First World War.
The first electric train service in Melbourne was on May 28 1919, and the first in Sydney was on 9 December 1926. (This may be wrong)
I find it interesting that they have ending up with the same name over the many years that these trains were in service.
Officially, the "Red Rattlers" of Sydney were several types of single deck EMUs that were a mix of wooden and steel body.
Sidenote: I don't really know much about Sydney trains so any extra info would be awesome!
The "Red Rattlers" of Melbourne were specifically the Swing Door and Sliding Door classifications, with the Sliding Doors becoming Tait trains, and the Swingdoors getting merged into one word.
The first generation of both Melbourne and Sydney's electric rollingstock were converted steam-hauled carriages. The modifications done in Sydney were quite extensive, involving rebuilding the carriages from the underframe up, increasing the width to match the 10'6" width of the new all-steel carriages that were introduced at the same time.
The first all-steel cars were manufactured in the UK and imported as a kit to be assembled locally. Subsequent orders were built by a number of manufacturers, all of them to the same general design until the 1950s. A major difference between Sydney and Melbourne was in the electrical equipment. Although both systems used 1500 V DC as the overhead supply, Melbourne's powered rollingstock had four traction motors driving all axles of the car. NSWGR considered using four motors, but ultimately decided that they could get adequate performance using just two motors on one bogie under the powered car. The motors used in Sydney were wound for 1500 V and operated in series and parallel. I believe that there were eight resistance stages inserted when starting and after transitioning from series to parallel.
Despite only using two motors per powered car, Sydney's rollingstock had considerably more power available for traction. The gradients on the Sydney network are more severe than those in Melbourne, and the climb up from Wynyard to the Sydney Harbour Bridge involves a long 1:30 grade that eases to 1:40 over the bridge itself. Ignoring the different gauges used by each state, Melbourne's rollingstock would not have been able to accelerate out of the Sydney Underground and over the bridge without overheating the resistances, as they wouldn't have had enough power to get up to full series running.
Later single-deck rollingstock introduced in Sydney after WWII adopted four motors on the powered cars, but these were electrically incompatible with the older stock and were marshalled into separate trains. These units were nicknamed 'Sputnik' trains after the Soviet satellite launched the same year.
An aside about the name "Red Rattler": Melbourne had an entirely wooden-bodied fleet until the all-steel "Harris" trains were introduced in 1952. These trains were painted in the VR blue-and-gold scheme instead of the all-over red used previously. The older trains became known as "Red Rattlers" because the doors and windows literally rattled in their frames. When Sydney introduced double-decker rollingstock from the mid-1970s, the shiny stainless steel looked a lot more modern than the dark red painted single-decker stock, to the extent that the new Eastern Suburbs line was operated with double-decker trains from its opening to emphasise its modernity. The "Red Rattler" moniker was adopted from Melbourne by the Sydney media, and only really took off in the 1980s.
I don't think there's enough art analysis of modern train paint schemes. Sadly I know basically nothing about art, so I can't really fill in the gaps, but I can at least try to get the conversation going.
Now, this is a difficult topic, for two main reasons:
There are a lot of trains. Less than cars, sure, but still, a very considerable amount.
We live in a time where it's gotten really easy to give them all widely different liveries.
Point 2 is surprisingly crucial. It used to be that every train livery was paint, with masking tape carefully applied, and a few stickers for the more complicated parts, letters and numbers. That limited the sheer amount of design you could get on there. Trains in Europe have also become very smooth, with not much in the way of access doors or similar. That means for complex paint schemes, you can now do vinyl wraps, like for cars; functionally you print out a giant sticker (or several) with a giant locomotive and make sure to apply them all straight. Sounds difficult, but there are companies specialised in that. So, want a locomotive with gold and Ode to Joy on the side?
(All pictures by me unless otherwise noted)
Yeah you can just do that. SETG's 193 218 here is the only one with this livery, and hey, at least it's still wearing it. They've changed some details since I took this picture in 2017.
So as an example, I'm picking one type of locomotive and in particular one train company. The locomotive is the Siemens Vectron, and generally speaking it looks like this:
The Vectron is an incredibly successful product by Siemens, introduced in 2008 and it keeps on selling. Locomotive 1750 is almost done and was recently shown off at a publicity event, and the orders are already for about 2700 locomotives. I'm only going to look at the "normal" version of it and ignore weird special versions like "with Diesel engine", "extra cheap" and, of course, "Finnish". With that out the way, the Vectron is an electric locomotive that can run at up to 200 km/h or even 230 km/h (125 or 143 mph), provide up to 6400 MW continuous power, run under any type of electricity common in Europe and in most countries. It's highly modular, so you only get the features you want, and you can add other ones later. Some of them haul passenger trains, in particular it's the most modern passenger locomotive in both the Netherlands and Denmark, but the vast majority haul freight all along the major European corridors. For quite a while there it was actually the only modern electric freight locomotive you could get, as their competitor Bombardier and their TRAXX was busy with software and quality control issues, then busy getting bought by Alstom, then busy with software and quality control issues some more. This seems to be coming to an end, Alstom has won some significant orders and is getting close to actually delivering, and meanwhile Stadler has been doing interesting stuff in the specialty field and they're going mainstream as well; but for now, Vectron is still the default. The lamp housings only come in grey, unless you buy the cheap version, the extra powerful version, or the Finnish version (which also doesn't have the whiskers).
The one in the picture is an internal Siemens test unit to get approval for 230 km/h operations, but for the most part, it represents what the locomotive looks like if you order one and forget to tell Siemens what paint you'd want. This sounds like a joke but it's actually surprisingly common. Most locomotives in Europe these days are bought by leasing companies. Some of them are very concerned about corporate identity and have their own paint schemes that customers can then add their logos to (or cover up, if they pay more), but others don't bother, they expect that the customer will wrap the locomotive anyway. Siemens also apparently always has a few white Vectrons in the assembly line, in case someone needs a locomotive really urgently. The expectation is never that customers keep it white for long, it's that they apply at least logos or big stickers and wrap it in whatever they want, with the white as a neutral base. You can often tell secretly white locomotives from the grab bars under the front windows; almost nobody bothers to paint or wrap those, generally speaking.
Design-wise… well, it's a box, with some slightly sculpted cabs at the end. A design feature that everybody loves are the "whiskers"; behind them is the cab air conditioner. People often compare it to European heavy semi-trucks, which is almost certainly intentional.
The full "default I don't care" Vectron doesn't have the silver edges and none of the big "230 km/h" and "Siemens" stickers of this one. It does have a dark grey frame, and a dark grey central roof section. These are the parts that get dirty the quickest (from the wheels and from the pantographs), so darker colours here help make that less apparent. Any part of a Vectron can and will become incredibly dirty eventually if you don't wash it, but these dark areas give you at least a couple more weeks before it becomes really apparent. They're not required, Siemens will happily paint any part of the locomotive any color you want, but a lot of companies adopt these colours for these parts anyway because it just makes sense.
The Beethoven locomotive up top is probably an example of a white default locomotive that got wrapped. I don't love the design, I think it's too busy, but it's not the worst.
For another example of a bad Vectron livery, I controversially submit BLS cargo, a Swiss railway company that nowadays does long-haul container traffic across Europe and crossing the alps:
First, see what I mean about getting dirty? Second, I know people like this livery, but to me, this is a pretty photograph on an otherwise boring livery. It's not integrated in the slightest, and the rest of the livery is just silver-grey, with some lime edges, and some red lower whiskers (fun fact: A splash of red at the front of the locomotive is legally required for Italy).
For something more interesting, let's consider their biggest competitor, SBB Cargo. SBB Cargo is a part of SBB, the Swiss state-owned railway company, and is the main provider of freight trains in Switzerland. They have an international arm, SBB Cargo International, which runs freight trains through Switzerland. Originally, SBB Cargo locomotives looked like this:
Red ends, blue middle, a big "cargo". For the classic locomotives, they got some dynamics slants in there. The more modern boring locomotives got red ends and red edges. In both cases, they're being a big cheeky with the dark frame: They're using it as a baseline for the "cargo" text, with the lower arch of the "g" extending into the frame. Also, note that the newer locomotive is number 482 000. Starting the numbering at zero? The Swiss sure are crazy.
They've been using this paint scheme for a while now, and it was good. But especially SBB Cargo International wanted something else, something of their own. They started out with some cheeky slogans, like the alp tamer:
Alpäzähmer roughly means "alp tamer" in deep Swiss dialect. The locomotive is advertising the opening of the Gotthard base tunnel under the alps in December of 2016, which finally "tamed" the mountain range.
Fun fact: In December of 2016 I travelled to Switzerland to experience this fresh new tunnel for myself. It is a massive engineering marvel, but it turns the actual experience of this 55 km/34 mile tunnel is just "dark for thirty minutes". On the way back, between Zurich and Munich, I watched some episodes of Supergirl, and somewhere around Lake Constance I wrote what is still somehow my most popular Tumblr post by a really long shot. I hate that post so much. The tunnel is good though.
However, a lot of SBB Cargo International's locomotives are just leased modern electrics with a logo stuck on there, like ES 64 F4-091.
Due to corporate mergers, this locomotive is currently on its third leasing company and 2.5th livery (most of it is still leasing company #2, leasing company #3 added the yellow stripe and replaced the logos of the old leasing company with their own). Since it was built in 2004, it's been hired by more than a dozen rail companies from Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, Switzerland, and Austria, it was very briefly a passenger locomotive despite only a 140 km/h (87 mph) top speed, and some companies, including SBB Cargo International, actually had it twice. And all it got to show for it is a logo, a name and an URL. Makes sense, who knows when it'll next get hired to Nordcargo, DB, ACTS, CTL, ITL, another branch of DB, TXL, KRE, RTB Cargo, NIAG LOCON, SETG…
But SBB Cargo International wanted to grow, and get locomotives that unquestionably their own; still leased, but on a very long-term basis, and with their own livery. Which locomotives? Siemens Vectron, of course, it's the default. Which livery? They could have just used a normal SBB Cargo livery, of course, but they wanted to stand out. Enter Simon Wijnacker.
Simon is a dutch rail nerd and graphics designer. He has written books about modern locomotives and their paint, he used to run a website cataloguing them, he still runs a news site about modern locomotives and their paint schemes, but most importantly, he and his design studio Railcolor Design… uh, design color schemes for rail vehicles.
And for SBB Cargo International, he (or his team) came up with a stand-out design: The Alppiercer.
Picture by Thomas Naas, licensed under CC-BY-ND 2.0, on Flickr
Everybody loves the Alppiercer, me included. The stepped gradient color palette? The clever use of the red ends and the blue center? The Swiss cross on the front? The ray of light under the mountains, symbolising how trains pierce the alps with the new Gotthard base tunnel? Perfection.
There have been dozens of variations of this design since, because SBB Cargo International now applies versions of it to all Vectrons it leases, no matter who from, so there are ones on black (Shadowpiercer, for locomotives from former MRCE), blue (Nighpiercer, for locomotives from Hupac), silver (Silverpiercer, Railpool), grey (Alppiercer 3, SüdLeasing), as well as all sorts of one-offs, like Hollandpiercer, Germanypiercer, Ruhrpiercer (for subsidiary RT&S) and so on.
In the meantime, the main SBB Cargo decided to get new locomotives as well, since maintenance of the old workhorses was getting more expensive than getting new ones. This is actually true for a lot of Europe, especially thanks to the need for new equipment like ETCS: Leasing a Vectron is often cheaper than keeping an old locomotive going, even though that one's already paid for. SBB Cargo (main) also decided to buy new locomotives; the contract for that went to Stadler, which surprised everyone. But until those new locomotives are designed, built and approved, it'll take a few years, so in the meantime they're doing the default thing and leasing a couple of Vectrons. They wanted them painted, though, and for that, they once again went to Simon, and he delivered. I don't know whether they requested something different from SBB Cargo International, or whether that was Simon's idea, but either way, this is the result:
I find this super-fascinating. It's the same locomotive, it's the same family of companies, it's based on the same blue-with-red-ends original design, it's even the same designer, yet it's a completely different feel. Don't even focus on that the alp motive is gone and the big "cargo" is back, look at the details:
In the Alppiercer, the red at the front goes all the way down to the bottom of the frame. Here, the frame is dark grey throughout.
The Alppiercer added some black over and under the front windows, where the handrails are. The domestic version lowers is until the black almost hits the whiskers.
Both actually visually raise the frame a bit, by painting the lowest section of the main body in the same color as the frame, but the big cargo version raises it higher, and draws your eye with a big white line. It's also just more frame, because the red of the Alppiercer turns back, creating an arrow shape, while the other has the red just plain slanted, thus giving more red.
There's even a bit of extra frame grey on the lowest set of whiskers.
Both locomotives feature black frames around the door side windows; fairly angular for the Alppiercer, but very smooth for the big cargo version. The big cargo version also links these frames with a horizontal line at the top of the body.
So both locomotives are red at the front, but the impression is a very different one. The Alppiercer looks taller, the big cargo version looks longer and more business-like, stronger.
(Also interesting: The lower arch of the g of the cargo can no longer be on the actual frame, because the Vectron has a very busy frame, with cutouts for fuel tanks in case you want to install a small diesel, with lots and lots of labels, and of course crucially, both a big "Siemens" and a big "Vectron" logo somewhere in there.)
But also interesting are the choices that are the same. A black frame around all windows emphasises them and makes them look larger. The locomotive has some defined bevels, but Railcolor largely ignores them - compare how much red the Alppiercer has with how much lime green the BLS version has. There is a very strong sense here that "I decide what the visual shape of the locomotive is, the manufacturer's outer shape is just a suggestion".
This becomes especially clear when you see the Alppiercer design applied on one of the earlier modern electrics, the Traxxpiercer:
Picture by peters452002, licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA, via Flickr
This is apparently going to stay a one-off, but it makes for an interesting comparison with a locomotive of the same type with the original paint scheme.
Oh god these things have gotten dirty and washed out. Pretty soon the ends will just be white if this continues. But anyway, note that the repainted one again got a raised frame, black around the side windows, extended black around (especially above) the front windows, and extended red at the edges. A subtle touch is that near the buffers, the red is cut off with a bit of black, making the shape slightly more fluid and dynamic. Yes, admittedly the main reason why it looks better and more modern is because it's clean, but also, Railcolor reinvented what it means to make the ends of a TRAXX locomotive red, which is not something anyone else ever tried.
The raised frame is a staple of Railcolor Design, seen also e.g. on their work for Flex, Budamar, very strongly for RTB Cargo and most hilariously Raillogix. The latter (sadly I didn't find any Creative Commons licensed pictures of it) is particularly hilarious, because there's so little design: The most boring logo ever, the company name, one color, a slightly different one for one corner each, and that's it… but then there's a bit of black around the front windows, and a bit of a raised locomotive frame, just as a little "Simon was here".
The Flex one also shows another staple of Railcolor Design, the "dog bone" design (name by me, not official): A narrow beam in the middle that expands out at the cabs. The "Transformer" locomotive for Trustrail is another good example; part of the designs for EBS that Railcolor keeps making that all follow this general approach.
Meanwhile the stepped gradient palettes are also popular. Adria Transport 193 012 "From Sea to Summit" is clearly not an Alppiercer, but very obviously designed by the same people.
So… what can we say from a critical artistic perspective about the work of Railcolor Design when it comes to inventing new ways to paint Swiss locomotives red and blue? I dunno, honestly, I have zero art education. I do know they're putting a lot of care and work into it; they're not afraid to redefine the visual shape of the locomotive; they're playing with its appearance, tall or long or shark-like…
Picture by Rob Dammers, licensed under CC-BY 2.0, found on Flickr
I haven't yet seen a really wide Vectron. Anyway, a lot of interesting stuff coming out from them that, in my opinion, pushes what train design can be in interesting directions.
What do you think? Especially if you know more about art and graphic design than me?
Anyway, before I was car autistic, I was a tiny baby child and was train autistic (until like age 7). My dad worked in an office right next to our town's train station and I would watch the trains go by from the office window in between watching hotwheels highway 35 with all the cars I owned that appeared in the movie.
I had "Giants of the Rails" on vhs and at least one "lots and lots of trains" vhs tape alongside the thomas the train videos and movies.
But I just got a core memory unlocked about France's Orange TGV train and how cool I thought it looked as a child.
This badass motherfucker right here.
Hell. Yeah.
Sud-Est Gang
The original TGVs wore the best colour scheme ever worn by a high speed train. None of the modern French liveries even come close.