The introductory “Hate” monologue from I Have No Mouth, and I Must Scream, with AM voiced by the TikTok TTS
Mike Driver
cherry valley forever

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Noah Kahan
occasionally subtle

No title available
One Nice Bug Per Day
taylor price

titsay
No title available
tumblr dot com
KIROKAZE
macklin celebrini has autism
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

izzy's playlists!
RMH
ojovivo

Kiana Khansmith
Cosimo Galluzzi
The Bowery Presents
seen from Canada
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Japan

seen from United States
seen from Mexico

seen from United States

seen from Netherlands

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Portugal

seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Türkiye

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Türkiye
@acailrose
The introductory “Hate” monologue from I Have No Mouth, and I Must Scream, with AM voiced by the TikTok TTS
i’ve stopped being mentally ill in the unhappy and always in a crisis way, I am now mentally ill in the mostly stable and happy but there’s clearly something weird going on way
the kind where no one is worried about me anymore but everyone knows there’s something wrong with me
Slow Fashion Brands BRANDS:,Website:,Price Range,Notes:,BST / used options:,Sizes up to:,Customizations? Linen basics in soft hues Not Perf
one of my "special interests" in the past couple of years has been exploring fast fashion vs. slow fashion. it has been a long journey trying to find clothes that actually 1) fit me 2) look good 3) are made from material that is not actively shoving plastic in the ecosystem 4) involve ethical labor, fair trade, fairly compensated, etc
before i did this research, i really had no clue about fabrics or fashion brands. i used to think i had zero interest in fashion, in fact.
i grew up wearing walmart and thrift store clothes, and when i went to college i bought clothes from target and asos. something started to shift a little bit when i found vintage resellers on etsy and ebay... those clothes were so unique. but a lot of the vintage clothes were polyester blends, stiff, and would fall apart as easily as my asos clothes. i would leave them hanging in my closet and never wear them. i would wear the same old t shirts and jeggings every day. i felt like it was impossible to ever wear comfortable clothes, or ever feel good in clothes, so why bother?
it started with linen. linen is very comfortable and pretty sustainable. i was amazed that i didn't feel the urge to rip my clothes off when i wore linen. lightbulb number one.
a friend let me borrow a nooworks dress, and i went to the store and got some overalls. wow. overalls. lightbulb number two. holy shit, you can wear overalls. you know how people say "not binary or non-binary but a secret third thing." that's overalls.
i realized i loved the bonkers prints that nooworks had, and all of it was soft, and made ethically. it was a higher price point than i was used to, which gave me pause. but then you realize: we're not supposed to be buying dumb clothes every other weekend. and isn't a slightly higher price point for soft clothes that you won't want to tear off your body worth it?
so i started my research. i made a spreadsheet. the prices can be all over the place across brands, so i made a column for prices. sizes can be all over the place too -- people always ask me "where is the plus size slow fashion?" it's there. just look at the size column. people say "isn't it better to buy secondhand?" yeah, it is. i have many links to secondhand sources.
if you have any suggestions or additions please let me know, it is a living document.
Dots emit radiation. As you get closer to them, they begin to vibrate and pulse. Moving closer still, the color separations become dramatically separate: Solids become very solid and the black ink holds together, while the CMY dots fly apart. Foreground and background, positive and negative space, reverse unexpectedly. Orange, green, brown, and fake gray give up their secrets, and the basic building blocks of a universe reveal themselves. Unstable molecules, built of primary colored atoms, buzz at different frequencies. Vectors of visual force, experienced implicitly at original size, become intense. Behind everything is wood pulp paper, a still deeper layer of creation, with its own unstable properties.
-In Defense of Dots: The lost art of comic books, John Hilgart
it is a harsh truth but it is one i am beholden to say: some of these people out here making these sexyman tournaments do NOT know how to properly seed a bracket
i get that it is much easier to just randomize your bracket lineup! i get that trying to calculate rankings is intrinsically inaccurate! but if youre out here pitting quarterfinalist picks against each other in the first round im judging you. give me some drama. wheres the panache. wheres the PAGEANTRY
this is what happens when you make ignoring sportsball a personality trait
yeah I know I missed the whole pathologic in autumn thing but whatever
“this is the hill you want to die on?” oh no i just love arguing. i fully intend to leave this hill once it gets boring. sorry for the confusion!
i hope that the popularity of goncharov convinces people to watch mikey and nicky, which is a movie about two mobsters who are so close to having gay sex that at one point john cassavetes' character has sex while peter falk's character takes slow drags of his cigarette and watches. clocks and the passage of time are potent motifs. the only friends from childhood they have left are each other. they hold each other close and brawl in the streets and the betrayal at the end is so slow and inevitable it feels like watching a dentist wash their hands and put on their gloves before coming to pull out your teeth. it's literally just like my favorite movie goncharov
Is this a fake movie too
you think i would lie about peter falk and john cassavetes? you think i would tell lies about elaine may's 1976 masterpiece mikey and nicky?
you think i would lie about a film like mikey and nicky that you can watch in it's entirety for free on youtube?
I saw this screenshots and I thought, "that guy looks like Columbo, I am about to get rickrolled," and I was wrong. There was a real movie on the other end of the link.
"stop telling people to Goncharov is so gay when it's literally just subtext" ok first of all this is a mafia film from 1973 are we really surprised they aren't making out on screen? and secondly, why do you hate subtext? must everything be explicitly stated? are we so used to canon representation now that we can't enjoy the simple pleasure of finding homoerotic tension where it was never intended to be found? can you look me in the eyes and tell me that there is a heterosexual explanation for the anchovy scene?
The eighties rolled on, and [Goncharov’s] underground cult following became a proxy for queer men to explore the extremes of desire without actually exploring the extremes of desire; the breakdown of the heterosexual marriage, a casual acquaintanceship that turns into bitter resentment, the entanglement of violence and hunger, all drew in an audience of punks, young artists, and counter-culture rebels.
Violence that stands in for queer desire, and queer desire that ends in violence, would become a controversial topic over the next several decades of film and media discussion – as more mainstream LGBT cinema took off in the 90’s and 2000’s, the subject of exploitation and over-exposure of homophobic trauma would become less palatable.
But this was the UK under Thatcher’s reign, and in the early 80’s the nature of homosexual desire was still taboo. This was barely ten years after the first pride, the Thorpe political scandal was still fresh in the minds of the polite society, and homosexuality was a topic reserved for scandalised tabloids.
It’s with this backdrop that underground re-enactments of Goncharov became popular in Brighton and Manchester, spreading eventually to London and the Oxford/Cambridge drama clubs. Amateur thespians played out the death scenes, the first meeting, the confrontations, the shoot-outs, the quiet desire. Male performers would take the roles of Katya and Sofia - in most popular re-enactments, Katya and Andrey would share one actor. Women played the parts of men, men played the parts of the femme fatale, and gender non-conformity abounded in the liminal space between lawlessness and story.
A tragedy knows it’s a tragedy. The actors in the re-enactments took a Tom Stoppard-like approach in how it repeated its narrative violence. The actor that will kiss Goncharov in one scene as Katya, will kill him just ten minutes later as Andrey. No costume change, no make-up trickery – same narrative tools used to hammer out the machinery of desire. Andrey and Gocharov may be doomed by the movie to kill eachother, but in the nimble hands of experimental theatre, they can finally play out their unsated hunger.
Francine Rubek and Samson Jian, Under the Queer Gaze (2014, Palgrave Macmillan)
sorry I can't hang out today, I'm partaking in a vivid mass hallucination of a 1973 mafia thriller by martin scorsese. Yeah it's gonna be all day
surprised to see a movie like Goncharov getting so popular on the website that found the moral nuance of steven universe to be unmanageable
The Goncharov meme is such a fun little spotlight on how people view media. Like, fake academic analysis about a movie that doesn't exist. Cool. But that's only the first level.
Next you have posts recreating a modern tumblr audience "discovering" an older piece of media and engaging with it through the lens of fan culture. Particularly tumblr-specific fan culture. Particularly in a way that feels like it got its blueprint from Dracula Daily. (Shitposts and memes, intense love for the most prominent female character, reads of complex romantic dynamics between characters, etc.)
Then you get fake discourse about the fake fan response to a fake movie that are quietly complaining about real ways real people respond to real media. I.e., America-centric readings, shallow, shipping-based readings, fans lionizing a protagonist not meant to be admired, etc.
(My personal favorite are posts that recreate the experience of being told a piece of media is so gay, you guys, only to watch it and find it isn't even remotely, that fans who wanted queer subtext wrung blood from a stone and thoroughly misled you.)
I also like the extra-meta ones about "this obscure movie being recently re-discovered," fake film history about copyright battles or the original cut being suppressed, etc. And of course, Johnny fucking Truant is here to give his editorial take on it, as he should be.
Pale Fire, House of Leaves, Goncharov. Humanity is such that every now and then we need to get really invested in fake arguments about a piece of media that doesn't exist.
The Goncharov meme is such a fun little spotlight on how people view media. Like, fake academic analysis about a movie that doesn't exist. Cool. But that's only the first level.
Next you have posts recreating a modern tumblr audience "discovering" an older piece of media and engaging with it through the lens of fan culture. Particularly tumblr-specific fan culture. Particularly in a way that feels like it got its blueprint from Dracula Daily. (Shitposts and memes, intense love for the most prominent female character, reads of complex romantic dynamics between characters, etc.)
Then you get fake discourse about the fake fan response to a fake movie that are quietly complaining about real ways real people respond to real media. I.e., America-centric readings, shallow, shipping-based readings, fans lionizing a protagonist not meant to be admired, etc.
(My personal favorite are posts that recreate the experience of being told a piece of media is so gay, you guys, only to watch it and find it isn't even remotely, that fans who wanted queer subtext wrung blood from a stone and thoroughly misled you.)
I also like the extra-meta ones about "this obscure movie being recently re-discovered," fake film history about copyright battles or the original cut being suppressed, etc. And of course, Johnny fucking Truant is here to give his editorial take on it, as he should be.
Pale Fire, House of Leaves, Goncharov. Humanity is such that every now and then we need to get really invested in fake arguments about a piece of media that doesn't exist.