[sisterofrage]

Literally every problem comes down to too many males. Ducks fuck their species into oblivion with gangrape drownings, leaving less females thus leading to more gangs of males and the cycle continues.

Allergies/asthma/etc. that past generations didn't see much of? Because male leaders decided to plant only male trees in many cities, leading to an overload of pollen modern humans can't handle.

(They claimed it was to prevent excess fruit rotting on the sidewalk, but they couldn't have planted non-fruiting trees, or given the fruit away? Get real, their egos like the idea or replacing female trees with male. Femicide reaches even to plants.)

Not even to mention human gangrape, the enormity of the porn and trafficking industry, and wars fought for little other reason than "excess men with nothing to live for".

There is no species that allows this many males to exist, and when that scale tips too far, the results are always disastrous.

There is no deep political answer to modern problems, nor is the answer a philosophical one. These are all just men pointing the finger to deny the far simpler answer that terrifies them: there are just too many males. We have too many and like any species with too many males, we are suffering for it.

[desisterfem]

i actually think only women should allowed to be run for positions of power

[hexdgirl]

Pussies are objectively more aesthetically pleasing than dicks idgaf

[gender-machine-broke]

[drbased]

They always use the word ‘ontologically’ as pure projection. Radfems don’t need to have a pseudo-spiritual symbolic view of the penis - we simply look at the material reality of the harm it’s caused. But they can’t conceptualise sex outside of gender, so anything associated with the material reality of sex has to ‘mean’ something deeper. They can’t process sex outside of what it ‘means’, so when they see us acknowledge the realities of sex, they assume that we’re using the same mental processing as them. For them, ‘feminism’ must require rejection of sex because acknowledgment of sex necessitates acknowledging sex stereotypes as part of sex.

And here’s the thing: the penis is ‘The Rape Organ’. Not ‘ontologically’ - because there are many penises that haven’t raped, and rape is committed in other ways. But there is no other part of the body that can forcibly penetrate, ejaculate, urinate, spread stis and forcibly impregnate all in one. Moreover, there is no bodily organ that generates such a clear motivation to rape. Yes, people gain pleasure from other types of rape, but forcible impregnation of women by men’s penises is what the patriarchy is literally built upon. Men happily admit their penis is a rape organ when there’s no societal stigma against it. Flashers wouldn’t exist if men didn’t know that their penis is an organ of sexual terror.

Men rape and forcibly impregnate women, using them as breeding stock. That is, to put it bluntly, what ‘rule of the father’ means in practical terms. The penis does not need to be a rape organ, but that’s how it’s viewed and weirded in society. And sure as shit it’s not feminists’ fault for pointing that out. The moment men stop raping with their penises, especially stop raping women, we’ll stop associating their penises with rape.

I had a man get defensive and irritated with me because I called him an asshole. And I had to tell him that it’s not some judgment upon his very soul - rather, it’s a blunt assessment of his current behaviour: the moment he stops behaving like an asshole is the moment I will stop calling him one. It really is as simple as that. Time and time again, women point out basic reality - sometimes making an active judgment, and sometimes simply recognising reality for what it is - and men take that as an affront upon their mortal souls, as some sort of unilateral and unchanging damnation of their very essence. It’s easier that way, because then they never have to feel accountable for their actions: they get to decide that their behaviour is good and righteous because they’ve decided that they are good and righteous. Trans-identified men, similarly, redefine ‘woman’ so that they get to decide that their bodies and behaviour are ‘female’ because they are female. It’s the same story every time: men are incentivised to process reality through isolated categorisation, and when women point out the basics of reality they, like a religious person who believe atheists ‘deny god’, have to believe that we are also making an isolated categorisation - and because we’re women, our categorisation must be wrong; we’re just not as deep as them, we don’t get it. So the simplicity of our recognition of basic reality is redefined as shallowness and vapidity - just as how religious people view our life on Earth as less ‘real’ than the spiritual world. And of course, many religions view women as inherently less spiritual than men.

All of this psychological gymnastics is to justify the patriarchy, which is, at its core, a justification of rape. Patriarchy is built from the ground up on rape, specifically men raping women with their penises. All these supposed ‘feminists’ want to fight the patriarchy without acknowledging that basic fact - a fact that is both not difficult to notice and also incredibly difficult to notice as rape is built into the fabric of society.

The trans-identified man with even the best intentions has had his fundamental sense of self constructed within this system: he is a member of the oppressor class, and said oppressor class maintains power through rape with the penis. It benefits him to obfuscate this relationship, utilising those same societal forces that disguise rape as normal to pretend the rape isn’t there.

[himejoshiba]

yes i respect ftm pronouns no i do not respect mtf pronouns. this is because females deserve special privileges that males dont

[female-uncle]

Men can't be trusted to make their own decisions as a class tbh #sadbuttrue

[nocturnaltigerrevelation]

redditors genuinely have to be killed

[magnetictapedatastorage]

the single most popular comic artist on tumblr decided to make one about a grotesque stereotype of... women who play an online video game despite constant sexual harassment. a hobby that can't possibly be construed as harming anyone.

except the grotesque stereotype then commits the cardinal sin of trying to talk with another woman about her experience. its played as a joke, that she's just crazy and obsessive and spiteful, unable to act like a normal person due to her obsession with hating men.

and im just taken aback by the unthinkable level of hatred it would take to draw a comic like that.

[grovyle]

shen gives me the creeps. i feel like his female characters are weirdly fetishistic now…….in like, a very online pervert sort of way.

i also looked sideways at the comic you’re referencing. it’s another one of those “maladjusted man-hater is FIXED by a good man!” stories i guess. such stories are not really as benevolent and wholesome as men like to think.

it’s interesting that shen’s gamer girl is so chronically online that she is executively and socially dysfunctional, while his male lead, by comparison, comes across as healthfully & sensibly offline—even though femboy culture is steeped in the internet. (it’s steeped in some uniquely toxic parts of the internet, too.)

personally, i have never known a femboy to have a healthy web/life balance. they are all very “logged in,” so to speak. conversely, it’s pretty uncommon for a woman to be caricature levels of chronically online. female game-addicts and self-identified femcels exist, but they do not mirror male game-addicts and incels.

[hugewomanwatches]

It’s actually even worse than him being just straightforwardly a tra and going after radfems, because what he’s actually doing is openly pandering to a trans audience to exploit them financially, and they know it and don’t care

A month ago he posted a comic facetiously suggesting that he’d get more patreon traffic if he drew himself female, and it clearly worked for him

He made basically zero effort to hide what he was doing, even joked about it and confirmed it

And now almost exactly a month later he’s posting a multipart comic about a “femcel radfem gamer” who gets harassed online and hates men

The depiction is clearly supposed to be someone who is an absolute nightmare, chronically online, openly cruel and ignorant

The character encounters someone at her local cornerstore who looks like a cute girl but when she tries to connect with her about men making our lives worse, the person claims to be a man

Our radfem character expresses exaggerated disgust and leaves without her things, and continues to spiral about it and grapple with confused attraction

It’s offensive and stupid on almost every conceivable level, but parts of her dialogue do sound like it could have almost been lifted from a real black pill, and it makes me wonder how much research the artist did to portray such a caricature. He had a month to spin this up, if he knew it was going to be wildly profitable for him i wouldn’t be surprised if he put in the work to familiarize himself with some actual talking points.

Also the ambiguity of the cashier character was clearly deliberate on the artist’s part, as the notes are chockablock full of readers gleefully debating whether the cashier character is supposed to be a “gnc trans man” or a “femboy”, all wondering what the subtitle “the boy from venus” might be referring to

I think the saddest part of this is how excited trans and tra audiences are for it and how at the bottom of each comic he’s got an entire panel with an advertisement for his patreon enticing them to pay a few dollars to get bonus panels and access the next installment faster. This is so obviously an opportunistic cash grab, and it’s insulting enough to see women so thoroughly dismissed and vilified, but to know it’s not even bc he believes it is such a slap in the face.

He made the most incendiary, controversial, hateful thing he could think of, knowing they would eat it up and pay him for it. It’s so slimy and greedy. What an absolute pig

[bimbocracy]

every single negative stereotype about women was dreamt up by men who were projecting. fight me about it.

[bimbocracy]

“women can’t drive”

It is so well known that women are better and safer drivers than men that OUR CAR INSURANCE RATES ARE LOWER. Women get into fewer accidents, get fewer DUIs, and receive fewer speeding tickets than men.

“women never shut up”

Several scientific studies have shown that not only do men talk more than women, they also think that women have been talking for much longer than they actually have. Men interrupt and talk over women, dominate conversations, and still think women talk too much.

“women are shallow”

Lol next

“my wife is my ball and chain lmao”

Multiple studies have shown that marriage between men and women: Increases male lifespan, decreases female lifespan Decreases male depression rates, increases female depression rates Decreases male stress levels, increases female stress levels Increases male health and happiness, decreases female health and happiness Increases a man’s chance of getting a raise or promotion, decreases a woman’s chances of getting a raise or promotion

“women are too emotional”

Men love to say this about women after hurting them, in order to shift the blame and dismiss their feelings in one go. In reality, women are taught to hold our tongues and control ourselves quite literally from birth. We’re taught to put men’s needs and wants ahead of our own emotions regardless of the personal cost. Men are taught to do more or less whatever the fuck they want to women. Men take their emotions out on women while women are expected to shove theirs down.

I could go on and on but I don’t really think I need to.

[please-unfollow-this-blog]

“women can’t drive” (The Guardian) (CBS News) (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety)

“women talk to much” (PBS, resources included)

“women are shallow” (just read the book, Dataclysm. by okcupid founder (?) that includes data about sex, gender, race, in finding online romantic partners)

“ball and chain” (University of London)

for all you pissbabies crying about sources

[ayanemoonlight]

Fucking finally.

[doingitatmybirthdaydinner]

you guys are probably talking about a 60 year old gruff straight man with a beer belly and a can of dip in his cargo shorts who kicks back after a long day of work in his lazy boy by jerking it to lesbian porn. he is not a woman, not even a trans woman, and certainly not a fucking lesbian. he’s probably “transphobic”. even if you’re joking, this is so offensive to actual lesbians because I know you people actually believe that men can be lesbians if they just fetishize us hard enough that they want to be us. imagine genuinely seeing a man fetishize lesbians and lesbian sex and immediately referring to him as she and saying he probably actually is a lesbian and giving him the benefit of the doubt and being sympathetic and sweet towards him. that’s a DUDE! who jerks it to lesbian porn! which is not unique to him or special to him at all! we’re so fucking cooked y’all

[leiatheia]

there are over 13.5k comments; this is just a sample

tw physical and emotional abuse, attempted murder, rape, statutory rape, drugging, csa, pedophilia, incest (let me know if i missed anything)

[average-exxistence]

'Patriarchy does not select who to oppress based on how we feel, behave or identify ourselves. We are oppressed based on the sex you can see on that sonogram. Beginning with that sonogram, females are designated as subhuman, belonging to the class to be exploited. Once born, we are educated on how to be ‘feminine’ (that is gender), to ensure our submission. We are not oppressed because we are feminine, we are feminine because we are oppressed.'

—Tasia Aránguez Sánchez (x)

[deadlysunlight]

why is women's potential for being bad people seen as the equivalent of men actually doing bad things en masse.

how does "women can rape too" become rhetorically equivalent to men actually being 99% of rapists? women could rape, but we don't. that's the entire problem with men. no one is forcing them to rape women or children, they are choosing to rape. it proves women are better people because we could rape and abuse children at the rates men do and yet women as a class choose not to.

why can't men as a class do the same?

very much follows the notion that women's language is violence, used to justify male violence against women. in this case, it's women's non-existent potential for violence that justifies male violence.

people now honestly think "oh she could have slapped him, she could have said some mean words, therefore him murdering her is justified." whether she actually hit him or said mean words is irrelevant.

as with most patriarchal reversals, facts don't matter, male feelings do.

[honeyapplebutterfly]

Why is it so difficult for males to comprehend that there can be ONE fucking space on the face of the PLANET that doesn’t include them? If you loved women and women’s comfort and safety, you would want us to have female exclusive spaces. You do not get to create an entire world controlled by male needs, wants, and desires for thousands of years and then say our HANDFUL of spaces just for US must include you as well. There is no way to become female. You are male. And you are an intruder.

Trans people have entire pride parades in every city of the US dedicated to them. We have underground whisper networks with coded language lest we lose our livelihoods for wanting a single space away from male domination. Go ANYWHERE. FUCKING. ELSE.

FEMALE ONLY SPACES WILL ALWAYS EXIST.

[lurking-garlic-knot]

[never-tell-me-what-to-do]

i hear men say they like misandrists bc they interpret it as playing hard to get great so some girls fake misandry just to get men's attention now too huh

[ot3]

notice how men feminine enough to be mistaken for women are a staple in much media but women masculine enough that they get mistaken for dudes are rare precious gems. just another one of life's little cruelties

[radishhfem]

I know I am too feminist for most people because Yes your favourite celebrities are creating misogynistic propaganda Yes your favourite music is sexist yes that included your favourite libfems who preach love for everyone