Polyamory is safe for work. Polyamory is safe for kids. Polyamory is safe for day time tv. Polyamory isn’t more sexual than any other relationship and it can be just as romantic, sweet, and healthy.
Aggressively reblogs.

blake kathryn
No title available
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
h
hello vonnie

ellievsbear
One Nice Bug Per Day
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
ojovivo
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

Janaina Medeiros
dirt enthusiast

Product Placement

Discoholic 🪩

oozey mess

@theartofmadeline
tumblr dot com
Monterey Bay Aquarium

JVL
Today's Document
seen from Singapore

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia
seen from Mexico
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from France

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Netherlands
@ateaaddict-blog
Polyamory is safe for work. Polyamory is safe for kids. Polyamory is safe for day time tv. Polyamory isn’t more sexual than any other relationship and it can be just as romantic, sweet, and healthy.
Aggressively reblogs.
「絡み合う」/「よむ」のイラスト [pixiv]
affirmations:
- it’s fun to be awake & in an upright position
- consciousness is a gift
- i CAN do this anymore
me as a teenager: man it sucks to have no privacy or autonomy but i guess its for a good reason. when i turn 18 i will realise how young i was and understand why they did all that.
me as an adult: teenagers are an oppressed class, their abuse is normalised and systemic and they need to start killing people
reblog to bap prev with your paw
reblog to bap prev with your paw
my deltarune fanart, ultimate strategic brilliance one billion
what is it about this face that drives tops crazy
could you have found a smaller picture
you do not need to protect men from transfemininity. you need to save girls.
horses cant scratch themselves but humans cant go fast. we support this legandary partnership
Wrong! Humans irrelevant and obsolete now
agnostic horse: we just dont know where scratch posts come from
I need my weird alone time or I will explode
Planet Earth (2006) Season 01 Episode 11 “Ocean Deep” Directed by Alastair Fothergill
I still find it pretty funny that in fallout 3 you can get your karma down by just opening Moriarty’s terminal over and over again.
The slavers at paradise falls have heard of me. I’m the guy that opens people’s computers over and over again without asking first.
Butch won’t be my companion. He’s like you’re too intense. You must’ve turned on that computer like 50 times in a row last time.
My forbidden computer touching ways have caught up with me.
The reason I’m doing this in the first place is that a lot of evil karma options in fallout 3 are just inconvenient. Like I could go out of my way to blow up a city or I could not blow up a city and get a much more convenient free house and keep access to their merchants.
So in order to keep getting the full evil karma experience, every time I do something convenient or utilitarian that raises my karma I go back to Moriarty’s Saloon and just open his terminal over and over again.
Thus, my good boy points are eliminated through repeated computer touching and the regulators here are hunting me down for looking at Moriarty’s personal data a hundred times in a row.
What’s really funny about lowering your karma this way is that after you do a major good Karma action and listen to the radio, the radio DJ Three Dog will be like this horrible fucker from vault 101 we all hate him so much you know that guy? He did another fucking thing. He saved a thousand orphans.
the secret is that saying “hopecore” or “hopepunk” will make people mad at you online but saying “stories about people overcoming corrupt and adversarial systems” is just Normal
this is part of an interesting phenomenon i've noticed where the shorthands people come up with for things wind up being far more annoying than the thing they're actually describing. like if i see a game calling itself a "cozy game" i'm rolling my eyes like good lord we need to put this cozy game shit on the shelf already. but if the same game instead calls itself a "farming sim" i'm just like yup, that's what that is. and then i move on because it's not really my cup of tea. i don't know what to make of this
It's the reification of media attributes into discrete commercial and personal identifiers, it's downstream of the individualist idea that your consumption is shorthand for what you believe in and the way many people online define their personality by that like they're taking sides in a war.
"Farming sim" is a mechanical description of what it is, "cozy game" is deliberately placing itself as part of a commercial-artistic movement for twee escapism that enthusiastically refuses to examine the reality of what it depicts and deliberately appeals to an audience who appreciates that consciously blind approach.
Likewise "hopepunk" in this example comes from a desire to make both a genre and a (supposedly) political aesthetic subculture out of a narrative concept - "stories about people overcoming adversarial systems" are indeed Normal, but they're only called "hopepunk" by people who think they're engaging in that fight simply by reading & writing them and react with hostility if told their liberal idealist conception of political struggle is fatally flawed because, again, they'd rather define their personality and ideology by consumption than meaningfully interrogate how reality functions.
I think another part of why it's particularly so annoying is that these genre descriptors actively tell you what to feel. A cozy game is telling you to feel cozy, "hopepunk" story is telling you to feel some abstract form of defiance. It's the commodification of art into little pre-determined emotional packages ready for appropriate consumption rather than leaving it to the audience to find their own meaning in it
did you know you can rename everything on your pc
You don't even need to study for the Rorschach test, btw, it's super easy. All they do is show you a bunch of stupid pictures of your dad getting eaten by a horse
Do not share the answers with your classmates.
Yes Dr Rorschach
Sorry Dr Rorschach
So I know that a lot of sources including google are claiming or are under the impression that Ringo Starr doesn't have the elf stones so I just wanted to clear things up reliably once and for all:
Yes, he did post about to gifting them to Barry Keoghan, the actor portraying him in the upcoming films, as a good luck charm for his role. However, the photo he posted was of him handing Keoghan a small leather sack, while elf stones famously erode all kinds of skin. Additionally, Ringo is on the record (I think? I swear I read this but I can't find the interview. Please reach out if you know what I'm talking about) that he keeps the stones away from cameras to prevent power-dampening effects.
It's likely that what he gave was a pouch of prop elf stones as a show of good faith, which could also be related to the old legend that a false elf stone will become real in a moment of need. Some people when presented with this evidence claim that while the photo was staged, the real stones were handed over in private, but this seems far fetched to me, especially since it's widely accepted that Ringo bound himself to the stones for nine and ninety years when he acquired them.
With all that said: Please stop spreading misinformation about the elf stones. If you don't have all the info, don't state your own assumptions as fact. And please do not listen to google's AI on important topics like these. All signs point to Ringo Starr currently being in possession of the elf stones.
Please reblog to spread awareness.