[bearsockz]

home cooked meal

[mossworm]

3D printed objects are not inherently food safe. do not prepare food with 3D printed objects.

[atomicniire]

This video discusses this topic and provides proof

[whateverthought]

"Oh no we HAD to get rid of the only black character in the Dance who challenges blood supremacy and Targaryen Obsession and Power because we know the audience wants our Groomer and Victim couple to work it out"

What if I said you're a clown, and you don't even understand the characters as you wrote them? What then? What if I called you racist for making racist decisions? What then?

[atomicniire]

Their justification makes no damn sense. Daemon can't have his canon cheating plot (which is ambiguous and you don't even have to include that part) because their relationship is too good? But Rhaenyra can have a cheating plot with two different women which is not alluded to in anyway in canon??? Also I think their show relationship is in an even worse spot then the book....

[hollowlujah]

happy bday strawberry! oh and happy ichigo week too!

[l0cal-cryptid]

What do you MEAN your favorite character is a ship?

[dailyrothko]

Mark Rothko, Four Darks in Red, 1958

[littlegreenfag-deactivated20240]

happy one year anniversary to the time i was in vermont in a dorm with a carbon monoxide leak and jacked off to this painting

[dappercyborg]

@atomicniire jacking off to a Rothko is something I imagine you doing

[desertedinurban]

High fashion Bleach by Deserted In Urban

[romanceyourdemons]

saw a post rightfully complaining about the fantasy trope of the petite/agile fmc’s weapon of choice being a dagger, considering that most serious styles of dagger-based combat are literally just wrestling where the winner gets to stab the loser. however i will point out that there are many historical traditions (i’m very familiar with east asian instances of this, and i seem to recall some european ones as well) of noblewomen carrying daggers or wearing big heavy hairpins designed to stab SO THAT they can commit suicide and die with spotless honor if threatened or captured. so if a woman’s primary weapon is a dagger, it means she’s been handed the premodern equivalent of a cyanide tooth and decided to get absolutely fucking jacked to make it everyone else’s problem

[aroace-ryland-grace]

the sewing machine is like if a horse and an inkjet printer had a child

[dappercyborg]

@atomicniire

[atomicniire]

Are you saying I'm a sewing machine?

[pondering-gales-left-orb]

Woe, jar of bees (and wasps) be upon ye

[shnowyfox]

it would be so awesome

it would be so cool

edit: idk if edits show up like this on posts but like. i have an educational reblog on this post. and. it is linked in the comments for easy finding. also added tags for filtering because this is my first containment breach i kinda half assed the tags when i posted this. i might add more if i see others add tags that make sense or if yall ask.

[steelnail]

Are you free from your curse yet i miss you

[atomicniire]

I have finally updated my Tumblr app after a year and a half. Don't like the changes but I'll adjust eventually. It was time.

[benjacksonstanaccount]

I'm sorry but this is just too funny not to put here (not my screenshot)

[penginius]

[piro-piroooooo]

big smile! :^D

[sztupy]

Landmark German ruling declares Google's AI Overviews are Google's own words and makes it liable for false answers

A German regional court has ruled that Google is directly liable for the content of its AI search overviews. According to the court, previou

[ayeforscotland]

Let’s fucking go

[made-in-manetheren]

This is HUGE.

1. The court holds Google responsible for statements made by its AI, considering them Google's statements (search engines have limited liability for results in their engine as they're the words of other sites/companies/people), meaning when their AI lies/hallucinates they're liable for the defamation/harm resulting from those statements.

2. Google's defense that customers are generally aware of the lack of reliability and are responsible for fact checking was dismissed. As the court pointed out, that would "significantly diminish" AI Search's stated purpose and it can't be distinguished from Google's business practices/statements as a search tool.

3. Studies have found about 91% of Google's everyday AI responses are accurate, leaving millions of searches per HOUR with potential liability for falsehoods. 56% of correct responses weren't supported by the sources the AI listed. Both of which mean Google is now liable for a LOT more AI "errors."

4. Google was held liable for 80% of court costs in this case and this precedent is expected to reverberate around the world. This is a massive shift from the 3rd-party search provider role Google has previously played and it comes right as they've tied ALL searches to their AI search.

TL;DR Google reeeeeally stepped in it this time.