A Matter of Trust
Song by Billy Joel
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
𓃗

PR's Tumblrdome
macklin celebrini has autism

Andulka
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
The Stonewall Inn
EXPECTATIONS
Sade Olutola
No title available
$LAYYYTER

Love Begins
Stranger Things
Cosmic Funnies
Show & Tell
NASA

pixel skylines
Xuebing Du
RMH
Mike Driver

seen from Brazil
seen from Italy

seen from Türkiye

seen from Germany

seen from Uruguay

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Belgium
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Norway

seen from Malaysia
seen from Austria

seen from Austria
seen from T1

seen from Malaysia
@bellaaldamas
A Matter of Trust
Song by Billy Joel
Is it true that evil beings can’t go into a church without being… *hisses* / Evil beings. You mean, like, what — vampires? / Ha. Vampires. No. I was thinking more along the lines of… witches.
Oh, how could I face the faceless days If I should lose you now?
2026 is not a 2014 and sometimes it's a good thing. A rage bait post with Ariel slander went viral not because people were agreeing with it but because we as a society came together to defend Ariel against said slander.
A humble reply/comment by truly yours on a separate defense post (not even the original rage bait) is humbly "thriving" and the defense post in question has thousands of likes and reposts. Society is healing:
I relate to Flynn in the Campfire Scene on a meta level as this is the exact reaction I invariably get whenever I watch magical girl anime. And particularly when the magical girl herself starts explaining, in the same half-robotic, half-brainwashed and inevitably miserable way as Rapunzel, how her forced magic that she never asked for is actually a "gift" (for others, not herself, obviously). One that needs to be cherished and "protected" at the expense of her needs, freedom, desires and well being.
This is the "holy hell, that's messed up, I need to liberate her or die trying" expression with which I watch those kinds of animes every time without fail:
ANASTASIA (1997) dir. Don Bluth and Gary Goldman.
face painting
The original, and still official, voice of Ariel speaks about her love for the character after voicing her since her initial casting in 1986. She won the role of Ariel over at least 500 other actresses, and Jodi admits that when she watches the film, she can see herself in Ariel. “She’s independent, spirited, and strong-willed. I don’t think I could have accomplished my dreams if there wasn’t a little of her in me.”
10 years ago today, Uncharted 4: A Thief's End was released! (May 10th 2016)
The finest sketches are always done in the notebooks😔😔😔
Rootbound Part One - Chapter Three Summary and Cliffnotes
Continued from Chapter Two..
It's especially important how in this chapter Rapunzel doubts both of her mothers, the fake one (even if she, according to these summaries of Rootbound, does not refer to Gothel as a "mother" in this) and the biological one, as she projects Gothel's manipulative behavior onto the Queen even if the latter is being genuine.
Rapunzel doesn't glorify her biological parents just because they are her blood. Not only is she still affected by her own "tower traumas" but she is also remaining aware of how the King and Queen and their flawed (to put it mildly) justice system tried to hang the man she loved without a trial and that it was her bio parents' fault rather than Gothel's. This is more than just acknowledging Flynn's traumas regarding the near execution though the book doesn't neglect to do that either. Showing how uncomfortable and at minimum uneasy he feels, always passing by the royal courtyard with the gallows still warm from his near hanging.
But this story takes it further: it equates, via Rapunzel's dream and her references to Flynn's scar from the stabbing, Gothel's actual murder of him and the King and Queen being about to kill him with no trial or mercy even before Gothel laid a finger on him. Moreover, Rapunzel places more weight on the King and Queen trying to kill him in cold blood - and straight up calls it "killing" for an expensive "hat" belonging to the royals - than she does on Gothel stabbing him fatally.
Rapunzel's dream has Gothel be the initial threat and then follows it up with the King and Queen being the BIGGER threat and the ones who almost did the unthinkable AND the irreversible (the hanging). Gothel is the obvious "evil" in this whereas the King and Queen are supposed to be the "good ones" and yet they tried to do something this cruel and are still beloved by their people. This is something Rapunzel openly questions and mentions how she does not want her own royal power to make her this kind of person. She wants to be her own person. This is the true development and independence she needed post movie.
This is exactly what the series should have done with the "Rapunzel is fresh out of tower, is traumatized and still not ready to step into the royal role" scenario. Except the Series did none of that: instead it framed Flynn, the one person who gave her freedom at the expense of his life, as her new "prison". It had Rapunzel remain submissive to her toxic and oppressive royal father, not once questioning his warped justice system and eventually perpetuating his tyrannical and oppressive leadership. Including in regards to Flynn and his "thief legacy" which Series Rapunzel so eagerly lectured him on to please the "think of the children" conservative crowd and the left wing haters of Flynn who claimed it was "PrObLeMaTiC!!!111!!!" Rapunzel "married the first man she met" and a criminal to boot. Never mind she met a bunch of actual violent criminals - the thugs - half an hour later and initially got along with them better than with Flynn because they were honest with her, unlike him at that stage.
In the movie Flynn had been the reserved and the guarded one (subverting the "resistant and unobtainable beauty" cliche, a "difficult" woman that a "freespirited and uninhibited" man/bad boy has to win over by breaking through her Walls TM and claiming her as a desired object while being the pursuing subject). And it backfired on the movie Flynn time and again until the narrative made it clear he can only get any further in life if he discards his fake bravado and sheds the artificial masculine facade choosing vulnerability and honesty instead. THAT was what saved both him and Rapunzel literally and figuratively starting the flooding cave and what made Rapunzel say she preferred his true vulnerable and nerdy self better than his fake persona.
The Series warped it all by framing Flynn's fake facade as his true persona and patronizing Rapunzel for falling for his "bad boy" charms because see, in the Real Life TM he is nothing but a useless comedic relief in present and a sleezy womanizer in between armed robberies who traumatized the poor royal women (including the Queen, Rapunzel's bio mother) in the past. So the near execution was totally justified! Long Live Sonnenburg, cried the leftist haters of Flynn and the right wing adepts of "thieving bad death penalty good" right wingers.
Progressives praised the Series framing of Flynn as a useless ex thieving lowlife because they hate the idea of a girl being in charge of her romantic agency and getting her freedom, her power AND the hot guy without being lectured or shamed for her romantic choices and having to redeem herself through girlboss sacrifice (Frozen Anna style). Because see, a woman being a self sacrificing girlboss is so leftist and feminist even though it's a literal conservative religious propaganda. Whereas the right wingers praised the series because they support the death penalty and everyone "important" remained white and who cares it pandered to the worst of the worst of leftist talking points about the OG movie.
Then again, no wonder: I do remember with a perfect clarity how Tangled 2010 was ripped to shreds by the "progressive Disney critical" bloggers on here and how they reblogged the hateful posts from conservative religious tradwife bloggers as long as they spouted vitriol against that "ditzy and obnoxious girl" and that "filthy orphaned thief who cut her hair WiTHoUt hErR cOnSeNT!!!111!!!".
It is commendable how the author of Rootbound not only shows the middle finger to both crowds but has Rapunzel mention her and Flynn's "new dream" love confession from the movie and how she directly ASKS if Flynn still feels the same way. Despite being in the place where he has to always see the gallows (again, the issue actually explicitly discussed and spelled out). Despite her parents trying to kill him without a trial for a theft of a luxury item and she feels responsibility and guilt for placing him in the situation and the environment where he has to always relive it. She cares about his well being and his perspective and she knows relationship is partnership, not just the giving and receiving scenario.
Rootbound Rapunzel knows that a scenario where one party only gives and the other one only receives is toxic and unhealthy because she had lived it with Gothel. The Series took that scenario and projected it into Rapunzel, Flynn and Cassandra except with Rapunzel in the Gothel role in her relationship with Flynn and Cassandra in the Gothel role in her relationship with Rapunzel. And the Series framed it as "healthy" as long as the parties are all young and hot (only old hags can be bad and evil, you see, so mich for feminism for leftists and the "family values" for right wingers).
But I'm sure progressives will hate this book for vindicating the romance and treating Flynn as the romantic hero he was meant to be in the movie rather than a bumbling clown in present and a genuinely disgusting man in the past who needed "fixing" through the noose and years of humiliation and purification through royal blood and prince "Horace" title to be worthy of the princess. Whereas the conservatives will hate extremely minimal, "why not" references to queerness of some secondary/supporting characters despite it not in any way affecting the main leads and their story.
Keep up with these detailed summaries, they are appreciated.
Rootbound Part One - Chapter One Summary and Cliffnotes
PART 1 follows Chapters 1-8, starts in Rapunzel's Kingdom (that is never given a name), and very early moves to the Kingdom of Astera mentioned in the book summary already out. Astera is where the main adventure takes place. It follows Eugene, Rapunzel, and another character you will meet when you read the book.
Part 1 wastes no time. It immediately delves into the reality of the characters after the movie, and what they went through. And it doesn't hold any punches to those realities unlike the series. As a book dealing with the aftermath of the movie, and its traumas, this was especially refreshing, as it developed our main characters without relying on flanderized stereotypes that the series was constrained to.
The author also shows that she put research into the world she was writing, and the characters (even the animals) to provide a realistic flair.
Now for the actual meat of the Act, and real spoilers starting with Chapter 1...
This is how the PTSD and the aftermath of lifelong traumas should be handled and how the Series, if it was bound to happen, should have dealt with those matters. Instead of almost immediately returning and reframing Rapunzel's symbol of oppression and lifelong exploitation - her magic hair - as the symbol of girlpower the book shows psychological aftereffects of her no longer possessing said symbol, the one thing the person closest to her (Gothel) had been abusing her into believing was of value about her. And the one thing Rapunzel had been led to think made her capable and worthy. This is one of the reasons this Rapunzel instinctively looks for a catch in other people's acceptance of her and their compliments to her and compares that to Gothel's treatment of her. Which she had considered a "norm" for 18 years, a norm where Gothel's acceptance and compliments were directly conditioned upon Rapunzel's usefulness.
Unlike the Series, this narrative does not pander to media illiterate crowd that watched too much anime, it does not punish Flynn with public humiliation and rejection for "taking away" the symbol of Rapunzel's supposed "girlpower" (which it never was in the movie) to give her freedom at the expense of his very life and to reassure her she is more than her forced "asset" and that her true value is her individuality, compassion, art and courage. Nor does Rootbound "reward" Rapunzel for rejecting that orphaned ex-thieving lowlife and leaving him to pour out his heart to a "frog"/Pascal while she runs off with her privileged lady in waiting to receive her Magical Girl "gift" back. Which she is then made to be "grateful for" and embrace her forced magical destiny like a good Magical Girl (read: good submissive patriarchal woman since all the Magical Girl narratives are inherently about submission and accepting forced roles under the guise of "female empowerment").
Here Rapunzel struggles with accepting the reality that the one thing her only guardian for 18 years had made her believe made her useful is now gone and she feels incapable and useless without it. But she still overcomes herself, overcomes the tower trauma and no longer wallows in it despite still being affected by it. Hence wearing the shoes and it being emphasized in a positive way by another character (a "neutral" party at that), signifying she is no longer "underdressed" and unequipped to face the world despite Gothel's best efforts. The book certainly does not take the result of trauma which was Rapunzel walking barefoot in the movie (because Gothel would not bring her shoes or let her wear any as it would go against the "keeping her underdressed and unequipped" plan) and reframe it as a "cute quirk". And does not add insult to injury by making it into an inherited, "adorable" family trait (which is offensive to abuse victims).
Flynn is there to reassure her while his own traumas are not ignored or made into a mockery even in the chapter where they are not the focus (they come into focus in the very next one) but are out there in the open despite his best efforts to hide them (paralleling Rapunzel doing the same thing). His insecurities and traumatic backstory are not turned into a punchline to please the detractors who claimed him being of a marginalized background and having a criminal record made him "unworthy" of the perfect princess (detractors both on the left and on the right, showing vividly how the two crowds are one and the same).
This narrative, unlike the Series, does not pander to the haters and twist and treat their movie relationship as a happenstance where the damsel fell for the first man she met because he was her rescuer (having an entire AU episode claiming she would have fallen for any other rescuer who would have gotten to her first) without "getting to know him first". That despite the actual movie canon showing Rapunzel and Flynn opening up to each other about their deepest traumas and the secrets they had not told anyone in years or ever and then continuing to do so throughout their other interactions post the shared near death experience.
The Series took a story about partnership, bonding and the importance of agency and choice and turned it into a story about forced decisions, damsels in distress falling for the "wrong" rescuers and accidental hookups. Where the tradeoff was Flynn "taking away Rapunzel's Magical Gift TM". Which was never actually a gift in the movie but Sonnenburg cannot hear you against the sound of the credit song of whatever anime about sexualized young waifus and forced magical destinies that he is currently watching.
On the contrary, this narrative does not treat Rapunzel and Flynn's movie relationship as a mistake that needed "fixing" by returning Rapunzel's bondage/deterrent 6 months into the post movie timeline, having her actually see her magic hair as a gift (who cares she never wanted it either time? Who even asks what those dumb women want anyway? Magical girl anime certainly never does and neither did Sonnenburg who evidently watched too much of it), having her spend THREE years with it and then cut it on her own (fulfilling the wet dream of the movie haters). Thus nullifying all the points of the movie and both Rapunzel and Flynn's developments individually and together.
Flynn's arc in the book is not about "putting that lowlife in his place" for "taking the Magical Girl gift away". The magical hair is correctly treated the way it was treated in the movie: like the symbol of oppression that left Rapunzel with scars and insecurities. There is no "humbling of the pretty bad boy" scenario constructed by Sonnenburg the right wing man-child hater of Flynn who was praised for implementing said scenario by the equally bigoted, equally dimwitted leftists. Even though movie Flynn was never the bad boy cliche and the movie made it explicitly clear his Flynn Rider persona was a defensive facade/bravado, as were Rapunzel's "quirky" frying pan wielding antics (but the Series chose to pander to the shallow "she was just annoying and adorkable" interpretation of the movie Rapunzel, frame Rapunzel's defensive facade as her true persona like it did Flynn's and have them be abused and berated for that by Monty and Cassandra respectively).
Rootbound treats Flynn's defensive facade as exactly what it was in the movie while letting his true vulnerabilities seep through that and having those vulnerabilities be the focus of the coming chapters and continue to be the focus of the story. Along with Rapunzel validating his experiences as much as he does hers - which is what an equal relationship should be - and repeatedly calling out and expressing disgust over the near execution for a crown, which this Rapunzel calls an "expensive hat belonging to the wrong family". Again, a far cry from the scoffing lecture Series Rapunzel gave to Flynn where she expressed disgust not over the near execution without a trial (the Series did not even mention that) but over his "thief legacy". And both the Flynn hating progressives from the left and the right wingers who "hate thieves" clapped while Disney did its most shameless pandering in years. But the progressives called it an "improvement and realism" whereas the conservatives chose to willfully ignore the pandering because as long as the main leads remained white it "can't be woke".
Shannen Doherty red carpet looks from the 90′s
Progressives in 2026 are literally forced to admit Usagi's treatment in the 90-s anime was horrendous (bullying, fat-shaming of a petite small girl, berating her for daring to have age appropriate interests and goals outside of her forced Higher Mission TM, her older boyfriend AND her future daughter ganging up against her, etc).
And they only admit it to hit the leftist talking points. NOT because it was actually heinous.
They acknowledge it because "fat-shaming bad" or "she was just a teenage girl, be kind, just wait, wait, she WILL grow into a self-sacrificing magical girlboss, just give her ~~~~time!".
When the actual criticism should be this: neither Usagi nor any teenage girl nor any woman at all should be a self sacrificing martyr for anyone ever because female sacrifice is never rewarded. Anime culture is dangerous for telling women and girls otherwise.
Still commend this kind of awareness: