Blue eared pheasant (Crossoptilon auritum), China
hello vonnie
untitled
sheepfilms
taylor price

Origami Around
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
NASA
Jules of Nature
Game of Thrones Daily
tumblr dot com

ellievsbear
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Not today Justin
Monterey Bay Aquarium
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

shark vs the universe
RMH
cherry valley forever

bliss lane

Product Placement
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Netherlands

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Iraq

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Norway

seen from Singapore

seen from United States

seen from T1
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
@caffeinatedcorvid
Blue eared pheasant (Crossoptilon auritum), China
I do it a lot here anyway, but allow me a moment to get on my archivist soapbox because this is not only cool af but important too.
The US National Archives (and this may certainly apply to other countries but this post is about this specific institution) has a lot of material. And that may seem like an obvious statement, but what I mean to say here is that it has a lot of unprocessed material.
“Processing”, in the archive world, is the word we use to mean “organizing the collection materials in a way that makes sense and describing the collection so people know what’s there”. Essentially, processing a collection or material is what makes it accessible to researchers. Think about how you organize yourself or your space. Most of the time when we acquire material we get it exactly how the creator kept it, which is ranges from neat as a pin to literal garbage dump, but mostly falls into the middle area of somewhat organized but also not really. Processing gives the archivist “intellectual control” (we go through everything so we now know exactly what’s in the collection) and gives researchers something to look at that’s a lot more manageable.
But, like I said, the National Archives has a lot of material. Which at this point includes a massive backlog. So what they have done, with the advent of the internet, is turned to crowdsourcing. (Using a large group of volunteers over the internet to accomplish more than the few people who work for the archive can do, and/or using group knowledge and skills that they don’t have to their advantage. Wikipedia or any fandom wiki is an example of crowdsourcing.) This is a long process, because anything they put up has to be digitized first, and that is not as easy as it sounds. I won’t rant here, but it’s time consuming, labor intensive, and in some cases not even feasible with the material.
Anyway, the National Archives crowdsources through a program that they call “citizen archivists”. It’s something that’s free and obligationless, it’s totally voluntary and you do things like add tags to pictures, transcribe documents that are handwritten or otherwise not word-searchable, and add comments about things that are missing information or context.
The reason I bring this up is because they have divided the work into what they call “missions”, basically just categories of material to work on. They have a new one that’s just been made public (likely because they finally got the digitization completed) that is a large collection of pictures consisting of Native subjects, and they need help tagging them.
So if you feel antsy and need something to do or you feel down and you want something positive, consider helping out the National Archives. Because the work the citizen archivists do makes the materials more accessible to the public, and ultimately to any and all future researchers out there.
Please do this! Its really helpful, especially for researchers
the Library of Congress has something similar- I’ve been transcribing Spanish legal documents for them
https://crowd.loc.gov/campaigns/herencia-centuries-of-spanish-legal-documents/
some hyper famous artists like Van Gogh transcend overratedness and become underrated because they're so normalized. Like I'll look at a van Gogh and I'm like wait this really is amazing you guys don't get it
Shakespeare is like this
Every time I see a Van Gogh that’s not one of his better known pieces it absolutely blows me away
Have you seen this shit my liege? smh unreal
THE ORANGES
Time for my biannual freakout about Two Crabs
A second thought save them all from my provoked rage...Where is Louis?
big fan of daniel going completely off the rails while shouting "im nORMAL i am NORMAL im A NORMAL MAN" the whole time
i got commissioned to do another excerpt from the Devil's Minion chapter of Queen of the Damned and it was So Much Fun these two are insane
chapter excerpt under the cut:
Interview with the Vampire ★ The Vampire Lestat 2x04 "I Want You More Than Anything in the World" 3x02 "Toledo"
Inspired by this post, @howmostardently.
"Is that your man? Yes, thats mine." 😌
Armand/Daniel nation how we feelin' this weekend! 😩
INTERVIEW WITH THE VAMPIRE 2.04 » I Want You More Than Anything in the World 3.03 » Toronto
They did not, in fact, cancel it.
My mans unlocked a higher level of synesthesia
Bumble sharks 🐝🦈
More random tropes that I fucking love: Becoming the mask you wore.
Like oh shit, this character who was sent to spy somewhere under a false identity suddenly realises they've started to genuinely become the person they claimed to be? Someone who's been telling the same lies about who they are for so long that they're actually forgetting that the story isn't true? Finding themselves genuinely doing the things they pretend to do in front of people, when they're alone and nobody's watching? Answering to a name that wasn't supposed to be theirs without thinking?
Ooohh-hoh-hoh, you lost track of yourself in pretending to be someone else? You were only supposed to impersonate somebody, a plausible background and a name you came up with on the spot, and now that the people you were supposed to infiltrate have become your true companions? You lost yourself in the game you played, and no you no longer know who you truly are, and where your true loyalties lie? And both sides would mark you a traitor if you came out with the truth. On a scale of one to ten, how bad did you fuck up.
Fuck that is a good trope. Never seen it done badly. Pour that shit on a table and I'll chop it into lines and snort it.
Solid argument, my man
Here, Michael, for your ear. Take one of mine.
JEFFREY COMBS as Herbert West BRUCE ABBOTT as Dan Cain RE-ANIMATOR (1985) dir. Stuart Gordon