Zor @cinnamonzor - Tumblr Blog

TO ANYONE WHO USES DISCORD- FOUR AI SCRAPING BOTS HAVE BEEN SECRETLY ADDED TO YOUR SERVERS WITHOUT YOUR CONSENT

Saw this going around and tested it myself, and I can confirm that this is unfortunately legit. Four hidden bots have been placed in any existing or newly created Discord server that are harvesting data, images, and most concerningly, one seems to be a face swap bot.

Due to them being invisible, banning them from your servers isn't possible without their ID's, which I've typed out for easy access.

1153984868804468756 1288638725869535283 1090660574196674713 1104973139257081909

Banning is done with the /ban command with each string pasted in one at a time. Four ban commands in total.

Image proof below and further information. This was in my PERSONAL server that has existed for +5 years. Discord is harvesting your shit without your consent, fight back.

unluckyxse7en

Hey so in case you're like me and wondered: Can you ban members without them being in the server?

The answer is yes, you absolutely can! It'll look like this - the numbers you paste will be what's "banned"

However my sibling tried this in her servers and found that One of them was NOT a string of numbers, like so:

And for clarity it isn't a difference in user or device, this is what she got elsewhere:

So if you ban these numbers and the message shows the actual username? Pretty sure that means they were in there.

Very unpleasant way to check the veracity of this post but hopefully this is a helpful tip for anyone who was concerned - my sib would have No Reason to add these in herself and didn't have any clue it was in there.

Personally, I'd say even if you are still worried about misinfo/fearmongering/etc from this post, think of it this way - worst case scenario is you're banning a bot you'll never use or need. Not a person, a bot. There's no real damage done playing it safe and running the ban commands through, aside from maybe losing some time doing so.

Best of luck everyone.

actualdraccus

Wishing I'd seen this more quickly - Had to take these things out of a lot of creative spaces just now. I'm not convinced that the username only shows up if they were in there, but I do think it's better safe than sorry, especially when peoples' art is involved.

cloud--atlas

@quidnunc-life @inkvoices @alistrawrites

xenthosss

@returnsnull7404 hey this is VERY much real I just took all of them off my discord

where-was-there-was

what the actual fuck

one of them was on my personal server and ALL OF THEM were on our writing server

pangur-and-grim

he tore out his own eyes after seeing God

pangur-and-grim

they didnt let me decorate cookies this year...

tiktaali

nourasbasha

Today, Angelina Jolie arrived near Gaza as news reports speak about a possible reopening of the Rafah crossing. For the world, this is diplomacy and headlines.

For my family, this could be the thin line between staying trapped in a tent , or finally escaping it. If Rafah opens, this may be our only chance to leave the cold, the fear, and the nights our children cry themselves awake.

nourasbasha

This news is not political for us. It is about our children sleeping in a tent. About cold nights, rain, illness, and fear.If Rafah opens, we may finally be able to move them somewhere safer, but only if we can afford the cost of leaving.

nourasbasha

All the help and appeals before were temporary. They were only to keep my children alive, food, blankets, protection from the cold. But today this is not temporary help. Leaving is the chance for real survival

If the door opens this may be our only chance to save our children. from the tent, from fear, from illness, from another night we may not survive .Those who help us today are not just easing pain. they are helping save us completely

Please help us survive

nourasbasha

Opening the crossing does not mean freedom by itself. Leaving requires money, documents, and help we do not have. This is why we are asking for support, so this moment does not pass while our children remain trapped in a tent.

autisticmudkip

Please, share and donate if you can! Anything you can give helps!

nourasbasha

Any help here is needed... four children, a father, and a mother are being rescued and evacuated from Gaza... Please don't hesitate, help us... This is important and life-changing.

rayne143

writing affirmations for 2026:

at least you didn’t use AI

steviemcfly

I honestly don’t understand why there aren’t more people who, when given the platform to discuss minimum wage, don’t simply distill it to the simplest of facts:

A forty hour work week is considered full time.

It’s considered as such because it takes up the amount of time we as a society have agreed should be considered the maximum work schedule required of an employee. (this, of course, does not always bear out practically, but just follow me here)

A person working the maximum amount of time required should earn enough for that labor to be able to survive. Phrased this way, I doubt even most conservatives could effectively argue against it, and out of the mouth of someone verbally deft enough to dance around the pathos-based jabs conservative pundits like to use to avoid actually debating, it could actually get opps thinking.

Therefore, if an employee is being paid less than [number of dollars needed for the post-tax total to pay for the basic necessities in a given area divided by forty] per hour, they are being ripped off and essentially having their labor, productivity, and profit generation value stolen by their employer.

Wages are a business expense, and if a company cannot afford to pay for its labor, it is by definition a failing business. A company stealing labor to stay afloat (without even touching those that do so simply to increase profit margins and/or management/executive pay/bonuses) is no more ethical than a failing construction company breaking into a lumber yard and stealing wood.

Our goal as a society should be to protect each other, especially those that most need protection, not to subsidize failing businesses whose owners could quite well subsidize them on their own.

reagan-was-a-horrible-president

Wages are a business expense, and if a company cannot afford to pay for its labor, it is by definition a failing business. A company stealing labor to stay afloat (without even touching those that do so simply to increase profit margins and/or management/executive pay/bonuses) is no more ethical than a failing construction company breaking into a lumber yard and stealing wood.

problemnyatic

oh my god this post is ten years old

labelleizzy

This argument is ninety years old if not older!

crunchbuttsteak

imnotrevealingmyname

You can only reblog this on the 3st of January

official-lucifers-child

the 3st huh?

transgirlsgetswords-deactivated

the 3st.

afloweroutofstone

The US government's military operation in the Caribbean is supposedly intended to target "narco-terrorists." In my latest article, I explore the history of the term to argue that "narco-terrorism" is mostly a myth— a "political slogan" which does not accurately describe the world. By focusing our attention on foreign suppliers, this myth distracts us from more important factors, including the US government's own history of supporting drug trafficking.

Framing “Operation Southern Spear” as a battle against “narco-terrorists” is a desperate attempt to commit new violence using old excuses, o

To say that “narco-terrorism” is a myth is not to deny the obvious violence associated with the black market drug trade, but to acknowledge that the term does more to confuse than to clarify. The idea does not accurately explain the complex dynamics of the global drug trade; instead, it radically oversimplifies the problem. By portraying military intervention as a response to drug trafficking, the “narco-terrorism” myth allows politicians to ignore all of the ways in which military intervention is a cause of drug trafficking... Perhaps the greatest flaw of “narco-terrorism” is that it encourages us to believe that complex human problems have simple military solutions. Sociologist C. Wright Mills once astutely criticized US elites for accepting a “military definition of reality,” a distorted perspective which prevents them from imagining policy solutions that do not involve military intervention. So long as the government insists upon seeing non-military problems through a military lens, they will never be solved.

afloweroutofstone

It is important to remember that the US government’s case against Maduro is almost entirely fictional