Is AngryDesertPhrog actually Own-Tech?
I was doing some thinking after reading that 14-year-old Redditor girl's interactions with AngryDesertPhrog and the stalking that Own-Tech has done to her and I noticed some disturbing parallels between AngryDesertPhrog and Own-Technician-7283/w4tchd0g0fd34th. I'd always gotten some creepy vibes from Phrog during my numerous interactions with them, like they were very inconsistent and even hypocritical about their "child safety" obsession. When I saw them try to demand a 14-year-old girl take a photo of her phone I started to get suspicious and looked back on things.
Both have interacted with Saphera while denying being a fan of her's.
Both have interacted with Probium while denying being his friend, colluder, partner, or any kind of relation.
Both are totally fine with the horrid actions of Saphera and Probium, claiming ignorance of them despite defending them.
Both will look at totally empirical evidence about Saphera or Probium and say "that doesn't count. I won't explain, it just doesn't count because I say so."
Both are complete and total pedants who are always VERY particular about exact wording. Hyperbole cannot exist around them.
Both cannot take jokes, always taking them 100% seriously and using them as "ammo" against their victim. Upon later being told they are jokes, they will ignore this so they don't lose their new ammo.
Their pedantry is exclusively used as a "gotcha" on others, often for petty reasons to seem smarter.
Both complain about not having the time to deal with something they have dedicated much of their mind, time, and energy towards for months right when they have to answer to a long list of their transgressions from their victims.
Both demand "evidence" but then insist none of it is good enough, but then their own "evidence" is just "the vibes on this one, man" or "I made broad assumptions without caring about motivation or context."
When using ammo against their victim, both will completely ignore time. Timestamps, order of events, how long ago it was, etc.
Both see pedophilic interactions where platonic and normal things are happening, suggesting they are projecting their own pedophilic desires onto the actions of others. Everything looks pedophilic to them for a reason. A "gross" one as they put it.
Both have defended lolicon/shotacon with the exact same defense. "It's gross, but not as bad as CSAM."
Despite this, they hang out with people who say lolicon/shotacon is CSAM and say anyone who likes it is as bad as any child molester. They are both fine with that and will not correct their allies, only their victims.
Both have a moral system based entirely around "Cyberweasel89 always evil and wrong, anyone who hates Cyberweasel89 always righteous and correct."
Both often hang out with pedo-hunter children (and teens since they will be pedantic about that label in an attempt to gotcha me).
Both claim to hate and be against pedophiles, but are perfectly fine with teens and children interacting with people the children claim are pedophiles.
Both have very inappropriate interactions with teens and children.
Both are pro-EPI, as they have zero issue with exposing minors to porn and with minors posting porn.
In particular, both had zero issue with their pet 13-year-old victim BuckoBoy linking to their favorite shotacon porn over on DeviantART, seeing him do so and making zero comment about it even though they clearly saw him doing it.
They actively encourage bad behavior in the children they hang out with by encouraging, defending, and enabling horrid, self-destructive, abusive, and toxic behavior behind their parent(s) backs.
Both seem to have a very Puritan, almost mythical view on children. Just about any interaction with one will get you on her shitlist. You so much as mention anything REMOTELY NSFW in earshot of a 17-year-old while 18 and she will come find you and try to stalk and deplatform you. But if that 17-year-old goes actively looking for NSFW communities to make and consume porn for, she will turn a blind eye about her "teens are all pure angels" belief she forces on to others.
Both try to maintain overly stiff, formal wording, but will slip into mockery with rofl emojis and "lol" the moment they slip up on their stiff false formality.
Both will happily harass children online.
Both have extremely broad and very inconsistent definitions for "pedophilia."
Both are virtue signalers who do not practice what they preach, seemingly seeing themselves as immune to anything they claim about their victims.
Both will constantly move the goalpost to maintain their belief in something. AngryDesertPhrog once told me it was worth punishment and harassment for me to have a panic attack in front of a child, insisting the child "did not consent" to the panic attack the child gave me, which is a very ableist thing to say (and all of the hate mob against me has shown some form of ableism), though Phrog of course denies any ableism in the same way Own-Tech does. She told me if they told me on "Am I the Asshole" that it was fine, she would relent. When they did precisely what she asked, she still refused to relent, despite the people there met the exact requirement she gave me. Meanwhile despite being disproven several times, Own-Tech has latched onto that "9 year old dick" story like it's a security blanket even though it's such weak material to harass me with that it's starting to smell of desperation how emotionally attached to it she is.
Both make ultimatum deals against their victims. "Go ask on AITAH" for me and "Show me a photo of your ID" to the 14-year-old girl they abused. The fact they feel they have the power to make these gambits is sickening. I'm glad thatchild didn't do it. I learned from that that it was just a trick and they weren't going to honor their end of the deal they themselves tried to force on that child. Oh, and the sicko used the child blocking her for her own good as an excuse to say "Welp, she didn't doxx herself like I demanded, guess I'm right in my abuse and harassment of a child!" Sicko predator.
Both are very thin-skinned and will get very angry if you block them or accuse them of something, denying it but never explaining it.
Both will edit a post after being blocked to express how angry they are, but cover it up by laughing mockingly at whoever blocked them.
Both are very creepy in their false cordial formalities at times. It might be why they get on so well with Probium. He's someone whose other victims have even described (accurately) as an "obsessed creepy stalker." Huh, just like Own-Tech!
Both claim to be LGBT and Autistic. In Own-Tech's case, it's when she needs to use them as shields, otherwise they rarely come up. But Phrog used her Autism as a shield for her bad faith pedantry once. I don't buy it due to their pedantry being used too much as a gotcha and not enough for anything else.
Own-Tech is female and Phrog was female when I knew them. Phrog might have changed to preferring fluid pronouns but I am unsure.
Both are very obsessed with claiming others are sockpuppets based on "how they type" and very vague similarities which could apply to millions of people.
Both claim photos and screenshots are effectively NFTs. No two people can own a copy of one. If you see someone use the same meme, they are the same person. They demand it be so.
Both are convinced that children can only be what they are in Own-Tech/Phrog's head and any who step outside that box are no longer allowed to be children in their eyes. This includes saying children are not children if they have sex education-based knowledge, despite them both being okay with EPI and children interaction with who they claim want to rape them.
Both have fuckMAP as one of their top subs.
Both have little minigami-esque subreddits among their top subs. And since they will no doubt try to "gotcha" me on this, I found the site their 14-year-old victim used to get data on their accounts, and in addition to finding it completely legal and just using public data and compiling numbers based on things like most said words, I also used it on Phrog's account.
Both will use their pedantry in the worst faith imaginable.
Both will use their pedantry arrogantly. No one else's use of a word can be correct. It MUST be their hyper-specific definition for each word which is the objectively correct one.
Both lie that I'm some kind of hive mind of sockpuppet accounts, despite using sockpuppets themselves (and splitting hairs on what a sockpuppet is to defend their own hypocrisy).
Both have posts up which slander me which they refuse to remove and have no reason to actually keep up other than wanting to incite harassment against me (or rather, their innocent victims they lie about being me).
Both accuse others of being hypocrites while being the worst hypocrites ever themselves (something they have in common with Probium, Saphera, and Saphera's fellow dramatuber Rev Says Desu who I imagine Phrog/Own-Tech adore for having harassed me before and for being The Lolicon King).
Both refuse to give a reason for doing what they do. Predating on children genjuinely seems to be a sick hobby for them.
Both insist on addressing criticism of them, but only selectively, but still somehow know when and where criticism of them occurs.
Both are fine with transphobia inconsistently.
Both are fine with doxxing inconsistently.
Both view themselves as some kind of vigilante Internet police consisting of both judge, jury, and executioner. Phrog is even a member of the MinistryofReddit, a subreddit which is famously a bit of a joke among other subreddits. Phrog's FuckMAP sub is also known for being very corrupt by the people who made replacement subs for it such as FuckMAPv2 and FuckMAPsButBetter.
Both arrogantly believe themselves always right about whatever reality they decided (something they have in common with Probium).
Both constantly contradict themselves due to always justifying what they want in the moment without concern for consistent views, morals, ethics, rationality, or facts (again, like Probium).
Both are block-happy, yet angry when their victims block them because they can't harass them as easily when blocked, then laugh mockingly and act like it's some kind of petty win that their victim blocked them.
Both have a fixation with children's genitals (like Probium), as all people who accuse many random, inconsistently specific people of being pedophiles.
Like, what really make the electricity in my brain fly was when I was attacked by BuckoBoy and Phrog turned to support Saphera because of it.
Phrog thought it was okay that BuckoBoy was a 13-year-old who sought out interactions with people he thought wanted to rape him as a 13-year-old pedo-hunter in a pedo-hunter subreddit full of kids.
Phrog thought it was okay that BuckoBoy was posting ungated, uncensored links to porn in SFW subreddits (thus showing she was okay with EPI).
Phrog thought it was okay that BuckoBoy admitted to finding it hilarious that he caused me enough distress to trigger a panic attack from my trauma and that he enjoyed causing drama.
No, Phrog insisted it was an unforgivable sin for an adult to have a panic attack without the consent of any children who might be around. If a Vietnam vet has a flashback with a kid around, and he somehow doesn't gain that child's permission before he has his flashback from whatever triggered his trauma, Phrog says that Vietnam vet must be abused and harassed and is a wicked sinner. How ableist is that, that Phrog insisted that you must be punished by her personally if you have a flashback or panic attack in front of a child without the child's permission first?
Even if Phrog gives you a condition that SHE HERSELF set to clear you of your sins in her eyes, she will not uphold her end of the bargain should you clear her conditions. She has decided this, she wants this more than anything, and no amount of goalpost moving or evidence against what she decided will cause her to change her mind about you being a wicked sinner who she supreme god judge for.
And that's what Own-Tech is doing with this "9 year old dick" story she's so obsessed with. Even when HER OWN STATEMENTS invalidate her claims about it, I am a wicked sinner who must be stalked, harassed, and abused because I got tricked by a liar and tried to comfort him 10 years ago, and for that I must pay eternally because she has judged I must, even if it means she posts porn for children to see because she supports EPI. It got to the point where she so ran out of ammo that "9 year old dick" story could be that she started saying I had to be harassed and abused because my comment encouraging a liar I gullibly fell for the lie of was "gross" but she doesn't think Probium's comment about child "arserape" is gross at all (proving just how pedophilic she could be deep down).
It was the exact same mental gymnastics of denying or fabricating "evidence" to reach a conclusion she already decided and wanted. Phrog with her PTSD panic attack consent, Own-Tech with the security blanket that is the "9 year old dick" she's obsessed with because she has no other ammo she can possibly use without outing herself as Phrog.
Of course, if it turns out I was wrong this whole time, that AngryDesertPhrog ISN'T Saphera de Noma's sockpuppet, then I will freely admit I was wrong and issue a formal apology to Saphera and Spiderleamer.
But it's not that I could never be proven wrong. It's that Own-Tech won't ever admit that, even if it would mean I had to admit I was wrong. She would rather see Spiderleamer lumped in with her than admit she's someone else. She claims it's because she doesn't want to be "harassed" but she openly admitted I never harassed anyone when she tried to define "harassment" as an excuse for her child abuse. It's really because she knows she's doing something incriminating and, out of cowardice, doesn't want it to tarnish her main's reputation. She would rather see her lumped in as the same person as Spiderleamer and Saphera than see me admit I was wrong, because she's amoral and selfish like that. In the end, the only thing that matters to her is herself and what she wants reality to be, and I pity her for that.
