#tw csam

[this-is-transandrophobia]

Hey, theres a post going around about you defending pedophilia. The context looks kinda weird and idk what to make of it, can you explain?

I already did and it sure sucks ass that I have to keep defending myself. In the notes on this post i said that fiction isn't csam bc it does not abuse real children and Ai is bc it feeds off of real photos of children. Here is my source on why it is classified that way and here is how incorrectly labeling it can harm victims. No where do I make any commentary on whether or not its should exist or anything else, just that its not csam. It is important to me to use the right words for it bc I am a victim of it myself.

I am aware of Australia's recent ruling but 1. I dont live in Australia and 2. Governments are quite frequently wrong about things. My government currently thinks its a great idea to kidnap and murder people for no fucking reason.

An asshole got mad that I blocked them, not for hating pedophilia, but for being a dick in my notes, and their friend decided to imply I'm a creep because of it. Ill remind yoj i am allowed to block anyone for any reason and id encourage you to do the same.

Don't ever fucking tell me trans women are the only ones getting pedojacketed ever again.

Calling a trans guy a pedophile defender for using the right terminology is transandrophobia btw.

Anyone else who accuses me of this shit is getting blocked on site. Between the harassment from this and what I'm dealing with on my main blog, im fucking done.

[unspeakablearchives]

where does CSAM or revenge porn fit in with anti-censorship?

/gen

Freedom of Expression does NOT cover things that cause tangible harm to specific people.

Think of it this way:

Everyone has innate human rights. Freedom of Expression is one of them, but it is not the only one. People also have rights to bodily autonomy, privacy, dignity, safety, and to not be sexually exploited.

Child Sexual Abuse Material ("CSAM" - this is now the preferred term for "child pornography") may technically be a form of "expression" in the most literal sense - but it is a form that is the documented product of the sexual abuse of a real child, and its circulation continues that abuse.

Likewise, Non-Consensual Intimate Imagery ("NCII" - this is now the preferred term for "revenge porn") is the non-consensual distribution of intimate material in a way that directly violates a specific person’s privacy, dignity, and safety.

So I really don't think this is a case of making some prudish exception to anti-censorship principles. It's a case of recognizing that one person’s claimed "expression" cannot include the right to violate another person’s human rights.

And, as a side note, that is also why FICTIONAL depictions of abuse, or even ugly works that seem to romanticize or encourage abuse, fall into a very different category.

Those works may be highly disturbing, exploitative, disgusting, or morally rotten, but they are NOT actually abusing a specific real person in the way CSAM and NCII are - the harm there is direct, concrete, and inseparable from the material itself.

With fiction, the argument is usually vague and indirect: some third party might consume it, be influenced by it, and then do something harmful later. That kind of causal chain is speculative, hard to prove, based on the actions of another person with their own free will, and potentially limitless once you start to expand on it. If you make that the standard for censorship, then practically any book, film, fantasy, or artwork could potentially end up suppressed on the theory that it might negatively affect someone somewhere.

Freedom of expression does protect idiotic ideas, disgusting art, fantasies, and highly offensive speech. But it does not include a right to sexually exploit, expose, or abuse a real person and then call the evidence "speech."

[proship-confessional]

a post i came across on reddit and felt people here would appreciate

[i-like-batfam]

Bruce always kinda noticed how Jason would avoid physical touch, how he would sometimes scrub his skin raw in the shower but he never thought much of it.

Then after he passed Bruce would spend days looking over every image he saved of him and when he memorized every detail of those images he started searching the internet for anything that included Jason. Images from galas he dragged him to, photos from the paparazzi that bruce used to fight off, pictures from Jason's school clubs. Then he saw that photo, 'got this of some kid on the street a few years ago, looks like Bruce's newest acquisition', he never knew an image alone could make him vomit. The comments were worse, 'this is limited edition now', 'I wonder how much brucie would pay for this', 'he must miss him, the kid was good' as if Bruce was anything like them, as if Bruce would ever even think about doing that.

It took the bat compter 15 minutes to track down their home addresses and 25 minutes for Bruce to put them all in comas so deep they'd spend most of their prison sentences in the icu.

Still, none of that violence could make up for never getting to tell his son how sorry he was that those things ever happened, that Bruce would protect him, that he'd make sure it never ever happened again.

[alois-canon-boyfriend]

Sorry man but you are living in denial. Consuming lolicon definitely makes you more likely to commit a crime against a child because regardless if it's CP or not, you're still entertaining the fantasy. Which is why in some countries arrests have already been carried out for distributing lolicon content, in case you didn't know. And if you care to research true crime, there have been many instances of pedophiles who upon arrest confess that they started off with lolicon, then went on to consume real CP and finally ended up committing an actual crime.

you can go fuck right off, actually.

I am not attracted to real children. I do not have interest in consuming CSAM, and i think anyone who does so is disgusting. I am not using lolisho content as a "substitute" for CSAM.

I like shotas. Not real children.

NOT ONLY THAT, you disgusting fucking freak, bit to suggest that i would cause harm against a child just because i enjoy shota content is actually BEYOND repulsive.

Because let's think this through for a second. You believe that because i enjoy fictional content, i will be prone to or eventually make the conscious decision to sexually assault a kid??? Use at least two braincells here, idiot. Are people who enjoy watching animated gore eventually going to commit a murder, by this logic??

I could go deeper here, but i doubt you'd try to listen, given that you were stupid enough to tell a victim of sexual assault that they would eventually push that sort of harm on a real child because of their tastes in fiction. What kind of stupid do you have to be?

AND ONE LAST THING, the CORRECT term is not "cp" or "child porn", it is "csam". At least get your shit straight before coming into my ask box looking like a stupid uneducated dipshit.

[rantblogblog]

IT'S ONLY A ARCHIVE WHEN THEY WANNA DEFEND KIDDIE PORN!!

I usually hate ai and ai bros but I HATE AO3 MORE! I FUCKING HATE THE HYPOCRISY AMD AO3 SAYS THEY AREN'T A POLITICAL ARCHIVE WHEN IT COMES TO PALESTINE! BUT THE WHOLE THING ABOUT ARCHIVES IS THAT THEY ARE POLITICAL BECAUSE THEY ARE ANTI-CENSORSHIP!

AO3 IS SUPPOSEDLY SUPPOSED TO BE ANTI-CENSORSHIP AND ARCHIVE BUT THEY REMOVED POSTS ABOUT PALESTINE AND CALLING FOR AWARENESS ABOUT THE GENOCIDE IN PALESTINE!! THEY ARE HYPOCRITES!

AO3 IS MADE FOR PREDATORS BY PREDATORS!

[pjtrashofficial]

Just another reminder to unfollow me if you’re fine tolerating blatant csam just because it’s “fictional”. This crap is made by pedophiles. You’re part of the problem if you’re letting pedophiles just exist among us. Thanksss

[deeptrospection]

Trauma survivors, SA survivors, bullying survivors, homophobia survivors, transphobia survivors, xenophobia survivors, DV survivors....

Do not need to forgive their abusers.

They are under no moral, ethical, religious, or spiritual obligation to forgive those that traumatized them.

Do not say "Forgiveness is for oneself, not for the abuser" as an excuse to make victims believe it's some type of therapy.

Victims do not owe their abusers anything. If someone owes, it's the abusers.