Iām glad that OP:
1) Figured this out.
2) Shared so others can learn from their mistake.
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
Peter Solarz

pixel skylines
todays bird
No title available
almost home

Discoholic šŖ©

Kaledo Art

Origami Around
d e v o n
art blog(derogatory)
Aqua Utopiaļ½ęµ·ć®åŗć§čØę¶ćē“”ć

romaā

No title available
Today's Document

shark vs the universe
dirt enthusiast
styofa doing anything
Claire Keane
Sade Olutola
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Japan

seen from United States

seen from Indonesia
seen from Indonesia

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Singapore

seen from Brazil

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Kenya
seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Singapore

seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from Türkiye
@dangerclaw
Iām glad that OP:
1) Figured this out.
2) Shared so others can learn from their mistake.
Stranger Things season 1: beneath the superficial image of āpeace and prosperityā in 1980s small-town America, there was the painful legacy of countless atrocities committed by the American government in the name of āfreedom.ā
Stranger Things season 4: evil Russians (not Soviets) have sent our All-American Hero to the gulags which apparently still exist in the 1980s and itās up to us to save him šŗšøš¦ š«”
Thereās probably a term that already exists for this but if there isnāt Iām gonna call it āRamboficationā in honor of its probably most well known instance: Rambo First Blood was about a soldier, John Rambo (thatās his actual name Iām not doing a bit), returning home from the Vietnam war, so traumatized by war that he brought the war home with him to a small town, unable to adapt to life without strict military discipline and hierarchy. Subsequent Rambo movies were about how John Rambo was the only supersoldier tough enough and patriotic enough to kill faceless hordes of dastardly foreign commies.
Ergo, āRamboficationā is the process of a series starting with a relatively nuanced or subversive narrative before its sequels become a shallow embrace of the very narrative it originally subverted. It happens surprisingly often!
In the sociological sense, recuperation is the process by which politically radical ideas and images are twisted, co-opted, absorbed, defused, incorporated, annexed or commodified within media culture and bourgeois society, and thus become interpreted through a neutralized, innocuous or more socially conventional perspective.
text: [ āSome of you have forgotten that only three years ago you were perfectly capable of writing an essay, writing a eulogy, telling a bedtime story to a child, and it should worry you that powerful companies have convinced us we canāt do things weāve been doing for 5000 years.ā ]
And they're absolutely specifically pushing it, make no mistake. It's not just a matter of "it's there, it's convenient, so people are going to take the path of the least resistance", it is a legitimate and concerted effort on the part of these companies to get people to outsource all these things to their models.
They're preying on insecurities to do it. Yes, you can write an essay - but can you write a good essay, they ask you. Do you not want to improve your output? Do you not want people to think of you as competent and very clever? Why go through the mortifying process of failing and failing and failing until you succeed if you can just skip the "learning" part of doing, and simply generate a ready-made product?
I'm preaching to the choir here obviously but it's a concerning thing to witness nonetheless. My kid is 6 next week and I've been teaching her that failing at things is morally neutral and in fact necessary even before the advent of AI, but it's becoming ever more important that we teach the kids that criticism and failure and discomfort aren't necessarily bad things, but just a part of the growth process.
AI companies are heavily invested in making themselves relevant. They want people to believe they can't do the things they have done unaided before and to make them become reliant on the AI models, so the AI models' existence is artificially justified.
My favorite scenes in the LotR books are the ones where Legolas has vital information and just decides it's not important to share.
Like when Gandalf spent literal PAGES trying to figure out why the vibes were off in Moria and Legolas chimes in with just "it's a balrog :) that shit's evil :) we're so fucked :)" like what do you MEAN you knew already and just didn't tell him??
Or at the beginning of Two Towers when Aragorn thinks there's something nearby so he puts his ear to the ground to listen, and then like 10 minutes later is like "hmmm i hear horses" and Legolas is just like "mm yep. there are 105 blond bitches with spears" like you just let your friend put his face in the dirt and you can SEE them??
Legolas please gain a sense of urgency
It's because legolas hasn't spent enough time with non-elves to remember that they don't know what he knows.
gandalf is scratching his head in moria, and legolas is thinking "oh man, the wizard noticed something off *besides* the obvious balrog that we all are aware of??"
"I wonder what aragorn is listening for? must be hard to hear, what with all of the horses. How many horses are there, actually? 1... 2... 3..."
"What do your elvish eyes see?" is Aragorn saying, as politely as possible, "Because the REST OF US are at a significant disadvantage, Prince Dipshit."
I just learned that the Russian word forĀ āladybugā translates toĀ āGodās Little Cowā
Itās the same in Irish! bóĆn DĆ©!
in hebrew itās āour rabbi mosesās cowā
Oh I love this news!!!!
Multiple cultures upon seeing a ladybug for the first time: āWhoās cow is this????ā
It feels like some early humans were naming things and one of them ran out of ideas.
Human 1: (points at animal) Whatās that?
Human 2: Cow.
Human 1: (points at bug) Whatās that?
Human 2: ⦠little cow.
Human 1: But itās so much smaller. Who would have use for such a small cow?
Human 2: (panicking but in too deep to stop now) God.
The āLadyā in the name āladybugā is the virgin Mary. People just cannot stop giving religious names to this bug.
The reason for this was that if you lived in an agrarian society then your survival was a throw of the dice every year, depending on the success of the crops. A failed crop year is a very hard year where deaths are expected. And if you grew a cereal like wheat, there were several things that could cause your crops to fail, but one of the big ones was if you happened to get a fuckton of aphids. You know what eats aphids? Ladybugs! If there are lots and lots of ladybugs around, there was a good chance that itād be a good crop year! They were little crop protectors! When your family lives or dies on the success of that crop, of course theyād be seen as a blessing and given an appropriate name!
That is such an interesting etymology!!!!
And entomology too i guess
in German theyāre MarienkƤfer which also pretty much means āMaryās Beetleā
In French itās āGood Lordās Beastā
Not even a cow, itās just a little Creature but we know for sure God loves it.
In Dutch itās āLieveheersbeestjeā, the Good Lordās Little Beast
A liddol creeture
ātigerā
clicking 'stay signed in'-buttons used to mean that u would stay signed in
If you're comfortable accusing anyone of faking disability, you're not a real ally to disabled people
One time when I was a kid a group of girls and I had to treat another student for hypothermia by ourselves because she had so many invisible health issues that the adults we asked for help didn't believe us. The student in question was actively hallucinating. When I finally ran for help the people I grabbed were slow as shit to respond, casually joking about how "dramatic" the person in question was.
The kid was picked up by an ambulance 30 minutes later.
Now as an adult working in security I get SO MANY folks- upper-middle aged mostly- coming to me to 'rat out' people they think are faking it.
I was once sent into a bathroom because a client demanded that the "fucker won't get out, so go drag them out"- I was NEVER going to do that, so I did a wellness check instead. You know who it was? A person recently released from the hospital after a car accident. They had a hole in their skull and major hearing loss. They couldn't answer the owner because they couldn't HEAR the owner.
Another time about a homeless man who got around town by kicking the ground from his wheelchair. "You know he doesn't actually need that thing, his legs work fine, it's just for pity points"- Oh, so he's not paralyzed, his wheelchair is performative? Funny story Dale, I actually know that guy, he was backed over by a truck and has chronic pain from his shattered pelvis. But sure, let's make him stand up and walk everywhere so nobody feels too bad for him and tries to help him or something.
"She doesn't need that scooter, I've seen her get out of it."
"Look how fat he is, because he just rides around and refuses to get up."
"She doesn't really need that cane- she comes here without it all the time"
Sincerely, truly, from the bottom of my heart- as someone who isn't physically disabled but hears this shit all the time- fuck off
I have no idea whether this is true, it seems way too stupid to be real and I have to assume it's made up, but I'm sharing because it has the vibe of something that would happen in a cartoon from the 90s that has characters burn a hole in a door by bouncing a laser pen beam between two mirrors
Person who wrote this scene would write about websites with security like this.
That's Joseph Cox from 404 media. The article has limited information but they're seeking more and their journalists will be trying to replicate it. This was meta's own ai chatbot that helped the hackers change the email. One of the accounts was the Barack Obama White House Account. Another was Sephora.
Link to the article
I'm trying so hard to suspend disbelief on this fuck of a life but every day I suspect more and more that we are living in a cartoon
As a society, we need to go back to understanding that strangers on the internet are, you know, strangers. I feel lately that I'm seeing a rise in 'An author I love blocked me because they took my comment the wrong way' posts on the ao3 subreddit, and then the comment is them calling the author a fucking bitch or something like that.
Don't do this. Tone doesn't translate well in text, and if you don't have a rapport with that author, they are not going to interpret, 'You're a fucking bitch' as, 'Author I hate you for being so talented and making me feel so keenly.' They're going to interpret it as you being an asshole. You can shit talk with your friends because you have an established relationship with them and can distinguish between playful banter and genuine anger. You do not have this with a stranger, no matter how much you like their fics. You will have a much more pleasant time in fandom and not get cockblocked from interacting with your favorite writers if you remember this.
#I don't often see comments like these when I'm reading a fic but there have been a few that made me raise an eyebrow#I don't know if I would block over someone calling me a bitch on a fic I wrote but I'd probs try to gently tell them it's not right#coz honestly I feel like this is an issue with younger age groups who are new to reading fics and might not understand fandom culture#or at least I hope it's younger people who simply don't know better š¬#otherwise... yikes
This isn't some esoteric niche aspect of fandom culture, strangers at the potluck also do not like being called a fucking bitch.
I like it in here.
Costco CEO Ron Vachris did the āCEO eats his own productā challenge by destroying a hot dog (and confirms the Costco hot dog combo is staying at $1.50 forever). LEGEND.
Show your unwavering support for Costcoās iconic $1.50 hot dog combo
Your favorite $1.50 Kirkland Signature Costco Hot Dog, now on a T-Shirt!Ā American Apparel Mens Shirt Iconic AA classic tee shirt in our fin
Most people know the warning from Costco founder Jim Sinegal to Costcoās previous CEO about raising the price of $1.50 hot dog combo: āIāll f**king kill you.ā
This exchange Sinegal has with the Seattle Times is better:
Can we all agree Clark used Kat and Bobby as sacrificial lambs to see if it was safe for him to go down the ramp?
Clarkās whole personality was that he was selfish and self-centred. He told Mary that he was hearing footsteps and knew there was something in there.
He told Bobby to tug if he ran into trouble but told Kat that there wouldnāt be any trouble when she panicked and asked what he meant.
His first question was āwhat did you seeā when Bobby was pulled back up, instead of asking him if he was okay.
He tied an almost impossible knot that Bobby couldnāt untie himself, and just kept recording him after he came back up, making no attempt to untie it for him.
When Kat and Clark got pushed down, Kat was the only one who ran after Bobby, Clark picked up the camera and abandoned them both.
Kat didnāt die to the entity, Clark mentioned that he ātried to help herā but implied that she refused and he kept her head in the fridgeā¦
He couldāve just borrowed the camera himself and not involve the two of them, but he is selfish and sacrificed them for his own safety.
So next time you feel bad for him for not having customers, or feel sorry for him being lonely, just remember that he didnāt care about anyone but himself.
At some point, there was a line that Clark crossed that doomed him to be lost to the backrooms forever.
Was it the moment he walked in?
Was it when he sacrificed Bobby?
Was it when he killed Kat?
Was it when he tied up Mary?
Or maybe it was years ago, back when his wife threw him out of his house.
I think that when Clark went back to the backrooms a SECOND time was the point of no return for him
Clark explored the backrooms for the first time, got a glimpse of the potential danger that existed within itā and didnāt say āthatās enough of thatā and left
He kept a going back, and brought more people with himā ultimately sealing his fate to be lost as a warped memory
When changing yourself is terrifying and hard and change means destroying your current self so you want to stay the same and the person who is meant to help change you says you can but never changing is only remembering worse and worse each time and it destroys you in a different way
Clark saying the creatures don't feel anything and then later in the same scene the woman anomaly is seen attempting to run away from the pirate, seemingly in fear. Something something devaluation of life seen as different than him.