African-Americans are consistently under-treated for pain by doctors when compared to white patients. For the same affliction, doctors are far more likely to prescribe strong pain medication to whites than to Blacks. A new study provides a rather disturbing reason why this is the case.
Apparently, white physicians believe that Black folks feel no pain — in a literal sense.
As Sandhya Somashekhar reported in the Washington Post, a University of Virginia study — published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences — points to unconscious racial bias on the part of physicians. These doctors may hold false and even outrageous beliefs concerning the biological differences between the races.
The subjects of the study included 222 white medical students and residents, and 92 random white laypeople with absolutely no medical training. Each group was provided with 11 false beliefs and four true statements about the differences in biological characteristics between Blacks and whites. Although many of the white laypeople believed many of the false statements, so too, did many of the white medical students and residents. Half of the students and residents believe at least one of the false statements was “possibly, probably, or definitely true.”
For example, 58 percent of people from the general population believed Black people have thicker skin than whites. However, 40 percent of first-year medical students agreed, as did 42 percent of second-year students, 22 percent of third-years, and 25 percent of residents. Similarly, 39 percent of laypeople thought that Black blood coagulates more quickly than the blood of white folk, along with 29 percent of first-year students, 17 percent of second-years, 3 percent of third-years, and 4 percent of residents.
When told that Blacks have less sensitive nerve endings than whites, 20 percent of laypeople agreed, as did 8 percent of first-year med students, 14 percent of second-years, no third-years and 4 percent of residents.
The correct statements provided to the participants included the idea that Black people are more likely to develop heart disease or have a stroke; that Blacks are less likely than whites to develop multiple sclerosis and other spinal cord diseases, and that African-Americans have denser and stronger bones than whites.
“The present work sheds light on a heretofore unexplored source of racial bias in pain assessment and treatment recommendations within a relevant population (i.e., medical students and residents), in a context where racial disparities are well documented (i.e., pain management),” wrote the authors of the report, including Kelly M. Hoffman of the Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, and her colleagues. “It demonstrates that beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites — beliefs dating back to slavery — are associated with the perception that black people feel less pain than do white people and with inadequate treatment recommendations for black patients’ pain.”
“Participants who endorsed more false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites showed a racial bias in the accuracy of their treatment recommendations,” according to the report.
Hoffman told ABC News she was shocked at how many medical students believed the made-up medical facts.
“Initially we were a little bit surprised at the percent of endorsement among medical residents,” she said. “Things like black skin is thicker than white. … It’s just striking for some of the them.”
This most recent report builds on the work of prior research concerning the issue of racial bias in medicine.
A study released last year in JAMA Pediatrics found that Black and Latino children who are treated for acute appendicitis — which is a painful inflammation of the appendix — are less likely to receive painkillers than their white counterparts.
For moderate pain, Black children more likely received no medication whatsoever, while they were less likely to receive opioids for severe pain. Doctors were more apt to treat Black patients with nonopioid analgesia, such as ibuprofen and acetaminophen.
The authors of the study cited doctors’ racial bias against Black children, surmising that physicians may believe Blacks have a higher threshold for pain, or are more prone to drug addiction, or are less worthy than whites of receiving such treatment.
Racism, apparently, is more painful than you may have realized.
It seems to me that the reason a lot of people have trouble with face-to-face socializing is that allistic people, generally speaking, really only want to connect on a superficial level. Take the canonical small-talk question: “How are you?” Answering this question honestly is generally taken as “oversharing”, particularly if something’s wrong. Similarly, I’ve rarely had an allistic person I wasn’t super close to ask me “what’s wrong?” when something obviously is, and be satisfied with an answer that took more than a few minutes’ attention to solve.
The impression I’ve come away with overall is that they want to feel connected without actually connecting most of the time.
By contrast, autistic people in my experience tend to view friendship as binary: Either you’re not a friend, or you’re intimate and we can share anything and everything with each other. I’ve got a whole bunch of nuanced levels of trust, but somewhere in the middle of them there’s a clear friend/not-friend line. And while I’ve been trained not to open up too much to any but the closest of friends, literally any of them could come to me with anything.
I’m not trying to call one method superior (though obviously one works better for me), just trying to illustrate the differences. It’s difficult for me to maintain emotional connection and distance simultaneously, and other autistics I’ve asked report the same thing, while that seems to be the default mode for allistics. To them, it’s rude of us to get closer than they’ve allowed; it feels like an invasion of space. To us, it feels rude to call someone “friend” if you’re still tying to keep your distance; it feels deceitful.
I’d appreciate other opinions from both sides of the allistic/autistic divide on this; my sample size is small, and if I’m off-base or over-generalizing, I’d like to know. (Also, I’m absolutely certain I haven’t begun to scratch the surface of the implications here.)
summary of the text’s main points:
Allistic people do small-talk to feel connected to other people, but they often do not want a deep connection. For example, the question “how are you” is rarely asked with the intention to get an honest answer.
Autistic people tend to distinguish clearly between “friends” and “not friends”. “Friends” are people they feel comfortable sharing anything with. With “not friends” they keep some distance. They do not like calling people “friends” who they don’t have a deep connection with.
tangentwithtanner
gamechangershow
s-u-f-j-a-n-s-t-e-v-e-n-s
yousharknotpass
2087
amandla
areudirty
