The Stonewall Inn
ojovivo

ellievsbear
Fai_Ryy
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr

@theartofmadeline
h
taylor price
RMH
almost home
Fieri Frames
Sade Olutola
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

Origami Around
No title available
$LAYYYTER
No title available
𩵠avery cochrane š©µ
hello vonnie
I'd rather be in outer space šø

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from Iraq
seen from Peru
seen from Uganda
seen from Ireland
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States

seen from T1
seen from Germany

seen from Brazil
seen from India
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
@eatyoursparkout
BFFFFs forever šŖ²š§
Cannot stand the trend of censoring any and all words that describe concepts that might make you go :( especially when the censoring is done in that quarter-assed way that's just 'did a lil scribble over a vowel so you know that I know this word describes a no-no."
I'm not even going to be vague about what sparked this. Do not fucking censor the word 'stole.' I'm at my fucking limit.
Who does this benefit. Who is made safer by this. Whose life is made better by this. Who is out there going "Wow I sure am glad I didn't have to see that word without it scribbled on a little. That really reduced the emotional impact of reading that word." Can I kill them?
"Stuck in the timeloop as a punishment" is cool and all, but stuck in the timeloop voluntarily though? Oh, brother. Stuck in the timeloop cause you just can't move on. Stuck in the timeloop even if you know that it's not real and whatever should've happen already did. Stuck in the timeloop even if doesn't makes you happy. You just can't bear the thought of not being able to see them ever again. Stuck in the timeloop even if you know you should move on. Stuck in the timeloop even if you know they would want you to move on.
But maybe just a little while longer.
Hii š«¶š» I absolutely love your Poison Ivy design, she's sooo gorgeous ā¤ļø Maybe you could make her interacting with someone else? Like Harley or Jon š
I donāt have a Harley design (yet), so hereās Ivy antagonizing Jon over him sneezing on one of her plants or something
Beetlejuice DC/pre broadway picture, Beej Wearing The Guide Hat ā¼ļø
Found here thanks to @/beetlebitties2 Twitter!
its probably a normal sign for the economy that all of my adulthood fantasies are like "imagine having your own kitchen living room and bathroom to decorate" "what if i could get on a train" "maybe one day i could purchase a sturdy pair of shoes" "i should save and invest in a single bicycle"
not to be corny but oneās radical politics should stem from a love for humanityĀ
over and over again it comes down to the fact that fanfiction is most people's only exposure to amateur writing
'so there's this website where literally anyone can post fiction they've written whenever they want and - get this! - a lot of it is bad' yeah no shit. what would you expect?
Relatedly:
A lot of fanfiction is specifically a type of amateur fiction that's shooting for maximum emotional gratification. 'i want these two characters to fuck nasty' 'i want this character to have a big ugly cry about their feelings' 'i want this character to get their legs broken' that sort of thing.
This approach is not inherent to fanfiction and it's not unique to fanfiction. There's whole communities of people out there writing original fiction that's aiming for exactly the same level of gratification. Most people are simply never exposed to it.
it feels so evil that you can't still access your university online library after you graduate *remembers my principles* it feels so evil that everyone can't access that stuff all the time
AAA video game publisher voice: "Look. The goose layed a golden egg, and that's nice! Everyone loved that egg. But keeping the golden goose means paying for bird feed and I don't want to, so I killed the goose."
#āthat goose keeps laying golden eggs. thatās stagnation. Iām going to kill it and go look for a goose that lays diamond eggsā#āthat goose normally lays golden eggs but this time it laid a silver egg. Iām going to kill it because even though I can still make good#money with that itās not as good as a golden eggā#āthat golden egg laying goose only lays an egg once a day instead of constantly shitting them out. I donāt care that golden eggs take time#if theyāre not constant the goose is worthless to meā
@thebaldursmouthgazette y u leave all the good stuff in the tags
something Iāve noticed in fandoms lately is a lack of⦠object permanence? perspective? Just reacting to each episode/chapter of something as if itās final & whatever plot line they dislike is the status quo forever? likeā¦ā¦ have a tiny bit of patience
I kinda understand because a lot of franchises lately have ended in shoddy and poorly thought out ways, but tbh either have some faith in your fav show or just write fanfic
this combined with people reading a boatload of fanfic between seasons then coming back to the show & getting upset that their headcanons arenāt canon⦠disappointment is a normal feeling but I also feel like people put themselves through unnecessary stress watching shows they clearly do not like
donāt forget who you were made for
heyyyy so this is so random but in one of ur reblogs you mentioned ellipsus being untrustworthy... do you mind talking more about that? i know very little about it but use it frequently for little drabbles as opposed to google docs or word.
Hey, yeah of course.
So my problem with ellipsus is that it's very, very hum about how it finances itself. If you dig through the FAQ, you will eventually find this buried under "How can I support Ellipsus:"
This is not transparent. This does not tell me how it is financing itself right now. Now, when you dig a bit through google, you'll find that it's venture capital backed (which means through investments) as a start-up. It's not entirely clear who backs it, but it's listend on SpeedInvest, a venture capital fund. Further, PitchBookāwhich lists data on companies and startupsā has this data on Ellipsus:
Now, none of this is inherently shady. But it tells you that this is a for-profit company, that together with its investors will eventually expect to, well, you know. Make Profit. And the aforementioned paid tier is, in my opinion, probably not going to cut that. Which too would be fine, but taken all this in the light of how they market incredibly aggressively to fandom, present themselves as just "writers and nerds" with "dachshunds" etc etc. is... not trustworthy, in my opinion. Soāwhat if the paid tier does not pay off enough? What's the plan now? Why, if none of this is An Issue, do I not find any of this information transparently and easily on their own goddamn website? I'm not saying anyone should run a writing program for free. I'm saying if you pick your market in fandom, I don't think it's too much to expect very straight-up information beyond a lot of promises ("we won't sell your data/we won't use AI/we won't do anything weird just trust us broskis").
I said this various times before but: if you don't know how a service pays for itself, and you're not paying, then you're the product. And beyond a "oh we're so fandom family uwu" messaging with no substance or proof, Ellipsus has given me literal subzero indication to trust them of this not being the case.
Which isn't to say that gDocs or whatever is better. But I'd deeply, deeply recommend using LibreOffice for a free alternative, or Scrivener, which is a one-time/lifetime purchase. It's also not to say not to use Ellipsus at all; use something else as your main software, then use it if you need something for on-the-go, or for easy draft-sharing or whatever. Like, all I'm saying here really is: don't just trust it blindly. Historically, things marketing themselves this aggressively to fandom with any lack of transparency are. Well. yk. Pretty often Not That Great.
Also, minor addendum, but I do have two (2) drafts on Ellipsus for editing at work, and when amazon's servers were down I could no longer log in. You know what worked? Scrivener. Scrivener fucking worked. So you know.
Yeah Ellipsus quietly announced theyre limiting version history to 30 days unless you upgrade to a paid plan#After promising over and over they would not block current features behind a paywall#I wouldnt even mind buying the software *if it was actual software*#Its not. It's a website.#If you dont have internet access you dont have access to any of your work.#Even Google Docs stored natively on your device via @dustyforgotten
well, that happened much faster than even I anticipated, I hate being right about these things. Also frankly, I do not think that this is enough to financially sustain them long-term, although I suppose that remains to be seen.
(obligatory i am once again not telling people not to use ellipsus, I'm just saying don't believe the venture capital backed startup when it pretends to be your queer fandom bestie. back up your work elsewhere and keep an eye on the stuff they're doing before you lose access to things like, yk, your version history that's older than a month.)
Prefacing this with I think itās important to be critical of any company marketing itself to you.
Iād like to encourage all users of Ellipsus to read their TOS and privacy policy which, as a legal contract between yourself and a company is a lot more than ātrust me broā vibes on their services. Are these subject to change? Of course, and itās important we monitor all changes to all TOS for services we use.
That being said, this post feels a lot like fearmongering with the knowledge people have no sense of nuance in todayās internet culture and will go running back to gdocs (verifiably evil) or settle for services that donāt meet their needs.
Iād like to mention that scrivener is a licensed based software that requires you to pay per system, alongside only offering cloud services via Dropbox, a third party company that is unavailable in the EU for not meeting GDPR requirements. In order for me to use scrivener for my needs (which I have used by the way, it is a perfectly serviceable program) I would have to pay for a license for my computer, alongside a license for my mobile device, and sign up for a third party company that cannot meet the privacy requirements of the EU. (***EDIT:*** This is old information. I have since found out that Dropbox now complies with EU data restrictions, however still only has a D rating on TOSDR.) If you desire a service with cloud sharing, this is not actually all that much cheaper than Ellipsus.
Nothing bad to say about libre other than my personally gripes with it, which are irrelevant.
I am not saying that we shouldnāt keep tabs on this, but claiming that a program that for all intents and purposes, appears to be actively providing a space for creatives where their creativity will not feed LLMs is rotten for being funded through venture capital reads as fear mongering and scare tactics when Ellipsus is not listed as a publicly traded company (the main source of ROI demands that result in enshittification). Being funded by venture capitalism is not an inherent sin, and in todayās market is usually required.
Also color me biased but I think that lambasting a service for not being 100% volunteer or paid for by the sweat and overdrawn accounts of devs is an immature way to engage with services we want to survive. Imperfect? Of course. However, I think we should give credence to the fact that currently this service is going against the grift of AI in a market that currently rewards people for simply suggesting they will one day have an AI product, without proof of concept.
My goal isnāt to force people to stay with Ellipsus if theyāre truly unhappy with the information thatās come to light in this post, but to make an informed decision on the services they use for their writing much like Iām sure the OP of this post intended by spreading the information.
the thing they dont tell you about learning to "trust the process" is that you forget and relearn it every single time you make a new piece of art. unfortunately there is no cure either
a chart of what i mean for the visual learners in the audience
Penetration is a gender-neutral act. Topping is gender-neutral. Bottoming is gender-neutral. You are not more or less of a man or a woman depending on how you fuck. You are not āfake transā for having sex a certain way. You are not any less masculine for bottoming or any less feminine for topping.
Additionally, acting like being penetrated is an act of submission is deeply rooted in misogynistic, cisheteronormative ideas of sexual intercourse, as in "penetration is something that is done to women for the sexual gratification of the man, nothing more, therefore it is inherently degrading and feminine".
A cishet man getting pegged by his cishet girlfriend is not gay, he's not less of a man or submissive by default. A cishet man getting pegged by his cishet girlfriend can be sexually dominant and simply likes to be fucked in his ass - these two can co-exist. Yet, in the eyes of cishet society, a man that likes to have his ass played with, must enjoy it because it's "degrading" , not because it simply feels good.
That's why I so heavily preach about the difference between sub/dom/switch and bottom/top/vers. Penetration can be used to increase the feeling and severity of a power dynamic, but it doesn't create one. These two things are entirely separate from eachother, unless connected willingly.
you should reblog this version instead, actually