Ownership meant a physical copy. Now you own nothing and can't find what you want across multiple streaming platforms.
Bring back headphones that plug in. Bring back expandable memory. Bring back owning media.
I'd rather be in outer space šø
hello vonnie
almost home
Mike Driver
macklin celebrini has autism

JBB: An Artblog!
RMH
wallacepolsom

ellievsbear
todays bird
Cosmic Funnies

JVL
occasionally subtle
NASA
Game of Thrones Daily
Stranger Things
sheepfilms
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

Love Begins
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Iraq

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Singapore

seen from Canada

seen from Dominican Republic

seen from Brazil

seen from Netherlands

seen from Pakistan
@eccentricairpanther
Ownership meant a physical copy. Now you own nothing and can't find what you want across multiple streaming platforms.
Bring back headphones that plug in. Bring back expandable memory. Bring back owning media.
āOmg, I love these! They go up to size 6X AND they have pockets?! Wow!! But do you have anything longer?ā
Sure do, no problem!!
āYES these are great!!! But what about..Ā longer?ā
I gotcha!! Cominā right up!
"Now that's what I'm talkin' about! But... how about if I'm feeling like it's the kinda day where I need my clothing to be bifurcated???"
Never fear, joggers are here!
*wild cheering* /scene
š¤ witchvamp.com š¤
since Iām thinking about this instead of studying for bar prep:
people in general tend to assume that a person whoās been arrested is either innocent or guilty. and if theyāre guilty, then they deserve fewer rights than the innocent person.
like, if the police break into an innocent personās house and look for drugs, we recognize that itās a bad thing and a gross violation of rights. but if the police break into someoneās house and doĀ find drugs, well, thatās just what they deserved. weād all be upset if the police started randomly murdering people on the street for no reason, but many wouldnāt mind if the police started randomly killing known child molesters. itās not okay if the police plant evidence to frame an innocent man for murder, but if they know heās the murderer and plant evidence to help the case along? well, thatās unfortunate but necessary.
there are three problems with this:
You cannot always know with certainty whoās innocent and whoās guilty;
A two-tieredĀ āinnocentā andĀ āguiltyā legal structure will always be used against innocent marginalized people;
Even guilty people have rights.
this happens a lot on tumblr. not exclusively on tumblr (itās also a major aspect of mostĀ āgrittyā police dramas and almost all comics), but itās definitely there. like, calls to summarily execute rapists sound great in theory, because we all agree that rape is evil. except for when itās used to kill innocent black men who looked the wrong way at a white woman.Ā
and there are people who will say that no, of course, the problem isnāt summarily killing rapists, the problem is summarily killing the wrong peopleĀ (that is, innocent people). which, again, you canāt know whoās innocent and whoās guilty - lots of innocent people arenāt sweet old ladies whoāve never done anything wrong, or have perfect alibis and never contradict themselves. hell, being guilty of a crime in the past doesnāt mean that they committed thisĀ specificĀ crime that theyāve been accused of.
and even if they are guilty - even if they are stone-cold, unrepentantly guilty - they still have rights. thatās whatĀ āinnocent until proven guiltyā means. it means that stripping someone of their legal rights is a big fucking deal,Ā so no matter how guilty Obvious McCriminal looks, you still have to follow the rules weāve set in place to prevent abuses.Ā
like, itās not that every person whoās ever been treated shittily by police and the court system is actually innocent, so therefore the system is bad. itās that we have a system that treats people like shit once weāve decided theyāre guilty, regardless of when the decision is made, and weāre okay with that. after conviction? definitely. after arrest? yup. beforeĀ arrest, because we just have a feeling about them? sure.
and I get why people make posts or write stories about guilty people being treated badly. wanting vengeance is a powerful emotion. grief and anger are powerful emotions. it is not unnatural to want to hurt people who have hurt others. people like the idea of karma, of cosmic scales balancing out the hurt and suffering inflicted by a person by making them suffer back. Iām not saying that no one is allowed to have those feelings.Ā
Iām just saying that there are implications behind them that are deeply disturbing (āif I decide youāre guilty, youāre less of a person to meā) and that itās the primary driving force behind most of the issues in our criminal justice system.
actually, since this post has become relevant (again), Iād like everyone to join me in a little thought experiment: why do the police bring up a murdered personās criminal record when they are extrajudicially killed?
like, we can all agree that the sentence for drug possession, drunk driving, trespassing, etc. is not execution, and even if it was, thatās after theyāve been arrested and convicted. cops are not judges, so itās not their call to decide if someone is guilty or to punish them for it. so why does it matter if someone isĀ āa known criminal,ā or if they have drugs in their system, or if they have a gun on their person?
āwell, obviously itās to bias the public against the person who was killed,ā you might say. okay, but why is that?
itās because they know that we think of guilty people as less than human, and innocent people as blameless. therefore the murdered person deserved to die (because guilty people deserve what they get), and the cop is innocent (he was just trying to protect people!). if it didnāt work as a tactic, then they wouldnāt do it!
it is this mindset that permits the police to murder. we cannot stop police violence unless we dismantle the idea that being guilty of a crime negates your humanity and your civil rights.
"that doesn't sound sincere- it sounds rehearsed" is one of the most devastating and fucked-up statements you can make to anyone in the neurodivergent/ADHD/Autistic/Schizophrenic/Disordered Personality sphere. yeah bitch it's rehearsed. because i wanted to get it right when i said it
Iāve recently discovered how much better life can be when we normalize this. My best friend and I have started saying āhang on, Iām scriptingā when we need a minute to mentally rehearse during big conversations (and ābear with me, Iām doing improvā when weāve reached the end of our script and start to struggle with words lol)
āThe daily routine of most adults is so heavy and artificial that we are closed off to much of the world. We have to do this in order to get our work done. I think one purpose of art is to get us out of those routines. When we hear music or poetry or stories, the world opens up again. Weāre drawn in ā or out ā and the windows of our perception are cleansed, as William Blake said. The same thing can happen when weāre around young children or adults who have unlearned those habits of shutting the world out.ā
ā Ursula K. Le GuinĀ
You can replace [ACTIVITY YOU ENJOY] with [SCROLLING] but watch out. This sucks bad š
Some things about this post since getting quite a few notes:
1. If you see this post, highly recommend taking it as an opportunity to set a timer for 15 minutes and switch over to ACTIVITY YOU ENJOY. if after those 15 minutes, you want to go back to scrolling, that's okay!
2. Huge shout out to this popping up in my notifs often, bc I do go back to activity.
3. I think there are times where scrolling is fine. Right now, for example, I'm being connected to a machine for two hours to donate plasma and platelets. Yes this is a brag but it is also a time where scrolling is one of the few things I can do. (Though I will probably also read or watch something on phone lol)
hmmm, this seems to be some kind of curse breaking spell⦠be free ye reader
Iām not Christian, I donāt go to church anymore, and my pastor died, but when he was alive Iād sometimes go to his sermons and I remember one time he said āit feels good to hate, but we know that it isnāt allowed, so when weāre told that weāre allowed to hate someone we get so excited that we forget weāre supposed to loveā, and if my humble atheist ass might borrow some church talk Iād like to perhaps submit that
Anyhow sometimes on the day to day I feel disgust or revulsion and I have to ask myself āis this a danger to anyone at all or am I just looking for something Iām allowed to hateā and a solid 98/100 times itās the latter so once again thank you pastor D
hi! you used to follow my old account @/florence-not-italy unfortunately i got scammed & hacked (don't fall for it guys!!) so this is my new account, just so you know :)
Feeling silly cause I'm just seeing this. Thank you for telling me!
The "Block AI Enhancements" toggle was originally introduced in Firefox 148 Nightly in January following significant community backlash afte
The Firefox "AI kill switch" is here.
Go to Settings > AI controls. There, you can toggle the "master kill switch" on to fully block all the features, which means two things:
you won't see them,
you can't even be asked about them.
The default state is, like before, "available". This means the features are NOT on by default (they never were), but Firefox will let you know about them where they exist (e.g. when you create your first tab group) so that you can choose to opt in.
Please note that Firefox for Android or iOS have never included AI features, so you won't see these settings on your smartphones or tablets.
Please also note that, unlike popular belief here on Tumblr, besides "chatbot in sidebar" (which is simply embedding the same page you'd have normally browsed to), none of these features have ever interacted with anything outside your PC, because they download a small model to your computer, to do everything locally. These small models have never been and are not downloaded until you explicitly agree to turn on one of the features.
A once-in-a-lifetime shot ā the moon perfectly framed by a rainbow. Caught at just the right time. š š
Joy and whimsy detected! This post is joyful and whimsical!
rb to give your mutuals a silly little paper valentine card and a red heart shaped lollipop š
Politicians have a secret math they don't want you to know.
important stats from that article about why calling local leaders matters:
One phone call = 100-1,000 angry voters.
One personal email = 10-50 voters.
One form letter = maybe 1 voter, if they even count it.
This is the economy of political pressure. Individualized contact influences 94% of congressional offices on undecided issues. Mass email campaigns? 18%. Petitions? Worthless.
But here's the secret that changes everything: State officials are sitting ducks.
State Comptrollers generally receive 5-10 constituent calls per month. State Treasurers? Many have never experienced a coordinated campaign. District Attorneys? Only hear from victims and lawyers, not voters. State Legislators? They average 20-30 contacts per week.
The magic happens at these thresholds:
10 calls in an hour = staff notices.
50 calls in a day = emergency meeting.
100 calls in a day = office shuts down to handle it.
500 calls in a week = policy change consideration.
1,000 calls = historical precedent shows this forces action.
Constituent contact increases legislator support probability by 12-20%. The Net Neutrality campaign's 1.3 million calls changed federal policy. The ACA defense campaign's 6,000 calls prevented repeal. At the state level, you need 100x fewer calls for the same impact.
this fantastic article has sample scripts for what to say about ICE in your state and city, as well as what to ask for to help your city and state fight federal over-reach where you live
we can win this fight, but we need to fight. I know on a personal level how hard it can be to make calls, especially to politicians, but we've reached a point that if we don't, the slippery slope into the chasm of tyranny becomes a cliff