Jacek Yerka - Tsunami --

JBB: An Artblog!

Product Placement
$LAYYYTER
Acquired Stardust

PR's Tumblrdome
šŖ¼
Claire Keane

ellievsbear

blake kathryn
h

ā
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
YOU ARE THE REASON

No title available

Janaina Medeiros
we're not kids anymore.
Game of Thrones Daily
art blog(derogatory)
hello vonnie
One Nice Bug Per Day
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Poland

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Colombia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Spain
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Pakistan
@eddiemyluhuv
Jacek Yerka - Tsunami --
from The Memory Palace, by Nate DiMeo
Accidentally got them addicted to miiboros
Just watched Adam Conover (of Adam Ruins Everything) make such a solid point that I think we should spread far and wide. Yes, having AI write your emails is lazy, sure, but people love being lazy. We need to really emphasize that sending AI emails (or using AI responses on social media, or publishing AI flyers, or or or) is rude.
It's rude. You're making someone take their time to read something you couldn't bother to write. You're telling them they were so unimportant you couldn't be bothered to actually take the time to say something yourself. And frankly, you're lying about it while you're at it.
It's rude.
It's not just rude to make me read something you didn't want to write. It is that you expect me to respond to your email written by Claude. You don't even want me to talk to you. You want me to talk to Claude so that you can make Claude respond for you. It is rude to expect me to talk to a chatbot when I wanted to talk to you.
It is also rude for you to receive correspondence or documents from me and have your chatbot of choice determine what to do with them without them ever being examined by a person, whether the chatbot also writes a response for you or not.
Botting these tasks also will also make a person themself ruder over time. If you eliminate all of the easy, normal tasks by giving them to a robot, you are left only with the hard and exceptional tasks. Doing nothing but these will quickly erode your social stamina. A gap will widen between a person and the messages sent on their behalf that real humans notice negatively.
The other side of the interaction gets ruder when bots are involved, too. Ask any call center customer service employee if they get treated with more or less patience after callers weren't helped by the bot they were diverted to.
Maryland will become the first US state to ban surveillance pricing in retail stores, after passing Protection from Predatory Pricing Act.
Jesus fucking christ that this exists in the first place
I WAS FUCKING WONDERING WHAT THOSE DIGITAL PRICE TAGS WERE ABOUT SUDDENLY i had hoped they were so the workers didn't have to finagle those little papers into the slider part anymore š
Hi, yes, that is the OFFICIAL excuse made to me by the guy replacing the paper tags with digital ones at my local Walmart, but the end goal is to remove the numbers off the shelf entirely, replacing them with QR codes that you have to scan with the appā¦. Which requires your login informationā¦.. and also stores your card information so even if you didnāt use your Walmart account at the physical checkout, if you used a card they recognize, they assign that purchase to your Walmart account purchase history.
I explained very clearly to the manager my issue with the meat section not having the price tags listed, and they claimed it was only going to be for the meat, since meat is by weight, and the price of each item is printed on the packs of each item.
Sure. Thatās how they get their foot in the door. Fast forward not even two weeks, and here we are:
Bar codes. No prices, no item descriptions. No price stickers on the individual items. Heck, not even the name of the item that is SUPPOSED to be there.
No. The only way to see the price is to scan it on your phone app, which is also recording what you looked at recently, as a way of gauging what you might be looking for in the future.
So hereās what weāre gonna do gang:
Every time you go into a store that has implemented these price-less tags:
Take 1-3 items up to the cash register. Ask the cashier for the price, or hit the price check item on the self checkout, which will likely call over the attendant.
Express that you didnāt actually want it, you just couldnāt see on the shelf how much it was.
POLITELY, AND WITH A THANK YOU FOR THE PRICE CONFIRMATION, Give the items to the cashier or attendant to put back.
When they inevitably try to push the app, politely decline. If pressed for why not, say you donāt want to have to carry your phone in-hand the whole time you are shopping in order to see how much things cost. (Not having cell service or data to use the app is NOT a valid excuse, as stores already often have complimentary WiFi AND more stores will provide WiFi rather than give up on this push for surveillance pricing)
If itās a shelf-stable item, the cashier will have to set it aside, taking up room in their limited operating space, and eventually pass it off to someone to put in a holding area to put back later. If itās a fridge/freezer item, it might have to get tossed due to food product sale regulations.
In either case, you are making it a pain in the ass for them to have these digital bar codes. Tie up the checkouts. Give the employees more busywork that the company has to pay them to do. Hurt their bottom line having to toss the pint of ice cream you carried around in your cart for 20 minutes before giving it back to the cashier.
Yes, call your reps. Yes, push for more legislation like this in more places. But also take an extra minute out of your shopping trip to MAKE IT HURT for companies to pull this shit.
I've seen some people in the notes express (very fair) concern that this is only going to inconvenience already under-paid laborers, and not have any impact on corporate. While I can't speak for every company or every store, I do work in a grocery store and I can tell you this is precisely the kind of thing that would have an impact, especially if people are doing it en masse. Stores absolutely track their shrink numbers, and they do draw distinctions between what gets stolen, damaged, or wasted for other reasons. If people are making it clear that the reason they're bringing things to the cashier is that the prices are not adequately represented on the displays, and rather than improving business it's wasting product, slowing down transactions, and causing confusion and mistrust in customers, that is a language that shareholders speak.
If there is enough widespread complaint about it at store level, it WILL get back to corporate. You can also make complaints online.
this little segment from sunrise on the reaping just gives me permission to headcanon peeta having a bike growing up and little katniss just watching him across the schoolyard pulling up on his brotherās hand-me-down bicycle every day. and adverting her eyes when he catches her staring.
I should be doing more to appreciate the lack of marvel movies in today's popular culture. I once yearned for marvel movies to have this level of irrelevance. They used to feel almost ozymandian, like an empire that had no beginning and no end. and now tony stark iron man is naught but two vast and trunkless legs of stone.
please let Show!Percy be mad at Athena when they meet in Titans curse. Let him be pissed for the Arch and the sirens and the way she's been treating Annabeth.
I need this beef to be two-sided. Even if she does get to his insecurities in said conversation and it still stops him from confessing.
āIf a society puts half its children into short skirts and warns them not to move in ways that reveal their panties, while putting the other half into jeans and overalls and encouraging them to climb trees, play ball, and participate in other vigorous outdoor games; if later, during adolescence, the children who have been wearing trousers are urged to āeat like growing boys,ā while the children in skirts are warned to watch their weight and not get fat; if the half in jeans runs around in sneakers or boots, while the half in skirts totters about on spike heels, then these two groups of people will be biologically as well as socially different. Their muscles will be different, as will their reflexes, posture, arms, legs and feet, hand-eye coordination, and so on. Similarly, people who spend eight hours a day in an office working at a typewriter or a visual display terminal will be biologically different from those who work on construction jobs. There is no way to sort the biological and social components that produce these differences. We cannot sort nature from nurture when we confront group differences in societies in which people from different races, classes, and sexes do not have equal access to resources and power, and therefore live in different environments. Sex-typed generalizations, such as that men are heavier, taller, or stronger than women, obscure the diversity among women and among men and the extensive overlaps between them⦠Most women and men fall within the same range of heights, weights, and strengths, three variables that depend a great deal on how we have grown up and live. We all know that first-generation Americans, on average, are taller than their immigrant parents and that men who do physical labor, on average, are stronger than male college professors. But we forget to look for the obvious reasons for differences when confronted with assertions like āMen are stronger than women.ā We should be asking: āWhich men?ā and āWhat do they do?ā There may be biologically based average differences between women and men, but these are interwoven with a host of social differences from which we cannot disentangle them.ā
ā Ruth Hubbard, āThe Political Nature of āHuman Natureāā
Oh nooo I hadnāt noticed that my catās automatic feeder was getting low on food so as usual she dashed off when she heard the machine start but I couldnāt hear the usual sound of her food falling into the bowl so I went to look and my poor cat was just. Sitting there. Staring at her empty food bowl. Then for a second she glanced up at me then right back to her bowl with the biggest, saddest, most bewildered eyes you could ever imagine on such a small creature. I filled her bowl and the machine right away ofc but I still feel a little guilty š
Quick artistās rendition
HOW did this get this many notes in less than 24 hours?????
Also, in case anyone was worried, rest assured mim the local void is missing no meals
dennis reynolds s12-14 core
Ryan Goslingās career has just been one long quest to climb the Warner Bros water tower
that man has been trying to climb this tower since he was 16. he has asked multiple times, and every time they said no, but now heās famous enough & variety was able to convince them to do a shoot on the tower. it all led here. it was all for this.
Iām obsessed with the implication that this was a coming-of-age ritual where a boy becomes a man, like a bar mitzvah
this is what i mean when i say "sniles so sneetly" btw
i appear to have infected 14k people with the phrase "sniling so sneetly". it makes me grin. snile, even. perhaps sneetly
"i've got no qualms about it" meanwhile i'm over here making qualm chowder
I will lock in tomorrow like nobody has ever locked in before