Noah Kahan
h
No title available

@theartofmadeline
Not today Justin

bliss lane
Claire Keane
No title available

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
The Bowery Presents
EXPECTATIONS
Sade Olutola

titsay
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Xuebing Du
cherry valley forever
Color Me Curious
untitled
d e v o n

shark vs the universe
seen from Myanmar (Burma)

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Norway
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Belarus
seen from Indonesia

seen from Bulgaria

seen from Canada

seen from Sweden
seen from Ukraine
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Austria
@electronicosmosis-trey
"And you won't have to fight for it"
Why have I had to fight for so long
Why am I still fighting now
Didn't you ever love me at all
Didn't you ever
How dare you get mad that I asked
Comedian COLLAPSES Fracturing Skull After Bragging of Triple Vax And Saying Jesus Loves Her Most
I'll say this. Anyone who actually believes the Steven Colbert non-sequitur that "Truth has a liberal bias," it's crystal clear to me at this point that they believe it out of some misguided sense of Political Tribalism, because they are closed-minded, because they want to, and not because they've carefully observed the statement coming true over an extended period of time.
"A man with an Experience is not at the mercy of a man with an Argument," and I have had the experience of watching Tim cover news, politics and culture and the privilege of watching him conscientiously present the Events of the Day with an obviously concerted effort to be as neutral as possible. I've been watching Tim Pool for about 5 years now. As I've said in the past, it's like watching The World's Slowest Red Pill. This is a young man who started on the ground during Occupy Wall Street (remember that, "liberal" cheerleaders of giant pharma and media corporations?), and who went on to work for Vice and ABC/ Disney/Univision for a period of time. He was a leftist, but the more these corporations insisted on "siding with the [perceived] audience" the more uncomfortable he apparently became, until he finally struck out on his own, created a YouTube channel and began "complaining about things on the internet." His channel started small and I personally watched it grow. As I'm not a leftist, I never agreed with all of his positions, nor do I now. At this point, he gets more views on YouTube than most of the corporate Media News channels, who frankly only get the views they do because they are heavily subsidized on social media by corporate money. Tim, on the other hand, is working on creating a fact-checking organization that isn't bought and paid for by corporate interests. He sees the need, and so have I over the last five years, as I've watched him report What Happened versus what corporate Fact Checkers Say Happened. The frequent and often glaring mismatch have disgusted us both.
The Truth most certainly doesn't have a "liberal bias." At least, not what is today called "liberal." Even though Tim Pool is far from being Christian or 'religious' in the traditional sense, I couldn't help but nod in agreement when he used the word "blasphemy" to describe this event, even if he means something different than I do right now. Nevertheless, I recognize where he is. I recognize it from when I was there. He's not even "conservative" yet... and frankly, with these sands shifting underneath all of us, I don't know if I'd confidently describe myself that way, either. And it might take 50 years, but... well, let's just say I'll keep watching and supporting Tim and people like him.
And you should too. For the sake of the Truth.
Some rando: This character should not have the chance to become a better person
Me: Why
Same person: Because they are a bad person!
Me: But what if that character was allowed to become a better person so that they are no longer a bad person?
Same person: You’re an abuse apologist
I would love for every bad person to become a good person. I’d think most humans think that it’d be a cool and great thing if all bad people became good.
A cool and great thing, which we can play pretend with in fiction, knowing it’s not realistic, just to feel a little better about the shitty real world we live in.
tbh, I think the problem is that people confuse “getting a redemption arc” with “being rewarded with what comes after a redemption arc”
like, redeemed villains are generally friends with the heroes. they get to experience love and The Power of Friendship for the first time, if they haven’t already. they generally get to experience forgiveness. if their motives are based off of some kind of trauma or pain (like a lot of redeemed villains) then they will probably have that resolved and get some sense of closure or inner peace from whatever is hurting them.
so when they say that “this character doesn’t deserve a redemption arc” what they mean is “this character doesn’t deserve to be loved. they don’t deserve happiness, peace, or companionship”. the alternatives I have seen are:
“I hope that this character realizes how awful they are and they kill themselves”
“I hope this character is redeemed by a heroic sacrifice” (meaning they would be redeemed but wouldn’t be alive to experience the “reward” afterwards)
“I hope this character begs and pleads for forgiveness over and over again, but is never forgiven”
it’s pretty disturbing tbh, to treat basic things that every human needs (like being loved) as a “reward” that you get for good behavior. or more accurately: never being bad in the first place. that once you fall from grace you’re damned for eternity.
I think this post exposes a really gross underbelly to purity culture bullshit that I don’t think I examined quite this way before.
If redemption is unacceptable, if bad behavior can never be forgiven, what is the alternative?
Because it sure seems like the alternative is “Indefinate suffering = justice.”
It’s essentially what we know as the God Complex.
But what God Himself actually says, is:
Ezekiel 18:32 For I have no pleasure in the death of him that dies, says the Lord GOD: wherefore turn yourselves, and live.
Ezekiel 33:11 Say unto them, As I live, says the Lord GOD, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked; but that the wicked turn from his way and live: turn, turn all of you from your evil ways; for why will you die, O house of Israel?
Lamentations 3:33 For he does not afflict willingly nor grieve the children of men.
Job 33:23‐28 Yet if there is a messenger on his side, one mediator in a thousand, to tell a man what is right for him, to be gracious to him and say, ‘Spare him from going down to the Pit; I have found his ransom,’ then his flesh is refreshed like a child’s; he returns to the days of his youth. He prays to God and finds favor; he sees God’s face and shouts for joy, and God restores His righteousness to that man. Then he sings before men with these words: ‘I have sinned and perverted what was right; yet I did not get what I deserved. He redeemed my soul from going down to the Pit, and I will live to see the light.’
The modern Left is utterly unforgiving because their worldview is that of a Marxist ‘religion for the godless.’ Therefore they take upon themselves the role of God. Their idea of “purity culture” is ideological purity, which is at the same time iron-clad and unyielding, yet the standards themselves constantly change to advantage those who wish to hold power. It is, itself, Abuse - but it’s a useful tool. With them, however, there is no forgiveness, no redemption, because to them there is no truth but Power… and because they have no understanding of God or Power, they see such things solely as liabilities. Nevertheless, the religious impulse is universal and ubiquitous among every tribe of humanity. Some take advantage of it, others are taken advantage of by it, but in both of those cases they misunderstand it. To those who recognize that humanity is made in God’s image and likeness, this isn’t a difficulty or even a surprise. But it’s terribly upsetting to those who are committed to unbelief, and it’s why they eventually and inevitably become “alienated and enemies [of God] in [their] mind by wicked works.” (Colossians 1:21)
I remain convinced that one reason Jordan Peterson is so popular with so many is that he speaks to the psychological aspects of religion and does not shy away from it. There are numerous mixed reasons and motivations for the various things humanity does, says, and believes. Those who smugly dismiss religion must necessarily ignore these connections… but to folks who value Truth no matter where it may be found, the authenticity of these connections is like a cup of cold water to a man lost in the desert.
Psalm 147:11 The LORD takes pleasure in them that fear Him, in those that hope in His mercy.
Anyway, that’s what this made me think of.
Mostly it looks like blatant Conservative Christian Calvinism morality inherited from fundie parents to be honest. Seems like Christians are the common denominator there. You came up with the concept of Hell, after all.
But anyway, im deeply curious about what you were doing on my blog. You replied directly to me. I mostly post about romantic fanfiction about Pinhead from Hellraiser and stuff. Something you wanna tell us? 👀
🤣🤣🤣
Honestly, I’m not sure how I found this post. Probably a tag I follow or something. I don’t generally consider reblogging a ‘reply’ to the specific person, on tumblr or any social media, really. I just thought it was an interesting point/discussion/thought… and since comments were off I had to reblog instead.
Interestingly, I am not a fan of horror nor fanfiction in general… although I did just rewatch “Hellraiser: Generations” recently, and thought it was interesting; both the story and the fact that Pinhead’s last words were “Amen.”
I may as well keep answering… 🤣 I definitely didn’t grow up with “fundie” parents. I did have a semi-Christian religious background, but God found me later in life, when I was out on my own. I’ve always found psychology, philosophy, spirituality and religion fascinating, though. That’s why when God got a hold of me (I use these terms because I am NOT a fan of the whole “accepting God into your life” type language that you might hear… well… “fundies” use, I guess… 🤣 …as if GOD Himself somehow needed OUR “acceptance”…), I began a lifelong mission to learn as much as I could about what I believed and why I believed it, and what others believe and why they believed it. I’m not one to simply accept what I’ve been told blindly; never have been, even when I often suffered for it in the past 😵😵🙄😂.
That’s why I know that Hell has never been a “Christian invention.” There are plenty of Scriptures in the Tanach (what most Christians would call the Old Testament) that mention, bolster, or build on the idea of what became commonly known as “Hell;” the most obvious ones that come to my mind are in Daniel 12 and Isaiah 66; they dovetail perfectly well with the ideas in the Jewish apocryphal literature that ends the New Testament commonly called “Revelation,” as well as the teachings of the Jewish Messiah and His apostles. The modern notion that Hell (and certain other doctrines) are somehow exclusively “Christian inventions” that just sprang out of nowhere, when even Christianity itself continued directly out of Judaism, is not something to put much stock in, historically speaking. I dunno if you come from a Jewish background or not, but I cannot tell you how fascinating the subject of Messianic Judaism is to me, though it seems to be taboo to some. If that’s you, please forgive me for stepping on toes - not my intention.
If that’s not you, it’s worth remembering that Judaism itself ALSO didn’t simply spring out of nowhere, but it developed in and around Middle Eastern cultures to which the idea of the afterlife and divine reward/punishment was not completely foreign, either. I just tend to view the history of religion, especially Judeo-Christian religion and its related concepts, through the lens of a sort of ‘progressive revelation’… the Truth always existed, but God revealed it more clearly over time. In one way it’s like an eye exam, with the doctor changing lenses as your view gets progressively clearer, but that’s not my favorite metaphor. I like to see it as though Humanity is God’s child, and as a child grows and matures he/she is capable of understanding more and undertaking more involved tasks. You wouldn’t hand the car keys to your 6-year-old, but you might if they’re 16, have a learner’s permit and you’re in the passenger seat. Eventually they learn to drive on their own… but it’s a process. I see that as the whole of human history… and that’s why I find ideas like religion, politics, and the psychology of redemption so deeply fascinating and rewarding.
Thanks for asking, even if I ended up giving you a little more than you bargained for. 😂 And thanks for the interesting reblog! 😊
To start with, I apologize for misreading the situation a bit, I believed you were a fundamentalist set in your ways and responded mostly with snark. Since you seem like a person actually willing to engage in conversation, I’m going to change tactics a bit in response here.
To explain why I thought you were a fundamentalist, you seem, at least at first glance, to use a lot of the same buzzword language that many conservative Christians use. The way you seem to place a lot of blame on “the left.” The way you spoke of your own beliefs as “the truth” - specifically the suggestion that once exposed to the christian faith and it’s literature, people cannot help but see “the truth” and therefore any rejection or disagreement with it must be a rejection of “the truth” and subsequently objective morality.
To be honest I have a hard time seeing that kind of language and not feeling suspicious/hesitant around folks who use it.
I would consider myself a leftist, and I’m very much agnostic.
I have never read and do not care to read Karl Marx at this time, and I do not consider marxist ideology to be the building blocks of all or even most american left leaning political beliefs.
“Purity culture” is a phrase which has a very different context for left leaning people than the way conservative Christians typically use it. When people on the left talk about it, we are speaking about unhealthy, overdramatic, and unmovable responses to relatively benign - but still harmful -behavior. I’m talking about cyberbullying and dogpiling. It exists in our spaces, yes.
The idea that purity culture has it’s origins in “the god complex” is a frustrating suggestion. I say this for several reasons:
1) purity culture looks directly tied to conservative christian calvanist ideology. For much of history, the idea of eternal punishment without redemption came primarily from christian ideologies. Christianity is hugely defining culturally for much of the modern western world, and it’s impact exists outside of itself due to this.
2) Most of the people I’ve met who have anything close to a “god complex” seem to be conservative Christians, predominantly because they seem to project their own ideologies and morals directly onto god, and call that god’s word regardless of whether there is biblical precedence for their beliefs at all. They then demand others submit to the will of god, when it blatantly themselves they speak of. Rarely, even among the worst people on the left, have a I seen that kind of behavior. The worst of us may engage in harsh and unyielding moral absolutes, yes, but I’ve never seen any of us project them onto god and then demand people submit to “god’s word.”
Another thing that gives me hesitation are your assertions about Judaism. I am not that educated in Judaism, but I know several Jewish people, and have listened to what they have to say about their beliefs and their relationship to Christianity. For one thing, my understanding is that “Judeo-Christian” is not a phrase they tend to use, because the two belief systems are so fundamentally different. Furthermore, many Jews have expressed that Christians tend to only perceive Judaism through a very Christian lens, and this results in very many misconceptions and misunderstandings.
For another thing, my understanding is that the modern Christian idea of Hell as a place of eternal punishment and fire is in no way accurate to Jewish ideas of “hell.”
Lastly, Maybe I’m misunderstanding you, I’m tired and not exactly able to give my mental best here, but I’m uncomfortable with the assertion that Christianity is a “progression” from Judaism in the way that a child grows and matures. Judaism still exists and thrives and grows on it’s own standing. If anything, I’ve found most Jews I’ve known to have a very mature and adult mentality when it comes to their relationship with god, and most Christians I’ve known have had a deeply regressive, childish relationship with god that I’ve found alienating. Not to suggest that you do, but this dynamic is in my opinion certainly not an uncommon one among american conservative Christians. I think this point relates to what I am saying about viewing Judaism through a Christian lens and nothing else. It doesn’t strike you as rude or dismissive to suggest that your beliefs are more “matured” than another, still very much thriving belief system and culture?
Hey, no apologies necessary. I'm here mainly because I choose to be, for myself, which in my estimation should be the reason for ALL of us to be on any form of Social Media... and it's damn near impossible to offend me. So...
Personally, I'm aware of the history of American fundamentalism; it was actually mentioned in a recent post I made of an article about so-called "book bannings" that were nothing of the sort. In the American culture and popular imagination, it was really the Scopes Monkey Trial that made "Christian fundamentalists" the Bad Guy and Boogieman that they became. This title was based on a series of popular essays around that time as early 20th century Christianity was finding itself "outside the camp" of academia (a camp, by the way, that they actually started. The University and much of the strategy of modern higher education had its origins in the Church... but I digress.) The coverage of the trial by a reporter with an axe to grind did an excellent job of making the Christian fundamentalists look uneducated and backwards in the newspapers (one might say, the 'tumblr' of it's day 🤣) and the libel stuck. This happened nearly a hundred years ago, but the Press has almost always leaned at least somewhat Left and like a rottweiler, they never let go of a useful trope once they discover that it works.
You may very well consider yourself to be On The Left, but I all but guarantee you there are those on the modern Left that would consider you Far Right. Because you're talking to me. And in 5 years, it'll be worse. 10 years, worse still. The slippery slope argument isn't always a logical fallacy if there's an observable slippery slope. I myself am probably to the left of some of these "fundamentalists" of which you speak on some issues. You may be more of a Classical Liberal, like a Dave Rubin or Tim Pool type. (He's taken to calling them the City Urban Liberal Types, because their behavior has become so much like a C.U.L.T.) But overall, there is one side of the political spectrum that has observably moved much further than the other, and make no mistake, it's this "Left" to which I refer.
This is "The Left," the ideology and worldview that holds the vast majority of Power in media, entertainment, government administration, and large corporations, and it increasingly uses this power to influence culture. However much power it gains, however, it is constantly letting us know it is never enough. I doubt you're part of that.
"Purity culture" can develop in just about any religious environment and is not tied exclusively to Christianity, Calvinist or otherwise. Make no mistake, the modern Left is a religion for the godless. It's the "purity culture" in this culture can be just as toxic as any other... so it's no surprise to anyone that cyberbullying and dogpiling exist there, along with gaslighting and gatekeeping and all sorts of other toxic behavior.
... I'm just going ahead and posting this draft whether it's finished or not because I'm about to start another new blog, thanks to tumblr staff's unique passive-aggressive version of Defending The Faith™️ by removing this one's ability to message and comment. And probably shadowbanning certain of my posts, given that certain particular posts get a lot of attention and some get absolutely ZERO notice 🤷♂️🙄
I always meant to get back to this, but honestly I got busy and I don't always come here primarily for The Discourse 😆
““It is the time you have wasted for your rose that makes your rose so important.””
— Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, The Little Prince
There's nothing even wrong with the "don't say gay" bill
And whoever decided to call it that is a moron anyway
The bill says not to teach 3rd graders or younger about sexual orientations or gender identities, or to otherwise teach about them in a way that isn't age appropriate.
I agree with this based on a lack of trust and respect for our school system to not have a shitty agenda when teaching anything about orientation. Children younger than nine don't understand social issues or sexuality clearly anyway, so don't be teaching them about it in school bc it isn't age appropriate. Teach them about it in like middle school if you want- the bill doesn't forbid that. Otherwise it's much easier to cross from teaching straight into indoctrination.
My only issue with this bill was the proposed amendment that would legally compel teachers to rat kids out to their parents if they hear the student is gay, or else be fired. That's fucking horrendous. And it was withdrawn after rightful backlash.
If you as a parent need your kid to understand about being gay under age 10, teach them your goddamn self. Or chill out and I assure you they will learn about it anyway, and/or learn it in a way they can better understand when they're a couple years older and have a greater capacity for understanding social and sexual topics.
Stop using public school for a fucking agenda
This coming from an open bisexual who's never gonna conceal gay shit from her kids and still doesn't require it to be written into the curriculum for little fuckin kids who still pretend to be horses and power rangers at recess and don't need to be taught anything about sexuality or gender yet.
The bill could still penalise kids with gay parents simply for mentioning having two mothers or fathers.
It’s very easy to misuse and that’s the reason why I don’t like it, even though there’s a real problem with political teachers.
The bill states that teachers and third parties may not instruct children in third grade or below in sexual orientation or gender identity. No part of the legislation at any point restricts student speech. It doesn't even forbid discussion of LGBT history or stuff like the Pulse shooting- just no instructing 5-8yos about being gay or trans.
The fucking bill isn't even named "Don't say gay", that the name the democrat party put it and it's actually a anti-grooming bill
Exactly, like I said whoever decided to call it that is an idiot
Some infant on @staff removed my ability to message and comment again.
Really?
You actually think you'll 'beat' me someday, huh?
Look at hominishostilis and others like him. That's the LEAST you can expect. Hope you're looking forward to it, children. 🤷♂️🤣🤦♂️ I'm a real-life human being, and I'm gonna continue to type words that will irritate the sensibilities of your sensitive little Land Of Make Believe. Not because it brings me joy, but because you are stubbornly swimming upstream against Reality and Truth... congrats on that? But I'll keep coming back. It's hardly an inconvenience.
In the meantime, just another reminder that if you cannot bring yourself to simply deal with Life on Life's terms, the way human beings have since they started, you have infantilized yourself. It's genuinely sad.
This is just a website. Keep your promises. It's soooooo simple.
Also, this
...is literally more likely to be real than anything you hear in the news or from @staff.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Some infant on @staff removed my ability to message and comment again.
Really?
You actually think you'll 'beat' me someday, huh?
Look at hominishostilis and others like him. That's the LEAST you can expect. Hope you're looking forward to it, children. 🤷♂️🤣🤦♂️ I'm a real-life human being, and I'm gonna continue to type words that will irritate the sensibilities of your sensitive little Land Of Make Believe. Not because it brings me joy, but because you are stubbornly swimming upstream against Reality and Truth... congrats on that? But I'll keep coming back. It's hardly an inconvenience.
In the meantime, just another reminder that if you cannot bring yourself to simply deal with Life on Life's terms, the way human beings have since they started, you have infantilized yourself. It's genuinely sad.
This is just a website. Keep your promises. It's soooooo simple.
Unmute !
Three Questions that will destroy any argument with the Left
Learn
SOME
HISTORY
Another courageous, Beautiful & Brave™️ hate message followed by an immediate block. So stunning. So confident. Clearly, so utterly righteous in their moral stance. 🙄🤣🤣 Oy 🤦♂️
I'll never understand the juvenile mentality of someone who does this. I mean it's... social media. It's a website, nothing more. It's literally there for people to be free to express their opinions. What goes on in the mind of the Bitter, Anxiety-ridden Authoritarian Rando? The world may never know. THEY may never know, they fear actual self-reflection so much. 😂🤦♂️🤷♂️
I mean, look, call it a humblebrag or whatever, but I do know myself, at least. I know what I believe, what I believe in, where I succeed, where I (like every single one of us) fall short. I'm okay with who I am, and I have the best possible reason one could have. I also know why I believe what I believe. I've evaluated it under the harsh light of True Truth and comparisons to alternative opinions and worldviews. Do any of these people? One cannot fathom. How do they think they function?...
As for myself, I know as no one else can the things I've never done, and will never do:
Hate "gay people"
Fear "gay people"
Hate People in general, rather than ideas and worldviews that are worthy of hatred because of the damage they do to People in general, whom I actually love
Delete a social media account because of some random bigot accusing me of being what he/she is
Silence myself for the comfort of those who simply need to learn to deal with Life on Life's terms, rather than the rules of their personally-chosen imaginations
Intentionally take up too much space
Intentionally take up too little space (it's called boundaries, and they're absolutely an essential for the mental health these types claim to care about so much)
Not get a good laugh out of people who try to intimidate me over a website on a computer
Fail to put said people on blast for the appropriate amount of public mocking
I'll never even desire to understand how people function like this. I do not want in the slightest to even begin to fathom such an absence of self-awareness. What an empty, empty life these people have. It breaks my heart that only a small percentage of them will ever realize it, and Seek More.
"The unexamined life is not worth living."
Wow! Almost wish I had a television to see this.
No I don't. Thanks @starseedpatriot for posting this.
So much truth that the anchors on the left were getting nervous.
Wow! How long til she's Clintoned?
Rare find in the wild:
A journalist that actually sounds like a journalist
Heart Attack guns, Talking Plasma balls, and CIA mind control. Par for the course, all completely real. You're not smart or smug or educated if you disbelieve in this stuff. You're just ignorant, that's all. 🤷♂️