the savage garden. the fool, alone. the empty universe.
Three Goblin Art
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

blake kathryn
$LAYYYTER
todays bird
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
Not today Justin
Mike Driver

Kaledo Art
ojovivo
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Stranger Things
trying on a metaphor
No title available
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Xuebing Du

pixel skylines

Product Placement

@theartofmadeline
taylor price

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Türkiye

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from India
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from Iraq

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
@emilydickinsonsghost
the savage garden. the fool, alone. the empty universe.
"Blackbird" - personal work, inspired by my hometown. Blackbirds are my favourite - they sing so beautifully.
I caught a real live one Didn't blink, didn't try to run
I'm just thinking about the "was it raining" scene and the difference of narration we're stepping into with Lestat. So far from the first episode we can see that being in Lestat's mind is disorienting and all over the place. However, I find this moment interesting because of Lestat's conviction within his memory; "I was raining" [obviously] being implied, While he may not be in a place to tell his own story in a connected and coherent way he fully believes what he's saying is the truth. Unlike Louis, being that when he was faced with the question, he gave it pause and realized that he couldn't answer definitively.
I somewhat worry about fans who are going to be unable to understand that everything Lestat says may not be the truth (maybe it wasn't raining, who knows?). But also for the fans who are unwilling to believe that Lestat may not be lying about everything either. And that's fully the point right? To understand that once a moment has passed the most truthful telling of events is what lives in our memories. And so for all the scenes that we get retold to us by lestat I'm excited to put both the pieces together to get a better look at what might have happened. (Now this isn't to say the Lestat will never be straight up lying I think he totally will) but its just a more interesting show if we allow the odyssey of recollection to inform us on the characters along with the plot. I think that 'this is what Louis remembers vs this is what Lestat remembers' is such an interesting way to get into the interiority of these characters.
All this to say! I think we focus a little less on what version of events is true, and more about what these memories tell us about the characters. (Or even, what does lying about this moment tell us about the character) I think its just more fun that way!
inspired by:
this show is a comedy → 7/?
INTERVIEW WITH THE VAMPIRE 3.01: Detroit TVLTwT/IWTVTwT Version.
The Vampire Lestat is now streaming on AMC+ and airs tonight at 9 PM on AMC. If you have the chance, please support the show by tuning in on the official platforms. Every view counts!
by god we have got to popularize woman whump
whump is the means by which many fans emotionally connect to characters. where we applaud their resolve — the attributes of their excellence for surviving and overcoming a trial and persisting despite all obstacles. and also where we celebrate their humanity and vulnerability. where we feel most strongly that they are deserving of affection, care, people going out of their way to help them.
women are usually denied these attributes. we are seen as lacking the necessary resolve or competence or inner strength. or seen as shallow damsels in distress too often so that the aid and assistance does not feel earned. so that it’s never reinforced that we deserve people going out of their way for us after an ordeal.
so what we need is more woman whump.
ship wars in this fandom gotta be the dumbest thing i've ever seen. they're all family and they're all in love, they've all survived multiple apocalypse-level events together, they've all tried to kill each other at least once, they all have at least one private resentment with everyone else that will never be resolved, and they will all be together forever
Good Omens
coloured pencil drawings
Reposting a couple of old pieces from the archive
1.28 • “The City on the Edge of Forever” STAR TREK: THE ORIGINAL SERIES (1966-1969)
1 x 10 - The Corbomite Maneuver
Tell you what… the truth is… sometimes I miss you so much I can hardly stand it.
BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN (2005) dir. Ang Lee
They wrote their own story.
✨️some thoughts under the cut, feel free to ignore it and just enjoy the picture✨️
Say it with me: IT. IS NOT. ABOUT. THE FUCKING. KISS!!! That’s not why people are mad.
The Ending SUCKS because the WRITING SUCKS.
NO, I don’t find the concept of ‘tHeY FiNd eACh oThEr IN eVerY uNivErSe’ beautiful.
1) Because they don’t. There’s zero evidence that this is a recurring thing, thats 100% fandom copium- and even then they don’t have any of their memories and aren’t the same people. THATS. NOT. THEM. And it never will be because people are the sum of their experiences AND THEIR CHOICES. You don’t take a comedy Christian satire and make the solution some Buddhist-esque reincarnation philosophy that requires an entirely new suspension of disbelief no one signed up for or wanted. That’s shit writing.
2) So not only does the finale spit on every theme it had prior regarding championing human choice as miraculous and the world being worth fighting for in all its flaws as it is- you are going to sit here and tell me that actually they never had any choice at all, so they decided to toss everything down the garbage disposal for the next life. That is, frankly, terrible, and nihilistic, and not at all sensible for this series.
Aziraphale and Crowley are a wonderful love story because they were on opposite sides and they CHOSE each other, and they CHOSE to love humans. They chose to be hedonistic and compassionate and selfish and ‘human’ as they were because they knew how to make choices. Their love has always been THEIR choice.
So how can you tell me that the ending is great because they sacrificed everything for humans to have free choice- which they already had by the way- and then say the ending is beautiful because Aziraphale and Crowley are Predestined to love each other in every reality. How is that not massively hypocritical to the concept they are trying to sell us last minute out of nowhere? Is predestiny not the antithesis of what they asked for by your own definition?!
How is taking their 6000 years of choosing each other over and over again, and summing it down to a deterministic soul bond, more ‘free will’ or beautiful than them literally defying cosmic powers just to stay together and eat dinner at the Ritz on a casual Tuesday?!
People act like their life was just complete suffering, but they were perfectly happy on their own earth. Season 1 left them exactly where they wanted to be!!! Together with the Earth. It was so EASY to circle back to that, all they had to do was write it, and no one would have questioned it because that’s THEM and what they want to be doing. If Adam defied Satan for humanity, why would Jesus Christ- who’d already died once for the salvation of humanity- not tell God to be merciful?! Why not have the humans make the choice, rather than Crowley- which is another hypocritical move because he’s making choices for them just like he’s telling god not to!
How do we have any evidence this new world doesn’t have a god? Trust? In the woman who just destroyed the world after having a casual laugh with Satan? Okay. They didn’t trade their existence for freedom, they traded the apple of knowledge for ignorance.
The fact is, is that the world that championed choice and love was the one they came from, not the one they sacrificed themselves for- because choice and love doesn’t mean there are no complications, it means you take a stand and you do what you want anyways.
This dystopian nightmare of an ending where they let the universe die and don’t know each other was never a thought in anyone’s mind until it came into existence with the most shallow and contrived justifications of all time ten minutes before close, and that’s because it’s out of character nonsense.
And I’m sick of hearing ‘they were always gonna be human’ ‘it was always gonna be this way’ like there was rational grounds for it beforehand. No it wasn’t, and it certainly didn’t need to be. At most it was everyone’s joke of a worst case scenario, and that’s what they decided to give us- probably after a quick google search to find out what would piss everyone off the most.
This was Neil Gaiman and his team of horror writers, who probably didn’t even consider the source material, throwing a temper tantrum and abusing the fandom for liking Terry Pratchett’s divine optimism more than his petty ass. They designed every ridiculous contingency in this horrible script to justify their own mess.
The Ineffable Husbands were fine as they were. Even as a Demon and an Angel they were already ‘human’ enough, THATS what was funny. What the hell is so great about being mortal and not being able to have a free table whenever they want, and having to deal with real world shit like taxes, and homophobia, and Dying?
Enough Dyin’. No Maur DYIN’. It’s it’s-ITS NOT ON!!!
The two were horribly out of character this entire film. All the film did was spit on the world building and take the magic out of it.
A missing scene. Thanks for all the fanart and fic throughout the years, you guys
This is how it should have ended actually. This
One of the most haunting things about GO3 for me is that the ending transforms the entire meaning of “eternity” in Good Omens.
Back in season 1, when Crowley tries to convince Aziraphale to help raise (educate) the Antichrist, one of his biggest arguments is the horror of post-apocalyptic eternity.
Not death.
Eternity.
Not simply losing Earth and humanity, but losing everything that made existence meaningful in the first place:
food, music, books, art, messy human lives, arguments, wine, Queen songs, ridiculous pubs, warm dinners, Bentley drives, nightingales.
Crowley and Aziraphale were never afraid of existing forever.
They were afraid of a dead eternity.
An eternity of endless Heavenly bureaucracy. Endless “Heavenly harmonies.” Climbing the same mountain forever and ever.
In season 2, Alpha Centauri still exists as an escape fantasy. A survival plan. A place where they could exist together forever, outside Heaven and Hell.
And Aziraphale never truly rejects eternity with Crowley. He rejects abandoning humanity.
That’s important.
Then GO3 does something devastating: they literally fly past Alpha Centauri.💫💞✨
Past the possibility of survival. Past the possibility of personal eternity together.
And eventually… they let eternity go.
That’s why the ending hurts so much for some of us.
Not because Aziraphale and Crowley “became human.” But because the show seems to suggest something even more tragic: that they ceased to exist as themselves.
And the reincarnation/multiverse interpretation honestly doesn’t comfort me much.
Because if Aziraphale and Crowley keep finding each other in every universe, every lifetime, without memory of who they once were, then that isn’t really eternal love.
It’s eternal repetition.
Not eternal happiness. Not eternal reunion.
Just endless versions of approaching each other again and again without ever fully reaching the original “us.”
And somehow that feels terrifyingly close to the very thing Crowley feared in season 1: another form of eternity without escape.
A different mountain. The same climb.
What makes it even more painful is that Aziraphale and Crowley never fully understood humanity to begin with.
They loved humans. Protected humans. Were fascinated by humans.
But they constantly observed humanity from the outside.
Crowley understands cruelty, violence, systems, fear, war. But ordinary human emotional chaos genuinely confuses him:
Jane Austen being both a smuggler and a romance novelist.
People turning tragedy into tourism (The story of Mr. Dalrymple, and the "Resurrectionist" pub).
Love is not working according to “conditions” or “ritual dances.”
Even Nina and Maggie prove that human connection cannot simply be engineered.
Humans are too contradictory. Too irrational. Too alive.
So if Aziraphale and Crowley really did reincarnate as humans while retaining fragments of their former selves — their love of books, stars, music, nightingales — then maybe they would always remain slightly alien inside humanity.
Always searching for connection. Always feeling incomplete. Always sensing some absence they cannot name.
Not angels anymore. Not demons anymore. But never fully human either.
And maybe that is the true tragedy of GO3.
Not death.
But endless becoming.
Endless searching.
Endless learning how to be human without ever fully understanding why being human hurts so much.
Maybe that’s why the ending feels less like a traditional “happy ending” and more like a cosmic elegy about memory, identity, freedom, and the unbearable weight of eternity.