really enjoying intersectionality as a lens in how it relates to oppression and privilege- that, and the interconnection with "passing".
An abled cis straight white man has cis, abled, male, and white privilege.
A disabled cis straight white man still has cis, male, and white privilege.
correspondingly, a straight white trans man has male, white, and straight privilege. Correspondingly, if he passed, he MAY possess cis privilege in interpersonal interactions. That doesn't fully account for medical transphobia and insurance, details of phalloplasty, etc, but I do like the integration of cis privilege as a spectrum, where the degree of passing is a notable impact on that scale.
Oppression and privilege are both a spectrum, and can overlap. It's neat to examine these things, and see that being male uniformly results in privilege, not detriments, and therefore cannot be an axis of oppression.
really, the whole malarkey with transandrophobia is so clearly not based in any reason, logic, real world experience, or tied to any internally consistent theoretical framework. Examining trans emasculation as trans men being denied male privilege, and experiencing transphobia and oppression on that axis is an important point- you're not being oppressed for being a man, you're getting denied the benefits of manhood because society is structured to maximize the impact when someone is being a transphobe, and because male privilege is arbitrarily rewarded only when certain toxic behaviors associated with masculinity are upheld.
If you only gain male privilege when you start talking over women, that's not just passing more, that's because you've incubated a cruel misogyny in your mind. Try talking over transphobes, ignoring them, not paying them heed, and deciding that the only way you can be a man is to strike at women.