styofa doing anything
we're not kids anymore.

ellievsbear

if i look back, i am lost
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
taylor price
No title available
macklin celebrini has autism

Kiana Khansmith
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
DEAR READER
d e v o n
occasionally subtle
dirt enthusiast
πͺΌ
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Sade Olutola
Cosmic Funnies
cherry valley forever

β
seen from Kenya
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Philippines

seen from France
seen from Poland
seen from Sri Lanka

seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from France

seen from Greece

seen from TΓΌrkiye

seen from Netherlands

seen from Greece

seen from TΓΌrkiye
seen from TΓΌrkiye

seen from United States

seen from Germany
@guardian-ange
the bit of chapters like 75% of the way through htn are hysterical for a lot of reasons but im personally a big fan of how. Gideons going on and on about how Harrow doesn't even like her and never will and didn't even want to eat her etc etc and then we cut back to Harrow and she's in like. ghost group therapy grief counseling. post grief lobotomy. grieving so hard she's writing au fanfic
I like when people like a character so way too much that it transcends even self shipping or kinning and becomes more of a patron saint that you pray to type of deal
Phoenix Wright has been disbarred for seven slutty slutty years
(Happy year of Apollo Justice everyone!!)
You know as an American born in the late 90s Iβve watched my country blow up foreigners on tv supposedly in the interest of national security since I was a toddler but quite frankly we live on a natural fortress of a continent with friendly nations to our north and south and have been attacked on our own soil literally two times in the past hundred years and we have military bases on every inhabited continent on earth. Itβs never made sense to do these things for βnational securityβ. It never will make sense unless you value the shareholders of weapons companies over the lives of children. And apparently a concerning amount of people do.
"goddess" "matriarchy" "female wisdom" girl your civic rights
βBut I didnβt and still donβt like making a cult of womenβs knowledge, preening ourselves on knowing things men donβt know, womenβs deep irrational wisdom, womenβs instinctive knowledge of Nature, and so on. All that all too often merely reinforces the masculinist idea of women as primitive and inferior β womenβs knowledge as elementary, primitive, always down below at the dark roots, while men get to cultivate and own the flowers and crops that come up into the light. But why should women keep talking baby talk while men get to grow up? Why should women feel blindly while men get to think?β
β Ursula K. Le Guin
Jo in Little Women: "I find it poor logic to say that because women are good, women should vote. Men do not vote because they are good; they vote because they are male, and women should vote, not because we are angels and men are animals, but because we are human beings and citizens of this country."
Gideon's Powers and the Nature of Kiriona
I've been having many thoughts about Kiriona lately, and I've shared some of my older ones elsewhere recently, but one big newer one I wanna talk about most is: I don't think Kiriona "should" be mega dead, actually! Like she is, I'm not saying she's not; I'm saying it doesn't make sense so we should be asking why.
So let's recap older thoughts real quick first because I do stand by those. I do think Kiriona looks like this because she wants to, not by John's choice. John's a perfectionist with a history of wanting pretty perfect dolls but is also a horrible people pleaser who's just lost nearly everyone close to him, and he's been handing her everything else she ever wanted on a silver platter; he'd absolutely cave if she asked.
I think she wants to see the look on Harrow's face for herself, to force her to remember and confront Gideon's sacrifice after Harrow had forced herself to forget. Possibly to pettily go at least one of us wasn't so eager to forget, possibly to have Harrow romantically restore her missing heart (right in line with her Sleeping Beauty ass rescue fantasy she and Ianthe set up), she'd have to decide for sure depending on Harrow's initial reaction. Though ALSO. Someone pointed out to me a few days ago: She thinks Harrow's into dead girls. She wants the D and the D stands for Dead. Making herself like this on purpose just in case Harrow finds that hotter... She'd do that too, you know she would lmao.
With that out of the way though, when I say "looks like this" and "in case it makes her hotter", something we do NOT talk about enough is:
Kiriona looks significantly WORSE than her literally lifeless corpse did.
Her corpse as we see it in As Yet Unsent is entirely incorrupti, just like any corpse near John stays. It was not rotting At All, yet Kiriona is waxen and discolored with foggy eyes. There's of course also the implication that her heart has been 100% removed, as opposed to how the iron railing only would have shredded it but at least some of the viscera would still be there. But we already knew there's been active work done, her being indestructible and all. Which brings us to the heart (hehe) of the matter:
There is literally no reason based on all the worldbuilding we have why Gideon shouldn't come back to life yet again. Our problem should not be resurrecting her, but making her ever stay dead.
She CAN'T stay dead. The closest she came was when "her soul" (more on that in a moment) was locked inside the mausoleum of Harrow's mind, much like Alecto locked in the Tomb, and the moment that body was empty, she woke up inside it. "But SG," you say, "that's just possession," and sure it could read that way, except Harrow's body dies four times while Gideon is piloting it, and while the last time in the lowest depths of the River is left questionable, the three times fighting Heralds result in Gideon's soul instantly reviving Harrow's body. You have to be alive to be capable of dying, and Dulcie also says from a place of expertise that Harrow's body is moving but not being puppeted.
This does necessarily get into the theory that Gideon is part of the Holy Trinity with John and Alecto, and I won't go too deep into the many many many points of evidence for that here, but the main part: with the exception of Harrow holding onto her, Gideon has always come back to life, both in her own body and someone else's. Just like John and just like Alecto/Nona, she can technically die but CAN'T STAY dead. So first we have to ask why that happens in the first place.
John's power doesn't come from nothing. John and Alecto explicitly share a soul, both he and Harrow-with-Alecto's-memories tell us that and this isn't something ALECTO would be wrong about. So we know John can't stay dead as long as and because Alecto is alive, and Alecto can't stay dead as long as and because John is alive. Immortality never comes from nothing. There is always an exchange, always another soul involved, this isn't a vague divine god power.
So where would Gideon's come from, and just as importantly, why would it suddenly stop?
Well, John and Alecto are also their own people with their own thoughts and feelings and experiences, even if memories do also bleed between them. The line is extremely blurry but there are distinct facets of their soul that are "just"(/mostly) them, they're obviously not the same person. So I'm positing that just as John and Alecto are two distinct facets of their shared soul, so is Gideon. "He said, Make it quick, but kill her, said me with my blood could do itβsaid me with my blood, I was the only oneβ¦" and "Dad won't be immortal anymore, but he said he doesn't care about that." And I mean there are tons of implications John doesn't intend to survive his endgame plans here and 'no longer immortal' doesn't necessarily mean 'alive' so there's that, but. Even if we ignore that, and even though we don't have the full details of how this conversation actually went, and even though John 100% wouldn't give her the full details regardless...
Even with all that, the fact that there's directly been implication Gideon CAN hurt her AND it would destroy their otherwise unbreakable two-way exchange kind of inherently implies she's part of this, even before you look at the mountains of other evidence; that it's a three-way exchange now, that another facet has splintered off from the same soul. So that would absolutely answer why Gideon can't stay dead: because John and Alecto are alive. Does that mean all three have to die at once, or if two of them died (or fundamentally changed, a la pulling a Paul, because I still hope John and Alecto will do that), would it genuinely leave the other alive but mortal? (I DOUBT the two-can-die version, mmmaaaybe on the fundamental change.) But WHATEVER the details, whatever the motivations, it DOES seem extremely likely those three are intertwined. There's been no OTHER explanation that would suit Gideon coming back to life from nerve gas as a baby and also be in line with how immortality as a whole works or anything else we know about the worldbuilding.
WHICH MEANS...
There's literally no reason why she shouldn't pop back to life in any other empty body, especially her own, especially when it hadn't rotted even a little bit. If she revived Harrow's body repeatedly, I don't see any reason a delay getting back to her own should suddenly make her (facet of the) soul stop having that ability.
Which further implies, while again I do think it would have been her own decision, John would have needed to do something to actively keep her dead, would have needed to make Kiriona look like this, look more rotted and more dead, on purpose.
And well, Pyrrha does directly suggest the body could be a copy. Given her apparently having some pre-Rez memories and now inhabiting the body that was regrown from a damn arm, it's possible she'd have a particular level of expertise and familiarity there, but whether she does or not, I'm inclined to believe the theory, specifically because "If it's John's copy, it's going to be exact" but GtN Chapter 1 mentions extremely offhand that Gideon was chipped as a baby, which would make for such a good Chekhov's Gun as a way to confirm which body was her original.
And if it IS a copy, if she's now a construct made to House her as a revenant, then perhaps the body she's in now isn't actually capable of being alive? π€ Like, it's not A Human Body, it's a literal construction of meat and bone that's made to Look Like That. Her soul won't heal it because those aren't technically wounds. It's made to look gray and dead with a gaping chest. Like, that's not the only explanation for how to keep her dead, it could also just be John putting an active time-pausing theorem on her body the way he froze a lot of the stuff in Canaan House, or otherwise just kind of doing a manual override. If I'm right about souls then her power is his power on a fundamental level, so he'd probably have a good idea of what he was working with. The copy part would just be a particularly interesting way of going about it imo.
BUT YEAH. The important part is:
Unless something happens to break the immortality loop before then, I don't think we'll actually have any trouble at all reviving Gideon. It's literally a matter of just letting it happen, or at least, getting rid of whatever is in place to stop it from happening.
What we should be worried about is, are we going to get her back once again only for us to learn she needs to die alongside John and Alecto to help fix everything? Who knows. There could be a million ending possibilities we haven't even begun to conceive, and I mean, "death can also die" still haunts me every day. But hey! At least we'll probably see her back on her feet for a little bit longer before our hearts get ripped out again! :3
people on this website be likeΒ βitβs actually schoolβs fault that i donβt know how to read because i wanted to write my essay on the divergent trilogy and that BITCH mrs. clarkson made us study 1984 instead. anyway hereβs a 10 tweet thread of easily disproven misinformation about a 3 year old news story and btw, who is toni morrison?β
i KNOW most of yβall are lying about being in the gifted program as children because none of you could pass the basic reading comprehension assessment they give third graders today
this post is mean and I never read divergent or whatever the fuck but 1984 sucks and is rape apologism so if somebody wanted to write about divergent or whatever good for them
this reply is like literally exactly what op is talking about lol. like firstly ops point isnβt β1984 is goodβ, ops point is that analysing complex stories teaches you how to form opinions and think for yourself.Β and like secondly in 1984 youβre supposed to think damn itβs fucked up that heβs thinking that way about her, i wonder if this ties in with the central theme of βa society like this will fuck you in the headβ? (this is the thinking for yourself part). like do you think orwell just put that in for fun? do you think that just because winston is the protagonist youβre supposed to agree with everything he does?
You know I feel like this post just gave me an epiphany for what is wrong with how Tumblr Fandom/Internet Fandom responds to media-or not *wrong* but makes it very hard to respond to anything but a morally correct, and heroic protagonist.Β
When an English teacher, or reader, taught or picked up 1984, it wasnβt with the intention they were going to love the protagonist. They picked it up with the intention of reading a whole story and trying to grasp the theme or catharsis from the story. If the protagonist was a *shitty* person it played into the the themes or the story, because it wasnβt about morally judging the book or *liking* or feeling attachment to the protagonist. Sometimes and often times, books were just about gaining another perspective.Β
No one read Lolita expecting to endear, or like, or be inspired by Humbert. You are supposed to be upset by his behavior, you donβt read Lolita with the intention of being inspired. You read it to learn more about what the fuck is going on inside someoneβs head when they behave like that. How children get sucked into abusive situations. Or readΒ βThe Great Gatsbyβ not because they want to fall in love with Gatsby or Nick, but to better understand and analyze the experience of the 1920s or destitution of the American Dream.Β
A lot of internet and fandom culture has changed that though. When we say something likeΒ βI love the Great Gatsbyβ it comes with the idea or association that means you must *love* or relate to one of the characters. And maybe you do, but the first assumption is not longer about the quality of the work or themes, or cathartic impact-itβs about character admiration. And with that character admiration, in tumblr stan culture, or kin culture, or exalting characters with fanart/romance/so on you donβt justΒ βadmireβ or find that characterΒ βcompellingβ it now translates toΒ βyou LOVE that characterβ or youΒ βDIRECTLY relate to that character.βΒ
You canβt sayΒ βI love how Humbert is written, itβs so fascinating and darkβ, without it directly translating you somehow relate to a child abuser or condone his actions. Taking in media has become an act of worship and connection. We no longer watch meant to just see the story as a whole, we watch expecting to connect to a character and if we offer them ourΒ βworshipβ as itβs become, as opposed to just attention or interest study as it traditionally was, it means we are condoning the character or saying we directly empathize with all their actions.Β
I think thatβs why there is often now so much fuss over *toxic* characters or not. Or whether that classical novel is showing good or bad things anymore. Weβre treating the characters as people we should love or want to draw or write about. Sometimes a story is just about getting the the theme or catharsis or learning another perspective. We donβt NEED to like the character. Or we donβt HAVE to like a character to be impressed by how theyβre written or intrigued by their behavior.Β
I think if internet culture could learn to view stories as small insights into other lives or single takes of one perspective instead of purposeful moral inspirations weβd be a lot less worried about how toxic or not toxic they are.Β
[ he needs a lacy cravat ]
[ a scribble of miles with shorter hair! he looks like his dad and it hurts ;w; ]
[ here are a couple more! ]
hi im not dead just busy with school have some assorted ace attorney stuff
klapollo yuri on ice au. hear my words
also viktor nikiforov is simply klavier gavin and howl pendragon fused into one guy im sorry i dont make the rules
never have i ever seen aaron tveit have onstage chemistry with a woman
men on the other hand.......
I see "old guy making long and rambling speech during which everyone is extremely uncomfortable about what he might say next" has been a thing at weddings since at least 1833.
"omg green and red, christmas colors" WRONG. french yaoi π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·π«π·
Les Mis is a Christmas Movie
Location of Corinthe: map comparison
I did this for the Saint-Merry barricade mapΒ so I thought I might as well do it to the Corinthe (Rue de la Chanvrerie) barricade too. Hereβs a comparison between then and now and both overlapping:
(The black square is Corinthe)
1832:Β
The streets are generally narrow, Rue MondΓ©tour and Rue de la Petite Truanderie being the narrowest.
Rue Saint-Denis is the widest and longest of the streets in the area.
Rue de la Chanverrerie is the shortest of the streets (about 120 meters or 130 yards)
It has no side streets at all.Β
Rue des PrΓͺcheurs is about the same width as Rue de la Chanverrerie but longer, continuing west to Les Halles.
2015:Β
Rue Rambuteau has taken over Rue de la Chanverrerie and itβs much wider than itβs predecessor, not to mention much much longer, breaking through places where there used to be houses.Β
Thereβs also a new street called Rue Pierre Lescot crossing Rue Rambuteau and Rue des PrΓͺcheurs. It has some trees too.
A small patch of trees (and idk what, cafΓ© tables? Something?) takes the place of the block that used to separate Rue de la Petite Truanderie from Rue de la Grande Truanderie.
The brand new shopping centre Forum Des Halles dominates the area. It has taken the space where Rue MondΓ©tour (now shorter) used to continue up until Rue des PrΓͺcheurs.
Rue des PrΓͺcheurs is much shorter than it used to be too.
Rue Saint-Denis (which used to be the widest street in this area) has stayed the same width as before but it seems narrow compared to the other streets that have been widened.
The new map overlaid on the old. You can see how much more space the buildings took in 1832.
Note that I didnβt mark all the courtyards, though. Or other possible passages behind the faΓ§ades. There are a lot of things that might not have made it into a map.
I guess mostly this is useful if you want to visit the place and have trouble figuring out where it is (which is understandable since the area has changed so much.)
Here, have some posts with photos: [x] [x]
And hereβs the Corinthe spot on Google Maps: [x]
(The modern address is 102 Rue Rambuteau.)
Actually I could do this with the Musain tooβ¦ if anybodyβs interested? Possibly also other places but then I might need to do more research first. These two are just places Iβve already put effort in figuring out.
(Oh and btw please tell me if you notice mistakes!)
Still thinking about how in the ThéÒtre du ChÒtelet production of Les Mis, when Thénardier was trying to rob Valjean's house, he asked Montparnasse to stand guard/be on the lookout, which he worded as "Montparnasse, fait le guet", which in French sounds like he said "Montparnasse be/act gay" and Montparnasse did a double take, hit the fruitiest pose with his hand on his hip and looked around like "I mean, okay ?".
And I was like. They did a "___, can you serve ? No, serve the country !" type of joke. Icons.