The thing that abled people who advocate for the disabled community donât get is that there are times when disabilities/accommodations clash. Horribly.
Like I spent years having to come up with a solution to get therapy dogs into a series of residence halls. Why years? Because we had to decide who got to stay and who got to leave: the people who needed therapy dogs or the people with severe allergies to animals. Who got the alternative housing?Â
Things like fidget toys might seem great for some disabled people but having them in the room could be distracting/overstimulating for others. The same goes with stimming. It canât be helped but neither can the anxiety that another person in the room feels as they watch/hear it. Additionally, something like a weighted blanket might immediately calm one kid down and send the other one into a panic attack due to the claustrophobia it causes. (*Points to myself*)
Every Metro bus in New York City has a series of seats at the front that can be lifted up to accommodate people in wheelchairs but if Iâm in one of those spots then someone with a cane/walker has to journey even further to sit down.
The flashing lights of a fire alarm are there to help deaf/hearing impaired but if theyâre not properly timed, they can also cause a person to have a seizure.
The worst part about all of these is that there is rarely a concrete solution that makes everyone happy/safe. And Iâm not here to offer any because I donât know them. Iâm just here to remind you all that as youâre taking your education/health classes, as youâre reading your textbooks, as youâre preparing to go be an advocate, just remember that there is rarely ever such a thing as a one-size-fits-all solution to advocacy and that something you do that can help one disabled person might actually hinder another.
Food for thought.
I have heard this referred to by some in the disability advocacy profession as âduelling disabilitiesâ and itâs definitely something I wish people would be more mindful of when discussing accessibility.
another useful term is âcompeting access needsâ or incompatible access needs.
i just came across the term âaccess frictionâ that was coined as an extension of the âcompeting access needsâ to remove the idea of competition, winning and losing
Calling Up Justice is creating a resource on access frictions because there are multiple meanings and applications of the term. Access frict
This is also one of several good reasons the phrase âfully accessibleâ means nothing without further context. Your venue is fully accessible? To whom?
Reblogging this version for the excellent turn of phrase, and the link that goes with it.
Also, while I was reading this, a slogan popped into my head:
The best accessibility is flexibility.















