Mike Driver
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
AnasAbdin
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
d e v o n
Discoholic 🪩
Show & Tell
JVL
Keni
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
★
Janaina Medeiros
Xuebing Du
i don't do bad sauce passes
ojovivo
No title available
blake kathryn
No title available
we're not kids anymore.
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from New Zealand
seen from Brazil
seen from Netherlands
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from France
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
@hamstergetten
Got blocked on facebook for disagreeing with:
"We need to focus puberty education on women. Periods are stigmatized. Men don't understand what it's like. If a high school girl gets her period in class, classmates will make fun of her. If a high school boy gets an erection in class, it's a badge of honor."
??? They'll mock that boy too. You can request more education on periods or whatever without pretending like boys dont also get mocked for puberty symptoms.
A badge of honor? What?
At least he survived unlike that guy who was beaten to death for the crime of supporting the US president recently.
What?
I... I don't even have words for the nonsense I've just witnessed, really. Recently, Israel was added a UN sexual violence in war zones blacklist. And just, look at this. Listen to this video.
.... WHAT DO YOU MEAN YOU DON'T NEED TO DO ANY VERIFICATION???? EXCUSE ME???
And people still want to believe the UN is a neutral party and not violently antisemitic.
"The information is verified with a very robust methodology of verification and documentation. I am a recipient. I compile that information and I present it to the Secretary-General... [viewing the direct evidence] is not my job." (x)
^that is the audio from that twitter screenshot. God forbid a UN agent trust their own agency's verification process, especially since the report discusses the sexual violence in Afghanistan, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Libya, Mali, Myanmar, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, and Ukraine. So no, Israel was not uniquely targeted.
Do you believe it is normal to ask the person who compiles UN findings to doubt UN findings? To spend their time doing all the work other agents have already done? When the report verified 9,788 cases of conflict-related sexual violence during 2025?? (x)
If you wanted to review the evidence you wouldn't be screenshotting a tweet to complain about the unique ~antisemitism~ of a report that features the infamous Sde Teiman rape (caught on camera and widely distributed alongside the "right to rape" protests that followed and the Israeli government dropping the charges against the rapists). If you want to review UN methodology you can view that here, with the 2009 Gaza Conflict Commission used as a relevant example (this guide was published in 2015).
In fact, let's go over their methodology together:
Information-gathering methods of the United Nations Fact-finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict (2009) (a) The review of reports of international organizations, including the United Nations; reports and other documentation, including affidavits, produced by non-governmental and civil society organizations (Palestinian, Israeli and international); media reports; and writings of academics and analysts on the conflict; (b) interviews with victims, witnesses and other persons having relevant information in keeping with established human rights methodology and in order to ensure both the safety and privacy of the interviewees and the integrity of the information provided, such interviews were conducted in private. The Mission decided not to interview children. The Mission conducted 188 individual interviews. Most interviews were conducted in person. if the Mission was unable to meet the relevant persons, interviews were conducted by telephone. Also in keeping with normal practice for this type of report and to continue to protect their safety and privacy, the names of the victims, witnesses and other sources are generally not explicitly referred to in the report and codes are used instead. The names of individuals who publicly testified at the hearings held by the Mission or who have explicitly agreed to be named are, however, identified; (c) Site visits to specific locations in Gaza where incidents had occurred. The Mission investigated 36 incidents in Gaza; (d) The analysis of video and photographic images, including satellite imagery provided by UNOSAT, and expert analysis of such images; (e) The review of medical reports about injuries to victims; (f) The forensic analysis of weapons and ammunition remnants collected at incident sites; (g) Meetings with a variety of interlocutors, including members of the diplomatic community, representatives of the parties concerned, NGOs, professional associations, military analysts, medical doctors, legal experts, scientists, United Nations staff; (h) invitations, through notes verbales, to United Nations Members States and United Nations agencies, departments and bodies to provide information relating to the Mission’s investigation requirements; (i) The wide circulation of a public call for written submissions from NGOs and other organizations and individuals interested in bringing information to the attention of the Mission. As a result, it received numerous submissions from organizations and individuals from israel, the Occupied Palestinian Territory and elsewhere in the world; (j) Public hearings in Gaza and in Geneva to hear: (i) victims and witnesses of violations; and (ii) individuals with specialized knowledge and expertise on the context and impact of the hostilities.
I genuinely don't know what other criteria they might have missed for these investigations. Despite how Special Representative Pramila Patten says she would never herself visit a torture camp, the UN specifically calls for site visits and yet "Israel continues to deny visas for OHCHR international staff (x).
UN Human Rights High Commissioner Michelle Bachelet has deplored Israel’s refusal to grant visas for her staff in the occupied Palestinian t
^this article was published 2022.
Let's recap. You professionally misunderstood what Patten was saying and spread a lie that insinuated there was no fact-checking towards the sexual violence Palestinians experience. That is, full fucking stop, rape denial. And you did it to further the idea that the UN was unfairly "picking on" the Jewish State due to antisemitism, an extremely fucking annoying statement considering how stupidly easy it is to fact-check the original tweet. Hell, you don't even have to do that. You can just correctly understand "it's not the responsibility of my office to do any verification" implies a different office verifies the information.
You lied about antisemitism to protect Israel from criticism. Please stop fucking doing that.
I didn't lie about antisemitism. If the person compiling the information does not take it upon themselves to review that information, and in fact openly announces they would not even go to one of these facilities even if offered, how exactly does that not prove bias?
You've got a whole wall of text here trying to argue that we should trust information the person presenting that information to the secretary general and ARGUING THAT THEY SHOULD BE ON THE BLACKLIST did not even bother to review themselves. And frankly, I don't give a fuck about any of it. Cuz she should fucking review the information, not openly announce she wouldn't review it to check that it's factual even if she was offered the chance to go to an Israeli detention center and verify it in person.
Oh, and your tags? No one said "compassion for rape victims is antisemitic." What we said is that not even trying to verify that a rape actually happened before presenting it in an argument that Israel should be blacklisted for using sexual violence is what's antisemitic.
The information. Was verified. Asking her to doubt the verification process of the UN, her own agency, is stupid. Like you are either incredibly stupid or deliberately and maliciously creating this argument knowing it's stupid but wanting to discredit the UN anyways.
Yes I think it's unreasonable for this woman to personally verify 9,788 cases of sexual violence. As any sane person would agree.
Was it? And we should trust that it was actually verified... Why, exactly? And especially when in charge of compiling the information did not bother to lay eyes on it?
And I don't need to discredit the UN, they do that themselves. 🤣 I mean, 1500 of their unrwa workers are suspected of having Hamas ties. Not to mention the long history of their workers soliciting sex from women in the areas they're supposed to be helping.
And actually, it's pretty fucking reasonable to expect someone whose entire job is compiling information to actually review said information. Especially when trying to blacklist a country for claims of sexual violence, AND ESPECIALLY when the claims about that violence are SO BULLSHIT there are people claiming they were raped by DOGS.
Oh she reviewed the information! Just not the direct evidence. Do you need me to explain the difference?
A US probe into Hamas "ties" of people living in Gaza, where Hamas is the fucking government, is stupid. Ohhh links to the government as an aid organization? You don't say.
Tbh "they're saying they're raped by dogs obviously that's fake" as if Israel doesn't have a long history of using dogs to abuse Palestinians? As if a man with fucking down syndrome wasn't murdered by a fucking IDF dog (and I don't mean the soldier)
Muhammed Bhar's family wants the Israeli military to investigate his death in Gaza City this month.
I think "Man with down syndrome murdered by army police dog" is gorish enough to believe rapists use animals for sexual violence. Maybe you have different standards
1) someone who doesn't review the evidence is not someone who should be arguing to put Israel on the blacklist.
2) Hamas is also a designated terrorist organization. Being the government is irrelevant. If you, as an aid worker, have ties to terrorists that is a big fucking deal. Especially when they're currently doing what Hamas has been doing.
3) did you see the part of that incident where the dog attack was accidental and the soldiers only "left him to die" because they were currently under fire and chose to protect idf soldiers over one man? I'm suspecting you didn't. That or you dismissed that part as propaganda.
I also fail to see how this incident lends any credibility to the idea the idf is using dogs to rape people. Nevermind how impossible it is to actually train a dog to do that. Dogs are notoriously hard to train to breed with each other on command, and it's really not physically possible for a dog to penetrate a human without help, their genitalia is not built like ours. It's designed for a willing recipient (in whatever sense that means for dogs), meaning very little resistance to penetration. Which means it's not really built to penetrate either human "hole."
4) you calling me a Nazi in the tags is just the cherry on top to all this. 🤣
Do. Do you think Pramila Patten as an individual is the one who decides what goes on this report. Are you that dense.
Hamas is only a designated terror organization if you're a white bitch. There's nothing "official" about Hamas' designation, it's literally western and western-aligned countries that designate them as such. The UN does not designate them a terrorist org. Probably because they're resisting people objectively worse than anything they could do. Any time you cling to Hamas as an "official designated terrorist org" you're just kinda doing western/American imperialism for them. How many genocides does the US have under its belt again? And I'm supposed to recognize its authority here? Lol.
I'm sorry that's INSANE spin of that story. Soldiers use dogs to physically threaten people -> dog attacks people. Soldiers: 😢 we had no idea that would happen.
You are a fucking nazi. You're an ethnosupremacist rape-denying nazi.
She doesn't need to "decide what goes on it" she just needs to fucking read it. To review the evidence. So it doesn't fucking matter if she's the one who "decides what goes on it" or not. She is the one presenting the information as a reason Israel should be on the blacklist. If she's not willing to review it first to fact-check it, why should we trust her?
"if you're a white bitch." I myself am Latina, I know several black people, other latinos, ethnic Jews and countless others who aren't white who fully believe them to be terrorists. So no, you're full of shit. 🤣
"resisting people objectively worse" is provably untrue, but also targetting civilians for murder, rape and kidnapping is not resistance. There is no law that permits any of those acts against civilians in the name of any cause, let alone "armed resistance."
The fact you are trying to argue Hamas are not terrorists is all anyone needs to see to know how fucking retarded you are.
And buddy, this specific case was an accident. This is literally a proven fact.
And I'm not a Nazi, nor an ethno-supremacist and I have seen no solid evidence whatsoever these rapes occurred, let alone ones committed by fucking dogs. Hearsay is not proof. "Activists" from the flotilla who claimed to have collapsed lungs yet were talking days after this supposed injury with no sign of any injury on their body is not proof of rape either. Especially when they were CAUGHT ON CAMERA faking being in a hospital bed in Turkey (after leaving on camera in Israel looking fine, all fist pumps and peace signs) then 12 hours later in Spain were looking fine and dandy.
Find me solid proof of a rape occuring, and I'd be the first to condemn the rapists. But so far, I have seen nothing solid at all.
She reports on other people's reports. She summarizes the evidence presented to her from the hundreds of commissions. She reviews data, she does not slog through interview transcripts. This is a reasonable thing to understand. Your standard that she personally immerse herself in the evidence of almost ten thousand cases is an impossible standard, but you know, that's what people like you do. Set an impossible standard and then say "see?" when no one meets it.
Are you seriously doing "I have black friends" right now? And using the word r*tard? Okay 👍 get more nazi idc
Okay I see from this manic rant you're like, sincerely more deep into conspiracy theories than is salvageable from one internet interaction. Make no mistake I still disdain you, but you have my pity too. You need to reacquaint yourself with reality soon before you lose any sense of humanity you have left, because if a video of a gang rape isn't enough "solid proof" there never will be. Which is exactly the point
How can she summarize the evidence of, by her own admission, she has never laid eyes on the evidence? You stupid fuck.
No, I'm pointing out that I know for a fact non-whites view them as terrorists so it's total bullshit to try and claim only "white bitches" view them as terrorists. But sure, strawman me and call me a Nazi again. Why not. And buddy, I can call whoever I want a retard, okay? I'm autistic. I may hate the word, but if you're being retarded, I'm calling you a retard.
"manic rant." That sure is a convenient excuse to not have to address anything I said.
And buddy, there was no "video of gang rape." I've seen that video. Men huddled around someone while others hold up riot shields is not a video of a gang rape. There was no literally no fucking rape depicted in that video.
Edit:
I never said they "never committed sexual violence." All armies do during war, unfortunately. But all the cases I've seen presented have never had any solid proof and often come from people who are very obviously lying. There was even a woman early on in 2023 who claimed there were mass rapes at Al Shifa hospital, then later admitted she lied about it to "encourage brotherhood" among Palestinians. When people are constantly crying wolf in regards to the idf, it should be a given that every case be viewed with a magnifying glass rather than just accepted with flimsy evidence (at best).
Oh my gooood read the report!!! Read the fucking report I linked it above! "How can she summarize it" just literally read it for yourself holy fucking shit. If you want to see how she literally discusses the abuses in Palestine then just. Go read it.
Woooah you're saying you, a racist nazi who views Palestinians as subhuman, have a social circle of people who agree with you that Hamas is a terrorist group?? Colour me shocked. I was talking about countries. You know. States. How the majority of the world's nation-states don't view Hamas as a terrorist group.
"I'm autistic so I'm going to use a slur as an insult" woof. Nah, you're just an edgelord.
Okay well there was the forensics of that rape in the case file. You'd know this if you. Read the file. "Men huddled around someone" with their arms pinned above their head. If it wasn't rape, what were they doing? Torture? Will you concede on torture? Because they were doing something they didn't want cameras to see
LMAO that fucking edit! You mean the "mass rape hoax" that HAMAS investigated and debunked? Guess we believe Hamas now when it's convenient? Fuck thats almost funny
Hamas didn't actually investigate and debunk it, she confessed it to be false and al-jazeera reported that. 🤣 That is not the same as Hamas investigating it and finding it to be false. They were more than happy to let the story run until she confessed to it's falsehood.
These fucks, DIDN'T GIVE A FUCKING SHIT ABOUT WOMEN WHO SAID THEY WERE FUCKING RAPED BY HAMAS AND WERE MORE THAN HAPPY TO BE SKEPTICAL! skepticism of these claims are fine, BUT BE MORALLY CONSISTENT! THEY DON'T GET TO FUCKING LECTURE ANYONE
A plane filled with Iraqi Jewish refugees photographed on arrival at Lod Airport outside Tel Aviv in early 1951 (Teddy Brauner, GPO).
Today, November 30th, is Jewish Refugee day or Yom HaPlitim (יום הפליטים), and we remember their stories.
Their arrival came amid a mass exodus triggered by escalating persecution in Iraq, including violent pogroms such as the 1941 Farhud, during which Jewish homes and businesses were looted and many civilians including children were murdered and wounded. Jewish girls were publicly raped. The community also faced targeted assassinations, public executions such as the infamous Baghdad hangings, and a series of bombings in 1950–1951 aimed at Iraq's Jewish community. In the late 1940s and early 1950s, Jews in Iraq were frequently arrested on fabricated charges, tortured in prison, and subjected to the banning of communal, religious and political activity. These pressures finally peaked in state-sanctioned expropriation, revocation of citizenship, and forced expatriation.
In 1951, 120,000 Iraqi Jews were issued passports for the sole purpose of emigration known as passports of No Return. A prerequisite was the waiving of all property and monetary belongings.
By the 1930s, Jews made up roughly a quarter of Baghdad’s total population, and by 1945 around 135,000 Jews lived across Iraq. Today only a handful remain.
This end of the millenia old Babylonian Jewish exile is referred to as Sant al-Tasqit.
This pattern was varied and repeated in every country across SWANA.
These are serious people, doing what needs to be done.
The Iraqis were serious at that time; they addressed the problem at its root.
Today, look at the Iranians: they tolerated the Jewish communities of Iran, granting them the same rights and freedoms as other Iranians, and what did the Jews do ?
They participated in and collaborated with Israel against Iran.
It's the same everywhere, the Jews will always act in THEIR interests to the detriment of the natives.
They have no loyalty to anyone, not even to those who protected them, and there are plenty of examples.
Iran, a theocratic hellstate where blasphemy is punished by death, is benevolent enough to allow tiny communities of Jews to exist under heavy restrictions and mandatory duckspeaking to support the dictatorship, and those filthy kikes DARE to not support their rightful overlords?! The Ayatollah was protecting them by planning and supporting the war Hamas started, and this is how they repay him for his merciful slaughterings?!?! Monsters! They are truly our misfortune.
Iran has never tried to screw over my country and no Iranian has ever called me goy.
While the kikes...
And I don't give a damn whether Iran is a theocracy or a dictatorship, it's not my country and I'm for non-intervention in a country's internal politics.
As well as for the right of Jews to return home, in a furnace then.
Oy Vey.
Hey, at least compared to all the leftists you're honest about what you are and what you want. They'll whine all day about tolerance and equality, but you've got the right mixture of guts and total delusion to proudly declare "Yes, I want these people to die because they're ontologically evil."
Thank you, that's kind of you.
I prefer to debate with people who say what they think, rather than with cowards who feign remorse, solely for the purpose of being on the "right side".
Uprightness, honesty, off with the masks!
Only in this way can we have a calm and constructive debate.
And if we need to shock, then let's shock.
A constructive debate over, perhaps, your proposal that all Jews should die for the crime of being Jewish? Or your opposite-day depiction of Iran as something other than the world's harshest theocracy?
The source of anti-Semitism is the Jews; they are the cause, according to them, they are hated without reason, they do nothing wrong; but it is quite the opposite.
Their misdeeds are numerous, and there is no shortage of evidence.
Showing patience with Jews is a grave mistake, a mistake I do not make.
If they must be exterminated to the last one, so be it.
If this puts an end to the spread of their ideas and projects, which are anything but beneficial (Gender/LGBT theory, endless immigration, endless war, etc...)
Regarding Iran, I am not Iranian; the fate of Iran belongs to them.
All those loud-mouthed moralists who buy themselves a conscience without seeing the shit in their own backyard can drop dead.
"It's this demographic's fault that everyone hates it". Do I need to explain the elementary-school levels of logic failures you need to get to this conclusion?
If they must be exterminated to the last one, so be it.
Do I need to explain the kindergarten levels of morality you need to not understand to say this and think it's ok?
But I'm totally "OK" with that.
Total Kikes Death.
Simple to understand.
No more interference from them in each other's affairs.
Morally, it's questionable, certainly.
But I don't care.
I point, I aim, and I fire.
So you'd be totally ok with gunning down children for being born wrong. That is what you are saying here, correct? Just wanna make sure we've got the paper trail ready for if you turn into one of those retards like the guy who heroically saved immigrants from ICE by killing them.
What I am saying is that if I have to choose between my people or the Jews, the choice is easy and if I have to get my hands dirty, then so be it.
Certainly, children should not have to suffer the consequences of the choices made by their parents or their governments.
But their harmful practices have been going on for a long time and it cannot be said that, THE JEWS, have no qualms whatsoever, nor the slightest qualms about murdering the children of the goyim.
Or to rape, plunder, steal.
And that is what they instill in their children, who will do as their parents do, and so on.
It goes without saying that one should have no scruples, pity, or even less mercy towards this race of vipers.
Without even blinking.
You can shove your moral lessons where the sun don't shine.
Me when I explain why I'm ok with killing children to save the world from this one group of people that just happens to be ontologically evil.
Life forces you to make choices: Them or me ?
It will be them, without shame.
Sure it would. You're a very tough guy who can kill as easy as he talks about it, which is why you're declaring it so proudly to random strangers on tumblr.
I never said it would be easy. It is in fact utterly abominable to take the lives of civilians; it's different when facing an adversary, an enemy; army against army, soldier against soldier.
But it is very different when it comes to the survival and prosperity of one's family or people.
The Jews have had numerous opportunities to break this vicious cycle, but they have not done so.
It goes without saying that not all Jews are bloodthirsty monsters, but I don't have superpowers, I can't know who is good or bad, so I make generalizations, like everyone else, it's human.
For more than a millennium they have followed their elites in their messianic delusions, always with their share of massacres.
And I'm supposed to be the villain, the bad guy, because I support a movement that lasted a little more than 5 years in the human history ?
They ask me to have qualms about this tribe of inbred retards, who cut off the tip of their dicks.
Who's laughs on our misfortunes ?
Who subjected my race, like others, "the goyim", to the worst possible horrors?
Who are you, you asshole, to lecture me?
Every day, in newspapers, on TV, radio, social media, etc... These fucking Jews rejoice in our misfortunes, rapes, murders and other joys, and I'm supposed to be ashamed?
Dude, I don't give a fuck about your so-called "moral superiority".
You're a piece of shit, that's all you are.
And I'm supposed to be the villain,
Dude, I don't give a fuck about your so-called "moral superiority".
Your short essay ^^^ suggests otherwise.
The hell was that? They sound nuts
sex and gender are both social constructs. significant difference between sexes is social and not biological.
We can argue gender is a social construct, but we absolutely cannot argue sex. For starters we have two very different sex traits in the form of penises and vaginas. Yes, there are outliers (as with anything) with intersex folks, but if we're talking about pure XX and XY? Men typically do have more muscle mass than women, men and women tend to have a higher likelihood to develop different autoimmune diseases and cancers. Hell, autism and a lot of mental disorders present differently between the two sexes.
I'm just going to link the Wikipedia article on sex differences on people. It's actually pretty informative as a baseline jumping point.
Besides if it was true why do we see sex differences in animals that are not social
This is how you do proper journalism: don't let him irritate you with his aggressive tone, fight back and show the world the monster who's sitting in front of you. Iconic.😎
It was a manifesto from a guy who wanted to KILL HIM, IT WAS OBVIOUSLY ABOUT HIM
This is how you do proper journalism: don't let him irritate you with his aggressive tone, fight back and show the world the monster who's sitting in front of you. Iconic.😎
Ah yes. "proper journalism" is reading aloud on air the maniac ramblings of a homicidal maniac, legitimizing him.
Also the nerve of you referring to Trump as a monster and no mention of said homicidal maniac who intended on slaughtering dozens in cold blood.
shame on you.
You don't hate journalists enough. You think that you do, but you don't.
It’s such a stupid gotcha from the journo too. “Oh so you assumed the inflammatory words the in manifesto of the guy who tried to kill you are about you?” Um yes??? That’s a very fair assumption???
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/republicans-propose-1-billion-taxpayer-dollars-secure-trump-ballroom-rcna343637
how we feeling about paying more taxes for trumps little ego boosting project after he claimed it would be fully privately funded?
It’s bad for sure. A lot of people were kind of ambivalent about the project because we were told it wasn’t going to be taxpayer funded. Now that the administration is going back on it and it’s no longer going to be just privately funded, it both looks bad optically and comes across as dishonest. They should have had all funds accounted for and a clear fiscal plan before even considering demolition.
I do have to wonder how much of an ego boost it is though? Was it an ego boost when past presidents added rooms? I know one did at least.
Though I do agree they should have made sure everything was ready, before doing it as you said, and going back on the promise to fund it privately is disgusting
The worst thing a woman can be in society is a transphobe and the worst a man can be is a serial rapist, apparently there literally isn’t a limit for what people will defend men for by this point
… it’s not really gendered, actually. You just have to have power.
False. There is still gender imbalance; nore leniency for powerful men compared to powerful women generally
I don't agree, many powerful women have gotten leniency for things just like powerful men, and yes sometimes more in certain things.
media outlets are literally refusing to use the word "rape" when women have sex with minors.
the only reason anyone thinks society is easier on male rapists is because they can't even comprehend that a woman is capable of violating someone and therefore never think about female rapists in the first place.
Hence why the worst thing a woman can be is a transphobe.. not because men are being defended but as you said, women who rape are barely accepted as existing
I looked this up thinking maybe it was because it was worded badly like Florida's law years ago that banned any sex with any animals, thereby making all sex between human beings illegal. But no. No that's not the reason. From the AP:
"Creating a new, wide-ranging anti-bestiality law would untangle the offense from the ban on sodomy in Louisiana’s “crime against nature " statute, prompting some lawmakers to label the measure a sly chess move. “This bill was written because the far left wants to undermine our other laws that protect family and traditional values that the people of Louisiana hold dear,” said Sen. Ryan Gatti, a Republican who was one of 10 senators to vote against the bill. “That was our concern, that it most likely will be used as a Trojan horse to delete the sodomy law,” he said.
Or that's what they claim anyway. So it would be inappropriate to call them senators who voted in favor of raping dogs or something. Or to give them a sobriquet like "The Rover-Raping Ring." Definitely should not do that. No, see, their problem is with consenting human adults having sex with each other, and to keep that illegal, these particular senators just have to allow the rape of beloved family pets. Totally understandable priorities.
Wait? It isn't already illegal? The beastiality I mean?
Please pray for me and my family if God puts it on your heart. My brother unexpectedly passed away today and I am devastated.
I may not be around much the next couple of days 💔
Are you ok?
the weirdest thing about generational discourse is seeing boomers/Gen x talk about millennials like they're infants who know nothing about the world, and need to wait until they turn 55 to take up elected positions, while also seeing people (presumably) my age talk about millennials like their decrepit old hags who "are refusing to let go of their power" and the power in question is making indie cartoons.
I sincerely hope this person is like. 15 and not 22 because I genuinely don't know how you have this mentality and not have a midlife crisis by the time you turn 25.
Stuff like this is bizarre to me because Gen Z and Gen A are so freaking lost right now that they are going through the 70's - 00's looking for a culture of their own because they don't have one. With clothing. Music. TV. ECT.
Gen Y isn't mad that they are "Losing Power" or whatever. People aren't even mad about gooseworx that are sane. However between SUPER early Gen Z all the way back to Gen X in fewer numbers, we have a bunch of adult toddlers who never wanted to grow up and are now taking it out on everyone else. Also nice of people to NO show what they were responding to. Also I hate this culture of " WOW under 40 is basically on their deathbed" bullshit. People live into their 90's regularly. Kindly stfu. But also, I loath this current trend of "WOW all are problems are -'s gens fault. Let's blame everything on them and not a consistent cycle of passing the buck to the next gen.
I have to say it. I am completely lost on what's even happening right now
Find is job. Report him for discrimination. But also. Commentator is correct. If you are fine with discrimination you need to always be fine with it.
Also this myth that ALL white people have been well off just for being "White" is a MORONIC take and not based in history or fact. Ask the Irish and Italians how they feel about history. Ask the irish that were sold as slaves for less than black slaves.
Fuck soy shit stains like this guy. He deserves EVERYTHING that happens to him. Make him fucking famous.
DADDY GOVERMENT HES DOING SOMETHING I DONT LIKE STOP HIM!
Fucking dork
It's not just 'doing something he doesn't like" you ignorant retard. This is blatant racial discrimination. Grow the fuck up.
Find is job. Report him for discrimination. But also. Commentator is correct. If you are fine with discrimination you need to always be fine with it.
Also this myth that ALL white people have been well off just for being "White" is a MORONIC take and not based in history or fact. Ask the Irish and Italians how they feel about history. Ask the irish that were sold as slaves for less than black slaves.
Fuck soy shit stains like this guy. He deserves EVERYTHING that happens to him. Make him fucking famous.
DADDY GOVERMENT HES DOING SOMETHING I DONT LIKE STOP HIM!
Fucking dork
It's not, "He's doing something I don't like". But since you're a toddler let me make it clear. Under the law, he's doing something actually illegal. As such he deserves to be punished. But if we lived the way people like you think we should, we should just put him down for making society worse. Since anarchist are such wonderful creatures that think if gov was just gone everything world be great. No. It wouldn't. Mass death would follow, and likely full on invasion by Russia, China or the UN under the guise of assisting people. Prior to that you'd see mass barbarism.
This whole, "laws shouldn't exist or be enforced" bullshit is what makes me say that you people are pro rape and child diddling. Because with no laws, the only the most ruthless thrive.
It's called, DON'T BREAK THE FUCKING LAW.
It's not a shit take you worthless fuck. Piece of anarchist shit.
The amount of people taking the fact that Massie lost the primary as proof Israel has Conquered the United States is astounding.
I've seen a number of people warning Jews (not "Zionists" not "Israelis" JEWS) that this is going to cause "the next stage of the 80 year cycle." People are not even hiding anymore that they are YEARNING to harm Jews.
It is beyond ridiculous that anyone denies the overwhelming presence of neo-nazis and antisemites in the antizionism movement.
In other American politics news, apparently a candidate has promised to turn an ICE detention center in an internment camp for "American Zionists." Complete with a "castration" for supposed pedophiles, which she claims will most likely be "mostly Zionists."
Maureen Galindo is running as a Democrat to represent Texas' 35th Congressional District. Controversy-tarred congressional candidate Maureen
Her own party has criticized her for this declaration, thankfully, but I have seen a LOT of so called "antizionists" literally cheering this declaration and calling anyone against it an Israeli shill.
It's amazing how readily these people admit they would have sided with the Nazis. With a smile on their face and a swastika on their chest.
She apparently wants to put her opponent on trial for treason and thinks Israel is planning a genocide in the u.s., for some reason?
literallyyyy building an entire life with your own body is one of the coolest and most badass things u could possibly do, basically creating something from nothing. tbh its straight up wizard shit and men would use it as proof of their superiority if they could manage it, believing otherwise is pure misogynistic copium imo
then why have I seen feminists push it?
