Happy out of touch thursday
Game of Thrones Daily
Three Goblin Art
No title available
ojovivo
Stranger Things

izzy's playlists!
Not today Justin

Discoholic đȘ©
Mike Driver
Peter Solarz
Aqua Utopiaïœæ”·ăźćșă§èšæ¶ă玥ă
Show & Tell
Claire Keane

Kaledo Art
taylor price
sheepfilms
trying on a metaphor

ç„æ„ / Permanent Vacation
Today's Document
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from Germany
seen from Ireland
seen from Germany

seen from Singapore

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Australia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Poland
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands

seen from T1

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Lithuania

seen from United States

seen from United States
@helpmebecomeme
Happy out of touch thursday
this is in perfect iambic meter and sounds like the first line of a weird poem
Rule #2
Donât ever hug a lobster when you see one on the street,
For decorum is essential when a lobster you must greet.
You may comment on the weather, compliment his choice of hat,
But crustaceans like their space if one should stop them for a chat.
Donât ever hug a lobster when youâre strolling down the coast,
Simply nod and give a greeting, or a handshake at the most,
For a lobsterâs first priority is formal social graces,
And one seemes over-familiar if a lobster one embraces.
Donât ever hug a lobster when you meet one in the sea,
For a lobsterâs spines and chitin make it difficult, you see,
And he might become self-conscious if you bring that fact to light,
So donât ever hug a lobster, simply put, itâs impolite.
but what if i read one of your fanfics and then went to your ao3 accounts and read all of your fanfics and left a comment on every single chapter of every single one and you got spam emails from all of my kudos and comments and it made you smile, what then? what if i brighten your day with my words like you did mine, what then???
marrage
weddning
honmoon
Babby
Fanfic update
in that order
please have nasty perverted thoughts about me
and tell me about them in detail
Pspspspsps girls who love to be used like filthy whores and then cuddled for hours.
Birch bark was heated in underground chambers to create a tougher adhesive.
Neanderthal tools might look relatively simple, but new research shows that Homo neanderthalensis devised a method of generating a glue derived from birch tar to hold them together about 200,000 years agoâand it was tough. This ancient superglue made bone and stone adhere to wood, was waterproof, and didnât decompose. The tar was also used a hundred thousand years before modern humans came up with anything synthetic. After studying ancient tools that carry residue from this glue, a team of researchers from the Eberhard Karls University of TĂŒbingen and other institutions in Germany found evidence that this glue wasnât just the original tar; it had been transformed in some way. This raises the question of what was involved in that transformation. To see how Neanderthals could have converted birch tar into glue, the research team tried several different processing methods. Any suspicion that the tar came directly from birch trees didnât hold up because birch trees do not secrete anything that worked as an adhesive. So what kind of processing was needed? Each technique that was tested used only materials that Neanderthals would have been able to access. Condensation methods, which involve burning birch bark on cobblestones so the tar can condense on the stones, were the simplest techniques usedâallowing bark to burn above ground doesnât really involve much thought beyond lighting a fire. The other methods involved a recipe where the bark was not actually burned but heated after being placed underground. Two of these methods involved burying rolls of bark in embers that would heat them and produce tar. The third method would distill the tar. Because there were no ceramics during the Stone Age, sediment was shaped into upper and lower structures to hold the bark, which was then heated by fire. Distilled tar would slowly drip from the upper structure into the lower one. The resulting tars were all put through chemical and molecular analysis, as well as micro-CT scans, to determine which came closest to the residue on actual Neanderthal tools. Tars synthesized underground were closest to the residue on the original artifacts. â[Neanderthals] distilled tar in an intentionally created underground environment that restricted oxygen flow and remained invisible during the process,â the researchers wrote. âThis degree of complexity is unlikely to have been invented spontaneously.â
âEvery time I go to the dentist, I think about that guy,â researcher says.
The worldâs first dentist was a Neanderthal, according to a recent study. 59,000 years ago in whatâs now southwestern Siberia, a Neanderthal had a toothache. It must have been a doozy because they were desperate enough to sit still while someone drilled into the tooth with a sharp stone tool, removing the infected tissue and ultimately relieving the pain. The process left behind a hole in the tooth that paleoanthropologist Alisa Zubova of the Russian Academy of Sciences and her colleagues recognized, tens of millennia later, as dental work. Archaeologists unearthed the tooth at Chagyrskaya Cave in Russia, and itâs now the oldest known evidence of dentistryâor any direct medical treatment.
...
To test whether the hole was made intentionally, Zubova and her colleagues examined the tooth more closely with scanning electron microscopes, micro-CT, and Raman spectroscopy, a technique for identifying the chemical makeup of an object. They also made their own stone drilll or perforator (a sharp stone tool that would have been used to drill or punch holes in hides, bone, and other materials) and tested it on three human teeth. Two of the teeth were museum specimens, whose age and context curators didnât know, making them less useful for other kinds of research. But one, an upper left third molar with an untreated cavity, came straight from the mouth of one of the authorsâfor science! (In most scientific papers, a section at the end outlines the specific contributions of each author, which usually means tasks like writing, data collection, production of stone tools, and analysis. This paperâs author contributions did not list âdonation of a tooth for experimental archaeology,â so we can only speculate about who bit the proverbial bullet.) The holes and striations left behind by Zubova and her colleaguesâ experiments very closely matched what they saw on the molar from Chagyrskaya, which means itâs very likely that the 59,000-year-old tooth was, in fact, the aftermath of an actual Paleolithic medical procedure.
Reblogging this manually. Op doesn't want credit for fear of being terminated.
I don't know who needs to hear this but... start living. The days are flying by and all you do is work, pay bills, and stress. Enjoy what you can like walks, sunsets, music, laughter. Joy doesn't have to be expensive. You deserve it.
if you dont ship it then youâre lying
the entire staff of the simpsons ships it so you might as well too thats all im sayin man
âThe occurrence of an event is not the same thing as knowing what one has lived through. Most people had not livedânor could it, for that matter, be said that they had diedâthrough any of their terrible events. They had simply been stunned by the hammer. They passed their lives thereafter in a kind of limbo of denied and unexamined pain.â
Another Country, by James Baldwin
got my lab results back turns out iâm full of rage because i am full of grief
the thing is they really do let you hit because you're goofy.
i say shit like "whuh oh!" and it makes girls want to kiss me under moonlight for some reason
happy pride
Long overdue fanart. I couldnât decide which one I liked better so Iâll just post both of them. :p
call me terminally academia-brained but i do think a lot of the fun of character analysis is figuring out how to build a compelling argument for a particular reading using lines of evidence from canon as well as meta/intertextual support
and you could say that what iâm saying here is basically âa lot of the fun of doing character analysis is doing character analysisâ but letâs be real a lot of fandom character analysis is pretty heavily vibes-based. and i think thatâs where i really chafe up against the traditional thought-terminating fandom attitude of like, everyoneâs opinions hold equal weight and any interrogation of that is inherently hostile. because i think itâs fascinating to dig into where others are coming from in terms of their views on characters or dynamics or whatever, especially when they differ significantly from more commonly expressed views, and part of that digging is asking people okay what parts of canon are you drawing from to support your opinion? what parts of canon are you disregarding or downplaying? how does this argument hold up in the light of how race, gender, class, ability, etc. operate both in the pieceâs in-fiction and real world contexts?
everyone had that one guy at their wizard school said edgy shit like "dark magic is just misunderstood, not evil" that ended up wanted in three countries for necromancy
She literally said that magics don't have specific moralities
quick little halply doodle for this morning