Lizard from Rollercoaster Tycoon 3: Wild
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

#extradirty
𓃗
ojovivo
The Bowery Presents
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

No title available
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
todays bird

tannertan36
The Stonewall Inn
Not today Justin

gracie abrams

Love Begins
No title available
Cosmic Funnies
YOU ARE THE REASON
Game of Thrones Daily

PR's Tumblrdome
almost home

seen from United States
seen from Chile
seen from Russia
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Canada

seen from Israel
seen from Ireland
seen from Morocco
seen from Kuwait

seen from United States
seen from Dominican Republic

seen from Bangladesh
seen from Paraguay

seen from France
seen from Paraguay
seen from Indonesia
seen from Colombia
seen from Argentina
seen from Italy

seen from Spain
@hunny-k
Lizard from Rollercoaster Tycoon 3: Wild
Shout-out to all the stories that didn't make it out of the shower with us in time to be actually written down.
Oh, come on. Fortune telling is nonsense.
It was scenes like this that made people sleep on the fact that Sokka was the MVP of this entire episode.
Indigenous lands are crucial for climate mitigation and resilience. Research shows their health is a direct result of Indigenous stewardship
While this isn't news to anyone who works in this space, it is useful to have this water-is-wet research to affirm that Indigenous knowledge and land management are extremely effective at storing carbon and protecting biodiversity.
I want to draw special attention to this part of the article:
New research shows that approach overlooks the key role that Indigenous knowledge and culture can play in mitigating climate change. It also reveals a dangerous misconception that has taken hold in global climate discussions: the idea that Indigenous lands are so rich because they are remote or sparsely populated. Nothing could be further from the truth. The health of Indigenous lands and their ability to store vast quantities of carbon stem from the stewardship of the people who inhabit them.
I'm actually bringing this back around to say another important thing.
I get a fair number of asks and comments on my posts expressing sentiments like "human beings are a plague on this Earth", "humans ruin everything, we deserve to be wiped out", "humanity is inherently selfish, evil, and irredeemable".
I don't think the folks saying these things have bad intentions, I know their words come from a place of very understandable pain, fear, and anger. But to act as though humanity's impact on nature is inherently damaging and extractive is to erase thousands of years of Indigenous stewardship of nature. These ecosystems are thriving because there are humans living there.
This is your regular reminder that you don't need to feel guilty for being a human. You are part of nature--viewing humans as inherently separate from the rest of nature is actually part of the problem. You will be so much better served redirecting that guilt into supporting the humans who are helping nature or resisting those who are hurting it.
The Kitchen Entity came crawling out of the oven vent, and now it just hovers here in the middle of the room, like some kind of domesticated jellyfish. When you turn on the microwave, it crackles like a geiger counter. On warm days, it smells like mom's special m&m pancakes.
anyone wanna guess what this doesthedogdie tie is for?
thaaaat’s right!
this is kind of a gold mine
So Hank Green got caught using AI and it’s a whole huge blow up, and I really don’t have much interest in adding to the pile on.
However, I do think this case is great example of what happens when smart people decide they can use these systems “responsibly.”
Let’s put aside the plagiarism and the energy use for a second (not that these don’t matter, but they’re not relevant to my point at the moment) and pretend these systems were made with entirely properly obtained info and ran on only solar, but otherwise were entirely the same. If you’re a person, you might think “okay, I’m going to only use this to come up with ideas for my next paper: I’m going to do all the research myself and the writing, I’m just gonna brainstorm topics.”
The thing is, even if you’re trying to limit use to just “brainstorming” the chatbot isn’t going to limit itself to just brainstorming. You might ask it “what should I write about involving Greek history” and it may suggest “the plague of Athens” but it’s also going to suggest some “basic info” on the plague of Athens that you might end up picking up and deciding your topic is. It’s going to provide you with “research.” And even if you decide to check that research yourself, that’s still setting you down a specific path you might not have picked organically.
And speaking of double checking its “research”, fact checking is a time heavy process. Not only now do you have to read the original text the bot provided, but you also have to compare it line by line with the summary the bot provided. That’s more time than it would have taken to just read the article by itself. And with any time heavy task, people are going to get lazy. And in original research being lazy might mean skimming a paper or an abstract, chatbots allow you to be lazy without looking at the article at all.
And soon enough, despite telling yourself you were only going to use it for brainstorming, you have offloaded topic generation, research and eventually even drafting because that’s what these bots are intended to do. They are not meant to serve as research tools or help brainstorm or serve as a bouncing off board: they are built to encourage maximum engagement. And that means if you go at them with the best of ethical intentions, they are built to tempt you to use them as much as possible, regardless of whatever line you drew in the sand for yourself.
Anyway, my main thought here is you are not smart enough to outwit the dopamine machine. It wants your attention and nothing more. Do not assume you can resist just because you know what’s under the hood.
Whenever you decide to use a tool, you should consider “what is this tool designed to do” and for LLM’s that answer is “maximize user engagement.” Anything else is in service to that goal.
everyday heroes
clarification
André 3000 photographed by Richard Burbridge, British GQ October 2004
When I finish this whale shark lamp all 4 of you are gonna be So I'm pressed
She glows now, just so you know, and she's full of string deliciöusee string
Are you gonna show us the lamp? 👀
Good news! Whäle shark lämp 🥰
A lot more than 4 of us are impressed
Javier Mayoral, Yes…I Know…, 2021
Acrylic on panel, 8 x 9.5 in
This post is a zombie. 🧟♀️ Pick one of the answers to see if you were bit or not. (There are 5 bite results out of 12 under the cut.) Best of luck. My deadeye is awaiting to meet any infected at the entrance of camp.
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
A. Zombie bit you! 🧟
B. Safe
C. Zombie bit you! 🧟♀️
D. Safe
E. Safe
F. Safe
G. Zombie bit you! 🧟♂️
H. Zombie bit you! 🧟♀️
I. Safe
J. Safe
K. Zombie bit you! 🧟♂️
L. Safe
unconvinced i'll ever find "the vitamin" that makes me all better so i can get real work done but i do expect they'll elucidate whatever my deal was post-mortem, after which what i did manage to accomplish with my life will be regarded on the level of Beethoven composing despite being deaf or Gordon Ramsay cooking despite being british
fuck with me