can I come over to your house and pet your cats and not say anything

Origami Around
trying on a metaphor
Game of Thrones Daily
todays bird
we're not kids anymore.

titsay
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
h
The Stonewall Inn
Sade Olutola

No title available

Love Begins
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

gracie abrams
One Nice Bug Per Day

#extradirty

ellievsbear
No title available
Not today Justin

seen from Argentina

seen from Canada

seen from United States
seen from Argentina
seen from Colombia
seen from United States
seen from Morocco
seen from Austria

seen from Germany
seen from Mexico

seen from Malaysia
seen from Mexico
seen from Azerbaijan
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Italy
@iamsweden
can I come over to your house and pet your cats and not say anything
SINNERS (2025) dir. RYAN COOGLER
everyone wants to help a little bit 😌
➡️ Watch this episode of Adventuring Academy on Dropout!
Aabria Iyengar returns to the show to talk about adversarial PCs, multi-classing, and embracing chaos. Content Warning: Mention of suicidal
recently saw this screenshot in the wild and lost my mind because i knew it wasnt supposed to say girl. its ladykins. its get off the cross ladykins. i know this because ladykins is not something my brain could make up and i remember ladykins. and i was sincerely wondering if someone put in the work to censor ladykins for some inscrutable purposes but then i looked it up and
turns out that actually rupaul made the same tweet twice with 1 word changed 8 months apart. he meditated on this for 8 months and 5 days and the word ladykins came to him. i initially thought he copy pasted the first tweet but i dont think thats true anymore i dont think he was operating with any memory of the first tweet i think these words were always in him and will always be. second tweet did way worse by the way. the people did not respond to ladykins
hold your horses is just genuine good life advice
holding my horses
Hi, its me. The warmest creature in the world. I love you. Im the warmest creature in the world and I love you so much and I need to be in your lap right now. Yes, I know about the heat wave. That's okay though because I was already the warmest creature in the world so I don't mind. I love you and you need to let me sleep in your lap right now. I'm soooo warm and I love you sooo much. If you say no you'll be saying no to a thing that love you. Let me sleep in your lap. When I fall asleep I get warmer. I love you
I NEED people to understand that condoms aren’t free because “MEN like to FUCK lol,” they’re free because thirteen thousand people die from AIDS every year in the US alone.
Stop framing free menstrual products as more essential than free condoms. They should BOTH be free.
This post is going around again, and I feel the need to finally make an addition that adds some context, because the notes keep picking up comments along the lines of “who cares if it’s just because people want to fuck? Fucking is great! Why are menstrual products even being brought up?”
Yes. Fucking is great. I enjoy it myself on occasion. But condoms are not free just because people enjoy fucking. Condoms used to be much, much, much harder to come by, and they were significantly more expensive. Many humans have always enjoyed fucking, but condoms have not always been available, much less for free.
This post was originally made in September of 2020. It was made after I got into a pitched argument with a straight cisgender woman, who argued that free condoms are actually oppressive in a society where free menstrual products are hard to come by. Her argument was that it is an act of violent misogyny for free condoms to be available anywhere when menstrual products are not, and that the prevalence of free condoms is clearly due to male privilege.
That is not why condoms are free, and if you think free condoms are in any way oppressive, you need to get your head out of your ass. You cannot drag free condoms into the conversation about free menstrual products without acknowledging the massive, grueling efforts of queer activists and allies–including WOMEN–that brought condoms into wider use.
Condoms are often free because AIDS activists put endless amounts of effort into education and distribution of resources for safe sex. Condoms are free because they keep everyone safer, not just the people (NOT JUST MEN!) who use them.
Free condoms are not patriarchal, and they benefit everyone. Please read up on the history of AIDS activists. There’s even a convenient Wikipedia page all about HIV/AIDS activism.
And since I didn’t include a source link in my original post (nor do I remember where I got that number by this point), here is some updated, properly sourced data on global HIV/AIDS infection rates, courtesy of unaids.org:
39.9 million [36.1 million–44.6 million] people globally were living with HIV in 2023.
1.3 million [1 million–1.7 million] people became newly infected with HIV in 2023.
630 000 [500 000–820 000] people died from AIDS-related illnesses in 2023.
30.7 million people [27–31.9 million] were accessing antiretroviral therapy in 2023.
88.4 million [71.3 million–112.8 million] people have become infected with HIV since the start of the epidemic.
42.3 million [35.7 million–51.1 million] people have died from AIDS-related illnesses since the start of the epidemic
Griswold v Connecticut is 60 years old this year. (Please tolerate weird Oyez link; some legal archive sites do not have fancy embed features.)
{{meta.description}}
That’s only 60 years of “condoms are legal FOR MARRIED PEOPLE, WITH ADVICE FROM A DOCTOR.”
…Several people on the current SCOTUS are trying to figure out how to overturn Griswold.
That right got extended to unmarried people in 1972, with Eisenstadt v Baird.
Condoms used to be a felony. And then they were a felony for unmarried people. And even after that, they carried a lot of stigma - why would you need a condom, unless you were being promiscuous?
AIDS activists fought hard for access to condoms as a public health issue, not as “a way for sluts to keep being slutty.” Free condoms save lives.
Ghosts aren't real, it was probably just the house settling that gave you that blowjob
Actually yknow what. WTNV should be considered revolutionary and significant gay media that played an important role in the growth of gay representation in media especially in podcasts. When people talk about important gay media in the early 2000s I want wtnv to be one of the ones people talk about. No if ands or buts about it.
Actually I cant shut up about this. In 2012, people did not even think about putting gay representation in popular media. Gay representation wasn’t considered profitable yet. Gay marriage would not be legalized for another three years. The Legend of Korra, a show that fought to the death to have their main lead hold hands with another woman, just released their first episode earlier that spring. Steven Universe, a show well known for its gay representation, including having the first gay proposal + marriage on a kids cartoon tv show, would begin a year later in 2013, but wouldn’t show their gay representation hand until 2015 with the episode Jail Break. The Adventure Zone, a podcast currently well known for it LGBTQ+ representation, wouldn’t begin until 2014, and didn’t show their hand until 2015. In my young queer experience, representation was covert, secretive, only implied or dead.
and then in the summer of 2012, wtnv introduced itself to the world, proclaimed its main character gay in the first episode, and played it gay (pun intended) for years. Being gay wasn’t a trope, or a goof, it was normal. Cecil Gershwin Palmer was just a canon, gay character who fell in love and stayed in love and was happy. and that was that.
if we talk about revolutionary queer media, we talk about Welcome to Nightvale. No exceptions.
I think it’s really important Cecil Baldwin credit for this. I’m not saying Fink and Cranor and later Dylan Marron have nothing to do with it, because of course they do. But Cecil being gay was not something the writers intended. Because initially, Carlos was not intended to be a love interest for Cecil. He was just meant to be a character that showed up occasionally to be a tongue-in-cheek goof on scientist characters in shows like Fringe or the X-Files. But Cecil Baldwin made the decision to make his character utterly in love with Carlos, because he was gay, and wanted his character to be as well.
For those who don’t know Cecil Baldwin is HIV+, and he’s openly discussed his struggle with it. This is a large part of why his playing a man who is openly gay and sexually active is also really important. The importance I think of having LGBT people playing LGBT people really shines through with both Cecil and Dylan’s characters. They can be authentic, they can be a source of hope and representation. Behind the scenes, Night Vale is just as diverse as the show itself. Cecil Baldwin’s pretty incredible and it’s worth it to read what he’s had to say on WTNV if you have the time.
lucretia my dear lucretia i love you and miss you
[ID: art of Lucretia from The Adventure Zone, drawn as mostly colorful line art with some shading against a black background. Lucretia is a young Black woman with an afro, with braids on either side of her face. She wears round glasses, a blue turtleneck, and a red robe as she smiles sadly at the viewer. End ID.]
this emerged in my head when I was trying to drive
May I propose the fill ins?
#i am undiagnosing myself with 'adhd' and rediagnosing myself with 'cursed by wizard'
One advantage of not really having a strong sense of gender identity is that you’re very [shrug emoji] about how people gender you. Sometimes people call me by she/her pronouns and sometimes they go with he/him pronouns and on the internet people often default to they/them, and neither option is entirely right but also, fuck if I know what would be right, and I don’t particularly care. Therefore I’m perfectly happy to outsource my gender identity to the people around me who actually need to figure out which box to put me in. I don’t need to talk about myself in third person, so really my pronouns sound like a you problem.
My pronouns are I/me and the rest is for someone else to deal with because I have better things to do.
Very fond of macrolabels, like “queer”, that provide zero extra information. Is it genderqueer? Is it romantic/sexual orientation queer? Is it queer as in “none of your fucking business what’s in my pants and what I do with it and with whom”?
This is actually probably the first time I’ve ever read something that accurately describes my relationship with gender--ie, ‘my gender is me and my pronouns are a you problem’--so thank you for that!
#you cannot gender me in a way that matters
WOW LIFE IS VERY COOL AND FUN
museum date but i spend the whole time crying over the concept of history and time
have you seen jimothy of Seattle, the raccoon with a short body? is he okay or is he too silly for a long lifespan?
Hopefully this video clears some stuff up about Jimothy! (There are captions for anyone who needs them)
I mean in this instance when I’m talking about a disease that affects the uterus then yes people with a uterus are going to suffer from it and people without a uterus aren’t? Yall are going to call me a TERF for believing in cervical cancer next
Very cool, taking an intersex girl out of context because she disagreed with your exclusionist definition of a medical condition.
Since the post isn't showing up for some people clicking on the link and this actually genuinely pisses me off:
Jimothy for Disability mascot/icon
Happy disability pride everyone!