what's the opposite of the suspension of disbelief? or: why did I start this blog?
I encountered this gem of a quote from Jean Baudrillard's "The Masses: The Implosion of the Social in the Media," in the part where he's explaining that despite our convictions towards statistics as the authority on future truths, "deep down, none of us believes in them, any more than the gambler believes in chance, but only in Luck (with a capital, the equivalent of Grace, not the other, which is the equivalent of probability)."
"An amusing example of this obstinate denial of statistical chance is given by this news item: 'If this will reassure you, we have calculated that, of every 50 people who catch the metro twice a day for 60 years, only one is in danger of being attacked. Now there is no reason why it should be you!" The beauty of statistics is never in their objectivity but in their involuntary humor."
(This is a bit different, but in my short stint as a New Yorker, last summer I was, in fact, the unfortunate witness of a person who committed suicide by jumping in front of a subway train at Grand Central -- something which my friends who had lived there for decades had never seen in their lives. But I digress.)
I find the anecdote about the statistics of attacks on the metro to be an excellent descriptor of what I consider to be the opposite of the suspension of disbelief, wherein the statirical irony -- and the humor of it -- exists only when we are taken out from the stupor and enchantment of what we believe we experience as "reality."
This concept is most clearly illustrated by Leandro Elrich's "Swimming Pool":
It looks like there's a bunch of people under a swimming pool, right?
But the only reason why this piece is so amusing is because it defies our expectations of what's true, and, furthermore, it's only cool or clever when it's revealed to us that a) it's "fake", and b) how it's done.
(The water is trapped in between two thin pieces of acrylic or plexiglass.)
I find examples of things like these in everyday life all the time, things that aren't real but have become "realer than real," HYPERREAL, if you will...
...only the vast majority of people NEVER stop to think about how weird and wacky, and outright UNNATURAL the reality we live in is.
Let this blog serve as a witness to the things which Baudrillard describe as "obscene," to this type of wry humor which can only be understood when we step back and question:
Or has reality been wholly be representations and reproductions, to the point of simulacra, where there is no longer any original? In other words: has simulated reality replaced the real?
And if it is, should be we be alarmed by it? Or at the very least, be called into consciousness so we can laugh about the ludicrousness of it all?
As Baudrillard said, "I suggest to you a vision of things which is no longer optimistic or pessimistic, but ironic and antagonistic." That's what this is all about.