Sorry for the lack of quality posts lately. Here’s a funny.

PR's Tumblrdome

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
sheepfilms
No title available

@theartofmadeline
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

No title available

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

pixel skylines
noise dept.
Game of Thrones Daily

Discoholic 🪩

Kiana Khansmith
No title available

No title available
dirt enthusiast

No title available
RMH
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
taylor price
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Kazakhstan

seen from Albania
seen from Gibraltar
seen from South Africa

seen from Malaysia
seen from Argentina

seen from Malaysia
seen from Türkiye
seen from Thailand

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Romania

seen from T1

seen from Malaysia
@isfj6
Sorry for the lack of quality posts lately. Here’s a funny.
How Si Works: Part 1 (Basic Mechanism and What Differs)
I heard people have some misconceptions about Si. They say that Si users are too nostalgic, straight, and boring. The funniest thing is when someone is called using Si if s/he reminisces something. So, as a Si-dom, I’d like to explain how Si works in order to align those misconceptions. Actually, I have explained some of them in my previous post. You can read it first before proceeding.
Basic Mechanism
They perceive something subjectively then they categorize them and store them. Informations = puzzle pieces. They will search for the stored informations when they are facing another circumstances, determining what to do (with Te/Fe).
The Elaboration (!)
They perceive something subjectively. This is because it’s an introverted function—ALL introverted functions are SUBJECTIVE. Subjective is one-sided opinion. So that’s why Si users are often perceived as rigid, because they don’t consider other’s point of view. If they don’t perceive it that way, it doesn’t exist. The truth for them is soooo subjective, although they have realistic views in almost everything. For example, if something is usually A, they will go A because there’s no B or C since they don’t happen.
Okay, so they continually scan environment for values and sensoric sensations, but they make impressions upon the experience. They internalize the sensoric experience. Note, they store IMPRESSIONS. Therefore, Si user can describe something in detail only IF it’s interesting for them. They cannot describe the bare fact like Se user does. They usually insert their impressions over things.
Moreover, since they pick up impressions from the environment, they will think that the world are ALL like that, without CROSSCHECKING it and FINDING ANOTHER SOURCES first (remember, it’s an introverted function). They generalize a specific thing. So, whenever they see something different from what they usually perceive, they will think that it’s an anomaly.
And remember: Because of the subjectiveness of the information that are perceived, the habit/behavior that Si users exhibit may differ from one to another. Thus, we cannot generalize the exhibited behavior.
They categorize and store the informations. After collecting enough informations, they categorize it. They categorize things based on similarities—thus it’s a broad categorization. They don’t break the informations down like Ti users do, nor searching for deeper meanings like Ni users do. From that, they actually can form a pattern of how the world works, but it depends on their Ne usage. They have large cabinets filled with folders and files. Think of it like X-Files, or library.
They will search for the stored informations when they are facing another circumstances, determining what to do. When they are faced with something, they automatically look into their cabinets for relevant data.
If they can’t find it (the situation is entirely new for them), their brain will go like this:
They will build a pattern from specific pieces of puzzles of reality that will lead to a conclusion of how the world works in general by completing the missing pieces. That’s why they are detailed. Also, they have the most ‘normal’ view. Note that the normal is relative to the society they are living in, but mostly they define their own ‘normal’.
Also, when they find relevant data, they often make a 'cause and effect’—for example, “This thing reminds me of B in the past—OH now I see..That’s why B was happening, it’s because of this thing!!”
—
What Differs…
What differs Ni and Si is Ni user tend to find the meaning beyond the experience, whereas Si leave it the way it is. If Si user sees an apple, it is an apple, with red skin, core on the middle, and tastes sweet. I ever tasted a sour apple and I hate it. Ni user can go through it, such as why was there an apple there? Why red? Why did God make an apple? Why did God make a forbidden apple to be eaten by Adam and Eve? Why is 'apple’ named apple?
What differ Se and Si are:
Si perceive subjective truth/fact and fact whereas Se perceive objective truth/fact. Thus, Si user is more reclusive to new information since they have to know it first before judging something—if they know about a particular thing, they tend to be judgmental because it’s the only thing they know, while Se user tend to be more open-minded and searching for another experience to explore and find the objective facts.
Si saves experiences, Se searches for more experiences. Si user doesn’t approach the experience but the experience affects them. Se user approaches the experience. An experience for Se user is a stepping stone for another experience.
They both are detail but in different motives. Si user is detail in something they put their mind to, while Se user detail in everything because it’s the fact of the world.
—
Abbreviations and Quick Review:
Ni (Introverted Intuition): Seeing meanings through things; gaining a single vision/having ‘gut feelings’.
Ne (Extroverted Intuition): Expanding possibilities of something.
Si (Introverted Sensing): Storing subjective sensory impressions.
Se (Extroverted Sensing): Exploring the world for more sensory experiences.
Te (Extroverted Thinking): Try to make the world make sense by organizing them.
—
Related posts:
How Si Works: Part 1 (Basic Mechanism and What Differs)
How Si Works: Part 2 (The Whys)
How Si Works: Part 3 (Si in Functional Stacking)
Enneagram survey
Hi everyone. I am doing a survey/study about patterns of thought between the enneagram types. Just reblog this post with your answers to these questions…
1.) What is your enneagram type and tritype? (with wings and instincts if you know them.)
2.) What makes you happy?
3.) What is your biggest fear?
4.) What is your greatest weakness?
5.) What is your greatest strength?
6.) How would you describe yourself?
7.) How would other people describe you?
8.) What is something that really motivates you?
9.) What is your greatest life goal?
10.) Anything else you would like to share about yourself?
Please share this post to as many people as possible! I want to get several hundred responses so that the results are as accurate as possible. Thank you, and have fun with this!
1.) Type: 6w5 / 4w5 / 1w2, self-pres.
2.) What makes you happy? Reading, writing, starting new creative projects, spending time with family and friends, exploring new cities/traveling, early nights curling up with a cuppa, listening to music, going to concerts, going on long walks, receiving sincere appreciation or praise, the rush of learning something new, discovering a new book/TV show/movie/album/song that touched me in some way, organizing.
3.) What is your biggest fear? Losing loved ones, being the only person to survive a major disaster, making the wrong decision resulting in hardship for myself or others.
4.) What is your greatest weakness? Self-doubt.
5.) What is your greatest strength? Loyalty.
6.) How would you describe yourself? Brave, kind, intelligent, creative, loyal, dependable, driven, nervous, friendly.
7.) How would other people describe you? Kind, intelligent, artsy, funny, shy.
8.) What is something that really motivates you? The possibility of creating something that would impact others’ lives for the better.
9.) What is your greatest life goal? To write a well-loved novel, and to be remembered as someone whose loyalty, kindness, and creativity positively impacted others.
Person: You always see the worst in people.
Six: Yeah, because people are the worst.
Six: *checks bag* OK it’s there
Six: *closes bag*….
Six: *2 seconds later* okay but is it REALLY there *checks ba
CARING FOR ENNEAGRAM TYPE 6
I can’t say I have the Type 6 distinctly operative within me, but some of the best people I’ve known are this type. I first got to know the type to some extent through my grandmother and then through a couple of good friends that helped me while I was in my teens, dealing with family dysfunction. Later on, my experience with more people of this type was mixed and I studied the Enneagram more. So this is caring for the Type 6, for anyone that would like to promote or - at least - respect their well-being and growth. If you have more input, feel free to add! What to keep in mind about the type: The Type 6 can be a highly committed person, taking their commitments very seriously (sometimes too seriously). They seek stability and security in some form and will make sure they know well what they’re getting themselves into. They question and test, and their trust may be difficult to earn. They tend to do their best to deliver on their promises and expect the same from others. They lose respect for people they view as lacking integrity and responsibility or who are not as diligent as they could be for the causes they deem important. Generally, they aim to make positive contributions and work hard to make things better from a small to a bigger scale - by assisting a few select people, groups, communities or humanity as a whole. What they enjoy: - Improving their knowledge and understanding. They are cerebral and technical-minded; they will seek to study and grasp systems, trends, their components and how they interconnect - down to specific details. - Making progress toward their aspirations. They have (or need to have) projects and goals they can invest in, preferably purposeful ones that lead to something significant. - Building solid relationships and feeling safe within them. They may be hard to make friends with, but some of them can be some of the best friends you’ve ever had and won’t settle for a poor definition of friendship. They look for people they can count on and rely on. - Appreciation and positive feedback. While some of them may be adverse to praise and some may instead verge on vanity, in the end, being recognized can be helpful to them for evaluating their actions… if not only satisfactory. - Being or doing epic or legendary things. Although not necessarily the most ambitious people, they can be idealistic and put their hearts and souls into passing on a unforgettable legacy. What helps them: - Making things clear. They are suspicious and often anxious. Vague and obscure information is not enough. They need to know where things stand and what they’re made of. - Keeping it real and down-to-earth. They can be dreamy and indulge in fantasies, but ultimately, at least a portion of what they visualize must be pursued and manifested in a practical manner, taking the steps necessary to make things come true. - Reciprocating their efforts. What’s fair and just is important to them and they’re usually attuned to this, whether they are able to be accurately discerning or not. They can be very serviceable, and in some cases, this is purely out of principle or generosity and they don’t intend to receive in return. However, there are times when situations must be win-win and exchanges 50/50 (or at least something close to this). What to watch out for: - Skepticism. While often necessary, it might be taken to the point of detriment and turn into pessimism. At its best, it helps analyse and see things for what they are. At its worst, however, it erodes confidence and becomes cowardice. - Devil’s advocate. Arguing for the sake of arguing, unable to choose a side. They may be trying to examine from as many angles as they can, but might also be thrilled by the heat of debates. At times, this costs them and everyone involved much. - Demands and complaints. They might assume deals where there were none to begin with and be adamant about quantity and quality, developing a sense of entitlement while in a position of privilege. Or it might simply be that they’re overextending themselves and don’t feel or are not appropriately rewarded. - High or impossible standards. They might hold themselves and others to high standards. Some of these might be impossible to reach, given the circumstances. And some are not as important as they believe them to be and need not to be imposed. This can leave them and others feeling like they’re never enough. - Focus on actual and potential problems. As troubleshooters, they don’t ignore problems and try to solve, fix or keep them from happening. This makes them defenders and more. Yet, too much focus on problems can cause said problems to grow in size and keep people in misery or stuck within a comfort zone that’s not quite comforting. What to really be concerned about: - Pedestaling. It’s fine to honor others, especially if they do possess noteworthy qualities. The problematic issues begin when they are set up in an asphyxiating, tall place from which they will inevitably eventually fall and be no more than disappointing. It’s even more problematic if they become harshly competitive and put others down in order to hold to higher regard whom they value most. It’s essential to remember that even people that are the object of adoration can be imperfect humans and not always perform in a manner that merits worship. - Scapegoating. Looking for someone to “lead” them and make all or most of the decisions for them just so that they will have somebody else to blame and not be under the pressure of exercising good judgement and dealing with the consequences. They might be quick to point fingers and deny their own wrongdoings and shortcomings, failing to improve themselves and take control of their destiny. Taking the time to reason this with them might get them to see things differently. - Devoting to false Gods. In desperate attempts to have a savior and protector, they might devote to people and figures that do not truly serve their best interests and stubbornly hold on to them. This might turn into obsession and extremism and lead them into making regrettable choices. They might become dogmatic and fanatic to destructive degrees and rationalize their behavior. While this is a complicated state that’s tricky to awaken from, it’s possible to gradually direct their faith toward more suitable and moderate beliefs. Why should you bother to care? Whether your relationships with Type 6 people are intimate or not, putting in, at the least, a bit of effort on your part (as much as it’s appropriate) can go a long way in making things better for everyone involved. Note: These are only a few things to consider when caring for Type 6.
“Sixes with a 5 wing are generally introverted and somewhat intellectual. When healthy, they often have many realms of interest as well as surprising competencies and skills. May have an original and idiosyncratic point of view. Can be bookish; some are interested in history or feel rooted in the past or related to a long tradition. Also good at predicting the future. May test potential friends for a long time but once you’re in, you’re in - a friend for life. When more entranced, they may project a willed remoteness. Have a “tip of the iceberg” quality - they show little but you sense hidden dimensions, intensity and activity. Tension between needing to be seen and withdrawing for protection. Might act arrogant or cryptic or cynical when afraid. When phobic, can be diplomatic and say things without saying them. Entranced counterphobics are either cool and loners or argumentative, tending towards violence. Can brood over injustices to them, entertain conspiracy theories, spend time alone building cases. Paranoia in private. May like secretive behind-the-scenes group activity. Sneaky vengeance, passive/aggressive toward others, self-attacking and self-destructive at home.”
Enneagram Type 6w5: The Guardian
If you're still up for it.. What's an INFP 6w5 like? Love your work! Thank you!
This is one of those rare times when I get to give examples of both wings, using one character. Bilbo Baggins actually uses both his 5 and 7 wing in The Hobbit.
The story starts out with a very content hobbit living a mundane life. He’s okay with a quiet, mundane existence in the Shire. In fact, he doesn’t want a bunch of dwarves intruding upon his nice little pantry and screwing up his house and plumbing, thank you very much. Gandalf actually tells him off for becoming too complacent and attached to his “doilies.” Bilbo is a rather logical, and somewhat detached, hobbit. He loves puzzles (as a lot of 5 wings do) and has no interest in an adventure, until he realizes what he’d be missing out on, if he did not go. He’s a total 6. He faints at the idea of going off on a perilous quest to reclaim an ancient kingdom from a fire-breathing dragon. Caution first, that’s his motto, but he also shows surprising courage on his journey. Like 6s do, he stays calm under pressure – he outsmarts Gollum in a game of riddles, he stays safe and hidden at the right times, and he uses the Ring to give him a feeling of security in a big, scary world. It’s his 6ish “security system.”
His 7 wing kicks in on the actual adventure, when the wonders around him, the beauty of Middle-Earth, and the thirst of excitement latches onto him. By the time we find him in The Lord of the Rings, Bilbo is once more embracing his 7 wing – he longs to go back on one last adventure, to revisit Rivendell and leave his comfortable home behind for a life on the road, alone. His 7 wing also shows in his somewhat irreverent, even insulting sense of humor.
Like most 6′s, he’s too reliant on something other than himself than he needs to be (in his case, he develops an addiction to the Ring and freaks out if he thinks he has lost it, because it makes him feel safe) but also finds his courage when he most needs it, especially in saving his ole buddy and biggest critic, Thorin.
- ENFP Mod
I kinda share too much about my history and behavior in the attempt to prevent (future) misunderstandings.
a real 6w5 (via alexander-wortley)
Anxiety: Beware.
Six: ??? Can u be more specific?
Anxiety: :)
Enneagram Childhood Wounds
Type 1: These children felt heavily criticized, punished, or not good enough. Household rules may have felt inconsistent. As such they became obsessed with being good/not making mistakes to avoid condemnation. The principle message was: “You must always be better than you are.”
Type 2: These children felt loved only if they were helping or pleasing others, their personal needs felt selfish. As a result they closed off their own needs and feelings and tuned into those of others. Love became defined as giving to others - though the love often didn’t feel received or reciprocated.
Type 3: To the heart - These children felt rewarded only for what they did and how well they did it. their feelings were discounted and ignored, only their performance and what was expected of them mattered. This harmed their ability to love themselves and others. Admiration replaced real love.
Type 4: These children felt abandoned by one or both caretakers. They felt alone, cut off from the source of love for reasons they couldn’t understand. They were not “seen” or mirrored, and felt different from their parents. As a result, they turned inward to their feelings and imagination to cope in isolation.
Type 5: These children received no meaningful interaction, emotion, or affection from caretakers. Or, the child had intrusive, over-controlling parent(s) and felt exposed and defenseless in the face of this intrusion. As a result, they built walls around themselves and retreated to the mental realm.
Type 6: To the trusting nature. These children were raised in an unpredictable situation with no safe place to go. They lost faith they would ever be protected. As such, they turned to their own inner defense of doubting, disbelieving reality and rejecting their own instincts/inner guidance.
Type 7: These children were deprived of nurturing, or it was too-soon removed. They handled this lack by searching for distractions to minimize/repress fear and pain. They decided to focus on positive options and rely on themselves to fulfill their desires and gain a sense of nurturance.
Type 8: These children often grew up in an unsafe environment (emotionally and/or physically) and had to mature way too soon. They didn’t feel safe to show any vulnerability, and may have felt controlled. Weakness was used against them, so they focused only on building their strength.
Type 9: To the gut, the core of being. These children were overlooked or neglected and felt unimportant or “lost.” They were ignored/attacked for having needs or expressing themselves (especially anger) and decided to keep a low profile and instead focus on the needs/experience of others.
(credit to Elan BenAmi, MA, and Rev. Lori Ohlson, MA, LPC)
hello! this is a brand new blog dedicated to personality theory in general, and isfj / si-doms / enneagram 6 in specific! feel free to follow away or send a message!