So I'm in the car, radio on, headed to work, half-listening as I run through the myriad of things I need to get done once I'm in the office. Then my ears perk up as the conversation turns to the Odyssey, and they talk about the Cyclops scene. I love random facts, and I am in a class that's all about how to use cameras and various media for storytelling, so I'm fascinated by the forced perspective used for this scene. Matt Damon's stunt double, also, is apparently a jacked-as-hell 4'9" woman. Her arms look like she could wrestle a bear and a whale at the same time if she had to, and still get home on time for dinner.
Of course, after that tidbit, I've turned my radio up, I'm listening more closely, and I'm loving this information. Devyn Dalton! What a dreamboat!! She's popular now, and she's getting a lot of interviews! Then one of the hosts says, "Isn't it emasculating for a man to be represented by a 4'9" woman?"
My face twists in a "You're joking, right?" sneer, and I said out loud, alone in my empty car toodlin' down the highway, "Why would that be emasculating???" (I didn't want it to be rhetorical; I definitely sent a text to the show when I parked my car lol) And I've been sitting with that since. That sentence only works if you already believe a woman doing something impressive in place of a man is, by definition, a loss of manhood. Not like, stealing the scene or even threatening his career, but her being his stunt double is a loss of HIS manhood itself. That's such a massive claim on a throwaway line.
That got me to jump down the rabbit hole, looking for a word that should exist--a mirror of "emasculate." If stripping away masculinity leaves a man with nothing, or with femininity, then stripping away femininity should leave a woman with nothing, or with masculinity. There should be a word for that, right? Language is usually pretty efficient about building words for things that happen.
But there isn't one.
Not REALLY, at least. People are trying--defeminize, desex, unsex--but I don't feel like any of them land the way "emasculate" lands. They don't get spat out as insults; none of them describe a woman losing to a man and calling it a wound to her womanhood.
For real, for most folks (who don't live in tumblr-land or run in progressive circles), this wouldn't even blip on their radar. Try it: a woman loses a fight/job/argument to a man, but no one will say he defeminized her. It's not a sentence anyone says or even reaches for. But a man losing a fight/job/argument to a woman? It emasculates him. The first scenario is just any ol' Tuesday to most. It's not unusual. Seemingly, it doesn't even need a word to describe it.
And that's my whole gripe!! Language doesn't build a word for a loss that a culture doesn't consider a loss. We have "emasculate" because a man losing to a woman was considered a fall--a critical one that diminished who he was at his core, worth naming and weaponizing. We never built the other word because a woman losing to a man was never a fall; it was just... expected. Or where women were already standing.
So when a female radio host (who often prides herself on being a champion of raising up women) says that a 4'9" woman (who can probably fold you in half) is "emasculating" to a male actor, she's telling on the framework running in the background of her life: the patriarchy, the internalized misogyny, all the baggage built into society long before she even opened her mouth. Maybe she's not aware of it. Maybe it's never been brought to her attention. Perhaps she's never asked, "Why?"
And maybe many of us have not been aware, not consciously. But I think that's where I want people to sit right now. Not necessarily why she called this "emasculating," but why she felt the need to react and blurt that out in the first place. The reflex, and the system that built it, all underneath.
(and this is still dealing with sex=gender binary framework, which is just simply...not true! 😃 but that's a whole thing to unpack in a different post; I just wanted to ponder the word "emasculating" and why it has no femme-equivalent)