So I've taken up embroidery
DEAR READER

pixel skylines
KIROKAZE

@theartofmadeline
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
sheepfilms

Kaledo Art

oozey mess

No title available
No title available

No title available
Cosimo Galluzzi

⁂
will byers stan first human second
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
taylor price

PR's Tumblrdome
Misplaced Lens Cap
Keni

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Thailand
seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from Iraq
seen from Colombia
seen from Iraq

seen from Italy
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
@kate-nonsense
So I've taken up embroidery
I thought about just tagging this 'nuff said, but it's not.
I want to say something to all of the women under 50 on this site. Ready? You do not have to be over 50 to start taking up space.
Can I make that blink? Is that a thing Tumblr can do? Because, seriously. The sooner you believe you are allowed to take up space, the better life will be.
Those people who constantly reblog your stuff but you never really talk:
The rule could have heavy impacts towards trans people across society.
Last week, the Trump administration quietly released a sweeping new federal rule that would use funding threats to force institutions across the country to reject transgender people. The 400-page proposed regulation would codify the administration's anti-trans executive orders into binding federal policy, imposing a blanket prohibition on federal funds going toward "gender ideology"
The proposed rule, formally titled "Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance," rewrites the government-wide framework governing all federal grants across every agency. Among its most consequential provisions, it requires that before a federal grant recipient can receive money, the award must pass a "pre-issuance review" conducted by a political appointee—not a career expert or peer reviewer—to ensure it is "consistent with applicable law, Federal agency priorities, and the national interest." The regulation explicitly instructs these appointees to screen for "denial by the recipient of the sex binary in humans or the notion that sex is a chosen or mutable characteristic." [...] An institution that acknowledges transgender people exist—through its policies, its training, its healthcare, its bathroom access, its HR procedures, its name-change processes—could be deemed to "deny the sex binary" or to “support the notion that sex is mutable” and have its federal funding blocked.
Importantly, the gender ideology prohibition has no age limitation—hospitals could be targeted not just for providing care to minors but for providing gender-affirming care to adults, because prescribing hormone therapy to a transgender patient of any age could be deemed promoting the belief that "sex is a chosen or mutable characteristic."
THIS IS OPEN TO COMMENT UNTIL JULY 13, 2026
This is all very bad and horrible, but I want to be clear that it’s worse and more sweeping than just eliminating trans research.
This torches everything. And I do mean everything.
A very abbreviated list of its ramifications include (but are not limited to):
ending funding for ALL DEI related initiatives
allowing the government to terminate grants at any point for any reason
preventing researchers from publishing, going to conferences, and being part of academic societies
requiring that topics must support the president’s agenda.
What this means, and if anything I’m under selling it, is the death of science and research in America. It allows the government to restrict any topic they please at a whims notice, putting officials who have no background in the topic in charge of deciding funding continuity. It controls what gets researched and if/how researchers are allowed to share their discoveries. There are no books to burn if the government never allows them to be written. This is fascism plain and simple.
Please, if you only ever write one public comment, this is the one to do.
Bringing back this guide to writing an effective public comment. This gives you the basics you need to know, what you need to include, a basic outline you can follow, etc.
Public comments are not a vote, it is a chance for you to say "here is an issue with this law I think you need to address" and provide justification for legal challenges if it goes forward:
"Comments raise the bar that agencies have to meet when making a rule; “if an agency fails to adequately respond to significant, relevant comments in a final rule, members of the public may seek to challenge the rule in court on that basis and claim it could be struck down.ˮ"
But also, if possible, don't stop at writing a comment. Don't stop at calling your representatives. You should ideally be talking to people in your community about this and organizing resistance on-the-ground; there is a good chance people are already doing that even if you aren't hearing about it.
Some added 101-level context from someone (me) who’s worked in federal grantmaking for 20 years and is literally certified on this document - this is a document that governs all federal grantmaking. It’s been around for over a decade and is a mega-document that combine multiple previous smaller documents that have been around for ages. It is updated every few years and generally the updates are minor - a notable change in the previous update was raising the small procurement threshold from $10,000 to $15,000 for example. Deeply dry boring minutiae that no one outside of federal grantmakers need concern themselves with. It was also federal GUIDELINES, which means there was flexibility.
This year’s is different. They are now federal REQUIREMENTS, which means there’s no flexibility. As was said previously, the 400 pages are not singularly devoted to being absolute shitheads to trans people. Theres a lot of stuff in there, some of which is the standard dry boring grants stuff, some of which is the horrible ideological warfare outlined above.
This document is issued by the OMB, the Office of Management and Budget, which is currently lead by fucking Russell Vought, the principal architect of Project 2025. This is how they’re going to implement all the horrible shit in there that wasn’t covered by Executive Order. Russell Vought is actively coming for my job, my marriage, and my kid, and most of my friends lost their jobs last year because of him. He is the fucking arch villain behind the heinous shit the current regime is doing.
So yes, please comment. You don’t have to read all 400 pages before doing so, it’s dry and dense as fuck, but I thought this information might be helpful. Also, while there is a public comment period, this isn’t voted on by Congress. The OMB just fucking issues it. Pressuring your elected officials into publicly saying “hey what the fuck are you doing here” is good, though.
Please note the comment period is open through JULY 13th, not JUNE 13th. I saw a lot of relogs yesterday saying "last day!" and I just want to say it is very much not too late.
As of today, 7/8/26, we have five days for public commentary on this to go through. I am begging y'all: if you care about independent science in the country that produces the most global science funding in the world, please leave a comment.
#kind of a milf reblog
I won't apologize
How the hell could I possibly explain this post to somebody not on tumblr
why are YOU as a man admitting to enjoying being hit and smacked and just generally manhandled by women
"Whimsy" is truly a wretched term. What maketh thee so carefree?
thy mother
Art thou for fucking real
Preview of a few entities I've made for an upcoming project of mine :)
This campaign defies censorship in social media to raise awareness for early detection of breast cancer
this is actually super fucking smartass of them
Reblogging as this is so important everyone! My mum had breast cancer and that shit is not nice so please check yourself ladies and gents! 💕💕💕
Always a reblog. 💋
I will forever reblog this when I see it because its so important
i love one (1) disaster wizard
It’s a good metaphor tho, because the situation is never going to get better if you don’t eventually pull the door. And afterwards, no matter what the damage was, you’ll have a working cabinet, whatever plates you could salvage, and a place to start putting new plates.
Reblogging for that comment ^
Hats off for negative jokes turned to wholesome posts
So this was me for a long time. Afraid to open the door, certain that all that I was would crash and break. That I could never be repaired.
But I opened the door.
And what fell out and crashed to the ground was not me. They weren’t my dishes.
They were other people’s dishes.
Put inside we without my permission, when I was too young to know that I could not hold them all.
I opened the door, and I’m still here.
It turns out, I’m not that fragile.
Yay today is my Brithday! I'll be happy if you share my art! <3
𝕃𝕖𝕗𝕥 𝔹𝕖𝕙𝕚𝕟𝕕
Character pairing: (Until Dawn) Joshua Washington & GN!Reader
Summary: Y/n comes back to Blackwood Mountain to search for their friend, hoping he's alive, and not counting on the possibility Josh may not be the Josh that they find.
Warnings: Wendigos, Wendigo!Josh, creepy/spooky-ish, quite the cliffhanger at the end (AKA author ran out of juice) [my Ko-Fi]
.⋆。⋆˚。⋆。˚。⋆.⛓💔🎬🤡⛓.⋆。⋆˚。⋆。˚。⋆.
It was hard to go back the first time, unbelievably so, and here is Y/n coming back up this cursed mountain a second time after the hell that broke loose. But they had to return.
Almost half a year went by and there were no news of the rescue teams coming back with Josh — the one whom was the source of half the trauma his friends went through, and also the only one said friends had left behind.
Sometimes someone will say something about a fictional character's choices and I'll think "do you want to be told a story, or read an instruction manual for Correct Behaviour"
I recently described my second novel's (early) plot outline to a friend and without giving too much away, it's a horror-romance about a woman whose lover is slowly transformed into a dangerous monster due to forces outside of their control. She wrestles with her fear and love, how useful her monstrous lover is in their current survival situation, how dangerous her lover could become, and ultimately at the end of the story decides that monster or not, this is a person that she loves and who loves her back, and goes back to save them from a horrible death.
And my friend's response was "well everyone will think the protagonist is stupid for not leaving Lover at the first sign they were turning into a monster. And then they'll think she's even more stupid for going back to save them when she could have used that opportunity to escape. I think the story sounds great but you should cut out the romance because she'd obviously just be afraid of Lover as soon as they become changed."
And I was just. So speechless. Not because I'm hostile to critique (it's actually very fun for me to be challenged because I love to Think About Things), but because this critique seemed to ask me Not To Tell The Story. My friend went on to explain that in real life this romance would be super toxic and would encourage women to ignore red flags and I, flabbergasted, am wondering when in real life you might be trapped in the Arctic being menaced by UFOs who have turned your doting partner into a Creetur
TIME TO CANCEL NITROS IF YOU ALREADY HAVENT
when the subtitles have slight inaccuracies like synonyms and asynchronous abbreviations/lengthenings to what's actually being said
Burnout is a jockey and he's riding me to death.