Cosmic Funnies
AnasAbdin
Game of Thrones Daily
Cosimo Galluzzi
KIROKAZE
dirt enthusiast
Three Goblin Art
h

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

Love Begins
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
ojovivo
No title available
No title available

oozey mess
Show & Tell

roma★
taylor price
Not today Justin
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from Ukraine
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from North Macedonia
seen from Pakistan
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Ireland
@kinkyrius
I may be sick but at least I make my granny shawl look hot as fuck
Kate McKinnon getting her hair pulled by THE pornstar Nina Hartley
the flat hand thing works, she’s correct
hey. don't cry. glados holding chell down with anonymous robotic appendages while searing her name into chell's back with a high powered laser as the girl writhes and sweats beneath her.
okay <3 yay <3
i should be allowed to kill someone with no repercussions. as a treat.
i mean if *i* wanna break a girl's ribs or slit her throat or strangle her to death or whatever, that's *my* business! i mean really it's lesbophobic that it's not allowed
i mean *really,* like, what if she wants it?? what if she just happens to have beautiful, soft flesh and big wet doe eyes that make you wanna rip out her throat??? what am i supposed to do, *not* kill and eat her???? fucking ridiculous
it’s really misandrist that you don’t want to slit men’s throats
i would like to slit men's throats for unrelated, entirely non-sexual reasons
kink ask meme: bondage?
Bondage is another really flexible kink that you can apply in a lot of different situations with a lot of different connotations. And they're all great.
The simple fact of limiting someone's mobility is hot. Leaving them progressively more helpless and/or dependent on you is a lot of fun. Bondage harnesses, leather or shibari, are less about restriction itself, but the simple presence of it serves as a constant reminder to the person wearing it, and that's also great.
You can tie someone's hands to a harness to limit them, or cuff someone's hands wrists together (with a slightly longer chain to leave some mobility, or not at all, depending on how you're feeling), or put a chain or bar between their elbows behind their back for the same effect. Or you can just go for an armbinder, box or otherwise to keep those pesky arms out of the way entirely.
For the legs I like ankle, knee or thigh cuffs with chains between them rather than a bar or something, because forcing a limited range of movement is hotter than just taking it away altogether.
Personally, the appeal of a lot of kink is aesthetic, which bondage can really nail. I care more about the restriction and it looking good than I care about it causing discomfort. The idea of, like, casual-wear bondage is fantastic.
But it also lends itself well to support other kinks. Like, most of this stuff before is if you want someone to move at all, but bondage also lends itself to tying someone in place to put them on display. And the aesthetic appeal of displaying someone like a trophy is fantastic.
So as long as it's not ugly, and meant to be humiliation in that sense, I'm wholly on board.
9/10 on its own, but easily pushed further up when paired with others.
while obviously we all know the utility monster is a kinda hot concept (ontologically correct to let it rape you), i think "it's ethically correct for me to do whatever I want to you because it causes you to feel pleasure" is probably a hotter kink-deconstruction of utilitarianism. in either case though I think the "broad societal belief that this argument is true" is also pretty important. everyone knows that your "happiness" matters more than anything else, and that I'm a better authority on your "happiness" than you are.
I think it's kind of cute how some utilitarians tried to work around this one by coming up with preference utilitarianism: the thing to maximize isn't 'pleasure' or 'happiness', but whether people get to do what they want. On-the-face gutless yet able to justify countless atrocities; one of very few moral philosophies truly compatible with liberal society.
But preference utilitarianism just kicks the can down the road. Forcing someone to feel pleasure is wrong - no comment on forcing them to want it. In fact, giving someone a new preference and then fulfilling it is ethical by default - more satisfied desires in the world!
It's like corruption kink if the corruption was objectively good. Your victim is making the world a better place just by indulging in all the things it now so desperately wants. It's saintly, almost! Your own utility monster on a leash.
And to maximize net benefit, the optimal victim would be someone exceptionally repressed. A huge change, necessarily, and the victim wouldn't care, but everyone who used to know it would.
But of course, this would be the best possible outcome. If you prefer otherwise, it's your preference that needs changing.
"It must be rough to see your job taken over by automation" I say to you while gesturing at a urinal.
alright fairy perverts, come and get your food
Oops, almost didn't see you down there
LIne
meal prep
By Natural Causes for @empress-em-kaldwin
swimsuit
beneath a rotten sun /
coward-eater, unloved, nith-king /
gorges on the abject dead
Wake up to a girl's happy trail~<3 ✧ദ്ദി( ˶^ᗜ^˶ )