And have I learned restraint?

A horny blog, for content that's maybe slightly more risqué than my main. Over 18. Trans. Good girl. Not necessarily "kinky" as such, just stuff I don't want on main.

[kinkyrius]

[yaknowlikenyah]

I may be sick but at least I make my granny shawl look hot as fuck

[80slesbiab]

Kate McKinnon getting her hair pulled by THE pornstar Nina Hartley

[rose-chateau]

[bitterkarella]

the flat hand thing works, she’s correct

[puppygirllaika]

hey. don't cry. glados holding chell down with anonymous robotic appendages while searing her name into chell's back with a high powered laser as the girl writhes and sweats beneath her.

[notsayferwork]

okay <3 yay <3

[cannibalcaprine]

i should be allowed to kill someone with no repercussions. as a treat.

[cannibalcaprine]

i mean if *i* wanna break a girl's ribs or slit her throat or strangle her to death or whatever, that's *my* business! i mean really it's lesbophobic that it's not allowed

[cannibalcaprine]

i mean *really,* like, what if she wants it?? what if she just happens to have beautiful, soft flesh and big wet doe eyes that make you wanna rip out her throat??? what am i supposed to do, *not* kill and eat her???? fucking ridiculous

[american-catboys-campaign]

it’s really misandrist that you don’t want to slit men’s throats

[cannibalcaprine]

i would like to slit men's throats for unrelated, entirely non-sexual reasons

[lipstickchainsaw]

kink ask meme: bondage?

Bondage is another really flexible kink that you can apply in a lot of different situations with a lot of different connotations. And they're all great.

The simple fact of limiting someone's mobility is hot. Leaving them progressively more helpless and/or dependent on you is a lot of fun. Bondage harnesses, leather or shibari, are less about restriction itself, but the simple presence of it serves as a constant reminder to the person wearing it, and that's also great.

You can tie someone's hands to a harness to limit them, or cuff someone's hands wrists together (with a slightly longer chain to leave some mobility, or not at all, depending on how you're feeling), or put a chain or bar between their elbows behind their back for the same effect. Or you can just go for an armbinder, box or otherwise to keep those pesky arms out of the way entirely.

For the legs I like ankle, knee or thigh cuffs with chains between them rather than a bar or something, because forcing a limited range of movement is hotter than just taking it away altogether.

Personally, the appeal of a lot of kink is aesthetic, which bondage can really nail. I care more about the restriction and it looking good than I care about it causing discomfort. The idea of, like, casual-wear bondage is fantastic.

But it also lends itself well to support other kinks. Like, most of this stuff before is if you want someone to move at all, but bondage also lends itself to tying someone in place to put them on display. And the aesthetic appeal of displaying someone like a trophy is fantastic.

So as long as it's not ugly, and meant to be humiliation in that sense, I'm wholly on board.

9/10 on its own, but easily pushed further up when paired with others.

[ace-trainer-alice]

while obviously we all know the utility monster is a kinda hot concept (ontologically correct to let it rape you), i think "it's ethically correct for me to do whatever I want to you because it causes you to feel pleasure" is probably a hotter kink-deconstruction of utilitarianism. in either case though I think the "broad societal belief that this argument is true" is also pretty important. everyone knows that your "happiness" matters more than anything else, and that I'm a better authority on your "happiness" than you are.

[trainwreck-of-thoughts]

I think it's kind of cute how some utilitarians tried to work around this one by coming up with preference utilitarianism: the thing to maximize isn't 'pleasure' or 'happiness', but whether people get to do what they want. On-the-face gutless yet able to justify countless atrocities; one of very few moral philosophies truly compatible with liberal society.

But preference utilitarianism just kicks the can down the road. Forcing someone to feel pleasure is wrong - no comment on forcing them to want it. In fact, giving someone a new preference and then fulfilling it is ethical by default - more satisfied desires in the world!

It's like corruption kink if the corruption was objectively good. Your victim is making the world a better place just by indulging in all the things it now so desperately wants. It's saintly, almost! Your own utility monster on a leash.

And to maximize net benefit, the optimal victim would be someone exceptionally repressed. A huge change, necessarily, and the victim wouldn't care, but everyone who used to know it would.

But of course, this would be the best possible outcome. If you prefer otherwise, it's your preference that needs changing.

[boringkate]

"It must be rough to see your job taken over by automation" I say to you while gesturing at a urinal.

[mollyjames]

alright fairy perverts, come and get your food

[thelusciouslibra]

Oops, almost didn't see you down there

[poligon-sticker]

LIne

[pr3tty-daisy]

[annelidist]

meal prep

[annelidist]

By Natural Causes for @empress-em-kaldwin

III. EMPLOYMENT PERIOD

The Lady agrees to take the Serpent as property for a period beginning on May 19 2186, and ending with the death of either party. At the end of said employment period, neither party shall have any obligation to the other party, except for any severance required hereunder or any non-disclosure agreement stated in Section X of this Agreement.

The Serpent may not terminate this Agreement. The Lady shall have the right to the use of any force or mind-altering effect necessary to secure the Serpent’s continued obedience. While the Serpent is in dereliction of duty, the Lady shall not have any obligations to the Serpent under this Agreement.

The Lady shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by providing at least 1 hour’s notice. If the Lady should terminate this Agreement, the Serpent shall be entitled to severance as described in Section III.a of this Agreement.

In the event of the Serpent’s death, the Serpent shall be entitled to no severance, and its remains and effects shall be the property of the Lady, whereupon this Agreement shall dissolve.

In the event of the Lady’s death, the Serpent shall be entitled to severance as described in Section III.a of this Agreement, and shall exit the Estate within 1 hour, whereupon this Agreement shall dissolve.

a. SEVERANCE

On the dissolution of this Agreement, unless specified otherwise the Serpent shall immediately take legal possession of itself and its effects, as well as a single, decaying copy of the Estate’s master key.

The Lady shall continuously wear a decaying copy of the Estate’s master key on a leather cord about her throat, primed to decay into dust no sooner than 1 hour and no later than 2 hours after removal from her person, living or dead.

[annelidist]

swimsuit

[annelidist]

beneath a rotten sun /

coward-eater, unloved, nith-king /

gorges on the abject dead

[gummywormsinmyeyes]

Wake up to a girl's happy trail~<3 ✧ദ്ദി( ˶^ᗜ^˶ )