š
Ok but why are her other nails TALONS
You have your fucking fingers and your fighting fingers.
art blog(derogatory)
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
𩵠avery cochrane š©µ
I'd rather be in outer space šø
Noah Kahan
Misplaced Lens Cap
Aqua Utopiaļ½ęµ·ć®åŗć§čØę¶ćē“”ć
Today's Document

ellievsbear

shark vs the universe

oozey mess

⣠Chile in a Photography ā£

if i look back, i am lost

PR's Tumblrdome

pixel skylines
Mike Driver

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
trying on a metaphor
RMH
seen from Switzerland

seen from Colombia

seen from South Africa
seen from Ireland
seen from Ecuador
seen from Portugal

seen from United States

seen from Bangladesh

seen from Paraguay

seen from Malaysia
seen from Mexico
seen from Kenya
seen from United States

seen from Vietnam

seen from United States

seen from Argentina
seen from France
seen from Colombia
seen from Laos

seen from Armenia
@lilboneca
š
Ok but why are her other nails TALONS
You have your fucking fingers and your fighting fingers.
so i saw some people discussing how loki in ragnarok shouldnāt have been at all phased or subverted by dr. strange ā which i agree with, but also, hey, itās comedic and you can argue that he was taken off-guard, but upon re-watch, something stuck out to me ā
thereās this moment when they appear at the bottom of the stairs and thor rolls down the last couple and stands up and he says
we couldāve just walked.
and it made me think of how magic works in terry pratchettās novels, how (to paraphrase) the hard part wasnāt turning someone into a frog, it was not turning someone into a frog when you knew how easy it was.
like, the whole scene with dr. strange is just. all magic. all pointless magic. unnecessary magic, when, well. they could have just walked.
whereas loki doesnāt really rely on magic overmuch in the movie ā he uses it as a tool, when he needs it, but if the job can be done with plain old non-magical trickery or a knife, he just uses those. he resorts to magic when heās cornered by valkyrie, he uses it when his goals are most directly accomplished by using magic rather than by other means.
whereas dr. strange is using magic all over his scene, just to use it. just because he can.Ā magic was unnecessary for ninety percent of what he did in that scene, the only time he needed magic was to whisk them away to norway. but he teleported all over the place even when he only needed to move a few feet, gave thor an ever-refilling beer that just spilled everywhere, floated around to make a show of how ~magical~ he was, whenā¦
he could have just walked.
i mean, iām very sure that the filmmakers intended it for comedic effect, but thereās also a layer there of dr. strange being much less comfortable with magic than loki is ā loki doesnāt need to bust out the magic at every opportunity, itās simply a skill, a tool that is completely under his control and at his disposal. whereas dr. strange (at least in his scene in ragnarok) is showing off, which reeks of insecurity.
i guess iām thinking⦠if you take the magic away, loki is still a deadly, formidable opponent with many tricks up his sleeve, but dr. strange is just a guy in a cape.
this is good and true because in the comics lokiĀ and dr strange got in a fight in a parking lot and then both of them had their magic taken away so loki just punched stephenĀ through a wall and called it a gay ass day
Screw it
One time my five year old sister and I went in a hike in the woods and I told her ānow if we come across a bear in here, I will throw myself in front of it and you run away!ā And she looked me dead in the eye and said āNo sorry I called it.ā I was like, āwhat? You want to die? Youāre five!ā She just looked into the abyss and said, āI have been here too long.ā And honestly? Big Mood.
āI have been here too long.ā Iām through
Damn
Iām convinced that Matt Groening can predict the future.
Wow tea
but like, very specific and accurate teaĀ
Amazing, breathtaking, stupendous, mindblowing
The funny cats histories
someone: hey can i ask you a personal question?
my oversharing ass already bursting to answer the question: moi?
Today is a good day to remind yāall that Freddie Mercury was Bisexual not Homosexual
Thank you for coming to my ted talk.
The only way weāre ever going to solve homelessness is by giving free housing to homeless people.Ā
Not cots in homeless shelters. Not beds in domestic violence shelters. Real, actual, permanent housing, with a door they can lock and the freedom to come and go as they please.Ā
It seems like a stupidly simple solution to an incredibly complicated problem, but this is the only way weāre ever going to end homelessness for good. Everything weāre doing right now is like flinging thimbles of water onto a house fire, and itās time to call the fire department. Donāt believe me? Consider that:
Providing free housing is actually cheaper than what weāre doing right now. Even when you factor in the cost of having round-the-clock mental health staff on hand in housing facilities, giving the homeless housing costs about one-third as much as leaving them on the streets.Ā How is that possible? People who sleep on the streets go to the hospital a whole lot more than anyone else. Being homeless is hard on your health - you are more likely to be assaulted, experience frostbite or heatstroke, or fail to manage a medical condition like diabetes. Homeless people are also more likely to get arrested for minor things like public urination or loitering, and itās hugely expensive to arrest them, process them, put them in prison and put them through court dates. We save so much money and eliminate so many problems by just giving them somewhere to live.Ā
Itās extremely difficult to get a job when you donāt have an address. Thereās a huge amount of prejudice against homeless people, and the same people who shoutĀ āget a job!ā are the first to toss someoneās application in the trash as soon as they seeĀ āno fixed addressā. Having an address also makes it easier to vote, open a bank account, keep up with your taxes and obey the terms of your probation.Ā
Homeless people waste a lot of time standing in line for shelters and services. Shelters have limited space available, and if you want to make sure you have a bed for the night, you need to be there long before the doors open. The same thing applies to soup kitchens. When your whole life revolves around being in line for vital services for hours on end, itās hard to make much progress in getting your life together. Providing people with housing gives them more time and more flexibility to return to school, find jobs, or reconnect with family.Ā
Itās virtually impossible to manage a mental health condition or recover from addiction when you have no permanent housing. Itās just not going to happen. Recovering from a mental health issue requires stability, routine and a safe place to retreat to, which are impossible when you live on the streets. Living rough makes it extremely difficult to show up to appointments, hang on to your prescription medications and avoid trauma. Itās more efficient for everyone involved to provide housing to the mentally ill first, and bring mental health services right to their doors.Ā
Itās hard to make much progress in life when you canāt accumulate possessions. Think about how hard your life would be if you had no safe place to store your things. When youāre homeless and sleeping in shelters, you can only keep as much stuff as you can carry with you, and most of your energy is going to go towards keeping that stuff safe. You canāt take advantage of clothing drives, because you canāt carry too many clothes. You eat a lot of fast food, because you have nowhere to store or prepare groceries. Showing up to appointments, interviews or shifts is difficult, because you have to lug everything you own with you to ensure nothing is stolen. Having a room with a lock changes everything.Ā
It keeps children out of the foster system. Ending up on the streets often means losing your children - if you canāt provide children with a stable home, thatās grounds to take them away. Families fleeing domestic violence can find themselves re-traumatized when children are placed in foster care due to inadequate housing. Providing stable housing allows families to stay together and minimizes trauma for children and parents, as well as foster care costs.Ā
It preserves basic human dignity. Itās hard for most of us to imagine how humiliating and dehumanizing it is to be homeless. Imagine not having access to regular showers, or even toilets. Having nowhere to clean your laundry. Having your schedule dictated by a homeless shelter. Sleeping in rooms with dozens or hundreds of other people, with absolutely no privacy. Being chased out of businesses and public places. Enduring the crushing boredom of having nowhere to go. Being treated as less than human. Itās impossible to maintain hope and dignity in those conditions, and no human being should have to endure that.Ā
We live in a society that treats housing like something you have toĀ āearnā by proving yourself worthy of it, and that toxic thinking has put us in a position where weāre literally willing to spend more money to have people sleeping in the streets. It has to stop. Housing is a bare minimum requirement for human dignity, and it should be a human right. Everyone deserves a safe and private space of their own, regardless of their abilities, mental health or circumstances. No one is asking for luxury condos here - dorm-style settings with private rooms and shared bathroom and kitchen facilities have proven to be effective. This isnāt about whoĀ ādeservesā housing; if you are a human being, you deserve a safe place to call home.Ā
taken literally 1 minute apart
Ah, the āol scream and sleep.
Not cheating on people and not betraying your friends is actually very very very easy and I would 100% recommend this to everyone
me: iām not sure about this outfit friend: you look fine letās just go!! me:
friend was right cuz that fit shreds
the greatest plan in history
gay culture is silently tolerating your straight friends being attracted to the ugliest human beings you have ever seen in your goddamn life
we only do it because they tolerate us thinking weāre in love after 2 days of knowing someone
Feminism then and now.
Mhm. Those are two sets of women, out being loud about issues that are important to them and other women. Suffrage and sexual assault are both important issues, then and now.Ā
Not really seeing the point youāre trying to make?Ā
Perhaps the intended point was that modern feminists fight for non issues and they do so very inefficiently.
You think sexual assault is a nonissue? Mmmmhmmmmmmmmmm
Not when it actually occurs.
But this is clearly a slutwalk, and slut-shaming is definitely a non-issue
Do you know the origin of slutwalks?
On January 24, 2011, Toronto Police Constable Michael Sanguinetti and another officer from 31 Division spoke on crime prevention, addressing the issue ofĀ campus rapeĀ at aĀ York UniversityĀ safety forum atĀ Osgoode Hall Law School. During the talk, Sanguinetti interrupted the more senior officer and said: āIāve been told Iām not supposed to say this ā however, women should avoid dressing like sluts in order not to be victimized.ā
Thus, slutwalks began in direct protest to this example of victim blaming.
So. It did happen. It does happen. Itās an issue.