Janaina Medeiros
No title available
Origami Around
shark vs the universe
d e v o n
⁂
Game of Thrones Daily
JVL
Sade Olutola
One Nice Bug Per Day
we're not kids anymore.
Love Begins
Cosimo Galluzzi
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Three Goblin Art
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
No title available
Xuebing Du
Misplaced Lens Cap
No title available
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from Congo - Kinshasa
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from Italy
seen from Morocco
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from United States
@m-nrva
I KNOW HOW MY FILTHY MUTANT ABILITIES UPSET YOU, SCHMIDT. DON’T WORRY–
–YOU WILL DIE PURE. NO MAGNETISM
JUST FISTS.
reblog Magneto punching a Nazi
you won’t get anything for it, except for a kickass photoset of Magneto punching a Nazi on your blog
The reason Magneto is that buff is because every time he’s fantasized about doing this for the last few decades, he has done one (1) push-up.
they literally deleted all existing reblogs of that post from existence btw<3
and theyre tryin to delete it all again
(Dming evil girlfriend) you love me because l am the one virtuous pretense in your fetid black heart
(Dming good girlfriend) you love me because l am your secret shame
my fetid black heart could use a virtuous pretense
Also on windows 10!! go to typing settings- how ai has helped you- typing insights-off
socialist realism and the philosophy of art in the soviet is pretty misunderstood by both of these types of people shown in the screenshot.
the exaltation of SR as "the highest art form in history to date" is a folklorist position that loses the actual theoretical content of what socialist realism claimed to be. For Lifschitz and Lukács, SR's superiority over critical realism is specifically a superiority of method: its partidism is conscious, rooted in the Marxist-Leninist comprehension of historical development, where the partidism of a Balzac or a Tolstoy was spontaneous, conditioned by class position in ways its author could not fully theorize. This is a historically determinate claim about a historically determinate form, and it cannot be generalized into a transhistorical aesthetic hierarchy without losing precisely the content that made the claim. Lifschitz's own treatment of beauty as dialectically constituted (absolute beauty existing as an accumulation of non-absolute cases) makes this kind of absolutist elevation incoherent on its own terms, because it performs the fetishization of a particular that Lifschitz identified as the root of dogmatist and relativist aesthetic positions alike.
The quote tweet performs the standard ideological operation applied to Soviet theoretical production broadly, that SR was a sort of political imposition on an "authentic artistic life" that would have flourished in its absence, specifically by catering to the low intellectual capacities of the reactionary peasantry. This has the same structure as the dismissal of dialectical materialism as arid dogmatism that suppressed philosophical advances: in both cases an externally imposed political form is said to have suffocated an authentic content that preceded or existed beside it. The avant-garde occupies here the same position that "authentic Marxist philosophy" occupies in anti-diamat discourse, the repressed vitality that the party machine stifled. But Lifschitz's critique of abstraction was developed from within the theoretical premises of the reflection theory, in 1927 at the Vjutemás, which was the institutional center of Soviet vanguardism. Simply, there was a theoretical argument whose conclusions were unflattering to the abstractionist tendency. The claim that SR was anti-intellectual placation for peasants also contains a specific class contempt towards the peasantry that was coincidentally levied by Trotsky in his attacks against the USSR until his death. Aside from this, the claim assumes that formal accessibility is a concession to cognitive limitation, when it actually is an artistic reflection of the essential contradictions of an epoch made legible to the popular classes because those contradictions constitute their lived existence.
taking the word of anti-soviet popular discourse for more "trivial" topics like art or architecture without our own investigation into the actual philosophical and political debates that took the USSR to the places that it did, mistakes and successes, is not helpful in any capacity
marathon is actually kind of fun. hm
turns out bungie is just good at designing gunplay. i haven't picked up a single weapon that feels bad to shoot yet. would be nice if the dedicated pve stuff was actually out though
it's on sale, should I get it?
is it worth using the words radical feminism anymore? seem distracting
I am not ceding the concept of abolishing patriarchy through radically altering society to people who think gender-segregated bathrooms are a foundational institution of women's rights! I refuse!
Pretend it says “TERFs are the ones who suck” I’m on mobile and it’s past midnight
Can't be stated enough just how badly "oh, but we don't want to recognize trans women as a type of women so we'll tie the theory in knots to avoid that" sabotages any attempt at radical feminism. It immediately results in having to discard bangers like "sex itself is a social construct that reinforces patriarchy" because it implies that insofar as "real woman" is a thing, trans women are part of that category.
Sex is a social construct? Nope, too inclusive of trans women.
Feminism should include women who can’t give birth for whatever reason? Can’t have that, too inclusive of trans women.
AMAB folks are not inherently stronger/smarter/better in any way? Well we need something to cling to and use to insist trans women are different and dangerous!
It’s really fucking dire. I’ve seen TERFs insisting that actually the pink tax is good because it harms trans women. I’ve seen TERFs saying the Christian tradwife trend is “more feminist” than allowing trans women to exist. I’ve seen TERFs saying they’d rather go through all the worst parts of menopause than let trans women have easy access to estrogen and progesterone. Just relentlessly abysmal stuff.
The only thing “radical” about TERFs brand of “radical feminism” is how radically stupid and self-destructive it is. I’ve heard this touted as reasoning for using the term FARTs instead of TERFs, but, and this is mostly just my personal take, I think we’re in too deep to change the term we refer to them with at this point. TWERF and SWERF are the only ones I’ve seen make any real waves and I figure it’s because they’re intuitive if you already know what TERF stands for and what they’re about.
It's actually an incredible case study in theory collapsing in the face of unwillingness to adapt. You hit one sticking point where the theory implies a conclusion that this group doesn't want, and it propagates backwards until they're uprooting foundational ideas because they chose to resolve the contradiction in the exact wrong direction.
thinking about problematic information gaps again..
she knows your address, interests, friends and weaknesses.
you don't know she exists yet
I mean imagine you meet some strange woman one day, she looks at you with this glimmer in her eyes and knows just what to say to make you trust her. presses just the right buttons to ensnare you, shares tiny slivers of information, only enough to make you realize that she knows far far more about you than you do her. stringing you along and feeding tidbits of information if you make her happy. promising she'll reveal what she knows if just do one more thing for her,
i LOVE tricking stupid naïve younger women into thinking i'm just perfect and we have every single thing in common.
we just happen to have the same tastes and like the same restaurants and cafés and watch the same shows and it's like a match made in heaven! i say the exact right thing at the perfect time and i just understand her so well, like nobody has before. how could i have known?!
you can trust me, right? right? how could i ever hurt you? we're just so alike. obviously, we were meant to be. do you want a drive home, by the way?
update: starting to get "Hey, did you do this to me?" DMs
Trans woman: [makes a salient take about transfeminism and culture]
Tumblr: How dare you?!? Don't you know that cultural critique can only come from the mouths of beautiful twinks with studio lighting?
I sure do love cis men on facebook mansplaining transfeminism to me.
"if you Crack an egg too early, it dies. If you notice one is having trouble hatching, but is clearly trying to, and do nothing, it'll die."
How about I set your fucking balls on fire. And kill you.
Me: "The egg prime directive is bullshit"
Tme's online: "What if you just let them be miserable and confused forever until they kill themselves I think that would be better"
I hope everything bad happens to you forever.
FUCKING BITES YOU BITES YOU BITES YOU
Me: "The egg prime directive is bullshit"
Tme's online: *implies trans women are groomers*
inshallah he will be drank
Clip of Lucy Dacus on the Las Culturistas podcast.
They didn’t make it
skill issue ngl
who else wide awake thinking about fran drescher mao skirt
genuinely what is the deal with all of the mao merch in stuff like this
can I reblog for both?
I’m reblogging for both
like to charge , renblog to cast
After reading this comic yesterday, my wife responded with, “…bad girls are hot.”
Eyyyyyyyyyy
I'm Still Alex - Webtoon | Tapas | Linktree | Patreon
There are many things going on politically that are frustrating, but something that I find even more frustrating is how telegraphed the trajectory we’re currently on was and continues to be.
Roughly two years ago, there was a family member that I outlined how exactly this was going to happen. How certain minorities were going to be labeled as being intrinsically criminal, and how this would lay the groundwork for future atrocities.
I pointed to specific language in Project 2025; Republicans literally spelled out what they were planning to do in advance.
I was ignored.
I’m not sure what it takes to get our fence-sitting “allies” to care, they might never…
…but given enough time and how bad things eventually get, they’ll say they did.
computer. mousegirl, embarrassed. bottom nude, half erect.
mabel... did they kill you mabel??? oh god they gutted you...
