Not book smart or street smart but a secret third thing.

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
NASA
taylor price

blake kathryn

No title available
RMH

Product Placement
Not today Justin

Kaledo Art
Jules of Nature

Andulka
Show & Tell
Cosmic Funnies
No title available
No title available
ojovivo
Game of Thrones Daily
Misplaced Lens Cap

JVL
Stranger Things

seen from Malaysia

seen from T1
seen from United States

seen from Canada

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Ukraine
seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from T1

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
@mal-edictions
Not book smart or street smart but a secret third thing.
He Woke Up Blind. His Doctor Never Mentioned Ozempic Could Do This.
He drove snowplows for a living.
Sixty-two years old. Howard County, Maryland. Motor equipment operator for the county government. The kind of man who shows up before dawn because a road needs clearing and he is the person who clears it.
His doctor gave him Ozempic in August 2023. Type 2 diabetes. The drug was everywhere by then. Morning news. Celebrity gossip. Pharmacy waiting rooms. The most talked-about medication in America, maybe ever.
New Year's Eve, 2023.
He woke up and could not see out of his right eye.
Not blurry. Not dim. Gone. Just gone.
The doctors gave it a name: non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. NAION. An eye stroke, basically. Blood stops flowing to the optic nerve. The nerve tissue dies. The vision does not come back. No surgery fixes it. No medication reverses it. You wake up with one working eye and that is simply what your life is now.
Nobody told him Ozempic could do this. Nothing on the box. Nothing from the pharmacist. Nothing from the doctor who wrote the prescription.
He kept taking the drug.
Ten months later, October 2024, he woke up and could not see out of his left eye either.
His name is Todd Engel. He is legally blind. He had to resign from his job. He cannot drive. He sat through his grandson's bar mitzvah and listened to something he could not see.
He told a reporter: "I want the manufacturers of Ozempic to see me. That I cannot see anything. I'm blind. I'm legally blind, and this is devastating."
Here is the part that makes this story something more than one man's tragedy.
Late summer 2023. A few months before Engel lost his first eye. Boston, Massachusetts. Mass Eye and Ear, one of the best neuro-ophthalmology programs in the world, affiliated with Harvard Medical School.
A senior doctor named Joseph Rizzo was reviewing the week's patient intake with his trainees. Rizzo is the director of the Neuro-Ophthalmology Service there, a Harvard professor, someone who has spent decades looking at rare optic nerve conditions.
He had seen three new NAION cases in seven days.
All three were on semaglutide. The active drug inside Ozempic.
NAION is uncommon. Roughly 2.3 to 10.2 cases per 100,000 adults over age fifty, per year. Three cases in one week at one clinic is the kind of clustering that experienced clinicians notice and do not let go of. His fellow, Tatiana Hathaway, started pulling charts. They went back through six years of patient records. Sixteen thousand, eight hundred and twenty-seven patients total. They built a matched cohort and ran the statistics.
The results were not subtle.
Diabetic patients on semaglutide were 4.28 times more likely to develop NAION than diabetic patients on other medications. Obese patients on semaglutide for weight loss were 7.64 times more likely.
The paper published in JAMA Ophthalmology on July 3, 2024. By the end of that month it had been read more than the top three JAMA Ophthalmology articles of all of 2023 combined.
Then Denmark looked.
A professor named Jakob Grauslund at Odense University Hospital ran the same question on a nationwide database: 424,152 Danes with Type 2 diabetes, followed over five years. Basically every diabetic adult in the country. He found semaglutide users had 2.19 times the NAION risk of patients on other diabetes drugs. And Denmark's annual NAION case count had more than doubled since Ozempic launched there in 2018. From 67.6 cases per year to 148.
A whole country's epidemiology shifting in real time.
A second Danish-Norwegian study followed in June 2025. 44,517 semaglutide users in Denmark, 16,860 in Norway. Same finding. Pooled hazard ratio of 2.81.
The signal replicated. Twice. In countries with no connection to the Harvard clinic, using completely different data, completely different methods.
On June 6, 2025, the European Medicines Agency concluded its formal review.
NAION is a very rare side effect of semaglutide. Up to 1 in 10,000 patients. Official classification. The product information for Ozempic, Wegovy, and Rybelsus across every EU member state had to be updated. By September 30, 2025, every package leaflet carried the warning.
The World Health Organization issued a global medical product alert on June 27.
In November 2025, the Danish government's patient compensation body paid four NAION victims 800,000 kroner. About $123,000. The director said simply: "NAION is a serious condition that causes permanent and incurable damage to vision."
The United States label still does not warn about blindness.
As of May 2026, the FDA says it is "currently evaluating whether there is a safety signal." Eleven months after Europe finished evaluating.
And then, in March 2026, something else surfaced. The FDA sent Novo Nordisk, the company that makes Ozempic, a formal warning letter. Based on an inspection of their New Jersey headquarters, the agency found the company had failed to investigate and timely report serious adverse events tied to semaglutide. Including two patient deaths. And one suicide.
The company's stock fell 3.6 percent. Novo Nordisk said it was confident it could resolve matters to the FDA's satisfaction.
When a pharmaceutical company is not properly reporting patient deaths to the regulator, the regulator's signal detection systems are working with incomplete data. That matters when you are trying to figure out why one agency moved and another has not.
Nobody fully knows why the drug does this to some eyes.
The leading theories involve blood pressure, speed of blood sugar correction, dehydration from gastrointestinal side effects. Some researchers think GLP-1 receptors in ocular tissue may be directly involved. Some think the sympathetic nervous system is implicated somehow. The honest answer is that the mechanism is not settled and European regulators decided the population-level evidence was sufficient to require a warning without needing to know the exact molecular pathway.
That is normal pharmacovigilance practice. You do not need to know how something breaks to tell people it might break.
KFF's November 2025 health poll found 12 percent of American adults are currently on a GLP-1 drug. About 31 million people. Up from 6 percent in May 2024.
Novo Nordisk says it has treated 46 million patients globally with its diabetes and obesity drugs since 2019. The company made the equivalent of roughly $45 billion in 2025. Goldman Sachs projects the global GLP-1 market could reach $100 billion per year by 2030.
One in ten thousand sounds like a small number until you multiply it by 31 million.
That math gives you 3,100 Americans potentially losing vision in one eye per year. At the conservative European estimate. The Harvard odds ratios suggest the real number could be much higher for patients with the anatomical risk factor that most people do not know they have until it is too late.
None of them are being warned.
The ophthalmologists who study this are not telling people to quit the drug. The American Academy of Ophthalmology and the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society have both said clearly that patients should not stop semaglutide based on this evidence alone. The cardiovascular benefits for high-risk patients are real. Pulling someone off the drug does not make them neutral. It exposes them to the heart attack the drug was preventing.
What they are saying, quietly, is this: if you are on Ozempic and you notice any sudden change in the vision of one eye, even something small that seems like it might be nothing, stop the drug and get to an ophthalmologist that same day. Not tomorrow. That day.
Because the second eye is the thing worth protecting.
Todd Engel's right eye went on New Year's Eve 2023. He kept taking his Ozempic because nobody told him not to. His left eye went in October 2024.
Ten months between them.
He filed his lawsuit in April 2025.
He sat through his grandson's bar mitzvah and listened.
He said: "I want the manufacturers of Ozempic to see me."
There are 31 million Americans on these drugs right now.
The label still says nothing about the eyes.
its on Erid, long after Grace and Rocky figure out how to hug and snuggle. Eridians dont really do full hugs like humans because then you can hear everyone's internal organs that close so its a little weird, maybe tapping/hand holding is the usual affection. Everyone assumes the constant cuddling is purely for Grace's human needs benefit, and while Grace obviously does love and need the touch, Rocky being driven to space madness and having every form of ptsd means he is equal if not more in need of constant full body hugs because he likes feeling how alive Grace is.
So random Eridian scientists are talking to Grace and are like, absolutely no disrespect intended, but very interesting Rocky overcame the cultural weirdness and sensory disgust of "hugs" and does them despite no benefit to himself because he cares for your needs! Its sweet!
Grace: actually Rocky freaks out if he cant press himself against my lungs and heart through the thinnest xenonite possible until he can hear every muscle cell in my body moving at least once a day.
Scientist: ok cool so hes kind of a total pervert then okay
People know that the whole "don't portray [harmful action] because viewers might recreate it" thing is a rule for children's shows right? It's supposed to be shit like "don't show peppa pig playing with fire so we don't get sued if a kid watches it and burns their house down." Not like, fanfiction for adults.
prev i hope u dont mind me sharing ur tags bc yeah this is an interesting add on
found this three year old draft buried in my files. is it funny? I don't remember
no no you’re on to something don’t leave this in the notes! (tags from @misscrazyfangirl321)
bringing a kind of MYCHEM'S 2ND ALBUM to the function while others study and work uwu
Uganda, Rwanda and South Africa are building solutions that richer nations could learn from
Interesting blog post.
I've been saying this for like 3 years now!! Always excited to see more coverage of it!!
If you're interested in the future of solarpunk, ecopunk, and a sustainable, livable future, African, South Asian, Latin American, and Indigenous climate movements are absolutely some of the biggest places you should look.
vegans make peace with honey
no shut up do it
vegans will pretend not to hear when natives tell them their agave products are unsustainable because they have whimsical feelings about, and i cannot stress this enough, the freedom of hive insects
Prove it.
I have not seen any evidence tonsugges they are harmed or die in the process of production. They do regurgitate the nectar as part of the process to concentrate it into honey (an interesting process) but they do not suffer any injury during this process. If they did, the cost to produce honey, which is done naturally as a measure to survive over winter and through times of lower availability, would outweigh the benefits. If you kill several bees to produce enough honey to make one more bee, It makes no sense. Any animal that did that would die, even with human intervention.
Do you have any sources which suggest otherwise? I’d be interested to hear of this (relatively publicly available) information was false or misunderstood.
Bee farmers use whats called a honey maker. It’s a crude devices. It similar to a meat grinder. They force the bees in and grind them up. What comes out is a paste. That paste is later filtered into what we know as honey
This is the funniest thing I’ve ever read
@zoologicallyobsessed please show us pics of your bee grinder
they might be falsely thinking about a honey extractor machine. but all these do is you place the beehive frames inside and a motor rotates it at a speed that removes the honey, which is then tapped through a tap at the bottom.
…do they think they put bees in that and spin them around until they vomit…?
bee carnival
bad and naughty bees get put into the b e e c e n t r i f u g e to extract their honey
Vegans coming after beekeepers is one of my major teeth grinding annoyances. For many reasons, because there’s so many lies. And to go one step further because it’s such a waste. You see, the strongest vegan argument is that they don’t want to exploit animals or take from them without their consent.
… but… Bees consent. NO. I’M NOT KIDDING.
How? Bee hives aren’t kept on leashes. They’re outside, the bees can travel miles every day. They follow their queen. Who is also outside, not on a leash, and can travel miles every day. If she doesn’t like the hive for any reason - for example: it got too hot, too cold, too messy, too filled with sugary stuff and they need more space… then the queen leaves. And with her the hive.
The queen stays in the hive because the hive is the best place to live. Period. Done. End of. If the hive is staying with the beekeeper it’s because the keeper is doing their job correctly and keeping them happy because the bees can, and do, leave bad beekeepers.
Of all the animals we have domesticated as livestock, bees are the ones you can most easily argue are consenting participants in their keeping.
Here it is. The bee post is back
I feel compelled to explain the misconception part for anyone who doesn’t know anything about beekeeping and finds any of this confusing. This might be a little redundant, but I’m scratching an itch.
Harvesting honey does not murder bees.
The device pictured above does not mash up bees or their hives.
There’s no ethical concern when it comes to eating honey, it’s totally ethical as food is concerned.
Bees manufacture honey using pollen. They store it in the cells of their hive, where it’s used as food for the colony, particularly the larvae growing into the next generation of bees.
When you harvest honey, you remove parts of the hive that are being used to store the honey, without taking any bees along for the ride. Those parts of the hive are then put into a device, like the centrifugal extractor shown above by gemstone-gynoid, where the parts are spun really fast to pull extract the honey. The honey gets collected on the walls of the extractor, drips down, and can then be filtered and bottled for human use.
So.
It turns out that bees love making honey and can make more of it than they’d ever need. It also turns out that beekeepers taking care of hives and harvesting their honey keeps bees healthy and thriving, more so than they’d normally accomplish on their own. And we really need bees healthy and thriving because they help us grow an astonishing amount of food by pollinating plants.
Like, there’s no need to have a conversation about this, anyone who claims that harvesting honey requires that you kill bees is lying. Either they don’t know anything about beekeeping and are just repeating a lie someone else told them, or they know that they’re lying and they’re just straight up trying to deceive people. Neither is a good look.
mmmmm yes my favorite chicken nugget condiment
m a s h e d b e e
this is the best post on Tumblr
Every time this comes around, I can’t help but wonder what some hardcore vegans are thinking lmao
Based on the evidence, I"m pretty sure they’re not.
PANSEXUAL
Hit the like button
it would be so awesome
it would be so cool
trying to prove a point to the boys at school
reblog this if you believe trans men are real men like this if you dont
As a trans man. Yes. I’m a real man and so are the rest of us.
i love how the reblog-to-like ratio is 8:1
Yes yes i know love is love. But they are still killing CHILDREN. over this.
ALL. OF. THIS.
Gotta catch em all
OH MY GOD IT DOES DIFFERENT FLAGS DEPENDING ON YOUR TAGS??
I've asked this question before and been surprised by the results, now I have access to more weirdos it's your problem:
It is the middle of a Sunday afternoon. You have nothing on, and aren't expecting visitors, deliveries or post.
Unexpectedly, there is a knock at the door.
Which of these would surprise you more to find on the doorstep?
Fairy
Walrus
Not naming options to skew votes but...
I think there's something fundamentally baffling with the way most of you think.
Happy birthday to this iconic poll
@d1zzy-c4t here have more color theory