taylor price
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda

JVL
todays bird

Janaina Medeiros

shark vs the universe
h
trying on a metaphor
Monterey Bay Aquarium

JBB: An Artblog!
sheepfilms
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
$LAYYYTER
Stranger Things

No title available

tannertan36
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

#extradirty
d e v o n
Mike Driver
seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Norway

seen from Iceland

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@maroyasha
Andor Appreciation Day 2 - Everyone Has Their Own Rebellion
@andorappreciation
yesterday's halloween piece
I’ll never understand why anthropomorphic animal cartoons like Robin Hood and Zootopia will go to the trouble of creating character designs that are meant to be understood as “attractive” or even “sexy” to the human audience but explicitly avoid showing interspecies romances between anthropomorphic animals. Why is THAT weird but, like, trying to make rabbits recognizably sexy-coded to humans isn’t?
Sometimes, sure, but why was Maid Marian a fox in Robin Hood? There wasn’t anything particularly “foxlike” about her personality, and it would make more sense for her to be a lion. They made her a fox only because Robin was a fox and making her something else would be “weird”, but I don’t think the wolf cop or the chicken maid or the lion prince were actually meant to represent race.
The best inter species couple is Kermit and Miss Piggy as the Cratchits in A Muppet Christmas Carol, because all their sons are frogs and all their daughters are pigs, as God clearly intended.
there are only two genders: frog and pig
I’ve pointed out to my friends that the fact that Kermit and Miss Piggy’s kids are like that means either
1) they reproduce asexually and the children are clones of each parent OR
2) Kermit and Miss Piggy are members of the same sexually dimorphic species, hence the split between their male and female children
yes I have spent too long running about potential muppet biology
oh god
Third option, when they want kids they get some fabric and make one, and hope a Hand inhabits it
Do you think there’s a ritual for inviting An Inhabiting Hand to possess the empty husk of your muppet baby?
Just wanted to show u guys that in Muppets Most Wanted, Piggy fantasizes about her and Kermit having babies and this is what they look like
So do with that what you will
Recall that in The Great Muppet Caper, Kermit and Fozzie are brothers. And this was their dad (right):
Thank you for specifying, which one of the two individuals in the picture was the dad haha
I, for one, think Shrek handled interspecies coupling the best. By this I am of course talking about the Dronkeys.
In season 3 of BoJack Horseman, we learn Diane (middle) has been impregnated by Mr. Peanutbutter (left). The fetuses are confirmed to be puppies.
This is the worst addition to this post
I am reminded of Treasure Planet.
In which Captain Amelia (left), an extra terrestrial anthropomorphic cat, had hybrid babies with Doctor Doppler (middle), an extra terrestrial anthropomorphic dog, whom also gave birth to the babies
I always thought that in muppet movies like muppet Christmas Carol the characters are played by the muppets (so kermit is acting and playing the role of Bob rather than being him) so the kids in that film would just be other acting muppets right?
Or is that just something my brain made up?
i think you are all forgetting some crucial information here:
So, Glumshoe and @sailor-lady asked if there was a ritual where they invited a hand to animate their children.
Muppet Babies is canon.
and i dont see any fucking hands.
This has dark implications all over it.
@therobotmonster im just saying, if i offered you $200 and a pizza of your choosing, whats the best headcanon you would come up with for my proposed issue?
I can circle that square with a few pieces of canon. We start out with Kermit on SNL:
The muppets are a form of life, perhaps not quite like our own, but one with its own orders and genuses and the like. Robin goes from tadpole to frog stage on Muppet Babies, after all, that’s a biological life process. Note that muppets keep sewing/stitching/hand jokes to a minimum, that’s because they aren’t puppets, they just resemble them.
The hand-thing presumes muppets work like toons from Roger Rabbit or toys from Toy Story, where they’re made by people an incarnated. I propose they are like Pokemon, a separate, parallel classification of life that exists alongside what we would call natural life. As with Pokemon, these lifeforms are not the result of a parallel evolution. Rather, their various kinds were created by some manner of God. We know these exist in the Muppet canon, as Big Bird argued the Egyptian Pantheon into letting a child ghost into the afterlife that one time.
Personally, as the essence of being a muppet is your greatest motivation being your greatest weakness, I blame the demiurge.
But you can blame Gonzo’s people or the aholes that are made of a Skexis and a Mystic, but not the Goblin King (he is a rogue memetic construct, what some might wrongly label a ‘tulpa’). It’s also possible they crossed over from the Gorg world. (but that does not preclude them from also being the creations of the demiurge)
This is not to say that muppets are inherently magic, any more than say, a hobbit or a goblin is “magic” in Lord of the Rings. They are simply created beings that thereafter reproduce after their own kind. Emmit Otter and his Ma, the fact that “Monster” and “grouch” are explicitly races in Sesame Street, etc.
Now, I hear you saying, “but [email protected], you handsome madman, we just pointed out that Fozzie and Kermit have a green half-bear/half-frog father!”
Yes. In a movie.
Because the Muppets are actors.
Muppets (the order of life) and the Muppets (the comedy/acting troupe), are different things. The former contains the latter but the latter does not contain all of the former. In essence, Kermit named his endeavor “The People’s Theater”.
Breaks down like this: You have our, real world universe. Within that is nested a universe that is much like ours, except it is sillier, and Muppets are creatures and not special effects. Within that are nested the fictional worlds of all the various muppet productions.
For further proof, I present these bloopers from Emmet Otter’s Jugband Christmas:
It is uncertain how much of the Muppet ouvre is canonical ‘behind the scenes’ and how much is constructed entertainment provided by the Muppet organization, because of one deep wrinkle we haven’t touched on…
Kayfabe.
Kermit is hard-core about Kayfabe. He comes from a Vaudeville theater background, the 4th wall does not exist in his performance ethos, the show must go on, and the rubes getting a peek behind the curtain doesn’t get you off that hook.
All your Muppet-troupe core performers stick close to this ethos, ensuring you can never be quite certain on what level of reality the scene you’re being presented with is intended to be.Any specific example that conflicts with the others cannot be shown not to just be another straight-faced performance.
It’s not an unreliable narrator, everyone is unreliable, from the producer on down to the go-fer.
Don’t blame me, blame the Demiurge.
(Here’s my Gofundme.)
don’t forget that during the filming of the Muppet Christmas Carol, the Muppets continued to move and talk after cuts, asking how they did playing their characters etc.
so like, e.g., Kermit broke character as Cratchit but nobody broke character as Kermit
@therobotmonster You bring up kayfabe and use that gif of Beaker and Sheamus, but completely neglect to mention that Beaker and Sheamus are (at least within the story of WWE) cousins.
The post was already pushing a pretty high word count and I knew people who knew the factoid would make the connection.
Fair enough, but that it’s even implied to possible for a human and a Muppet to be blood relatives is pretty important to the overall conversation of Muppet biology.
No, you see, when I say:
I’m not talking simple, one-level Wrasslin’ type kayfabe. Shamus can’t be used as evidence, because we don’t know how the levels of Kayfabe align. This is also true of arguments that Walter is Jason Segal’s cousin outside the film-verse.
Breaks down like this:
Shamus is a character within the Wrassleverse. In this universe, he has been presented as Beaker’s cousin. In the next level of reality up, Shamus is a professional wrestler playing a role wherein Beaker is his cousin.
But we don’t know if that universe is the one where the Muppets are sapient creatures who are actors, or if it is the reality where they are puppets performed by actors. Remember Emmit Otter and his ma.
Are we seeing one man perform kayfabe, or are we seeing two?
The answer cannot be locked down, because the essence of Muppet is the futile struggle of Sisyphus by way of Willy Loman, with a chaser of “No Exit.” Never succeeding, never failing enough to invalidate the effort. This is why I blame the demiurge.
We all have our burgers boulders to heft.
Why is Seamus being blood related to Beaker weird? Have we already forgot Dave the human, and Walter?
Not weird, we’re well past weird.
Inconclusive.
There are Muppet “humans” in the same sense that there are muppet dogs (both sapient and otherwise). Dave the human is no more an issue than the Swedish Chef or Statler and Waldorf. (If the Animal Show can be considered a part of this)
The Muppets, with Walter, is just like all the other muppet movies, the conceit is that these are productions starring muppets (the creatures) put on by the Muppets (the acting troupe/production company). As stated above, in-our-universe promotionals present Segal and Walter as cousins, as opposed to brothers in the film. However, that’s still got Kermit’s hand on it, so we don’t now if that can be taken at face value.
And lets diagram out the Shamus problem. We’ve got the following possibilities, and no way of telling them apart, except for the last one, which is out of bounds for the nature of the exercise:
Wrasslin and Muppets are both real. - Beaker and Shamus are cousins, whether by blood or marriage unknown, though blood is implied.
Muppets are fake in a world where Wrasslin’ is real. - Shamus is the character, but Beaker’s still being worked as a puppet as part of a cross-promotion tie-in.
Muppets are real in a world where Wrasslin’ is fake. - Both Shamus and Beaker are Actors.
Both Muppets and Wrasslin’ are Fake - Presumed state of our universe.
That being said, if the Muppets are, as I hypothesize, a created order of life, it is possible that whatever creator (ex: the demiurge) involved might have granted them the ability to breed true with non-muppet life. I’m just not yet convinced there’s canonical support for that happening.
The inferior elephant-lion branch of the conversation crossed my dash again, so I am required to present the true and just version.
I have the option to hide long posts turned on WHY DIDN’T IT SHORTEN THIS ONE
Why would you want it too?
That would be a great theory if I didn’t refresh my dash and see that my reblog was also not shortened at all.
Very time i see this on my dash it goes a different route. I don’t think i’ve ever seen a post more indicitave of its host site’s culture
> as Big Bird argued the Egyptian Pantheon into letting a child ghost into the afterlife that one time
Hey uh sorry @therobotmonster did you really just drop this in there as though it needed no further explanation
Yeah, that literally happened:
I was a hard-core Sesame Street viewer from about 1979 to 1984, and my memories of the show are the sort of deep nostalgic tangle you'd expe
(Full Ep here if you’re curious)
A full goddamn page. Nice.
Ghost Pokemon - Halloween 2023
Thank you for the support on this project! Now to the next one!
WHAT THE FUCK THIS IS SO GOOD
Color Like a Classic Comic Book
I'm doing some tinkering on Fauxstalgia stuff, and since I believe in sharing resources, here's an RGB PNG version of the official DC pantone guide, with the swatches re-sampled from current pantone standards. This set is from 1982, but should be generally believable for most stuff post-WWII.
The versions floating around online (two of which are under the fold) are scans of prints and are not accurate for color-picking.
Now, these colors would also be altered by the printing process, but for clean, pre-print versions, here's some authenticity.
Reblog if Fan Fics are just as valid as Fan Art
Affirmation for writers, please!!
Likes do nothing!!
I think my biggest problem with Beastars is that all the predator animals were like, super bloodthirsty and the stigma was that predators are just murderers-in-waiting, when there should have been fuckin hamsters mauling the shit out of everything they perceived as a threat or minor inconvenience. A donkey caving skulls because some pred looked at them wrong. Rabbits biting onto somebody's neck and goring them with their machine-gun raking kicks.
It's a very fun and enjoyable story overall, but it's clearly romanticising the "power" and "ambition" of the predator, when it should have been portraying the horror that is the fury of the prey.
yeah like i had the football conversation with some guys at work the other day and it took awhile to explain this. see, i think modern american football should be played with a bull moose on the field. i would watch it if there was a moose on the field and if he got you, he got you. i think this would absolutely improve everything about the game, from the perspective of the audience.
and every time i bring up my cherished dream of Moose Football, someone says, ‘wait, like the coliseum? why wouldn’t you use lions?’
and i have to explain that lions wouldn’t fight anyone if you dumped them on a football field. one male lion versus two teams of beefy human men? it would be animal abuse, the lion would be stressed to death after like one game. lions are either cooperative or ambush hunters. you could not keep a lion healthy if you were regularly exposing it to football players. tigers are even worse, they won’t attack anything from the front, drawing eyeballs on a cow’s butt is enough to get them to back off. big cats have to fight something to death for every meal for their whole adult lives and their life ends once they start losing those fights. so they pick their battles really carefully.
a moose, though. a bull moose is not exactly full of bloodlust, but he’s big and he’s confident and he could tear through a football team without breaking a sweat, and he knows it. football moose could be a thing, easy.
and they should.
Roach I desperately need you to expound further on the virtues of Moose Football because the more I think about PvPvM (player vs player vs Moose) gameplay in a sports arena, the more violently excited I become, and I would like to enter Moose Football into the mind rotisserie
here’s what i know about football: those guys spend too much time standing around while sports commenters make noises. then they run around a bit. then stuff stops again. i don’t like any of that. i want there to be a moose to look at. any time everyone is just standing around looking hot and annoyed, the camera should be on what the moose is doing. the players can go off the field, when it’s not their turn to do the football running part, but the moose should get free reign of the whole pitch. the handlers can give it carrots depending on how many guys it’s bowled over so far. i think probably you should have two separate camera feeds: one covers the boring football game and talks about the strategies and statistics and whatever. it can have as much footage as anyone likes of the football men. the other one is the perpetual moose cam and they get like a david attenborough deepfake to tell you what the moose is doing at all times.
the other thing is that i think sports teams should all have their own moose and it comes with them when they do away games. like, wherever the game is being played, the visiting team brings the moose. i think that would probably make it interesting, strategically, for people who care about that kind of thing. it would be in a team’s best interest to bring along the biggest, meanest, healthiest motherfucker they can possibly manage. if the moose likes them, great! if the moose doesn’t like anyone, that’s also fine, at least they know this moose’s particular moves. i know teams trade players around a lot, so that could also be something for people who like football to talk about boringly at work when i’m trying to eat lunch. who’s the new guy on that team? is he any good? and how’s he doing with the moose?
anyway. there you go. Moose Football. we live in the darkest fucking timeline.
she only plays minecraft and spore
I couldn’t resist this. The idea of space sirens and starmaids just make me want to grab pen and paper instantly. So, this is how I enjoyed my free Sunday. <3 My thanks for @quietpinetrees for the wonderful inspiration.
Scanned and coloured version, traditional media, A4-ish
As a writer, very little brings me as much joy as being the inspiration for someone else’s creativity. I want to thank @drachenmagier for sharing this magnificent art with the world.
I hope everyone inspired by my writing to create something of their own is kind enough to share it.
Dialogue tips that actually work:
You are not writing a movie (ignore this if you are). The reader doesn't need to know every word the characters say for the duration of the story. Less is more.
Dialogue can happen within the prose. "And they awkwardky discussed the weather for five minutes" is way better than actually writing five pages of dialogue about the weather.
Balance your dialogues. Surprise yourself with a monosyllabic answe to a dialogue that's ten sentences long. Don't be afraid of letting your character use half a page for a reply or nothing at all!
Don't write accents phonetically, use slang and colloquialisms if needed.
Comma before "said" and no caps after "!?" unless it's an action tag. Study dialogue punctuation.
Learn the difference between action tags and dialogue tags. Then, use them interchangeably (or none at all).
Don't be afraid to use said. Use said if characters are just saying things, use another word if not. Simple. There's no need to use fancy synonyms unless absolutely necessary.
Not everyone talks the same way so it makes sense for your characters to use certain words more often than others. Think of someone who says "like" to start every sentence or someone who talks really slow. Be creative.
Use prose to slow down the pace during a conversation.
Skip prose to speed up the pace during a conversation.
FanFiction.net is not gone.
Right now it's a victim of DNS (Domain Name Service) spoofing. This means that a malicious party is trying to steal traffic from FFn by purchasing a very similar domain.
Correction:
The new "fake" site that people are seeing still belongs to FanFiction.net—they just misconfigured their servers and are not redirecting traffic from the bare fanfiction.net to the main site at www.fanfiction.net. There is likely no malicious agent. Didn't mean to scare anyone! Just wanted to let people know the site wasn't deleted!
So if you want to read fanfiction and not see leaves, you have have to type out "www.fanfiction.net".
Please share so people stop panicking.
Fanfiction.net going/gone down?
Friends -- this is what fanfiction.net's front page looks like right now.
@beautifulfic advises (and I can confirm, I just checked it) that the mobile version of the site, m.fanfiction.net, appears still to be up. STRONGLY suggest that if you have material there that's not preserved elsewhere, you go in via the mobile gateway and archive it NOW.
Please reblog so others can take action.
ETA: @mylittleredgirl advises that if you attach “www.” to the front of the URL, the site displays correctly. But this is still concerning, and suggests somebody’s either monkeying around with their .htaccess file—a fairly important piece of under-the-hood "equipment" for a website—or has possibly misconfigured the site in some other way.
At the moment there's no telling what's going on. Meanwhile, if I had anything over there, I’d back it up anyway.
saw this on twitter rn, if you ever feel discouraged about writing fanfiction, read this again
...This.
The ways media can affect us is weird.
I just finished Inuyasha and Final Act for the first time. I started Inuyasha when I was in 3rd grade. I'm 24 now.
I don't know why I never finished it. I moved a ton as a kid. Never really settled in at all.
Rewatching the same episodes again and again for years might have been some weird way to hold onto something simpler.
So now that I'm done with the series, a series that means the world to me, it's like I've almost let go of that simpler time in my mind in some weird way.
I know it's not gone and that I'll always have those memories.
It's just like I cut the last thread connected to it. And all I can do is watch it drift away in the wind.