#since when has Henry let anything (up to and including allegedly objective morality) get between him and Hans#if you want to convince me a Divorce Arc 2.0 could happen over the Hussite Wars you can't just make vague gestures at Henry's conscience#if you want to convince me the wedding would destroy them then have the courage to make something external the problem#instead of projecting modern ideas about infidelity/guilt onto two dudes with canonically flexible relationships with both of those concepts#if you want to doom them then doom them *because you want to*#don't just shrug and assume they're doomed because of things that don't actually apply to them#make a conscious CHOICE to doom them simply because you WANT to via @naranjapetrificada
Copied the tags because YES. Hansry are only as doomed as you want them to be until we have another game (and even then a lot will be up to choice and where your imagination takes you probably). Like you said, we can play around with dates of historical events since Warhorse already do. But I do want to emphasis neither Hans nor Henry particularly care about cheating on women. They are both men of their time. In KCD1 Henry can cheat on Theresa and lie to her about her:
Because to this accusation (after sleeping with any women post finishing the courtship questline):
Henry's responses range between:
So, there is a good argument to be made about Henry canonically not particularly caring about being faithful to women he is with. Even Theresa. And Theresa at the end of KCD1 doesn't expect him to remain faithful to her when he is traveling away. And Hans, who completely forgot about a girl he claimed was the love of his life (Karolina) once he slept with her (or not) won't break up with Henry (who he actually cares about) over getting married to a women he didn't even chose to marry, be fr. He outright says so in KCD2, after he knows about his upcoming wedding:
Henry is not in the same category as Jitka or any other women Hans had slept with. He is his own category for Hans.
Tbh, I can see Hansry not really defining their relationship as anything specific. They don't even know how to refer to each other as friends (calling Henry Hans's page, squire, retainer, escort, protector, companion, etc), I doubt they would have the terminology for their romantic relationship. They know they love each other, but they're not going to define it in any modern terms. I can't really see them calling themselves "lovers" either because what they are is so much more than that for them that I'm not sure the term would fit in their minds yk.
Even if they have a divorce 2.0 (or any other arguments), it's because they fought over something and are angry with each other personally. Even then I'm not sure they'd last not talking to each other for much longer than a week unless one of them died, but op's tags are true. Henry's morality is very flexible, he is willing to kill/torture/maim/dig in shit/etc for Hans's sake repeatedly, and neither of them seem to care about adultery all that much (not that they would necessarily see sleeping with each other as the same as cheating on their wife with another women. Besides, they are already sinning with each other, adding adultery to the mix is just one more sin on top).
(a bit of a rant, not all of it related to what op said, but op is right. Plus I have a whole scenario in my mind of Henry helping Hynce keep his inheritance after Hans dies so another birdie won't have to go through that mess that I love. I have thought about Henry post Hans's death a lot. Because even after Hans dies, Henry would not move on. You do not just move on from that kind of devotion. But I don't really see it as being "doomed" per se, it's life)